UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

 

 

Filed by the Registrant  x                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x Definitive Proxy Statement
¨ Definitive Additional Materials
¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x No fee required.
¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 (1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 (2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 (3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

 (4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

     

 (5) 

Total fee paid:

 

     

¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1) 

Amount previously paid:

 

     

 (2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

     

 (3) 

Filing Party:

 

     

 (4) 

Date Filed:

 

     

 

 

 


LOGOLOGO

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation

PROXY

STATEMENT

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

June 3, 2014
9:30 a.m. (Eastern Time)


LOGOCC


COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
NOTICE OF 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

GLENPOINTE CENTRE WEST 500 FRANK W. BURR BLVD. TEANECK, NEW JERSEY 07666


LOGO

April 17, 201429, 2016

To Our Stockholders:

YouWe are most cordially invitedpleased to attend the 2014invite you to our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation at 9:30 a.m. local time, on Tuesday, June 3, 2014,that will be held at our headquarters, Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666.07666, on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.

2015 was a significant year for the Company as it again delivered industry-leading growth. Revenue reached $12.4 billion, a 21% increase over 2014. Net income rose 13% to $1.6 billion, or $2.65 per diluted share. Diluted earnings per share on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis was $2.65 and $3.07, respectively, in 2015, up from $2.35 and $2.60, respectively, in 2014. GAAP operating margin in 2015 was 17.3% and non-GAAP operating margin was 19.7%.1 Throughout the year, our solid financial position enabled us to invest in expanding our capacity to serve clients and grow our business, while also repurchasing $376 million of our stock under our stock buyback program.

The Company’s strong performance in 2015 reflects our unique ability to help global enterprises fulfill a dual mandate. They mustrun better – operating with greater efficiency, productivity and flexibility. At the same time, they mustrun differently – embracing innovation and reinventing their business to compete in today’s dynamic digital world. With our deep knowledge of diverse industry sectors, extensive process and technology expertise, global delivery network and 221,700 talented associates worldwide, we are well positioned to help clients master both sides of the dual mandate.

Since last year’s annual meeting, there have been several corporate governance developments that we are pleased to update you on. First, the Board welcomed two new directors: Zein Abdalla and Jonathan Chadwick. Mr. Abdalla brings extensive leadership and global business expertise to the Board from his 19 years in senior and executive positions at PepsiCo, Inc., including as President prior to his retirement in 2014, where he led and shaped large scale operations in developed, developing and emerging markets. Mr. Chadwick brings a wide range of technology, finance and operations experience to the Board from his 19 years as a financial and operational leader of several prominent technology companies, most recently as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of VMware, Inc.

Second, the Board approved amended and restated By-laws for the Company that provide for proxy access. Under the new provisions, a stockholder, or a group of stockholders, owning 3% or more of the Company’s shares continuously for at least three years may nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials directors constituting up to 25% of the Board or two individuals, whichever is greater, provided that the stockholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements outlined in the By-laws.

The Notice of Meeting and Proxy Statement on the following pages provide further information on the Company’s performance and corporate governance and describe the matters to be presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting.

In addition, they include instructions on how to vote your shares by proxy and/or attend the meeting and vote in person. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. Therefore, Imeeting in person, we urge you to promptly vote and submit your vote by proxy by phone, viafollowing the Internet, or, if you received paper copies of these materials, by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy cardinstructions provided in the enclosed envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States. If you have previously received our Notice of Internet Availability ofMeeting and Proxy Materials, then instructions regarding how you can vote are contained in that notice. If you have received a proxy card, then instructions regarding how you can vote are contained on the proxy card. If you decide to attend the Annual Meeting, you will be able to vote in person, even if you have previously submitted your proxy.Statement.

ThankWe thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely,

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

John E. Klein

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Francisco D’Souza

Chief Executive Officer

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation


 

 

Table
1See “Reconciliation of ContentsNon-GAAP Financial Measures” on page 55 of the Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to our results as reported under GAAP.


COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION

Notice of

2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To Our Stockholders:

The 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held as follows:

 

Date:

 

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Proxy Statement

1

Proposals

1

Recommendations of the Board

2

Information About This Proxy Statement

2

Questions and Answers About the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

3

Corporate Governance

6

General

6

Determination of Independence

6

Director Candidates

6

Voting for Directors

7

Communications from Stockholders

7

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

8

Code of Ethics

8

Attendance by Members of the Board of Directors at Meetings

8

Committees of the Board

9

Audit Committee

9

Compensation Committee

10

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

10

Director Compensation

11

2013 Director Compensation Table

12

Proposals to be Voted On

14

Proposal 1:  Election of Directors

14

Proposal 2:  Approval of First Amendment to 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan

21

Proposal 3:  Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-On-Pay)

32

Proposal 4:  Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

34

Executive Officers

35

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

38
Wednesday, June 15, 2016

 

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation


Time:

 

9:30 a.m. Eastern Time

Table of Contents  continued

Location:

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation

Glenpointe Centre West

500 Frank W. Burr Blvd.

Teaneck, NJ 07666

 

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

41

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

42

Executive Compensation

43

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

43

Tax Considerations

53

Compensation Committee Report

55

Executive Compensation Tables

56

2013 Summary Compensation Table

56

2013 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

58

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2013 Table

59

2013 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

61

2013 Pension Benefits Table

61

2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

61

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

62

Calculation of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

64

Equity Compensation Plan Information

65

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

65

Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

66

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Other Matters

67

Stockholders’ Proposals

69

Other Matters

69

Solicitation of Proxies

70

Cognizant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K

71

Exhibit A: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan

A-1

Exhibit B: First Amendment to the Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan

B-1

Agenda:

2014 Proxy Statement1. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation


Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To Be Held Tuesday, June 3, 2014

LOGO

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION

GLENPOINTE CENTRE WEST 500 FRANK W. BURR BLVD. TEANECK, NEW JERSEY 07666

TheElect Zein Abdalla, Maureen Breakiron-Evans, Jonathan Chadwick, Francisco D’Souza, John N. Fox, Jr., John E, Klein, Leo S. Mackay, Jr., Lakshmi Narayanan, Michael Patsalos-Fox, Robert E. Weissman and Thomas M. Wendel as Directors to serve until the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”)and until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified;

2.

Approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held at our headquarters, Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey on Tuesday, June 3, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. local time,the Company’s named executive officers;

3.

Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the following purposes:year ending December 31, 2016;

 

LOGO  To elect Michael Patsalos-Fox and Robert E. Weissman as Class II Directors to serve until the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified;
LOGO  To approve the First Amendment to the Company’s 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan;
LOGO  To approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;
LOGO  To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2014; and
LOGO  To transact
4.

Consider a stockholder proposal requesting that the Board of Directors take the steps necessary to permit stockholder action by written consent, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and

5.

Transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any continuation, postponement, or adjournment thereof.

Holders of record of our Class A Common Stock as of the close of business on April 7, 2014 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any continuation, postponement, or adjournment thereof. A complete list of such stockholders will be open to the examination of any stockholder at our principal executive offices at Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666 for a period of ten days prior to the Annual Meeting and on the day of the Annual Meeting.

Holders of record of our Class A Common Stock as of the close of business on April 18, 2016 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting, or any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof. A complete list of these stockholders will be open to the examination of any stockholder at our principal executive offices at Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666 for a period of ten days prior to the Annual Meeting and on the day of the Annual Meeting.

The Annual Meeting may be continued or adjourned from time to time without notice other than by announcement at the Annual Meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

        LOGO

It is important that your shares be represented regardless of the number of shares you may hold. Whether or not you plan to attend theOur Proxy Statement and 2015 Annual Meeting in person, we urge you to vote your shares via the toll-free telephone number or over the Internet, as described in the enclosed materials. If you received a copy of the proxy card by mail, you may sign, date and mail the proxy card in the enclosed return envelope. Promptly voting your shares will ensure the presence of a quorumReport are available at the Annual Meeting and will save us the expense of further solicitation. Submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your shares at the Annual Meeting if you desire to do so, as your proxy is revocable at your option.www.proxyvote.com.

By Order of the Board of Directors

LOGO

Steven Schwartz

Secretary

Teaneck, New Jersey

April 17, 201429, 2016

To attend the Annual Meeting in person, please see “Who can attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders?” on page 3 of the Proxy Statement for advance registration instructions and other information.

 

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation

Importance of Voting

It is important that your shares be represented regardless of the number of shares you may hold. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we urge you to vote your sharesvia the toll-free telephone number orover the Internet, as described in the following materials. If you received a copy of the proxy card by mail, you maysign, date and mail the proxy card in the enclosed return envelope. Promptly voting your shares will ensure the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting and save us the expense of further solicitation. Submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your shares at the Annual Meeting if you desire to do so, as your proxy is revocable at your option.


  TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

  i  


ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT

1

General

1

Proposals and Board Recommendations

1

Additional Information About This Proxy Statement

2

Why You Received this Proxy Statement

2

Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

2

Printed Copies of Our Proxy Materials

2

Householding

2

Questions and Answers About the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

2

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEProxy Statement

5

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

5

Vote Required

5

Director Nominees

5

Majority Voting Standard in Election of Directors

11

Board Composition

11

Director Candidate Identification and Evaluation Process

11

Director Independence

13

Board Operations

13

Board Leadership Structure

13

Director Attendance at Board and Stockholder Meetings

14

Board Role in Risk Oversight

14

Committees of the Board

14

Communications to the Board from Stockholders

15

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATIONCOMPENSATION

16

GLENPOINTE CENTRE WEST 500 FRANK W. BURR BLVD. TEANECK, NEW JERSEY 07666Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-On-Pay)

16

Vote Required

16

This proxy statement is furnished in connection withBackground

16

Frequency of Say-on-Pay Vote

16

2015 Say-on-Pay Vote

16

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

17

Overview of Executive Compensation Program

17

Role of Stockholder Say-on-Pay Votes

18

The Compensation-Setting Process

19

Direct Compensation of Named Executives

20

Other Elements of Compensation

24

Additional Compensation Policies and Practices

26

Ongoing and Post-Employment Compensation

28

Report of the solicitation byCompensation Committee of the Board of Directors

30

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

30

Executive Compensation Tables

31

2015 Summary Compensation Table

31

2015 Grants of Cognizant Technology Solutions CorporationPlan-Based Awards Table

32

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2015 Table

33

2015 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

34

2015 Pension Benefits Table

35

2015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

35

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

35

Calculation of proxiesPotential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

38

Equity Compensation Plan Information

39

Director Compensation

40

Discussion and Analysis

40

2015 Director Compensation Table

42

Director Stock and Option Awards Outstanding

42


AUDIT MATTERS

43

Proposal 3 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

43

Vote Required

43

Our Auditor Review and Engagement Process

43

We Expect PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to be votedAttend the 2016 Annual Meeting

43

Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

44

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Other Matters

45

Audit Fees

45

Audit-Related Fees

45

Tax Fees

45

All Other Fees

45

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures

45

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

46

Proposal 4 – Stockholder Proposal Regarding Stockholder Action by Written Consent

46

Vote Required

46

The Board’s Statement of Opposition

47

Stockholder Proposals for the 2017 Annual Meeting

48

Proposals for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy Statement

48

Director Nominees for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy Statement (Proxy Access)

48

Other Proposals or Nominees for Presentation at ourthe 2017 Annual Meeting

48

Management Discretion to Vote Proxies on These Proposals

48

Non-Compliant Proposals

48

ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE INFORMATION

49

Corporate Governance Guidelines

49

Code of Ethics

49

Executive Officers

49

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

51

Class A Common Stock

51

Security Ownership of 5% Stockholders

51

Security Ownership of Directors and Officers

52

Certain Relationships and Related Persons Transactions

53

Transactions with Related Persons

53

Review of Related Person Transactions

53

Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

53

ADDITIONAL REFERENCE INFORMATION

54

Other Matters at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held

54

Solicitation of Proxies

54

Cognizant’s Annual Report on Tuesday, Form 10-K

54

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

55

Index of Defined Terms

56


  PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights certain information in the Proxy Statement. Please read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting at the Annual Meeting.

2016 ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

Meeting Date and Time

Location

June 3, 2014 (the “Annual Meeting”), at our headquarters, 15, 2016 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time

Cognizant Headquarters

Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey at 9:30 a.m. local time, and at any continuation, postponement, or adjournment thereof. 07666

Record Date

Voting Eligibility

April 18, 2016

Holders of record of shares of Class Aour Common Stock $0.01 par value (“Class A Common Stock”), as of the close of business on April 7, 2014 (the “Record Date”), will bethe Record Date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Voting in Advance

Voting in Person  

Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and any continuation, postponement, or adjournmentvote in person, we urge you to vote your shares in advance through one of the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were approximately 608,444,973 shares of Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Class A Common Stock is entitled to one vote on any matter presented to stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

This proxy statement and the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “2013 Annual Report”) will be released on or about April 17, 2014 to our stockholders on the Record Date.

In this proxy statement, “Cognizant”, “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our” refer to Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation.following:

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, JUNE 3, 2014

This Proxy Statement and our 2013 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at http://www.proxyvote.com/

Stockholders may receive directionsIf you plan to attend the meeting and vote your proxy in person, please follow the advance registration instructions under “Who can attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders” on page 3.

Use the Internet

Call Toll-Free

Mail Your Proxy Card

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

Vote over the Internet atwww.proxyvote.com.

Vote by telephone by calling

1-800-690-6903.

Vote by signing, dating and
returning the proxy

card.

MEETING AGENDA AND PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

   

 

Description

 

 

Board
Recommendation

 

 

 

Reason’s for Board

Recommendation

 

 

 

See
Page No.

 

  1.   

 

Elect Zein Abdalla, Maureen Breakiron-Evans, Jonathan Chadwick, Francisco D’Souza, John N. Fox, Jr., John E, Klein, Leo S. Mackay, Jr., Lakshmi Narayanan, Michael Patsalos-Fox, Robert E. Weissman and Thomas M. Wendel as Directors to serve until the 2017 Annual Meeting, and until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified

 

FOR

each Director nominee 

 Our nominees are experienced professionals who have the right mix of skills, qualifications and business acumen to lead the Company. 5
2. 

 

Approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers

 FOR Our executive compensation program reflects our commitment to paying for performance. 16
3. 

 

Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2016

 FOR 

 

The Audit Committee believes that the engagement of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

 43
4. 

 

Consider a stockholder proposal requesting that the Board take the steps necessary to permit stockholder action by written consent

 AGAINST See Board’s statement of opposition. 46



iPROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


BOARD OVERVIEW

The diverse backgrounds and qualifications of our Directors provide a composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that allows the Board to fulfill its responsibilities and serve the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Their many years of business success and strategic insights help continuously strengthen our business.

      
   

 

Name and Primary Occupation

 

 

 

 

Director
Since

 

 

Independent
Director

 

 

Other
Public
Boards

 

 

Committee Membership

     

 

 

    AC    

 

 

CC

 

 

NCGC

 

 

 

LOGO

 Zein Abdalla LOGO   LOGO   

2015

 

 

ü

 

 

1

 

 

X

 

   X

 

 

Retired President of PepsiCo, Inc.

 

 

      

 

 

LOGO

 Maureen Breakiron-Evans LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   

2009

 

 

ü

 

 

2

 

 

C, FE

 

   X

 

 

Former Chief Financial Officer of Towers Perrin

 

 

      

 

 

LOGO

 Jonathan Chadwick LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   

2016

 

 

ü

 

 

1

 

 

X, FE

 

    
 

Former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Chief Operating Officer of VMware, Inc.

 

      

 

 

LOGO

 Francisco D’Souza LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   

2007

 

   

1

 

      
 

Chief Executive Officer of Cognizant

 

 

       

 

 

LOGO

 John N. Fox, Jr. LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   

2007

 

 

ü

 

 

1

 

   X

 

 X

 

 

Former Vice Chairman of Deloitte & Touche, LLP

and
Global Director, Strategic Clients of

Deloitte Consulting

 

      

 

 

LOGO

 John E. Klein LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   

1998

 

 

ü

 

 

0

 

 

X

 

 C

 

 X

 

 

Chairman of Cognizant and President and

Chief Executive Officer of Polarex, Inc.

 

 

      

 

 

LOGO

 Leo S. Mackay, Jr. LOGO   LOGO   

2012

 

 

ü

 

 

0

 

 

X

 

    
 

Vice President, Ethics and Sustainability of Lockheed Martin Corporation

 

      

 

 

LOGO

 Lakshmi Narayanan LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   

2003

 

   

0

 

      
 

Vice Chairman and Former President and

Chief Executive Officer of Cognizant

 

      

 

 

LOGO

 Michael Patsalos-Fox LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   

2012

 

 

ü

 

 

0

 

   X

 

 X

 

 

Chief Executive Officer of Stroz Friedberg and Former Chairman, the Americas and Senior Partner of McKinsey & Company

 

      

 

 

LOGO

 Robert E. Weissman LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   

2001

 

 

ü

 

 

0

 

   X

 

 C

 

 

Chairman of Shelburne Investments and

Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of

The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation

 

      

 

 

LOGO

 Thomas M. Wendel LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   

2001

 

 

ü

 

 

0

 

 

X

 

   X

 

 

Retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Bridge Information Systems, Inc.

 

      

AC

Audit CommitteeCCommittee Chair

CC

Compensation CommitteeXCommittee Member

NCGC

Nominating and Corporate Governance CommitteeFEAC Financial Expert

Director Attendance

Each Director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all fiscal year 2015 meetings of the Board and each committee

on which he or she served. All but two of the nine Directors then on the Board attended our 2015 Annual Meeting.

LOGO

Leadership

LOGO

Global Business ExperienceLOGOConsultingLOGOTechnologyLOGOFinancial



PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARYii


Director Experience

Director Tenure

The wide range of experience, skills and qualifications of our Directors contribute to a well-functioning Board that effectively oversees the Company’s investor relations staff at 201-498-8840 or by emailing David.Nelson@cognizant.com.strategy and management.

The tenure of our Directors ensures a balanced mix of extensive Company and industry knowledge and experience and fresh perspective.

LOGO

LOGO

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

The Board oversees the Company’s strategy, operational direction, management and financial performance with the objective of ensuring that the Company operates in a manner that serves the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders. The following demonstrate the Company’s commitment to sound and effective corporate governance.

Board of Directors
Majority of independent directors (9 of 11)Separate Chairman and CEO positions
No classified BoardRegular executive sessions of independent directors
Majority voting in director electionsAnnual Board and committee self-assessments
None of our directors serves on more than two other public company boards of directorsConsideration of Board diversity in director selection

Stockholder Rights and Engagement
Proxy access by-law – 3% / 3 years / 25% of the Board1Stockholder right to call special meeting
Annual director electionsAnnual vote to ratify selection of independent registered public accounting firm
Annual Say-on-Pay advisory voteNo poison pill

Strategy and Risk
Board oversight of Company strategyBoard oversight, through the Governance Committee, of management succession planning
Board oversight of Company risk management practices; management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes

1New since the 2015 Annual Meeting. For more information, see “Director Nominees for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy Statement (Proxy Access)” on page 48.



iiiPROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


COMPANY FINANCIAL AND OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS

5-Year Highlights

The following tables provide financial and operational highlights for the Company for 2015 and the preceding four years.

Revenue (in billions)

LOGO

  Year-over-year revenue growth of 21.0% from 2014 to 2015 (including the acquisition of TriZetto, a leading provider of healthcare IT software and solutions).

  Strong, consistent revenue growth for a number of years, with annual revenue more than doubling from 2011 to 2015.

PROPOSALSNon-GAAP Operating Margin1

 

AtLOGO

  Our goal is to manage the Annual Meeting,Company to a targeted non-GAAP operating margin of 19% to 20% of revenues, with the excess reinvested in the Company for future growth.

  The Company has consistently been within or slightly above the targeted range.

1     See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on page 55 for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to our stockholders will be asked to:results as reported under GAAP.

Non-GAAP Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS)1

LOGO

  Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share (“non-GAAP EPS”) growth of 18.1% from 2014 to 2015.

  Strong, consistent non-GAAP EPS growth for a number of years, with non-GAAP EPS nearly doubling from 2011 through 2015.

1     See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on page 55 for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to our results as reported under GAAP. The calculation ofnon-GAAP EPS for 2011 has not been conformed to the presentation of the other years and excludes the adjustment for the effect of non-operating foreign currency exchange gains and losses, net of tax.



 

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARYiv


The Company’s performance, including with respect to the financial and operating measures set forth above, have helped drive favorable stockholder return in recent years as demonstrated in the chart below.

5-Year Cumulative Total Stockholder Return

LOGO

  Compound average growth in the Company’s share price of 13.1% over the last five years.

  The Company has outperformed, on a cumulative total stockholder return basis,1 its peer group of other information technology consulting firms2 over the last five years.

1   Comparison assumes $100 was invested, from December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2015, in Cognizant Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index, the NASDAQ 100 Index and our peer group (capitalization weighted), and that all dividends were reinvested.

2   Peer group consists of the following information technology consulting firms: Accenture plc., Computer Sciences Corporation, Computer Task Group, Inc., ExlService Holdings Inc., Genpact Limited, Infosys Ltd., Syntel Inc., Wipro Ltd. and WNS (Holdings) Limited.

2015 Highlights

The Company demonstrated strong performance for 2015 with year-over-year revenue growth of 21.0% (inclusive of 6.2% related to the acquisition of TriZetto). Key drivers of that growth were:

Solid performance across all of our business segments:

Business Segment          Year-over-Year Revenue Growth             % of 2015 Revenue    

  Financial Services

 16.7% 40.3%

  Healthcare

 36.4%1 29.5%

  Manufacturing/Retail/Logistics

 12.0% 18.9%

  Other

 17.4% 11.3%

                       1   Inclusive of 23.9% related to the acquisition of TriZetto.

Sustained strength in the North American market with year-over-year revenue growth of 23.9% (inclusive of TriZetto revenue);

Continued penetration of the European market with year-over-year revenue growth of 6.6% after a negative currency impact of 10.2%;

Continued penetration of the Rest of World (primarily the Asia Pacific) market with year-over-year revenue growth of 29.9% after a negative currency impact of 9.2%;

Increased customer spending on discretionary projects;

Expansion of our service offerings, including consulting, infrastructure services and business process services, which enabled us to cross-sell new services to our customers and meet the rapidly growing demand for complex large-scale outsourcing solutions;

Increased penetration at existing customers, including strategic clients; and

Continued expansion of the market for global delivery of IT services and business process services.

For more information on our financial performance, please refer to our 2015 Annual Report available atwww.proxyvote.com or on our website atwww.cognizant.com.



vPROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS

The Compensation Committee oversees and administers our executive compensation program. The program is designed to attract, retain and incentivize our executive officers, including the Named Executives identified in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table on page 31, and appropriately reward them for their contributions to the achievement of the Company’s business strategies and goals.

Program Objectives

The Compensation Committee has designed the executive compensation program for our Named Executives to meet the following objectives:

Ensure executive compensation is aligned with our corporate strategies and business objectives;

Subject a substantial portion of an executive officer’s compensation to achieving both short-term and long-term performance objectives that enhance stockholder value by linking rewards to measurable corporate and individual performance;

Reinforce the importance of meeting and exceeding identifiable and measurable goals through superior awards for superior performance;

Provide total direct compensation that is competitive in markets in which we compete for management talent in order to attract, retain and motivate the best possible executive talent;

Provide an incentive for long-term continued employment with our Company; and

Reinforce our desired culture and unique corporate environment by fostering a sense of ownership, urgency and overall entrepreneurial spirit.

Key Program Features

The following tables summarize key elements of our executive compensation program and where they are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the Proxy Statement.

What We Do

See
    Page No.    

LOGO  Annual advisory Say-on-Pay vote for stockholders18
LOGO  Pay for performance20
LOGO  Use appropriate peer groups when establishing compensation19
LOGO  Retain an independent external compensation consultant19
LOGO  Set significant stock ownership guidelines for executives26
LOGO  Include a clawback policy in our incentive plans27
LOGO  Utilize “double trigger” provisions for plans that contemplate a change in control29

What We Don’t Do

See
    Page No.    

LOGO  No hedging or speculation with respect to Cognizant securities26
LOGO  No short sales of Cognizant securities26
LOGO  No margin accounts with Cognizant securities26
LOGO  Limited pledging of Cognizant securities26
LOGO  No excise tax “gross up” and limited tax “gross up” for perquisites26, 30



PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARYvi


Primary Compensation Elements for 2015

Our executive compensation program is designed to motivate, retain and engage our executive leadership and appropriately reward them for their contributions to the achievement of our business strategies and goals. In order to achieve our compensation objectives, the Company provides its executives with a total direct compensation package consisting of the following elements.

Base Salary

Annual

Long-Term Incentives – Stock Based Awards

Cash Incentive

PSUs

RSUs

PurposeStable source of income at competitive levelsMotivate and reward achievement of financial and operational goals

Reward achievement of financial objectives, continued service and long-term performance of our Common Stock

Reward continued
service and long-
term performance
of our Common
Stock

Who receives

All Named Executives LOGO

When grantedReviewed annually

Approved annually in February for prior year

Annually LOGO

Form of delivery

Cash LOGO

Equity LOGO

Type of performance

Short-term emphasis LOGO

Long-term emphasis LOGO

Performance periodOngoing1 year

1 year for performance measurement determines number of shares that may vest; vesting 1/3rd at 18 months and 2/3rds at 36 months from grant date with service through those dates (see changes below)

Quarterly vesting
over 3 years from
grant date subject
to continued
service
How compensation is realizedCompensation Committee judgmentCompensation Committee verifies performance against targets

Compensation Committee verifies performance against targets, determining the number of shares that may vest; value realized depends on number of shares that vest and stock price on the vesting dates

Value realized
depends on stock
price on the
vesting dates
Most recent
performance measures
N/A

Revenue (50%), non-GAAP Income from Operations (40%) and days sales outstanding (10%)

2016 Revenue (75%) andnon-GAAP EPS (25%)N/A

      PSUs – CHANGES IN 2015      PSUs – ADDITIONAL CHANGES IN 2016

PSUs granted in 2015 utilize two weighted performance metrics measured during fiscal year 2016: revenue (75%) andnon-GAAP EPS (25%). PSUs granted in prior years utilized a single performance metric (revenue).

PSUs granted in 2016 will continue to utilize the same two weighted performance metrics as in 2015 and, in addition, will move to a2-year performance measurement period with vesting of 1/3rd at 30 months and 2/3rds at 36 months, replacing the previous 1-year performance measurement period and vesting of 1/3rd at 18 months and 2/3rds at 36 months.



viiPROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


2015 Target Total Direct Compensation

The following chart illustrates the balance of the elements of 2015 total direct compensation (using grant date share prices for RSUs and PSUs and target values for the annual cash incentive and the PSUs) for our Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executives.

2015 Target Total Direct Compensation

LOGO



PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARYviii


PROXY STATEMENT

LOGO  Elect Michael Patsalos-Fox and Robert E. Weissman as Class II Directors to serve until the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified;
LOGO  Approve the First Amendment to the Company’s 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2009 Incentive Compensation Plan”);
LOGO  Approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;
LOGO  Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2014; and
LOGO  Transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any continuation, postponement, or adjournment thereof.

We know of no other business that will be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the Annual Meeting, however, the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation1


 

RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD

The Board of Directors, or Board, recommends that you vote your shares as indicated below. If you return a properly completed proxy card, or vote your shares by telephone or Internet, your shares of Class A Common Stock will be voted on your behalf as you direct. If not otherwise specified, the shares of Class A Common Stock represented by the proxies will be voted, and the Board of Directors recommends that you vote:

LOGO  FOR the election of Michael Patsalos-Fox and Robert E. Weissman as Class II Directors;
LOGO  FOR the First Amendment to the 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan;
LOGO  FOR the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers; and
LOGO  FOR the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2014.

If any other matter properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the Annual Meeting the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.

INFORMATION  ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT

 

Why you received this proxy statement. You are viewing or have received these proxy materials because Cognizant’s Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. This proxy statement includes information that we are required to provide to you under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and that is designed to assist you in voting your shares.

Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. As permitted by SEC rules, Cognizant is making this proxy statement and its 2013 Annual Report available to certain of its stockholders electronically via the Internet. On or about April 17, 2014, we mailed to these stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Internet Notice”) containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our 2013 Annual Report and vote online. If you received an Internet Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail unless you specifically request them. Instead, the Internet Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy statement and 2013 Annual Report. The Internet Notice also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy over the Internet. If you received an Internet Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials contained on the Internet Notice.

Printed Copies of Our Proxy Materials. Some of our stockholders received printed copies of our proxy statement, 2013 Annual Report and proxy card. If you received printed copies of our proxy materials, then instructions regarding how you can vote are contained on the proxy card included in the materials.

Householding. The SEC’s rules permit us to deliver a single Internet Notice or set of proxy materials to one address shared by two or more of our stockholders. This delivery method is referred to as “householding” and can result in significant cost savings. To take advantage of this opportunity, we have delivered only one Internet Notice or one set of proxy materials to multiple stockholders who share an address, unless we received contrary instructions from the impacted stockholders prior to the mailing date. We agree to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the Internet Notice or proxy materials, as requested, to any stockholder at the shared address to which a single copy of those documents was delivered. If you prefer to receive separate copies of the Internet Notice or proxy materials, contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. at (800) 542-1061 or in writing at Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.

If you are currently a stockholder sharing an address with another stockholder and wish to receive only one copy of future Internet Notices or proxy materials for your household, please contact Broadridge at the above phone number or address.

GENERAL

This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (the “Board of Directors” or “Board”) of proxies to be voted at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, June 15, 2016 (the “Annual Meeting”), at our headquarters, Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666, at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time, and at any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof. Holders of record of shares of Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value (“Common Stock”), as of the close of business on April 18, 2016 (the “Record Date”), will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof. As of the Record Date, there were approximately 605,884,138 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote on any matter presented to stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

This proxy statement and the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “2015 Annual Report”) will be released on or about April 29, 2016 to our stockholders on the Record Date.

In this proxy statement, “Cognizant”, “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our” refer to Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation.

 

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation2


Questions and Answers about the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 15, 2016

This proxy statement and our 2015 Annual Report are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

To attend the meeting in person, please see “Who can attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders?” on page 3 for advance registration instructions and other information.

PROPOSALS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders will be asked to vote on the proposals and other stockholder actions set forth below. The Board recommends that you vote your shares as indicated below. If you return a properly completed proxy card, or vote your shares by telephone or over the Internet, your shares of Common Stock will be voted on your behalf as you direct. If not otherwise specified, the shares of Common Stock represented by the proxies will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations.

 

 

 

 

Proposals and Other Stockholder Actions

 Board
Recommendation
 See
Page No.
1.  

Elect Zein Abdalla, Maureen Breakiron-Evans, Jonathan Chadwick, Francisco D’Souza, John N. Fox, Jr., John E, Klein, Leo S. Mackay, Jr., Lakshmi Narayanan, Michael Patsalos-Fox, Robert E. Weissman and Thomas M. Wendel as directors of the Company (“Directors”) to serve until the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“2017 Annual Meeting”) and until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified;

 

 

FOR

  each Director nominee  

 5
2.  

Approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

 

 FOR 16
3.  

Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016;

 

 

 

FOR

 

 

43

4.  

Consider a stockholder proposal requesting that the Board take the steps necessary to permit stockholder action by written consent, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and

 

 AGAINST 46
5.  

Transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any continuation, postponement, or adjournment thereof.

 

 FOR N/A

We know of no other business that will be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the Annual Meeting, however, the proxy holders named on the Company’s proxy card will vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.

 

WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?

The record date for the Annual Meeting is April 7, 2014. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The only class of stock entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting is our Class A Common Stock. Each outstanding share of Class A Common Stock is entitled to one vote for all matters before the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the record date, there were 608,444,973 shares of Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BEING A “RECORD HOLDER” AND HOLDING SHARES IN “STREET NAME”?

A record holder holds shares in his or her name. Shares held in “street name” means shares that are held in the name of a bank or broker on a person’s behalf.

AM I ENTITLED TO VOTE IF MY SHARES ARE HELD IN “STREET NAME”?

Yes. If your shares are held by a bank or a brokerage firm, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares held in “street name.”
1ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT

Why You Received This Proxy Statement

You are viewing or have received these proxy materials because the Board is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. This proxy statement includes information that we are required to provide to you under the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and that is designed to assist you in voting your shares.

Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

As permitted by SEC rules, Cognizant is making this proxy statement and its 2015 Annual Report available to certain of its stockholders electronically via the Internet. On or about April 29, 2016 we mailed to these stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Internet Notice”) containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our 2015 Annual Report and vote online. If you received an Internet Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail unless you specifically request them. Instead, the Internet Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy statement and 2015 Annual Report. The Internet Notice also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy over the Internet. If you received an Internet Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials contained on the Internet Notice.

Printed Copies of Our Proxy Materials

Some of our stockholders received printed copies of our proxy statement, 2015 Annual Report and proxy card. If you received printed copies of our proxy materials, then instructions regarding how you can vote are contained on the proxy card included in the materials.

Householding

The SEC’s rules permit us to deliver a single Internet Notice or set of proxy materials to one address shared by two or more of our stockholders. This delivery method is referred to as “householding” and can result in significant cost savings. To take advantage of this opportunity, we have delivered only one Internet Notice or one set of proxy materials to multiple stockholders who share an address, unless we received contrary instructions from the impacted stockholders prior to the mailing date. We agree to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the Internet Notice or proxy materials, as requested, to any stockholder at the shared address to which a single copy of those documents was delivered. If you prefer to receive separate copies of the Internet Notice or proxy materials, contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) at 1-800-542-1061 or in writing at Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.

If you are currently a stockholder sharing an address with another stockholder and wish to receive only one copy of future Internet Notices or proxy materials for your household, please contact Broadridge at the above phone number or address.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

The Record Date for the Annual Meeting is April 18, 2016. You are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting only if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on that date, or if you hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting. The only class of stock entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting is our Common Stock. Each outstanding share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote for all matters before the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 605,884,138 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

What is the difference between being a “record holder” and holding shares in “street name”?

A record holder holds shares in his or her name. Shares held in “street name” means shares that are held in the name of a bank or broker on a person’s behalf.

Am I entitled to vote if my shares are held in “street name”?

Yes. If your shares are held by a bank or a brokerage firm, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares held in “street name”. If your shares are held in street name, these proxy materials are being provided to you by your bank or brokerage firm, along with a voting instruction card if you received printed copies of our proxy materials. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank or brokerage firm how to vote your shares, and the bank or brokerage firm is required to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. If your shares are held in street name, these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your bank or brokerage firm, along with a voting instruction card. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank or brokerage firm how to vote your shares, and the bank or brokerage firm is required to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions.

HOW MANY SHARES MUST BE PRESENT TO HOLD THE ANNUAL MEETING?

A quorum must be present at the Annual Meeting for any business to be conducted. The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding on the record date will constitute a quorum.

WHO CAN ATTEND THE 2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS?

All Cognizant stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting may attend our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If your shares are held in street name, however, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy from your bank or brokerage firm.

WHAT IF A QUORUM IS NOT PRESENT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?

If a quorum is not present at the scheduled time of the Annual Meeting, a majority of the outstanding shares represented at the Annual Meeting, by proxy or in person, and entitled to vote may adjourn the Annual Meeting.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF I RECEIVE MORE THAN ONE INTERNET NOTICE OR MORE THAN ONE SET OF PROXY MATERIALS?

It means that your shares are held in more than one account at the transfer agent and/or with banks or brokers. Please vote all of your shares. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, for each Internet Notice or set of proxy materials, please submit your proxy by phone, via the Internet, or, if you received printed copies of the proxy materials, by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed envelope.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation3


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

HOW DO I VOTE?

ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT2


How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

A quorum must be present at the Annual Meeting for any business to be conducted. The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date will constitute a quorum.

Who can attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders?

You may attend the Annual Meeting only if you are a Cognizant stockholder who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, or if you hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you must call the Company’s investor relations staff at 1-201-498-8840 or emailDavid.Nelson@cognizant.com no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on June 14, 2016 to have your name placed on the attendance list. In order to be admitted into the Annual Meeting, your name must appear on the attendance list and you must present government-issued photo identification (such as a driver’s license). If your bank or broker holds your shares in street name, you will also be required to present proof of beneficial ownership of our Common Stock on the Record Date, such as the Internet Notice you received from your bank or broker, a bank or brokerage statement, or a letter from your bank or broker showing that you owned shares of our Common Stock at the close of business on the Record Date.

What if a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting?

If a quorum is not present at the scheduled time of the Annual Meeting, a majority of the outstanding shares represented at the Annual Meeting, by proxy or in person, and entitled to vote may adjourn the Annual Meeting.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Internet Notice or more than one set of proxy materials?

It means that your shares are held in more than one account at the transfer agent and/or with banks or brokers. Please vote all of your shares. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, for each Internet Notice or set of proxy materials, please submit your proxy by phone, via the Internet, or, if you received printed copies of the proxy materials, by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed envelope.

How do I vote?

We recommend that stockholders vote by proxy even if they plan to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. If you are a stockholder of record, there are three ways to vote by proxy:

 

by Telephone—You can vote by telephone by calling 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions on the proxy card;

by telephone—You can vote by telephone by calling 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions on the proxy card;

by Internet—You can vote over the Internet atwww.proxyvote.com by following the instructions on the Internet Notice or proxy card; or

 

by Internet—You can vote over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com by following the instructions on the Internet Notice or proxy card; or

by Mail—You can vote by mail by signing, dating and mailing the proxy card, which you may have received by mail.

Telephone and Internet voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, on June 2, 2014.

If your shares are held in street name through a bank or broker, you will receive instructions on how to vote from the bank or broker. You must follow their instructions in order for your shares to be voted. Telephone and Internet voting also will be offered to stockholders owning shares through certain banks and brokers. If your shares are not registered in your own name and you would like to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, you should contact your bank or broker to obtain a legal proxy or broker’s proxy card and bring it to the Annual Meeting in order to vote.

CAN I CHANGE MY VOTE AFTER I SUBMIT MY PROXY?

Yes.

by mail—You can vote by mail by signing, dating and mailing the proxy card, which you may have received by mail.

Telephone and Internet voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 14, 2016.

If your shares are held in street name through a bank or broker, you will receive instructions on how to vote from the bank or broker. You must follow their instructions in order for your shares to be voted. Telephone and Internet voting also will be offered to stockholders owning shares through certain banks and brokers. If your shares are not registered in your own name and you would like to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, you should contact your bank or broker to obtain a legal proxy and bring it to the Annual Meeting in order to vote.

Can I change my vote after I submit my proxy?

Yes. If you are a registered stockholder, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote:

 

by submitting a duly executed proxy bearing a later date;

by submitting a duly executed proxy bearing a later date;

 

by granting a subsequent proxy through the Internet or telephone;

by granting a subsequent proxy through the Internet or telephone;

 

by giving written notice of such revocation to the Secretary of Cognizant prior to or at the Annual Meeting; or

by giving written notice of revocation to the Secretary of Cognizant prior to or at the Annual Meeting; or

 

by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

Your most recent proxy card or telephone or Internet proxy is the one that is counted. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting itself will not revoke your proxy unless you give written notice of revocation to the Secretary before your proxy is voted or you vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held in street name, you may change or revoke your voting instructions by following the specific directions provided to you by your bank or broker, or you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting by obtaining a legal proxy from your bank or broker and submitting the legal proxy along with your ballot.

WHO WILL COUNT THE VOTES?

 

Representatives of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., our inspectors of election, will tabulate and certify the votes.

WHAT IF I DO NOT SPECIFY HOW MY SHARES ARE TO BE VOTED?
3ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT


Who will count the votes?

Representatives of Broadridge, our inspector of election, will tabulate and certify the votes.

What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?

If you submit a proxy but do not indicate any voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board. The Board’s recommendations for each proposal are set forth on page 1, as well as with the description of each proposal in this proxy statement.

Will any other business be conducted at the Annual Meeting?

We know of no other business that will be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the Annual Meeting, however, the proxy holders named on the Company’s proxy card will vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.

How many votes are required for the approval of the proposals to be voted upon and how will abstentions and broker non-votes be treated?

 

If you submit a proxy but do not indicate any voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors’ recommendations are set forth on page 2 of this proxy statement, as well as with the description of each proposal in this proxy statement.

WILL ANY OTHER BUSINESS BE CONDUCTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?

 

We know of no other business that will be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the Annual Meeting, however, the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.Proposal

 

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation4


Votes required

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

HOW MANY VOTES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSALS TO BE VOTED UPON AND HOW WILL ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES BE TREATED?Effect of Abstentions and

BrokerNon-Votes

 

ProposalVotes requiredEffect of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
Proposal 1: Election of Directors  

A director nominee will be elected to the Board of Directors if the votes cast “for” the nominee exceed the votes cast “against” the nominee.

No effect.

Proposal 2: Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote on Executive Compensation(Say-on-Pay)

The affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast.

No effect.

Proposal 3: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast.

No effect. We do not expect any broker non-votes on this proposal.

Proposal 4: Stockholder Proposal Regarding Stockholder Action by Written Consent

The affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast.

  No effect.
Proposal 2: Approval of First Amendment to 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan

What is an abstention and how will abstentions be treated?

An “abstention” represents a stockholder’s affirmative choice to decline to vote on a proposal. Abstentions are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Shares voting “abstain” have no effect on the election of directors, the approval of the compensation of our Named Executives, the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm and the stockholder proposal regarding stockholder action by written consent.

What are broker non-votes and do they count for determining a quorum?

Generally, broker non-votes occur when shares held by a broker in “street name” for a beneficial owner are not voted with respect to a particular proposal because the broker (1) has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and (2) lacks discretionary voting power to vote those shares. A broker is entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on routine matters, such as the ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm, without instructions from the beneficial owner of those shares. On the other hand, absent instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares, we expect that a broker will not be entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on all of the other proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. Broker non-votes count for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present.

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders?

We plan to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and we will report the final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which we intend to file with the SEC shortly after the Annual Meeting.

ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT4 The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast.No effect.
Proposal 3: Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay)The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast.No effect.


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Proposal 4: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmThe affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast.No effect. We do not expect any broker
non-votes on this proposal.
What are you voting on?At the Annual Meeting, eleven Directors are to be elected to hold office until the 2017 Annual Meeting and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. All nominees are current Directors and all except Messrs. Abdalla and Chadwick were elected by stockholders at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2015 Annual Meeting”).

LOGO

The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR all the Director nominees listed below.

Vote Required

A Director nominee will be elected to the Board if the votes cast “for” the nominee exceed the votes cast “against” the nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal. If you submit a proxy but do not indicate any voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares represented by such proxy “for” the election as Directors of the nominees listed below. In the event any of the nominees should become unable to serve or for good cause will not serve as a Director, it is intended that votes will be cast for a substitute nominee designated by the Board or the Board may elect to reduce its size. The Board has no reason to believe that any of the nominees named will be unable to serve if elected. Each of the nominees has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected.

Director Nominees

We believe that the backgrounds and qualifications of our Directors, considered as a group, should provide a composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities. The Board is composed of a diverse group of leaders in their respective fields, many with leadership experience at major domestic and international companies and experience on other companies’ boards, which provides an understanding of different business processes, challenges and strategies. Others are or have been officers or trustees of significant academic, research and philanthropic institutions or have prior public policy or regulatory experience that enables them to bring unique perspectives and insights to the Board. Set forth below are highlights of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of our Directors that have led the Governance Committee to conclude that these individuals should continue to serve on the Board and the principal occupations and business experience, for at least the past five years, of each of the nominees. There are no family relationships among any of our executive officers, directors and key employees.

WHAT IS AN ABSTENTION AND HOW WILL ABSTENTIONS BE TREATED?Zein Abdalla

Director Since: 2015

Age: 57

Skills and Qualifications:  LOGO   LOGO

LOGO

Retired President of
PepsiCo, Inc.

Career Highlights

 

An “abstention” represents  President of PepsiCo, Inc., a stockholder’s affirmative choice to decline to vote on a proposal. Abstentions are counted as presentmultinational food, snack and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Shares voting “abstain” have no effect on the election of directors, the approval of the first amendment to the 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan, the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers and the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm.beverage company (2012 – 2014)

WHAT ARE BROKER NON-VOTES AND DO THEY COUNT FOR DETERMINING A QUORUM?  Executive positions with PepsiCo Europe Region

-  Chief Executive Officer (2009 – 2012)

-  President (2006 – 2009)

 Various senior positions with PepsiCo (1995 – 2006)

Current Public Company Boards

 

Generally, broker non-votes occur when shares held by  The TJX Companies, Inc., a broker in “street name” for a beneficial owner are not voted with respect to a particular proposal because the broker (1) has not received voting instructions from the beneficial ownerretailer of apparel and (2) lacks discretionary voting power to vote those shares. A broker is entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on routine matters, such as the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, without instructions from the beneficial owner of those shares. On the other hand, absent instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares, we expect that a broker will not be entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on all of the other proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. Broker non-votes count for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present.home fashions

WHERE CAN I FIND THE VOTING RESULTS OF THE 2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS?-  Corporate Governance Committee

-  Finance Committee

Other Positions

 

We plan  Member of the Imperial College Business School Advisory Board

 Board Advisor, Mars, Incorporated

Education

 B.S., Imperial College, London University

Committees

Audit

Nominating and Corporate Governance

Mr. Abdalla has over 35 years of global consumer goods experience gained across developed and emerging markets. He brings extensive leadership and global business expertise to announce preliminary voting resultsthe Board from his career, including 19 years in senior and executive positions at the Annual MeetingPepsiCo. His executive experience with this large global company has given him expertise in corporate management, large-scale mergers and we will report the final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which we intend to file with the SEC shortly after the Annual Meeting.acquisitions, operations, brand management and innovation, supply chain and global strategy.

 

LOGO

Leadership

LOGO

Global Business Experience

LOGO

Consulting

LOGO

Technology

LOGO

Financial

5CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Maureen

Breakiron-Evans

Director Since: 2009

     Age: 61     

Skills and Qualifications:   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO

LOGO

Former Chief Financial

Officer of Towers Perrin

Career Highlights

 Chief Financial Officer of Towers Perrin, a global professional services company (2007 – 2008)

 Vice President and General Auditor of CIGNA Corporation, a health services organization (2005 – 2006)

 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Inovant, LLC, VISA’s captive technology development and transaction processing company (2001 – 2004)

Current Public Company Boards

 Ally Financial Inc., a provider of payment processing services

-  Audit Committee

 Heartland Payment Systems, Inc., a provider of payment processing services

-  Chair of Audit Committee

Past Director Positions

 Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburg, a private government-sponsored enterprise

 ING Direct, an Internet bank

Education

 B.B.A., Stetson University

 M.B.A., Harvard Business School

 M.L.A., Stanford University

Certifications

 CPA in California

Committees

Audit (Chair)

Nominating and Corporate Governance

Ms. Breakiron-Evans began her career as a financial auditor, ultimately serving as an Audit Partner with Arthur Andersen & Co. Her experience in public accounting with this major accounting firm provides the Board with insights into many aspects of the financial reporting and tax issues facing technology consulting companies. Her years as chief financial officer or other executive officer at various companies brings extensive leadership, technology, financial and risk management experience to the Board.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation5


 

 

Jonathan Chadwick

Director Since: 2016

     Age: 50     

Skills and Qualifications:   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO

LOGO

Former Executive Vice

President, Chief

Financial Officer and

Chief Operating Officer

of VMware, Inc.

Career Highlights

 Executive positions with VMware, Inc., a virtualization and cloud infrastructure solutions company

-  Chief Operating Officer
(2014 – 2016)

-  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2012 – 2016)

 Chief Financial Officer of Skype Technologies S.A., an Internet communications company, and Corporate GovernanceVice President of Microsoft Corporation (2011 – 2012)

 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of McAfee, Inc., a security technology company
(2010 – 2011)

 Various executive positions with Cisco Systems, Inc. (1997 – 2010)

 Various positions with Coopers & Lybrand,
an accounting firm (1993 – 1997)

Current Public Company Boards

 F5 Networks, Inc.

-  Chair of Audit Committee

Education

 B.Sc., University of Bath, U.K.

Certifications

 Chartered Accountant in England and Wales

 

 

Committees

Audit

Mr. Chadwick brings a wide range of technology, finance and operations experience to the Board from his 19 years as a financial and operational leader of several prominent technology companies, most recently as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of VMware. His extensive experience with key enabling technologies, including virtualization, networking and security, provides valuable insight and perspective to the Board.

LOGO

Leadership

LOGO

Global Business Experience

LOGO

Consulting

LOGO

Technology

LOGO

Financial

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE6


Francisco D’Souza

Director Since: 2007

     Age: 47     

Skills and Qualifications:   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO

LOGO

 

Chief Executive Officer

of Cognizant

Career Highlights

 Executive positions at Cognizant

-  Chief Executive Officer (since 2007)

-  President (2007 – 2012)

-  Chief Operating Officer (2003 – 2006)

-  Senior Vice President, North American Operations and Business Development (1999 – 2003)

-  Vice President, North American Operations and Business Development (1998 – 1999)

-  Director – North American Operations and Business Development (1997 – 1998)

-  Joined Cognizant as a co-founder in 1994, the year it was started as a division of The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation

Current Public Company Boards

 General Electric Company

-  Audit Committee

-  Science and Technology Committee

Other Positions

 Member of the Board of Trustees of Carnegie Mellon University

 Co-Chairman of the Board of Trustees of The New York Hall of Science

 Member of the Board of Directors of the U.S.–India Business Council

Education

 B.B.A., University of Macau (formerly University of East Asia)

 M.B.A., Carnegie Mellon University

Mr. D’Souza has over 20 years of experience in the technology industry. During Mr. D’Souza’s tenure as Chief Executive Officer, Cognizant’s annual revenue has grown from less than $1.5 billion to over $12 billion and its employee base has grown from 55,000 to 221,700. As a result of this strong growth, Cognizant has been named a member of the S&P 500, the Fortune 500, the Forbes Global 2000 and one of Forbes’ Fastest Growing Tech Companies.

GENERALJohn N. Fox, Jr.

 

Our

Director Since: 2007

      Age: 73      

Skills and Qualifications:   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO

LOGO

Former Vice Chairman

of Deloitte & Touche

LLP and Global

Director, Strategic

Clients of

Deloitte Consultring

Career Highlights

 Vice Chairman of Deloitte & Touche LLP, a global professional services firm, and Global Director, Strategic Clients for Deloitte Consulting (1998 – 2003)

 Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Board of Directors has adopted Corporateand the Board’s Governance Guidelines, a Code(Executive) Committee (1998 – 2003)

 Various senior positions with Deloitte Consulting (1968 – 2003)

Current Public Company Boards

 VASCO Data Security International, Inc., an information technology security company

-   Chair of Ethics entitled “Cognizant’s Core Values and Standards of Business Conduct” and charters for ourCompensation Committee

-   Audit Committee

-   Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Audit Committee

Other Positions

 Trustee for Wabash College

 Trustee for Steppenwolf Theatre Company

Education

 B.A., Wabash College

 M.B.A., University of Michigan

Committees

Compensation

Nominating and Compensation CommitteeCorporate Governance

Mr. Fox brings to assist the Board in the exercise35 years of its responsibilitiesglobal business and to serve as a framework for the effective governance of the Company. You can access our current committee charters, our Corporate Governance Guidelinesconsulting experience at Deloitte Consulting, an internationally prominent consulting firm, where he advised clients on large scale, complex transactions, including strategic initiatives, new business models, reengineering business processes, merger integration and our Code of Ethics in the “Company Overview” section of the “About Cognizant” page of our website under the “Corporate Governance” tab located at www.cognizant.com or by writing to our Secretary at our offices at Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666.organizational change.

LOGO

Leadership

LOGO

Global Business Experience

LOGO

Consulting

LOGO

Technology

LOGO

Financial

7CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


DETERMINATION OF INDEPENDENCEJohn E. Klein

 

Under

Director Since: 1998

      Age: 74      

Skills and Qualifications:   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO

LOGO

Chairman of Cognizant

and President and

Chief Executive Officer

of Polarex, Inc.

Career Highlights

 Chairman of the Board of Cognizant (since 2003)

 President and Chief Executive Officer of Polarex, Inc., a technology consulting firm (employed since 1994)

 Previously

-  President and Chief Executive Officer of MDIS Group, PLC, a UK listed software and services company

-  Vice President at International Business Machines Corporation, or IBM

-  Vice President at Digital Equipment Corporation

Education

 B.S., U.S. Merchant Marine Academy

 M.B.A., New York University

Committees

Audit

Compensation (Chair)

Nominating and Corporate Governance

Mr. Klein has over 35 years of experience in the high technology field with global firms such as IBM, Digital Equipment and MDIS. Through his career, Mr. Klein has obtained broad leadership, global business, consulting, technology and financial expertise. His strong leadership skills and other qualifications are key in his role as the Company’s Chairman of the Board. Mr. Klein has previously served as Chairman of Glovia International and PRO IV Limited, two enterprise software and services companies.

Leo S. Mackay, Jr.

Director Since: 2012

     Age: 54     

Skills and Qualifications:   LOGO   LOGO

LOGO

Vice President, Ethics

and Sustainability of

Lockheed Martin

Corporation

Career Highlights

 Vice President, Ethics and Sustainability (elected corporate officer) of Lockheed Martin Corporation, a global security and aerospace company (since 2011)

 Vice President, Corporate Business Development and various other positions with Lockheed Martin (2007 – 2011)

 President, Integrated Coast Guard Systems LLC and Vice President and General Manager, Coast Guard Systems (2005 – 2007)

 Chief Operations Officer of ACS State Healthcare LLC, a services company serving the healthcare industry (2003 – 2005)

 Various positions with Bell Helicopter, a helicopter and tiltrotor craft manufacturer

Past Director Positions

 Chair of the Board of Visitors of the Graduate School of Public Affairs at the University of Maryland

 Center for a New American Century

Education

 B.S., United States Naval Academy

 M.P.P., Harvard University

 Ph.D., Harvard University

Committees

Audit

Dr. Mackay brings global business perspective to the Board from his work with Lockheed Martin and ACS Healthcare, corporate governance and compliance expertise from his current role as Vice President, Ethics and Sustainability with Lockheed Martin, and experience working with the federal government and managing large enterprises from his time as Deputy Secretary of Veteran Affairs. He has demonstrated leadership skills, obtained through his previous work experience and also as a former Navy F-14 pilot, a Naval Weapons School graduate and veteran of Operation Earnest Will.

LOGO

Leadership

LOGO

Global Business Experience

LOGO

Consulting

LOGO

Technology

LOGO

Financial

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE8


Lakshmi Narayanan

Director Since: 2003

Age: 63

Skills and Qualifications:   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO

LOGO

Vice Chairman and

Former President and

Chief Executive Officer

of Cognizant

Career Highlights

 Vice Chairman of the Board of Cognizant (since 2007)

 Executive positions at Cognizant

-  Vice Chairman (2007 – 2014)

-  Chief Executive Officer (2003 – 2006)

-  President (1998 – 2006)

 Executive positions at Cognizant’s Indian subsidiary

-  President (1996 – 2003)

-  Chief Technology Officer (1994 – 1996)

 Regional head with Tata Consultancy Services Limited, a consulting and software services company (1975 – 1994)

Other Positions

 Board of Directors of TVS Capital Funds, Limited, a private investment management company in India

-  Chair of Governance Committee

 Board of Directors of various charitable foundations

-  United Way of Chennai, a chapter of United Way Worldwide

- Cognizant Foundation

 Chair of the Board of Governors of ICT Academy of Tamil Nadu, a not-for-profit training and research institution established as a public-private partnership between various Indian governmental entities and IT and technology companies

 Board of Directors of U.S. India Business Council (USIBC)

Education

 B.S., Indian Institute of Science

 M.S., Indian Institute of Science

 Management Degree, Indian Institute of Science

Mr. Narayanan has over 30 years of experience in the technology field with Tata Consultancy Services and Cognizant through which he has obtained strong leadership, global business, consulting, technology and financial skills. He is also a past chairman (2007-2008) of the National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM) in India.

Michael Patsalos-Fox

Director Since: 2012

Age: 63

Skills and Qualifications:   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO

LOGO

Chief Executive Officer

of Stroz Friedberg and

Former Chairman, the

Americas and

Senior Partner of

McKinsey & Company

Career Highlights

 Chief Executive Officer of Stroz Friedberg, a global investigation and cyber security firm (since 2013)

 Senior Partner and various other positions with McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting company (1981 – 2013)

-  Board of Directors (1998 – 2010)

-  Chairman, the Americas (2003 – 2009)

-  Member of Operating Committee

-  Managing Partner of New York and New Jersey offices, North American Corporate Finance and Strategy practice and European Telecoms practice

- Leader of new business growth opportunities around data, analytics and software

Education

 B.S., University of Sydney

 M.B.A., International Institute for Management Development

Committees

Compensation

Nominating and Corporate Governance

Mr. Patsalos-Fox brings to the Board over 30 years of international business experience with McKinsey, where he acquired extensive experience developing corporate strategies and working with technology companies. He also has significant leadership experience from the senior management positions he held while at McKinsey.

LOGO

Leadership

LOGO

Global Business Experience

LOGO

Consulting

LOGO

Technology

LOGO

Financial

9CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Robert E. Weissman

Director Since: 2001

     Age: 75     

Skills and Qualifications:   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO

LOGO

Chairman of

Shelburne Investments

and Retired Chairman

and Chief Executive

Officer of The Dun &

Bradstreet Corporation

Career Highlights

 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IMS Health, a provider of information to the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries (1998 – 1999)

 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cognizant (1996 – 1997)

 Executive positions at The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation, a data, analytics and insights company

-  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (1995 – 1996)

-  President and Chief Operating Officer (1985 – 1995)

-  Other positions since 1979

 President and Chief Executive Officer of National CSS, a computer time-sharing company acquired by The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation in 1979

Past Public Company Boards

 State Street Corporation, a global financial services company

 Pitney Bowes, Inc., a global technology company

 Information Services Group, a technology insights, market intelligence and advisory services company

Other Positions

 Chairman of Shelburne Investments, a private investment company that works with emerging companies in the United States and Europe

 Board of Trustees of Babson College

Education

 B.S., Babson College

 Honorary Doctor of Laws, Babson College

Committees

Compensation

Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)

Mr. Weissman has over 30 years of leadership experience as a chief executive officer of several public technology and services companies, including Cognizant. He also has significant public company board experience.

Thomas M. Wendel

Director Since: 2001

     Age: 79     

Skills and Qualifications:   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO

LOGO

Retired Chairman,

President and Chief

Executive Officer of

Bridge Information

Systems, Inc.

��

Career Highlights

 Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Bridge Information Systems, Inc., a global financial information, transaction services and network services company (1995 – 2000)

 Founding President and Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Brokerage, Inc., a U.S. government securities brokerage firm

 Various positions with Paine Webber, Inc., a stock brokerage and asset management firm

-  Chief Financial Officer

-  Executive Vice President

-  Managing Director

 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pan American World Airways, a worldwide commercial airline

Education

 B.S, Ursinus College

 M.A., San Jose State College

 M.B.A., University of Santa Clara

Committees

Audit

Nominating and Corporate Governance

Mr. Wendel has held various executive level positions, including Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, at several global companies over the course of his career. He brings an array of leadership, technology and financial expertise to the Board.

LOGO

Leadership

LOGO

Global Business Experience

LOGO

Consulting

LOGO

Technology

LOGO

Financial

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE10


Majority Voting Standard in Election of Directors

Our By-laws provide that the voting standard for the election of directors in uncontested elections is a majority of votes cast. If none of our stockholders provides us with notice of an intention to nominate one or more candidates to compete with the Board’s nominees in a Director election, or if our stockholders have withdrawn all such nominations by the day before the Company mails its notice of meeting to our stockholders, a nominee must receive more votes cast “for” than “against” his or her election or re-election in order to be elected or re-elected to the Board.

In accordance with our By-laws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board will nominate for election or re-election as a Director only candidates who agree to tender, promptly following their failure to receive the required vote for election or re-election at the next meeting at which they would face election or re-election, an irrevocable resignation that will be effective upon acceptance by the Board. In addition, the Board will fill Director vacancies and new directorships only with candidates who agree to tender the same form of resignation, promptly following their appointment to the Board.

If an incumbent Director fails to receive the required vote for re-election, then, within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote, the Governance Committee will act to determine whether to accept the Director’s resignation and will submit the recommendation for prompt consideration by the Board, and the Board will act on the Governance Committee’s recommendation. The Governance Committee and the Board may consider any factors they deem relevant in deciding whether to accept a Director’s resignation. Any such Director may not participate in the Governance Committee recommendation or Board action regarding whether to accept the resignation offer. If each member of the Governance Committee fails to receive the required vote in favor of his or her election in the same election, then those independent Directors who did receive the required vote will appoint a committee amongst themselves to consider the resignation offers and recommend to the Board whether to accept them. However, if the only Directors who did not receive the required vote in the same election constitute three or fewer Directors, all Directors may participate in the action regarding whether to accept the resignation offers.

Thereafter, the Board will promptly disclose its decision-making process and decision regarding whether to accept the Director’s resignation offer (or the reason(s) for rejecting the resignation offer, if applicable) in a Form 8-K furnished to the SEC.

BOARD COMPOSITION

Director Candidate Identification and Evaluation Process

The Governance Committee is charged with identifying and evaluating director candidates and recommending nominees to the Board for approval.

Finding Director Candidates

The Governance Committee seeks recommendations from Board members and others, engages search firms from time-to-time to assist in the identification and evaluation of director candidates, meets periodically to evaluate biographical information and background material relating to potential candidates and has selected candidates interviewed by members of the Governance Committee and the Board. In 2015 and 2016, the Company engaged athird-party director search firm to assist the Governance Committee in identifying and evaluating director candidates. Zein Abdalla and Jonathan Chadwick, who were elected to the Board in 2015 and 2016, respectively, were identified by such search firm.

Director Candidate Selection

The Governance Committee strives to maintain an engaged, independent Board with broad and diverse experience and judgment that is committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders. In considering whether to recommend any particular candidate for inclusion in the Board’s slate of recommended Director nominees, the Governance Committee applies the criteria set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. These criteria include the candidate’s integrity, business acumen, knowledge of our business and industry, experience, diligence, absence of conflicts of interest and the ability to act in the interests of all stockholders, and includes consideration of the value of Board diversity. In evaluating Director candidates, the Governance Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is a prerequisite for each prospective nominee. We believe that the backgrounds, qualifications and diversity of our Directors, considered as a group, should provide a composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities.

11CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


The Governance Committee’s Director candidate selection includes the following considerations:

Ensuring an experienced, qualified Board with expertise in areas relevant to the Company. We seek directors who have held significant leadership positions and have global business experience, especially in the consulting and technology industries in which we compete. In addition, we seek directors with the financial reporting, corporate governance and compliance experience appropriate for a large, global, publicly traded company.

LOGO

Leadership
LOGO11/11 Directors
We believe that directors who have held significant leadership positions over an extended period, especially CEO positions, possess extraordinary leadership qualities, and the ability to identify and develop those qualities in others. They demonstrate a practical understanding of organizations, processes, strategy and risk management, and know how to drive change and growth.

LOGO

Global Business Experience
LOGO9/11 Directors
With over 20% of our revenue currently coming from, and our continued success dependent, in part, on continued growth in, our business outside the United States, and with the extensive international aspects of our business operations, including our outsourcing services, we believe that global business experience is an important quality for many of our Directors to possess.

LOGO

Consulting
LOGO5/11 Directors
Consulting, including as to information technology strategy, business and operations, is one of our key areas of business focus. It is an important component of the continuing growth of our business and permeates other important technology growth areas for us. As consulting is a critical component of our efforts to develop ever more strategic relationships with clients, it is important to have directors with consulting experience.

LOGO

Technology
LOGO8/11 Directors
As a leading information technology company, developing and investing in new technologies and ideas is at the heart of our business. Our current investments include building capabilities to enable clients to drive digital transformation at scale and create next generation information technology infrastructures, and building platform-based solutions and industry utilities to enable clients to achieve new levels of efficiency. As such, having directors with technology experience is as important as ever.

LOGO

Financial
LOGO8/11 Directors
We use a broad set of financial metrics to measure our operating and strategic performance. Accurate financial reporting and robust auditing are also critical to our success. As such, it is important for us to have directors with an understanding of financial statements and financial reporting processes.

Enhancing the Board’s Diversity. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the value of director diversity, including as to race, gender, age and cultural background, should be considered in the selection of directors. The Governance Committee seeks out qualified women and individuals from minority groups to include in the pool from which Board nominees are chosen, and in fact two of the three most recent director additions to the Board have been individuals from minority groups.

Ensuring a balanced mix of different tenures. The Governance Committee believes it is important to maintain a mix of experienced directors with a deep understanding of the Company and its industry and others who bring a fresh perspective. In this regard, the Governance Committee has recruited four new directors over the last four years.

Maintaining independence and avoiding conflicts of interest. The Governance Committee looks at other positions a director candidate has held or holds (including other board memberships) and any potential conflicts of interest to ensure the continued independence of the Board and its committees.

As part of the Governance Committee’s annual self-assessment process, it assesses its performance as to all aspects of the selection and nomination process for directors, including diversity.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE12


Director Candidate Recommendations by Stockholders

Stockholders may recommend individuals to the Governance Committee for consideration as potential director candidates by submitting the names of the recommended individuals, together with appropriate biographical information and background materials and a statement as to whether the stockholder or group of stockholders making the recommendation has beneficially owned more than 5% of Common Stock for at least a year as of the date such recommendation is made. Such recommendations should be sent to the Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666. Assuming that appropriate biographical and background material has been provided on a timely basis, the Governance Committee will evaluate stockholder-recommended candidates by following substantially the same process, and applying substantially the same criteria, as it follows for candidates submitted by others.

In addition, our By-laws provide that stockholders satisfying certain ownership and holding period requirements with respect to the Common Stock and other requirements may nominate directors for inclusion in our proxy statement. See “Director Nominees for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy Statement (Proxy Access)” on page 48.

Director Independence

Board Member Independence

9 of 11

Directors are

Independent

Each of our Directors, other than Messrs. D’Souza and Narayanan, has been determined by the Board to be an “independent director” under the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market rules, a Director will only qualify as an “independent director” if,LLC (“NASDAQ”), which require that, in the opinion of ourthe Board, of Directors, thatsuch person does not have a relationship whichthat would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a Director. In evaluating the independence of our

Committee Member Independence

100%

Independent

Directors theon

all Board considered transactions and relationships between the Company and its subsidiaries and each Director and their family members, as defined in the NASDAQ rules. As a result of this review, the

Committees

The Board has determined that all of the members of each of Maureen Breakiron-Evans, John Fox, John Klein, Leo S. Mackay, Jr., Michael Patsalos-Fox, Robert Weissman,the Board’s three standing committees (Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Thomas Wendel do not have a relationship which would interfere with the exercise ofGovernance Committee) are independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a Director and that each of these Directors is an “independent director” as defined under NASDAQ rules. In determiningrules and, where applicable, also satisfy the committee-specific requirements set forth below.

HEIGHTENED COMMITTEE STANDARDS

Audit Committee

All members of the Audit Committee are required to satisfythe independence requirements contemplatedby Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and NASDAQ rules, specifically that Audit Committee members may not accept any direct or indirect consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the Company or any of its subsidiaries, except for their compensation for Board service, and that Audit Committee members may not be affiliated with the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

Compensation Committee

Under NASDAQ rules the Board must affirmatively determine the independence of each member of the Compensation Committee after considering all sources of compensation of the director, the Board considered the fact that Mr. Patsalos-Fox was a Senior Partner at McKinsey & Company, a position he held until October 2013. From time to time in the ordinary course of business,including any consulting, advisory or other compensation paid by the Company throughor any of its subsidiaries, engages in transactionsand whether the Compensation Committee member is affiliated with McKinsey & Company. The Board considered the magnitude and natureCompany or any of this relationship and determined that it did not impair the independence of Mr. Patsalos-Fox.its subsidiaries.

DIRECTOR CANDIDATES

BOARD OPERATIONS

Board Leadership Structure

 

The process followed by the Nominating Separate
Chairman

and Corporate Governance Committee to identify and evaluate director candidates includes requests to Board members and others for recommendations, meetings from time to time to evaluate biographical information and background material relating to potential candidates and interviews of selected candidates by members of the Committee and the Board. From time to time, we also engage search firms to assist in the identification of director candidates.CEO

In considering whether to recommend any particular candidate for inclusion in the Board’s slate of recommended Director nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will apply the criteria set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. These criteria include the candidate’s integrity, business acumen, knowledge of our business and industry, experience, diligence, absence of conflicts of interest and the ability to act in the interests of all stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a specific policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. However, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the value of diversity on the Board should be considered. The Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is a prerequisite for each prospective nominee. We believe that the backgrounds and qualifications of our Directors, considered as a group, should provide a composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities.

Stockholders may recommend individuals to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration as potential Director candidates by submitting the names of the recommended individuals, together with appropriate biographical information and background materials and a statement as to whether the stockholder or group of stockholders making the recommendation has beneficially owned more than 5% of Class A Common Stock for at least a year as of the date

2014 Proxy Statement  Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation6


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

such recommendation is made, to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666. Assuming that appropriate biographical and background material has been provided on a timely basis, the Committee will evaluate stockholder-recommended candidates by following substantially the same process, and applying substantially the same criteria, as it follows for candidates submitted by others.

VOTING FOR DIRECTORS

Our By-laws provide that the vote standard for the election of directors is a majority of votes cast in uncontested elections. In accordance with the Company’s By-laws, if none of our stockholders provides the Company notice of an intention to nominate one or more candidates to compete with the Board’s nominees in a Director election, or if our stockholders have withdrawn all such nominations by the day before the Company mails its notice of meeting to our stockholders, a nominee must receive more votes cast for than against his or her election or re-election in order to be elected or re-elected to the Board. The Board expects a Director to tender his or her resignation if he or she fails to receive the required number of votes for re-election. The Board will nominate for election or re-election as Director only candidates who agree to tender, promptly following such person’s failure to receive the required vote for election or re-election at the next meeting at which such person would face election or re-election, an irrevocable resignation that will be effective upon Board acceptance of such resignation. In addition, the Board will fill Director vacancies and new directorships only with candidates who agree to tender, promptly following their appointment to the Board, the same form of resignation tendered by other Directors in accordance with this corporate governance guideline. If an incumbent Director fails to receive the required vote for re-election, then, within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will act to determine whether to accept the Director’s resignation and will submit such recommendation for prompt consideration by the Board, and the Board will act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board may consider any factors they deem relevant in deciding whether to accept a Director’s resignation.

Any Director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this provision may not participate in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommendation or Board action regarding whether to accept the resignation offer.

Thereafter, the Board will promptly disclose its decision-making process and decision regarding whether to accept the Director’s resignation offer (or the reason(s) for rejecting the resignation offer, if applicable) in a Form 8-K furnished to the SEC.

If each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee fails to receive the required vote in favor of his or her election in the same election, then those independent Directors who did receive the required vote will appoint a committee amongst themselves to consider the resignation offers and recommend to the Board whether to accept them. However, if the only Directors who did not receive the required vote in the same election constitute three or fewer Directors, all Directors may participate in the action regarding whether to accept the resignation offers.

COMMUNICATIONS FROM STOCKHOLDERS

The Board will give appropriate attention to written communications that are submitted by stockholders, and will respond if and as appropriate. Our Chairman of the Board and Secretary and General Counsel are primarily responsible for monitoring communications from stockholders and for providing copies or summaries to the other Directors as they consider appropriate.

Under procedures approved by a majority of the independent Directors, communications are forwarded to all Directors if they relate to important substantive matters and include suggestions or comments that our Secretary and Chairman of the Board consider to be important for the Directors to know. In general, communications relating to corporate governance and long-term corporate strategy are more likely to be forwarded than communications relating to ordinary business affairs, personal grievances and matters as to which we tend to receive repetitive or duplicative communications.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation7


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Stockholders who wish to send communications on any topic to the Board should address such communications to the Board of Directors by emailing the Board of Directors at the following email address: corporategovernance@cognizant.com; or in writing: c/o Corporate Secretary, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666.

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE AND ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT

The Board evaluates its leadership structure and role in risk oversight on an ongoing basis. Since December 2003, the Company’s board leadership structure has separated the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer roles into two positions. Currently, John E. Klein is the Chairman of the Board and Francisco D’Souza is the Chief Executive Officer. The Board determines whatevaluates its leadership structure it deems appropriateon an ongoing basis based on factors such as the experience of the applicable individuals and the current business environment of the Company or other relevant factors.Company. After considering these factors, the Board

determined that continuing to separate the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer is the appropriate board leadership structure at this time.

13CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Director Attendance at Board and Stockholder Meetings

There were seven meetings of the Board during 2015. Each Director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) all meetings of the Board held during the period in which he or she served as a Director and (ii) the total number of meetings held by the committees on which he or she served during the period, if applicable.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that Directors are expected to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. For the 2015 Annual Meeting, Mr. D’Souza acted as Chairman and all but two of the nine then current Directors attended (participating by teleconference).

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Board is responsible for oversight of the Company’s risk management practices while management is responsible for the day-to-day risk management processes. This division of responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the risks facing the Company. The Board receives periodic reports from management regarding the most significant risks facing the Company and evaluates its role in risk oversight on an ongoing basis. In addition, the Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight role by receiving periodic reports regarding the Company’s risk and control environment. The Board does not believe that its role in the oversight of the Company’s risks affects the Board’s leadership structure.

Committees of the Board

The Board has established three standing committees—the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Governance Committee”)—each of which operates under a charter that has been approved by the Board. Current copies of each committee’s charter are posted in the “Company Overview” section of the “About Cognizant” page of our website located atwww.cognizant.com, under the “Corporate Governance” tab.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Board of Directors is also responsible for oversight of the Company’s risk management practices while management is responsible for the day-to-day risk management processes. This division of responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the risks facing the Company, and the Company’s board leadership structure supports this approach. The Board receives periodic reports from management regarding the most significant risks facing the Company. In addition, the Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight role by receiving periodic reports regarding the Company’s risk and control environment.

CODE OF ETHICSMembers

 

We have adopted a written Code of Ethics that applies to our Directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. We have posted our Code of Ethics, entitled “Cognizant’s Core Values and Standards of Business Conduct,” in the “Company Overview” section of the “About Cognizant” page of our website under the “Corporate Governance” tab located at www.cognizant.com. In addition, we intend to post on our website all disclosures that are required by law or NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of our Code of Ethics.Zein Abdalla

ATTENDANCE BY MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AT MEETINGSMaureen Breakiron-Evans (Chair)

Jonathan Chadwick

There were nine meetings of the Board of Directors during 2013. Each Director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) all meetings of the Board of Directors held during the period in which he or she served as a Director and (ii) the total number of meetings held by the committees on which he or she served during the period, if applicable.John E. Klein

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that Directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Mr. D’Souza acted as Chairman of the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and all other Directors participated in the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders by teleconference.Leo S. Mackay, Jr.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation8


Thomas M. Wendel

 

CommitteesNo. of the BoardMeetings in 2015:9

 

Audit Committee Financial Experts

 

The Board of Directors has established three standing committees—the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee—each of which operates under a charter that has been approved by our Board of Directors. Current copies of each committee’s charter are posted under the “Corporate Governance” tab in the “Company Overview” section of the “About Cognizant” page of our website located at www.cognizant.com.

The members of each of the Board committees and committee chairs are set forth in the following chart.

NameAuditCompensationNominating and Corporate
Governance

Maureen Breakiron-Evans

ChairX

Francisco D’Souza

John N. Fox, Jr.

XX

John E. Klein

XChairX

Leo S. Mackay, Jr.

X

Lakshmi Narayanan

Michael Patsalos-Fox

XX

Robert E. Weissman

XChair

Thomas M. Wendel

XX

The Board of Directors has determined that all of the members of each of the Board’s three standing committees are independent as defined under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, including, in the case of all members of the Audit Committee, the independence requirements contemplated by Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, and including, in the case of all members of the Compensation Committee, the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market specific to the independence of compensation committee members.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Our Audit Committee’s responsibilities include:

providing direct oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm, including responsibility over such accountant’s appointment, termination, qualifications and independence and the scope and fees of the annual audit of our consolidated financial statements;

discussing the contents of our annual and quarterly consolidated financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm;

pre-approving all audit services, and any other services, including review, attest and non-audit services, provided by our independent registered public accounting firm;

monitoring our internal control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures and Code of Ethics;

reviewing and discussing the internal audit process, scope of activities and audit results with our internal audit department;

reviewing and discussing with management our risk management framework and processes; and

preparing the audit committee report required by SEC rules (which is included on page 66 of this proxy statement).

The members of the Audit Committee are Ms. Breakiron-Evans and Messrs. Klein, Mackay and Wendel. The Audit Committee met nine times during 2013. The Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Breakiron-Evans Mr. Chadwick

is an “audit committee financial expert”

as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of

Regulation S-K.

2014 Proxy StatementKey ResponsibilitiesCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation9


COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

 

  Direct oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm, including appointment, termination, qualifications and independence, and pre-approval of the scope and fees of the annual audit and any other services, including review, attest and non-audit services;

  Reviewing and discussing the contents of our quarterly and annual consolidated financial statements and earnings releases with management and the independent registered public accounting firm;

  Recommending to the Board inclusion of our audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K;

  Monitoring our internal control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures, and Code of Ethics;

  Reviewing and discussing the internal audit process, scope of activities and audit results with our internal audit department;

  Reviewing and discussing with management our risk management framework and processes; and

  Preparing the Audit Committee report required by SEC rules (which is included on page 44).

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE14


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Members

 

OurJohn N. Fox, Jr.

John E. Klein (Chair)

Michael Patsalos-Fox

Robert E. Weissman

No. of Meetings in 2015:4

Key Responsibilities

  Making recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer;

  Reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to the Board with respect to, the compensation of our other executive officers;

  Overseeing evaluations of our senior executives;

  Reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to our incentive compensation arrangements, including an annual review to ensure that such compensation arrangements do not encourage unnecessary risk taking;

  Reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to Director compensation;

  Preparing the Compensation Committee report required by SEC rules (which is responsible for assistingincluded on page 30); and

  Assisting the Board in the discharge of itsany other responsibilities relating to the compensation of our executive officers. In fulfilling its purpose, our Compensation Committee has the following principal duties:

 

 

reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to the Board with respect to, the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s other executive officers;

overseeing an evaluation of our senior executives;

overseeing and administering our cash and stock-based compensation incentive plans;

reviewing incentive compensation arrangements to ensure that such compensation arrangements do not encourage unnecessary risk taking; and

reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to Director compensation.

The Compensation Committee also administers the 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan and establishes the terms and conditions of all stock-based compensation awards granted thereunder, and the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Compensation Committee met five times during 2013. The members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Fox, Klein, Patsalos-Fox and Weissman.

NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Members

 

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include:Zein Abdalla

Maureen Breakiron-Evans

recommending to the Board the persons to be nominated for election as directors and to be appointed to each of the Board’s committees;

reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to management succession planning;

developing and recommending to the Board corporate governance guidelines; and

overseeing an annual evaluation of the Board.

The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Ms. Breakiron-Evans and Messrs.John N. Fox, Jr.

John E. Klein

Michael Patsalos-Fox

Robert E. Weissman and Wendel. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met two times during 2013.(Chair)

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation10


Thomas M. Wendel

 

Director CompensationNo. of Meetings in 2015:4

Key Responsibilities

  Recommending to the Board the persons to be nominated for election as Directors and to be appointed to each of the Board’s committees;

  Reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to management succession planning;

  Developing and recommending to the Board our Corporate Governance Guidelines; and

  Overseeing an annual evaluation of the Board.

Communications to the Board from Stockholders

 

All share and share-based numbers and values in this Director Compensation section reflect
How you can communicate concerns to our DirectorsUnder procedures approved by a majority of the Company’s two-for-one stock split that occurred on March 7, 2014.

independent Directors, who are our employees or employees of our subsidiaries receive no cash remuneration for serving as Directors. All Directors who are not our employees or employees of our subsidiaries, referred to herein as non-employee Directors, other than our Chairman receive an annual retainer of $40,000 for their service on the Board of Directors (with no additional fees paid for attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors). Ourand Secretary and General Counsel are primarily responsible for monitoring communications from stockholders and, if they relate to important substantive matters and include suggestions or comments that our Secretary and Chairman receives an annual retainer of $140,000 (with no additional fees paid for attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors). The Chairconsider to be important for the Directors to know, providing copies or summaries to the other Directors. In general, communications relating to corporate governance and long-term corporate strategy are more likely to be forwarded than

communications relating to ordinary business affairs, personal grievances and matters as to which we tend to receive repetitive or duplicative communications.

The Board will give appropriate attention to written communications that are submitted by stockholders, and will respond if and as appropriate. Stockholders who wish to send communications on any topic to the Board should address such communications to the Board by emailing the Board atcorporategovernance@cognizant.com or by writing to the Board c/o Corporate Secretary, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666.

15CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


  COMPENSATION

PROPOSAL 2 — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (SAY-ON-PAY)

What are you voting on?In accordance with Section 14A of the Audit Committee receivesExchange Act, we are asking stockholders to vote on an annual retaineradvisory basis to approve the compensation paid to our Named Executives, as disclosed in this proxy statement.

RESOLUTION STOCKHOLDERS ARE BEING ASKED TO APPROVE

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of $15,000. The Chair of the Compensation Committee receives an annual retainer of $10,000. The Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an annual retainer of $5,000. All non-employee Directors, receive $1,500 for attendance at each meeting of a committee of the Board of Directors, other than telephonic meetings that are held for 30 minutes or less, for which no attendance fee is paid.

Directors were previously eligible to participate in our: (1) Amended and Restated 1999 Incentive Compensation Plan, which we refer to as the 1999 Incentive Plan; and (2) Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, which we refer to as the Director Plan. During 2009, the 1999 Incentive Plan and the Director Plan were succeeded by the Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan, which we refer to asapprove, on an advisory basis, the 2009 Incentive Plan. Awards granted under the previous plans are still valid, however no additional awards may be granted from the 1999 Incentive Plan and the Director Plan. All Directors are currently eligible to participate in our 2009 Incentive Plan.

Each newly elected non-employee Director receives a deferred stock unit grant under the 2009 Incentive Plan equal in value to $160,000 as measured by the closing pricecompensation of the Company’s Class A Common Stock (rounded down to the nearest whole share) on the date of grant. The date of grant is the date of election to the Board unless otherwise specified by the Board or a Committee thereof. The shares underlying such stock unit grant are issued upon the Director’s termination of service in accordance with the 2009 Incentive Plan.

During 2013, the Directors were granted options to purchase shares of Class A Common Stock and restricted stock units with respect to shares of Class A Common Stock under the 2009 Incentive Plan. Each of the options granted under the 2009 Incentive Plan vests ratably, fifty percent per year on the anniversary of such grant in 2014 and 2015, and has an exercise price equal to the fair market value per share of Class A Common Stock on the grant date or the closing price on the last trading day if granted on a weekend or holiday, and a maximum term of seven years measured from such date. The Directors will have a limited period in which to exercise their vested options following cessation of Board service.

Each of the restricted stock units granted to the Directors under the 2009 Incentive Plan during 2013 vests ratably one-third per year on the anniversary of such grant in 2014, 2015 and 2016. The non-employee Directors had the opportunity to defer settlement of these restricted stock units. Messrs. Howe and Weissman elected to defer such settlement until the first to occur of (i) a change in control of the Company, (ii) the Director’s death or permanent disability or (iii) the July 1 immediately following his separation from service from the Company. Ms. Breakiron-Evans and Messrs. Wendell and Klein elected to defer such settlement until the first to occur of: (i) a change in control of the Company, (ii) the Director’s death or disability or (iii) (a) with respect to one-third of the Director’s restricted stock units (rounded down to the nearest whole share), the July 1 immediately following his or her separation from service from the Company and (b) with respect to one-third of his or her restricted stock units (rounded down to the nearest whole share), the second July 1 immediately following his or her separation from service from the Company and (c) with respect to the remainder of his or her restricted stock units, the third July 1 following his or her separation from service from the Company. Messrs. Patsalos-Fox, Fox and Mackay, Jr. did not elect to defer the settlement of their restricted stock units.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation11


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table shows the option and restricted stock unit grants made to the Directors in 2013:

Director  

Number of Shares
Underlying

Options Granted

  Number of Shares
Underlying
Restricted Stock
Units Granted
  Grant Date  

Exercise Price

Per Share for

Options

Maureen Breakiron-Evans  11,560  3,084  June 4, 2013  $32.41
John N. Fox, Jr.  11,560  3,084  June 4, 2013  $32.41
Robert W. Howe  11,560  3,084  June 4, 2013  $32.41
John E. Klein  11,560  3,084  June 4, 2013  $32.41
Leo S. Mackay, Jr.  11,560  3,084  June 4, 2013  $32.41
Lakshmi Narayanan  11,560  3,084  June 4, 2013  $32.41
Michael Patsalos-Fox  11,560  3,084  June 4, 2013  $32.41
Robert E. Weissman  11,560  3,084  June 4, 2013  $32.41
Thomas M. Wendel  11,560  3,084  June 4, 2013  $32.41

2013 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation of each of our Directors for the 2013 fiscal year.

Name  

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

($) 1

  

Stock Awards

($) 2

   

Option Awards

($) 3

  

Total

($)

Maureen Breakiron-Evans   68,500    99,952    99,994  268,446
John N. Fox, Jr.   47,500    99,952    99,994  247,446
Robert W. Howe5   40,000    99,952    99,994  239.946
John E. Klein   169,500    99,952    99,994  369,446
Leo S. Mackay, Jr.   52,000    99,952    99,994  251,946
Lakshmi Narayanan   100,000 4   99,952    99,994  299,946
Michael Patsalos-Fox   43,000    99,952    99,994  242,946
Robert E. Weissman   52,500    99,952    99,994  252,446
Thomas M. Wendel   53,500    99,952    99,994  253,446

1

Consists of amounts described under “Director Compensation.”

2

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock units granted in the 2013 fiscal year under the 2009 Incentive Plan, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of each restricted stock award was $32.41. The reported dollar amounts do not take into account any estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. For information regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards, see Note 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

3

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value for stock options granted in the 2013 fiscal year under the 2009 Incentive Plan, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of each stock option was $8.65. The reported dollar amounts do not take into account any estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. For information regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards, see Note 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

4

Represents the amount that Mr. Narayanan receives as salary as an employee of the Company and in lieu of any retainers or attendance fees that Mr. Narayanan would otherwise be entitled to as a member of the Board.

5

Mr. Howe died in 2014.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation12


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the aggregate number of stock awards and the aggregate number of stock options held by each of our Directors at December 31, 2013.

Name  

Aggregate

Number of
Stock Awards

(#) 1

   

Aggregate

Number of
Stock Options

(#)

 

Maureen Breakiron-Evans

   14,834     91.560  

John N. Fox, Jr.

   3,084     116,360  

Robert W. Howe2

   3,084     51,560  

John E. Klein

   3,084     61,560  

Leo S. Mackay, Jr.

   7,590     31,560  

Lakshmi Narayanan

   3,084     21,560  

Michael Patsalos-Fox

   8,662     31,560  

Robert E. Weissman

   3,084     71,560  

Thomas M. Wendel

   3,084     71,560  

1

Includes the restricted stock units granted in 2013, with respect to which the settlement has been delayed for some directors, as described above. For Ms. Breakiron-Evans, Mr. Mackay, Jr. and Mr. Patsalos-Fox, also includes 11,750, 4,506 and 5,578 deferred stock units, respectively, to be settled upon the Director’s termination of service on our Board.

2

Mr. Howe forfeited all his stock awards and his 21,560 unvested stock options upon his death in 2014.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation13


PROPOSALS TO BE VOTED ON — PROPOSAL 1

Election of Directors

At the Annual Meeting, two (2) Class II Directors are to be elected to hold office until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2015, or until their successors shall have been duly elected and qualified, subject to such director’s prior death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office.

We currently have nine (9) Directors, following the death of director Robert W. Howe in February 2014. A majority of the votes cast is required for the election of directors at the Annual Meeting. A majority of the votes cast means that the number of votes cast “for” a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

In accordance with our By-laws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board will nominate for election or re-election as a Director only candidates who agree to tender, promptly following their failure to receive the required vote for election or re-election at the next meeting at which they would face election or re-election, an irrevocable resignation that will be effective upon acceptance by the Board. In addition, the Board will fill Director vacancies and new directorships only with candidates who agree to tender the same form of resignation, promptly following their appointment to the Board.

If an incumbent Director fails to receive the required vote for re-election, then, within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will act to determine whether to accept the Director’s resignation and will submit the recommendation for prompt consideration by the Board, and the Board will act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation.

Thereafter, the Board will promptly disclose its decision-making process and decision regarding whether to accept the Director’s resignation offer (or the reason(s) for rejecting the resignation offer, if applicable) in a Form 8-K furnished to the SEC.

Any Director who tenders his or her resignationnamed executive officers, disclosed pursuant to this provisionItem 402 of our Corporate Governance Guidelines may not participateRegulation S-K in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommendation or Board action regarding whether to accept the resignation offer. If each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee fails to receive the required vote in favor of his or her election in the same election, then those independent Directors who did receive the required vote will appoint a committee amongst themselves to consider the resignation offers and recommend to the Board whether to accept them. However, if the only Directors who did not receive the required vote in the same election constitute three or fewer Directors, all Directors may participate in the action regarding whether to accept the resignation offers.

As set forth in our Certificate of Incorporation, the terms of office of the members of the Board of Directors are currently divided into three classes, which division will terminate atCompany’s definitive proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Our Certificate of Incorporation further provides that each director elected at or after the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will serve for a term expiring at the first annual meeting of stockholders held after such director’s election, subject to such director’s prior death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office.

The current class composition is as follows: Class I, whose term will expire at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; Class II, whose term currently expires at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and whose new term will expire at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; and Class III, whose term will expire at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and whose subsequent term will expire at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The current Class I Directors are Maureen Breakiron-Evans, John E. Klein, and Lakshmi Narayanan; the current Class II Directors are Michael Patsalos-Fox and Robert E. Weissman; and the current Class III Directors are Francisco D’Souza, John N. Fox, Jr., Leo S. Mackay, Jr. and Thomas M. Wendel.

There are no family relationships among any of our executive officers, directors and key employees.

If you submit a proxy but do not indicate any voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares of Class A Common Stock represented thereby for the election as directors of the persons whose names and biographies appear below. All of the persons whose names and biographies appear below are currently serving as our directors. In the event any of the nominees should become unavailable or unable to serve as a director, it is intended that votes will be cast for a substitute

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation14


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

nominee designated by the Board of Directors or the Board may elect to reduce its size. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that the nominees named will be unable to serve if elected. Each of the nominees has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected.

VOTE REQUIRED

A director nominee will be elected to the Board of Directors if the votes cast “for” the nominee exceed the votes cast “against” the nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

LOGO  The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the election of the Class II Director nominees.

NOMINEES FOR CLASS II DIRECTORS (TERMS TO EXPIRE AT THE 2015 ANNUAL MEETING)

The current members of the Board of Directors who are also nominees for election to the Board of Directors as Class II Directors are as follows:

Name Age    Served as a
Director Since
    Current Positions with Cognizant

Michael Patsalos-Fox

   61     2012    Director

Robert E. Weissman

   73     2001    Director

The principal occupations and business experience, for at least the past five years, of each Class II Nominee for election at the 2014 Annual Meeting are as follows:

LOGO

MICHAEL PATSALOS-FOX

 

  

Age 61

 

Michael Patsalos-Fox was appointed to the Board of Directors in July 2012. Mr. Patsalos-Fox currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of Stroz Friedberg, a global investigation and cyber security firm, effective November 2013. Mr. Patsalos-Fox was a Senior Partner at McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm (“McKinsey”), until October 2013. Mr. Patsalos-Fox served as a member of McKinsey’s operating committee and was a leader of McKinsey’s new business growth opportunities around data, analytics, and software through June 30, 2012. Mr. Patsalos-Fox held various other positions with McKinsey since 1981, including Managing Partner of the New York and New Jersey offices. He also served on McKinsey’s board of directors from 1998 through 2010. From 2003 through 2009, Mr. Patsalos-Fox also served as Chairman, the Americas, for McKinsey. Mr. Patsalos-Fox received a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Sydney and a Master of Business Administration degree from the International Institute for Management Development in Lausanne, Switzerland.

 

  

LOGOLOGO

  

ROBERT E. WEISSMAN

Age 73

 

Robert E. Weissman was elected to the Board of Directors in May 2001. Mr. Weissman retired in January 2001 after nearly thirty years serving as Chief Executive Officer for several public corporations. Most recently, Mr. Weissman was Chairman of the Board of Directors of IMS Health, a provider of information to the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries. He served as both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IMS Health until March 1999. Prior to his position with IMS Health, Mr. Weissman was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cognizant Corporation and prior to that, was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation. Prior to his election as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation in 1995, he held the position of President and Chief Operating Officer of that company from 1985. Mr. Weissman joined The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation in May 1979, when The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation acquired National CSS, a computer time-sharing company, of which he was President and Chief Executive Officer. Since his

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation15


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

retirement, Mr. Weissman has been active as Chairman of Shelburne Investments, a private investment company that works with emerging companies in the United States and Europe. Mr. Weissman is a director of Information Services Group Inc. and previously served as a director of State Street Corporation and Pitney Bowes, Inc. Mr. Weissman was previously a member of the Advisory Board for Affinnova, Inc., a privately held market research firm. Mr. Weissman graduated from Babson College in 1964. He serves on Babson’s Board of Trustees, and received an honorary Doctor of Laws degree from Babson in 1995.

CONTINUING MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS:

CLASS I DIRECTORS (TERMS TO EXPIRE AT THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING)

The current members of the Board of Directors who are Class I Directors are as follows:

Name Age    Served as a
Director Since
    Positions with Cognizant

Maureen Breakiron-Evans

 59    2009    Director

John E. Klein

 72    1998    Chairman of the Board and Director

Lakshmi Narayanan

 61    2003    Vice Chairman and Director

The principal occupations and business experience, for at least the past five years, of each Class I Director are as follows:

LOGO

MAUREEN BREAKIRON-EVANS

Age 59

Maureen Breakiron-Evans was elected to the Board of Directors in May 2009. Ms. Breakiron-Evans served as Chief Financial Officer of Towers Perrin from January 2007 to April 2008, where she was the head of Financial Resources and responsible for the firm’s financial strategy. From February 2005 to October 2006, Ms. Breakiron-Evans served as Vice President and General Auditor of CIGNA Corporation where she was responsible for managing the enterprise risk management and internal audit functions. From 2001 to 2004, Ms. Breakiron-Evans served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Inovant, LLC, which is VISA’s captive technology development and transaction processing company. Prior to that, Ms. Breakiron-Evans held several positions at Transamerica Corporation, a provider of insurance, investments, and retirement products and services, in San Francisco, including Vice President and General Auditor, Vice President of Control and Services and President of Transamerica Business Technologies Corp. Ms. Breakiron-Evans began her career as a financial auditor, ultimately serving as an Audit Partner with Arthur Andersen & Co. On November 29, 2012, Ms. Breakiron-Evans was appointed to the board of directors of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc, a provider of payment processing services. On January 1, 2011, Ms. Breakiron-Evans began serving a four-year term as a director of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, a private government sponsored-enterprise. Ms. Breakiron-Evans previously served as a director of ING Direct, an Internet bank, from November 2005 until March 2007. Ms. Breakiron-Evans is a member of the Board of Trustees of Stetson University. Ms. Breakiron-Evans received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Stetson University, a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard Business School and a Master of Liberal Arts degree from Stanford University. She is also a Certified Public Accountant in the State of California.

LOGO

JOHN E. KLEIN

Age 72

John E. Klein was elected to the Board of Directors in March 1998 and elected to serve as our Chairman of the Board in December 2003. Mr. Klein currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of Polarex, Inc., an organization providing executive support to software and services companies, where he has been employed since 1994. Prior to that, Mr. Klein held various positions at various companies, including President and Chief Executive Officer of MDIS Group PLC, a UK listed software and services company. In addition, Mr. Klein also served as Chairman of Glovia International and PRO IV Limited, two enterprise software and services companies. Prior to 1995, Mr. Klein was a Vice President at both Digital Equipment Corporation and IBM. Mr. Klein holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy and a Master of Business Administration degree from New York University.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation16


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

LOGO

LAKSHMI NARAYANAN

Age 61

Lakshmi Narayanan was appointed Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, effective January 1, 2007. Mr. Narayanan served as our Chief Executive Officer from December 2003 through December 2006 and as our President from March 1998 through December 2006. Mr. Narayanan joined our Indian subsidiary as Chief Technology Officer in 1994 and was elected President of such subsidiary on January 1, 1996. Prior to joining us, from 1975 to 1994, Mr. Narayanan was the regional head of Tata Consultancy Services, a large consulting and software services company located in India. Mr. Narayanan serves on the board of directors and as the Chairman of the Governance Committee of TVS Capital Funds Limited. Mr. Narayanan is the Chairman of the Board of ICT Academy of Tamil Nadu, a not-for-profit training and research institution established in a partnership model between the Government of India, IT Industry and the Confederation of Indian Industry. Mr. Narayanan holds a Bachelor of Science degree, a Master of Science degree and a Management degree from the Indian Institute of Science.

CLASS III DIRECTORS (TERMS TO EXPIRE AT THE 2015 ANNUAL MEETING)

The current members of the Board of Directors who are Class III Directors are as follows:

Name Age    Served as a
Director Since
    Positions with Cognizant

Francisco D’Souza

 45    2007    Chief Executive Officer and Director

John N. Fox, Jr.

 71    2007    Director

Leo S. Mackay, Jr.

 52    2012    Director

Thomas M. Wendel

 77    2001    Director

The principal occupations and business experience, for at least the past five years, of each Class III Director are as follows:

LOGO

FRANCISCO D’SOUZA

Age 45

Francisco D’Souza was appointed Chief Executive Officer and became a member of the Board of Directors, effective January 1, 2007. Mr. D’Souza served as our President from January 1, 2007 through February 6, 2012 and as our Chief Operating Officer from December 2003 through December 2006. Prior to that, from November 1999 to December 2003, he served as our Senior Vice President, North American Operations and Business Development. From March 1998 to November 1999, he served as our Vice President, North American Operations and Business Development and as our Director-North American Operations and Business Development from June 1997 to March 1998. From January 1996 to June 1997, Mr. D’Souza was engaged as our consultant. From February 1995 to December 1995, Mr. D’Souza was employed as Product Manager at Pilot Software. Between 1992 and 1995, Mr. D’Souza held various marketing, business development and technology management positions as a Management Associate at The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation. While working at The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation, Mr. D’Souza was part of the team that established the software development and maintenance business conducted by us. Mr. D’Souza serves on the Board of Directors of General Electric Company. Mr. D’Souza serves on the Board of Trustees of Carnegie Mellon University, the Board of Trustees of The New York Hall of Science and the Board of Directors of the U.S.-India Business Council. Mr. D’Souza also is a member of the Business Roundtable. Mr. D’Souza holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of Macau (formerly known as the University of East Asia) and a Master of Business Administration degree from Carnegie Mellon University.

LOGO

JOHN N. FOX, JR.

Age 71

John N. Fox, Jr., was appointed to the Board of Directors in December 2007. Mr. Fox formerly served as Vice Chairman of Deloitte & Touche LLP and Global Director, Strategic Clients for Deloitte Consulting, from 1998 to 2003. Mr. Fox held various other positions with Deloitte Consulting from 1968 to 2003, and in addition to his responsibilities as Vice Chairman and Global Director, he also served on Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu’s board of directors and was a member of the Governance (Executive) Committee from 1998 to 2003. Mr. Fox currently serves as a Trustee for Wabash College and Steppenwolf Theatre

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation17


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Company and has been a member of the board of directors of VASCO Data Security International, Inc. since April 2005. Mr. Fox received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Wabash College and his Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Michigan.

LOGO

LEO S. MACKAY, JR.

Age 52

Leo S. Mackay, Jr. was appointed to the Board of Directors in September 2012. Mr. Mackay is Vice President, Ethics and Sustainability at Lockheed Martin Corporation, a defense contractor engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture and integration of products and services (“Lockheed”). Mr. Mackay also served in various other positions for Lockheed, including Vice President, Corporate Business Development, from 2007 through 2011, in which he was responsible for leading Lockheed’s strategic customer relationship development, and as President, ICGS LLC and Vice President and General Manager, Coast Guard Systems, from 2005 through 2007. From 2003 through 2005, Mr. Mackay served as Chief Operations Officer for ACS State Healthcare LLC. Mr. Mackay received a Bachelor of Science degree from the United States Naval Academy, a Master of Public Policy from Harvard University – John F. Kennedy School of Government, and a Ph.D. in Public Policy from Harvard University.

LOGO

THOMAS M. WENDEL

Age 77

Thomas M. Wendel was elected to the Board of Directors in June 2001. In July 2000, Mr. Wendel retired as the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Bridge Information Systems, a global financial information, transaction services, and network services company. Prior to joining Bridge in 1995, Mr. Wendel was founding President and Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Brokerage Inc., a U.S. government securities brokerage firm. Mr. Wendel previously served in various positions at Paine Webber, Inc., including Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Managing Director. Prior to joining Paine Webber in 1982, Mr. Wendel was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pan American World Airways. Mr. Wendel holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics from Ursinus College, a Master of Arts in Economics from San Jose State College, and a Master in Business Administration from the University of Santa Clara.

DIRECTOR EXPERIENCE, QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES AND SKILLS

We believe that the backgrounds and qualifications of our Directors, considered as a group, should provide a composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities. The Board is composed ofunanimously recommends a diverse group of leaders in their respective fields. Many of the current Directors have leadership experience at major domestic and international companies with operations inside and outside the United States, as well as experience on other companies’ boards, which provides an understanding of different business processes, challenges and strategies. Other Directors have experience as officers or trustees of significant academic, research and philanthropic institutions, which brings unique perspectives to the Board. Further, the Company’s Directors have other experience that makes them valuable members, such as prior public policy or regulatory experience that provides insight into issues faced by companies.

The following highlights the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of our individual Board members that have led the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to conclude that these individuals should continue to serve on our Board:

Maureen Breakiron-Evans

Global business experience as the Chief Financial Officer of Towers Perrin, Executive Vice President of VISA/Inovant, General Auditor of CIGNA Corporation and various executive positions at Transamerica Corporation.

Enterprise Risk Management experience at each of the above named companies.

Audit Partner at Arthur Andersen & Co.

Outside board and audit committee experience as a director of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc.

Outside board and audit committee experience as a director of ING Direct.

Certified Public Accountant.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation18


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Francisco D’Souza

Global business experience in various roles with our Company as well as The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation over the past twenty years.

Over twenty years’ experience in the technology industry.

Outside board experience as a director of General Electric Company.

Member of the Business Roundtable, an association of chief executive officers of leading U.S. companies that develops, recommends and advocates for innovative policy solutions that help expand U.S. economic opportunity.

Experience as a trustee of a charitable organization.

Experience as a university trustee.

John N. Fox, Jr.

Global business experience as Vice Chairman at Deloitte & Touche LLP and Global Director at Deloitte Consulting.

Over thirty-five years’ experience consulting and advising clients on large scale, complex transactions, including strategic initiatives, new business models, reengineered business processes, merger integration and organizational change.

Experience as a college trustee.

Outside board experience as a director of VASCO Data Security International, Inc.

John E. Klein

Over thirty-five years’ experience in the high technology field with global firms such as IBM, Digital Equipment and MDIS.

Global business experience as President and Chief Executive Officer of Polarex, Inc., an organization providing executive support to software and services companies.

Outside board experience as a director of various software and servicing companies.

Leo S. Mackay, Jr.

Global business experience with Lockheed Martin Corporation, ACS State Healthcare, and Bell Helicopter.

Experience with corporate governance, ethics, compliance and sustainability as a Vice President and an elected corporate officer of Lockheed Martin Corporation.

Outside board experience as Chair of the Board of Visitors of the Graduate School of Public Affairs at the University of Maryland, and a director of the Center for a New American Security.

Leadership experience as a former Navy F-14 pilot, a Naval Fighter Weapons School graduate, and a veteran of Operation Earnest Will.

Lakshmi Narayanan

Over thirty years’ experience in the technology field.

Affiliation with a leading software and services organization. Former Chairman of the National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM). Continues to serve on the Past Chairmen’s council on policy matters.

Directed the course of the industry by managing large programs.

Member of the Governments’ Competitiveness Council on manufacturing.

Outside board experience as a director of TVS Capital Funds Limited, U.S. India Business Council (USIBC), a trade and investment promotion council, and certain charitable foundations, including United Way of Chennai, a chapter of United Way Worldwide, and the Cognizant Foundation.

Michael Patsalos-Fox

Over thirty years’ of international business experience at McKinsey & Company.

Leadership experience as a member of McKinsey’s Operating Committee, and previously as head of its Americas region, New York and New Jersey Offices, the North American Corporate Finance and Strategy practice, and the European Telecoms practice.

Experience developing corporate strategies and working with technology companies.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation19


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Robert E. Weissman

Over thirty years’ experience as Chief Executive Officer of several public corporations.

Private equity management experience as Chairman of Shelburne Investments, a private investment company working with emerging companies in the United States and Europe.

Affiliation with leading business and public policy associations (including the Business Roundtable, the Institute of Management Accountants, the Society of Manufacturing Engineers, the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, and the Committee for Economic Development).

Outside board experience as a director of State Street Corporation, Pitney Bowes, Inc. and Information Services Group.

Experience as a college trustee.

Thomas M. Wendel

Global business experience as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Bridge Information Systems.

Founder of Liberty Brokerage, Inc.

Experience as Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Managing Director of Paine Webber, Inc. and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pan American World Airways.

Outside board experience as a director of several public and private companies.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation20


PROPOSAL 2

Approval of First Amendment to 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan

The Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2009 Incentive Plan”) was approved by our stockholders in June 2009. We periodically have granted stock options, restricted stock units and performance-based stock units under the plan. We are submitting the First Amendment to the 2009 Incentive Plan (the “First Amendment”) to our stockholders for approval. All share and share-based numbers and values in this Proposal 2 reflect the Company’s two-for-one stock split that occurred on March 7, 2014.

The substantive changes to the plan effected by the First Amendment are:

increasing the maximum number of shares for which awards may be made to any one employee, consultant or other independent advisor under the plan in any single calendar year from 2,000,000 shares to 2,500,000 shares;

increasing the maximum dollar amount for which awards may be made to any one participant under the plan in any single calendar year from $3,000,000 to $4,000,000;

adding a limit of 50,000 on the maximum number of shares for which awards may be made to any one non-employee member of the Board or the board of directors of our parent or any of our subsidiary companies under the plan in any single calendar year;

expanding the list of performance measures for qualifying awards as performance-based under Section 162(m) of the Code (“Section 162(m)”) to include the following new measures: productivity measures, funds from operations and operating efficiency; and

clarifying that the operating or net income and gross, operating or net profit margin performance criteria may be measured before acquisition related charges or net non-operating foreign currency exchange gains or losses and that the earnings per share performance criterion may be measured either before or after acquisition related charges, net non-operating foreign currency exchange gains or losses, charges for stock-based compensation or any taxes or fringe benefits incurred by the Company (or any parent or subsidiary) in settlement of stock-based awards.

We are asking for increases to the per-person share limits and dollar limitations under the plan and for modifications to the list of performance criteria to create additional flexibility to continue to aid the Company and its subsidiaries in recruiting and retaining service providers and to motivate such individuals to exert their best efforts on behalf of the Company and its subsidiaries by providing incentives through the granting of awards. We expect that we will benefit from the added interests that such individuals will have in the welfare of the Company as a result of their proprietary interest in our success. We believe that equity-based incentives, including incentives that are tied to the performance of the Company, are crucial to recruit and retain employees and other service providers, as well as important means of aligning their interests with those of our stockholders.

We are asking our stockholders to approve the First Amendment in order to satisfy the stockholder approval requirements of Section 162(m). In general, Section 162(m) places a limit on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of the compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer or any of our three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than our Chief Financial Officer) (“covered employees”). Under Section 162(m), compensation paid to such persons in excess of $1,000,000 in a taxable year generally is not deductible by the Company. However, compensation that qualifies as “performance-based” under Section 162(m) does not count against the $1,000,000 deduction limitation. One of the requirements of “performance-based” compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) is that the material terms of the performance goals under which compensation may be paid be disclosed to and approved by our public stockholders every five years. For purposes of Section 162(m), the material terms include (i) the employees eligible to receive compensation, (ii) a description of the business criteria on which the performance goals may be based and (iii) the maximum amount of compensation that can be paid to an employee under the performance goals. Each of these aspects of the 2009 Incentive Plan, as amended by the First Amendment (the amended plan, the “Amended 2009 Incentive Plan”), is discussed below, and stockholder approval of this Proposal 2 and the First Amendment will be deemed to constitute approval of the material terms of the performance goals under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan for purposes of the stockholder approval requirements of Section 162(m). We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders to preserve the ability to grant “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m).

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation21


PROPOSAL 2 — APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2009 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

Stockholder approval of the material terms of the performance goals under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan is only one of several requirements under Section 162(m) that must be satisfied for amounts paid under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan to qualify for the “performance-based” compensation exemption under Section 162(m). Additional requirements are described under “Summary of Federal Income Tax Consequences” starting on page 28 of this proxy statement. In addition, in certain circumstances, we may determine to grant compensation to covered employees that will not qualify as “performance-based” compensation for purposes of Section 162(m), and nothing in this proposal precludes us or the Compensation Committee from making any payment or granting awards that are not intended to qualify for tax deductibility under Section 162(m). Moreover, even if we intend to grant compensation that qualifies as “performance-based” compensation for purposes of Section 162(m), we cannot guarantee that such compensation ultimately will be deductible by us.

If our stockholders do not approve the First Amendment pursuant to this Proposal 2, the First Amendment will not be effective and we will not make any grants pursuant to the terms of the First Amendment, including the revised performance criteria included therein, and no new awards will be granted in excess of the existing individual annual share and dollar limits. The 2009 Incentive Plan (as in effect prior to the First Amendment) will, however, remain in effect and we may continue to grant equity awards under the 2009 Incentive Plan pursuant to its current terms. In addition, all previously granted awards will continue to be subject to the 2009 Incentive Plan.

Summary Description of Amended 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan

The principal terms and provisions of the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan are summarized below. The summary, however, is not intended to be a complete description of all the terms of the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the 2009 Incentive Plan and the First Amendment, which are attached as Exhibits A and B.

Incentive Programs. The Amended 2009 Incentive Plan consists of three separate equity incentive programs: (i) the discretionary grant program, (ii) the stock issuance program, and (iii) the incentive bonus program. The principal features of each program are described below.

Types of Awards. The various types of incentives which may be issued under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan are as follows: (i) stock options and stock appreciation rights under the discretionary grant program, (ii) direct stock issuances, stock bonuses and stock issuances pursuant to restricted stock units and other share-right awards under the stock issuance program, and (iii) cash bonus awards, performance unit awards and dividend equivalent rights awarded under the incentive bonus program.

Administration. The Compensation Committee will have the exclusive authority to administer the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan with respect to awards made to our executive officers and Board members and will also have the authority to make awards to all other eligible individuals. However, our Board of Directors may at any time appoint a secondary committee of one or more Board members to have separate but concurrent authority with the Compensation Committee to make awards under the plan to individuals other than executive officers and Board members. In addition, administration of the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan may, at the Board’s discretion, be vested in a special award committee of one or more executive officers with authority to administer the plan with respect to employees other than executive officers, Board members and members of such special award committee and to make awards to such individuals under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan, subject to such limitations imposed on such committee by the Board.

The term “plan administrator,” as used in this summary, will mean our Compensation Committee and any secondary or special award committee, to the extent each such entity is acting within the scope of its administrative authority under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan.

Eligibility. Officers and employees in our employ or in the employ of our parent or subsidiary companies (whether now existing or subsequently established), as well as members of our Board of Directors or the board of directors of our parent or subsidiary companies (whether now existing or subsequently established) and consultants and other independent advisors of any of the foregoing entities, will be eligible to participate in the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan. As of March 31, 2014, approximately 12,487 persons (including 14 executive officers, seven non-employee Board members, approximately 12,466 other employees and approximately zero consultants or advisors) will be eligible to participate in the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan.

Securities Subject to Amended 2009 Incentive Plan. 48,000,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock were initially reserved for issuance over the term of the 2009 Incentive Plan and, as of March 31, 2014, 22,310,890 of such shares remain available for

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation22


PROPOSAL 2 — APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2009 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

issuance under the 2009 Incentive Plan and will continue to be available under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan. For each share of Class A Common Stock issued without cash consideration pursuant to awards under the stock issuance program or the incentive bonus program, the share reserve under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan will be reduced by 1.55 shares.

Awards made under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan will be subject to the following per-participant limitations in order to provide the plan administrator with the opportunity to structure one or more of those awards as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) and to satisfy other considerations.

For awards to employees, consultants and other independent advisors who provide services to the Company (or any parent or subsidiary) measured in terms of shares of our Class A Common Stock (whether payable in our Class A Common Stock, cash or a combination of both), no participant in the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan may receive awards for more than 2,500,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock in any single calendar year, subject to adjustment for subsequent stock splits, stock dividends and similar transactions.

For awards measured in terms of cash dollars (whether payable in cash, shares of our Class A Common Stock, or both), no participant in the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan may receive awards with an aggregate dollar value in excess of $4,000,000 in any single calendar year, with such limitation to be measured at the time the award is made.

For awards to non-employee members of the Board or the board of directors of any parent or subsidiary measured in terms of shares of our Class A Common Stock (whether payable in our Class A Common Stock, cash or a combination of both), no such director may receive awards for more than 50,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock in any single calendar year, subject to adjustment for subsequent stock splits, stock dividends and similar transactions.

The shares of Class A Common Stock issuable under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan may be drawn from shares of our authorized but unissued Class A Common Stock or from shares of our Class A Common Stock that we acquire, including shares purchased on the open market or in private transactions.

Shares subject to awards under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan which remain unissued upon the expiration or termination of those awards will be available for subsequent grants under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan. Any unvested shares issued under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan that are subsequently forfeited or that we repurchase, at a price not greater than the original issue price paid per share, pursuant to our repurchase rights under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan will be added back to the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan and will accordingly be available for subsequent issuance.

There are no net counting provisions in effect under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan. Accordingly, the following share counting procedures will apply:

Should the exercise price of an option be paid in shares of our Class A Common Stock, then the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan will be reduced by the gross number of shares for which that option is exercised, and not by the net number of new shares issued under the exercised option.

Should shares of Class A Common Stock otherwise issuable under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan be withheld by us in satisfaction of the withholding taxes incurred in connection with the exercise, issuance or vesting of an award, then the number of shares of Class A Common Stock available for issuance under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan will be reduced by the full number of shares issuable pursuant to that award, as calculated prior to any such share withholding.

Upon the exercise of any stock appreciation right granted under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan, the share reserve will be reduced by the gross number of shares as to which such stock appreciation right is exercised, and not by the net number of shares actually issued upon such exercise.

Equity Incentive Programs

Discretionary Grant Program. Under the discretionary grant program, eligible persons may be granted options to purchase shares of our Class A Common Stock or stock appreciation rights tied to the value of our Class A Common Stock. The plan administrator will have complete discretion to determine which eligible individuals are to receive such awards, the time or times when those awards are to be made, the number of shares subject to each such award, the vesting schedule to be in effect for the award, the maximum term for which the award is to remain outstanding and the status of any granted option as either an incentive stock option or a non-statutory option under the federal tax laws. Each granted option will have an exercise price per share determined by the plan administrator, but the exercise price will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the option shares on the grant date. No granted option will have a term in excess of seven years. However, one or

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation23


PROPOSAL 2 — APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2009 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

more options may be structured so that they will be immediately exercisable for any or all of the option shares. The shares acquired under such immediately exercisable options will be subject to repurchase by us, at the lower of the exercise price paid per share or the fair market value per share, if the optionee ceases service prior to vesting in those shares.

Upon cessation of service, the optionee will have a limited period of time in which to exercise his or her outstanding options to the extent exercisable for vested shares. The plan administrator will have complete discretion to extend the period following the optionee’s cessation of service during which his or her outstanding options may be exercised and/or to accelerate the exercisability or vesting of such options in whole or in part. Such discretion may be exercised at any time while the options remain outstanding, whether before or after the optionee’s actual cessation of service.

The Amended 2009 Incentive Plan will allow the issuance of two types of stock appreciation rights under the discretionary grant program:

Tandem stock appreciation rights provide the holders with the right to surrender their options for an appreciation distribution from us in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of the vested shares of our Class A Common Stock subject to the surrendered option over (ii) the aggregate exercise price payable for those shares.

Stand-alone stock appreciation rights allow the holders to exercise those rights as to a specific number of shares of our Class A Common Stock and receive in exchange an appreciation distribution from us in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of the shares of Class A Common Stock as to which those rights are exercised over (ii) the aggregate base price in effect for those shares. The base price per share may not be less than the fair market value per share of our Class A Common Stock on the date the stand-alone stock appreciation right is granted, and the right may not have a term in excess of seven years.

The distribution with respect to any exercised tandem or stand-alone stock appreciation right will be made in shares of our Class A Common Stock or cash. Stock appreciation rights will remain exercisable for a limited period following the holder’s cessation of service, but only to the extent those rights are exercisable at the time of such cessation of service. The plan administrator will have complete discretion to extend the period following the holder’s cessation of service during which his or her outstanding stock appreciation rights may be exercised and/or to accelerate the exercisability or vesting of those stock appreciation rights in whole or in part. Such discretion may be exercised at any time while the stock appreciation right remains outstanding, whether before or after the holder’s actual cessation of service.

Repricing Prohibition. The plan administrator may not implement any of the following repricing programs without obtaining stockholder approval: (i) the cancellation of outstanding options or stock appreciation rights in return for new options or stock appreciation rights with a lower exercise price per share, (ii) the cancellation of outstanding options or stock appreciation rights with exercise prices per share in excess of the then current fair market value per share of our Class A Common Stock for consideration payable in cash or our equity securities or (iii) the direct reduction of the exercise price in effect for outstanding options or stock appreciation rights.

Stock Issuance Program. Shares may be issued under the stock issuance program at a price per share not less than their fair market value, payable in cash or other valid consideration under the Delaware General Corporation Law. Shares may also be issued as a bonus for past services without any cash purchase price required of the recipient. Shares of our Class A Common Stock may also be issued under the program pursuant to share right awards or restricted stock units which entitle the recipients to receive those shares, without payment of any cash purchase price, upon the attainment of designated performance goals or the completion of a prescribed service period or upon the expiration of a designated time period following the vesting of those awards or units, including (without limitation), a deferred distribution date following the termination of the recipient’s service with us.

The plan administrator will have complete discretion to determine which eligible individuals are to receive awards under the stock issuance program, the time or times when those awards are to be made, the number of shares subject to each such award, the applicable performance and/or service vesting provisions, the issuance schedule to be in effect for the shares that vest and become issuable under each such award and the cash consideration (if any) payable per share.

The shares issued may be fully and immediately vested upon issuance or may vest upon the completion of a designated service period or the attainment of pre-established performance goals. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following limitations shall apply with respect to the vesting schedules established for the awards made under the stock issuance program, subject to acceleration in connection with the optionee’s termination of employment under designated circumstances and upon certain changes in control of the company: (i) for any award which is to vest on the basis of service,

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation24


PROPOSAL 2 — APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2009 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

the minimum vesting period shall be three (3) years, with such vesting to occur in one or more installments over that period as determined by the plan administrator, but in no event more favorably than monthly; and (ii) for any such award which is to vest on the basis of performance objectives, the performance period will have a duration of at least one year.

To enable the compensation attributable to one or more awards under the program to qualify as “performance-based” compensation which will not be subject to the $1,000,000 limitation on the income tax deductibility of the compensation paid per executive officer which is imposed under Section 162(m), the plan administrator will also have the discretionary authority to structure one or more of those awards so that the underlying shares of Class A Common Stock will vest only upon the achievement of certain pre-established corporate performance goals based on one or more of the following criteria: (i) revenue or revenue growth, (ii) operating or net income, (iii) operating or net income before acquisition related charges, net non-operating foreign currency exchange gains or losses, and/or charges for stock-based compensation and any taxes or fringe benefits incurred by the Company (or any parent or subsidiary) in settlement of stock-based awards, (iv) operating or net income before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and/or charges for stock-based compensation and any taxes or fringe benefits incurred by the Company (or any parent or subsidiary) in settlement of stock-based awards, (v) gross, operating or net profit margin, (vi) gross, operating or net profit margin before acquisition related charges, net non-operating foreign currency exchange gains or losses, and/or charges for stock-based compensation, and any taxes or fringe benefits incurred by the Company (or any parent or subsidiary) in settlement of stock-based awards, (vii) earnings per share, either before or after acquisition related charges, net non-operating foreign currency exchange gains or losses, and/or charges for stock-based compensation and any taxes or fringe benefits incurred by the Company (or any parent or subsidiary) in settlement of stock-based awards, (viii) return on assets, capital or stockholder equity, (ix) total stockholder return, (x) cash flow, (xi) measures in terms of days sales outstanding or accounts receivable outstanding, (xii) working capital, (xiii) market share, (xiv) increases in customer base, (xv) cost reductions or other expense control objectives, (xvi) market price of the Common Stock, whether measured in absolute terms or in relation to earnings or operating income or in relation to various stock market or industry indices, (xvii) budget objectives, (xviii) working capital, (xix) mergers, acquisitions or divestitures, (xx) measures of customer satisfaction, (xxi) productivity measures, (xxii) funds from operations, (xxiii) operating efficiency or (xxiv) economic value-added models. In addition, such performance goals may be based upon the attainment of specified levels of our performance under one or more of the measures described above relative to the performance of other entities and may also be based on the performance of any of our business units or divisions or any parent or subsidiary. Performance goals may include a minimum threshold level of performance below which no award will be earned, levels of performance at which specified portions of an award will be earned and a maximum level of performance at which an award will be fully earned. In addition, the performance goals may be subject to adjustment for one or more of the following items: (a) asset impairments or write-downs, (b) litigation judgments or verdicts and expenses and settlement costs and expenses, (c) the effect of changes in tax laws or regulations, accounting principles or other applicable laws, regulations or provisions affecting reported results, (d) accruals for reorganization and restructuring programs, (e) any extraordinary nonrecurring items as described in applicable accounting standards and/or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in the Company’s annual report to stockholders for the applicable year, (f) the operations of any business acquired by the Company or any parent or subsidiary or of any joint venture in which the Company or any parent or subsidiary participates, (g) the divestiture of one or business operations or the assets thereof, (h) the costs incurred in connection with such acquisitions or divestitures or (i) non-operating foreign exchange gains or losses.

The plan administrator will have the discretionary authority at any time to accelerate the vesting of any and all shares of restricted stock or other unvested shares outstanding under the stock issuance program. However, no vesting requirements tied to the attainment of performance objectives may be waived with respect to shares which were intended at the time of issuance to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), except in the event of certain involuntary terminations or changes in control or ownership.

Outstanding restricted stock units or other stock-based awards under the stock issuance program will automatically terminate, and no shares of our Class A Common Stock will actually be issued in satisfaction of those units or awards, if the performance goals or service requirements established for such units or awards are not attained. The plan administrator, however, will have the discretionary authority to issue shares of our Class A Common Stock in satisfaction of one or more outstanding restricted stock units or other stock-based right awards as to which the designated performance goals or service

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation25


PROPOSAL 2 — APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2009 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

requirements are not attained. However, no vesting requirements tied to the attainment of performance objectives may be waived with respect to units or awards which were intended at the time of issuance to qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m), except in the event of certain involuntary terminations or changes in control or ownership.

Incentive Bonus Program. Cash bonus awards, performance unit awards and dividend equivalent rights may be awarded under the incentive bonus program. Cash bonus awards will vest over an eligible individual’s designated service period or upon the attainment of pre-established performance goals and may be paid in cash or shares of our Class A Common Stock valued at fair market value on the payment date. Performance unit awards will be subject to the following parameters:

(i) A performance unit will represent a participating interest in a special bonus pool tied to the attainment of pre-established corporate performance objectives based on one or more performance goals described above in the description of the stock issuance program. The amount of the bonus pool may vary with the level at which the applicable performance objectives are attained, and the value of each performance unit which becomes due and payable upon the attained level of performance will be determined by dividing the amount of the resulting bonus pool (if any) by the total number of performance units issued and outstanding at the completion of the applicable performance period.

(ii) Performance units may also be structured to include a service-vesting requirement which the participant must satisfy following the completion of the performance period in order to vest in the performance units awarded with respect to that performance period.

(iii) Performance units which become due and payable following the attainment of the applicable performance objectives and the satisfaction of any applicable service-vesting requirement may be paid in cash or shares of our Class A Common Stock valued at fair market value on the payment date.

Dividend equivalent rights may be issued as stand-alone awards or in tandem with other awards made under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan. Each dividend equivalent right award will represent the right to receive the economic equivalent of each dividend or distribution, whether in cash, securities or other property (other than shares of our Class A Common Stock) which is made per issued and outstanding share of Class A Common Stock during the term the dividend equivalent right remains outstanding. Payment of the amounts attributable to such dividend equivalent rights may be made either concurrently with the actual dividend or distribution made per issued and outstanding share of our Class A Common Stock or may be deferred to a later date. Payment may be made in cash or shares of our Class A Common Stock.

The plan administrator will have complete discretion under the incentive bonus program to determine which eligible individuals are to receive such awards under the program, the time or times when those awards are to be made, the form of each such award, the performance objectives for each such award, the amount payable at one or more designated levels of attained performance, any applicable service vesting requirements, the payout schedule for each such award and the method by which the award is to be settled (cash or shares of our Class A Common Stock).

In order to enable the compensation attributable to one or more awards under the program to qualify as performance-based compensation which will not be subject to the $1,000,000 limitation on the income tax deductibility of the compensation paid per executive officer which is imposed under Section 162(m), the plan administrator will also have the discretionary authority to structure one or more awards so that cash or shares of Class A Common Stock subject to those awards will vest only upon the achievement of certain pre-established corporate performance goals based on one or more of the performance goals described above in the summary of the stock issuance program.

The plan administrator will have the discretionary authority at any time to accelerate the vesting of any and all awards outstanding under the incentive bonus program. However, no vesting requirements tied to the attainment of performance objectives may be waived with respect to awards which were intended at the time of issuance to qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m), except in the event of certain involuntary terminations or changes in control or ownership.

General Provisions

Vesting Acceleration. In the event we should experience a change in control, the following special vesting acceleration provisions will be in effect for outstanding awards under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan:

(i) Each outstanding award under the discretionary grant program or the stock issuance program will automatically accelerate in full upon a change in control, if that award is not assumed or otherwise continued in effect by the successor corporation or replaced with a cash incentive program which preserves the intrinsic value of the award and provides for

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation26


PROPOSAL 2 — APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2009 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

subsequent payout of that value in accordance with the same vesting schedule in effect for that award, unless such acceleration is subject to other limitations imposed by the plan administrator.

(ii) The plan administrator will have complete discretion to grant one or more awards which will vest in the event the individual’s service with us or the successor entity is terminated within a designated period following a change in control transaction in which those awards are assumed or otherwise continued in effect.

(iii) The plan administrator will have the discretion to structure one or more awards so that those awards will immediately vest upon a change in control, whether or not they are to be assumed or otherwise continued in effect.

(iv) Unless the plan administrator establishes a different definition for one or more awards, a change in control will generally be deemed to occur for purposes of the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan in the event (i) there occurs a merger, consolidation or other reorganization approved by our stockholders (unless securities representing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of the voting securities of the successor corporation are immediately thereafter beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the persons who beneficially owned our outstanding voting securities immediately prior to such transaction), (ii) there occurs a sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, (iii) there occurs any transaction or series of related transactions (over a period of 12 months or less) pursuant to which any person or group of related persons becomes directly or indirectly the beneficial owner of securities possessing (or convertible into or exercisable for securities possessing) 35% or more of the total combined voting power of our outstanding securities, or (iv) there is a change in the majority of the Board members over a period of 12 months or less by reason of one or more contested elections for Board membership.

The plan administrator’s authority above extends to any awards intended to qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m), even though the accelerated vesting of those awards may result in their loss of “performance-based” status under Section 162(m).

Changes in Capitalization.In the event any change is made to the outstanding shares of our Class A Common Stock by reason of any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, combination of shares, exchange of shares, spin-off transaction or other change in corporate structure effected without our receipt of consideration or should the value of our outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock be substantially reduced by reason of a spin-off transaction or extraordinary dividend or distribution, equitable adjustments will be made to: (i) the maximum number and/or class of securities issuable under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan; (ii) the maximum number and/or class of securities for which any one person may be granted Class A Common Stock-denominated awards under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan per calendar year; (iii) the number and/or class of securities and the exercise price per share in effect for outstanding awards under the discretionary grant program, (iv) the number and/or class of securities subject to each outstanding award under the stock issuance program and the cash consideration (if any) payable per share, (v) the maximum number and/or class of securities issuable under the plan pursuant to incentive stock options, (vi) the number and/or class of securities subject to the Company’s outstanding repurchase rights under the plan and the repurchase price payable per share (vii) the number and/or class of securities subject to each outstanding award under the incentive bonus program denominated in shares of our Class A Common Stock, and (viii) the number of shares of Class A Common Stock by which the share reserve will be reduced for each share of Class A Common Stock issued without cash consideration pursuant to the stock issuance program. Such adjustments will be made in such manner as the plan administrator deems appropriate in order to preclude any dilution or enlargement of benefits under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan or the outstanding awards thereunder.

Valuation. The fair market value per share of our Class A Common Stock on any relevant date under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan will be deemed to be equal to the closing selling price per share on that date on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. On March 31, 2014, the fair market value per share of our Class A Common Stock determined on such basis was $50.60. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should a different method of fair market value determination be required by applicable law or regulation of the foreign jurisdiction in which an award is to be made under the plan, then the fair market value per share applicable to such award will be determined in accordance with the law or regulations of the foreign jurisdiction in which that award is made.

Stockholder Rights and Transferability. No optionee will have any stockholder rights with respect to the option shares until such optionee has exercised the option and paid the exercise price for the purchased shares. The holder of a stock appreciation right will not have any stockholder rights with respect to the shares subject to that right unless and until such person exercises the right and becomes the holder of record of any shares of our Class A Common Stock distributed upon such exercise. Options are not assignable or transferable other than by will or the laws of inheritance following optionee’s

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation27


PROPOSAL 2 — APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2009 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

death, and during the optionee’s lifetime, the option may only be exercised by the optionee. However, the plan administrator may structure one or more non-statutory options under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan so that those options will be transferable during optionee’s lifetime to a revocable living trust established for the optionee or the optionee and his or her spouse or to the optionee’s former spouse pursuant to a domestic relations order. Stand-alone stock appreciation rights will be subject to the same transferability restrictions applicable to non-statutory options.

A participant will have full stockholder rights with respect to any shares of Class A Common Stock issued to him or her under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan, whether or not his or her interest in those shares is vested. A participant will not have any stockholder rights with respect to the shares of Class A Common Stock subject to a restricted stock unit or performance share award until that award vests and the shares of Class A Common Stock are actually issued thereunder. However, dividend-equivalent units may be paid or credited, either in cash or in actual or phantom shares of Class A Common Stock, on outstanding restricted stock units or performance shares, subject to such terms and conditions as the plan administrator may deem appropriate.

Special Tax Election. The plan administrator may provide one or more holders of awards under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan with the right to have us withhold a portion of the shares otherwise issuable to such individuals in satisfaction of the withholding taxes to which they become subject in connection with the issuance, exercise or settlement of those awards. Alternatively, the plan administrator may allow such individuals to deliver previously acquired shares of our Class A Common Stock in payment of such withholding tax liability.

Amendment and Termination. Our Board of Directors may amend or modify the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan at any time; provided, however, that stockholder approval will be required for any amendment which materially increases the number of shares of Class A Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan (other than in connection with certain changes to our capital structure as explained above), materially increases the benefits accruing to participants, materially expands the class of individuals eligible to participate in the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan, expands the types of awards which may be made under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan or extends the term of the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan or to the extent such stockholder approval may otherwise be required under applicable law or regulation or pursuant to the listing standards of the stock exchange on which our Class A Common Stock is at the time primarily traded. Unless sooner terminated by our Board of Directors, the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan will terminate on the earliest of (i) June 4, 2019, (ii) the date on which all shares available for issuance under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan have been issued as fully-vested shares or (iii) the termination of all outstanding awards in connection with certain changes in control or ownership.

Deferred Compensation. The plan administrator may, in its sole discretion, structure one or more awards under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan so that the participants may be provided with an election to defer the compensation associated with those awards for federal income tax purposes. In addition, to the extent we maintain one or more separate nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements which allow the participants the opportunity to make notional investments of their deferred account balances in shares of Class A Common Stock, the plan administrator may authorize the share reserve under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan to serve as the source of any shares of Class A Common Stock that become payable under those deferred compensation arrangements. In such event, the share reserve under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan shall be reduced on a share-for-one share basis for each share of Class A Common Stock issued under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan in settlement of the deferred compensation owed under those separate arrangements.

New Plan Benefits

Except with respect to grants of stock options that will be awarded to Mr. Narayanan and non-employee directors serving on our board of directors on the date of the Annual Meeting, which are shown in the table below, the number of awards that our named executive officers, directors, other executive officers and other employees may receive under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan will be determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee in the future, and the Compensation Committee has not made any determination to make future grants to any persons under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan as of the date of this proxy statement. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the benefits that will be received in the future by participants in the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan or the benefits that would have been received by such participants if the First Amendment had been in effect in the year ended December 31, 2013.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation28


PROPOSAL 2 — APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2009 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

Amended 2009 Incentive Plan

Name and Position  

Dollar Value of

Shares

Underlying

Options

Granted (#)

   

Dollar

Value of

Shares

Subject to

Stock Awards

($)

 

Francisco D’Souza
Chief Executive Officer

  $0    $0  

Gordon J. Coburn
President

  $0    $0  

Karen McLoughlin
Chief Financial Officer

  $0    $0  

Malcolm Frank
Executive Vice President, Strategy and Marketing

  $0    $0  

Rajeev Mehta
Chief Executive Officer, IT Services

  $0    $0  

All current executive officers as a group (1)

  $100,000    $100,000  

All current non-employee directors as a group (1)

  $700,000    $700,000  

All employees except current executive officers as a group

  $0    $0  

(1)

At the Annual Meeting, Mr. Narayanan and the non-employee members of our Board will each receive a grant of stock options with a modified Black-Scholes value (using the assumptions utilized in preparing the Company’s most recent audited financial statements) as of the date of grant of $100,000 and a grant of restricted stock units with a fair market value as of the date of grant of $100,000 unless such member is not elected at the Annual Meeting. The number of shares subject to such awards will be determined based on the fair market value of our Class A Common Stock on the date of grant and, therefore, is not determinable at this time. Each such option will have an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value per share of our Class A Common Stock on the grant date and a maximum term of seven years measured from the grant date and will vest ratably, 50% per year on each of the first two anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to the director’s continued service on the Board through each applicable vesting date. Each such restricted stock unit award will vest ratably, one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to the director’s continuous service on the Board through each applicable vesting date.

Summary of Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a summary of the Federal income taxation treatment applicable to us and the participants who receive awards under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan. This summary describes basic tax rules and is not intended as, and should not be relied upon, as tax guidance for participants in the plan. It does not describe the implications, if any, of a number of special tax rules, such as the alternative minimum tax, and foreign, state and local tax laws. Changes to the tax laws could alter the tax consequences described below.

Option Grants. Options granted under the discretionary grant program may be either incentive stock options which satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Code or non-statutory options which are not intended to meet such requirements. The Federal income tax treatment for the two types of options differs as follows:

Incentive Options. No taxable income is recognized by the optionee at the time of the option grant, and no taxable income is recognized for regular tax purposes at the time the option is exercised, although taxable income may arise at that time for alternative minimum tax purposes. The optionee will recognize taxable income in the year in which the purchased shares are sold or otherwise made the subject of certain other dispositions. For Federal tax purposes, dispositions are divided into two categories: (i) qualifying and (ii) disqualifying. A qualifying disposition occurs if the sale or other disposition is made more than two (2) years after the date the option for the shares involved in such sale or disposition is granted and more than one (1) year after the date the option is exercised for those shares. If the sale or disposition occurs before these two periods are satisfied, then a disqualifying disposition will result.

Upon a qualifying disposition, the optionee will recognize long-term capital gain in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the amount realized upon the sale or other disposition of the purchased shares over (ii) the exercise price paid for the shares. If there is a disqualifying disposition of the shares, then the excess of (i) the fair market value of those shares on the exercise date or (if less) the amount realized upon such sale or disposition over (ii) the exercise price paid for the shares will be taxable as ordinary income to the optionee. Any additional gain recognized upon the disposition will be a capital gain.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation29


PROPOSAL 2 — APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2009 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

If the optionee makes a disqualifying disposition of the purchased shares, then we will be entitled to an income tax deduction, for the taxable year in which such disposition occurs, equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the optionee as a result of the disposition. We will not be entitled to any income tax deduction if the optionee makes a qualifying disposition of the shares.

Non-Statutory Options. No taxable income is recognized by an optionee upon the grant of a non-statutory option. The optionee will in general recognize ordinary income, in the year in which the option is exercised, equal to the excess of the fair market value of the purchased shares on the exercise date over the exercise price paid for the shares, and we will be required to collect the withholding taxes applicable to such income from the optionee.

If the shares acquired upon exercise of the non-statutory option are unvested and subject to repurchase by us in the event of the optionee’s termination of service prior to vesting in those shares, then the optionee will not recognize any taxable income at the time of exercise but will have to report as ordinary income, as and when our repurchase right lapses, an amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of the shares on the date the repurchase right lapses over (ii) the exercise price paid for the shares. The optionee may, however, elect under Section 83(b) of the Code no later than 30 days after receipt of the shares to include as ordinary income in the year of exercise of the option an amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of the purchased shares on the exercise date over (ii) the exercise price paid for such shares. If the Section 83(b) election is made, the optionee will not recognize any additional income as and when the repurchase right lapses.

We will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the optionee with respect to the exercised non-statutory option. The deduction will in general be allowed for our taxable year in which such ordinary income is recognized by the optionee.

Stock Appreciation Rights. No taxable income is recognized upon receipt of a stock appreciation right. The holder will recognize ordinary income in the year in which the stock appreciation right is exercised, in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the underlying shares of Class A Common Stock on the exercise date over the base price in effect for the exercised right, and we will be required to collect the withholding taxes applicable to such income from the holder.

We will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the holder in connection with the exercise of the stock appreciation right. The deduction will be allowed for the taxable year in which such ordinary income is recognized.

Direct Stock Issuances. The tax principles applicable to direct stock issuances under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan will be substantially the same as those summarized above for the exercise of non-statutory option grants.

Restricted Stock Units. No taxable income is recognized upon receipt of a restricted stock unit. The holder will recognize ordinary income in the year in which the shares subject to that unit are actually issued to the holder. The amount of that income will be equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance, and we will be required to collect the withholding taxes applicable to such income from the holder.

We will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the holder at the time the shares are issued. The deduction will be allowed for the taxable year in which such ordinary income is recognized.

Cash Awards. The payment of a cash award will result in the recipient’s recognition of ordinary income equal to the dollar amount received. The recipient will be required to satisfy the tax withholding requirements applicable to such income. We will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the holder at the time the cash award is paid. The deduction will be allowed for the taxable year in which such ordinary income is recognized.

Performance Units. No taxable income is recognized upon receipt of performance units. The holder will recognize ordinary income in the year in which the performance units are settled. The amount of that income will be equal to the fair market value of the shares of Class A Common Stock or cash received in settlement of the performance units, and the holder will be required to satisfy the tax withholding requirements applicable to such income. We will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of the ordinary income recognized by the holder of the performance units at the time those units are settled. That deduction will be allowed for the taxable year in which such ordinary income is recognized.

Dividend Equivalent Rights. No taxable income is recognized upon receipt of a dividend equivalent right award. The holder will recognize ordinary income in the year in which a dividend or distribution, whether in cash, securities or other property, is paid to the holder. The amount of that income will be equal to the fair market value of the cash, securities or other property received, and the holder will be required to satisfy the tax withholding requirements applicable to such income. We will be

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation30


PROPOSAL 2 — APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2009 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

entitled to an income tax deduction equal to the amount of the ordinary income recognized by the holder of the dividend equivalent right award at the time the dividend or distribution is paid to such holder. That deduction will be allowed for the taxable year in which such ordinary income is recognized.

Section 162(m). As described above, Section 162(m) denies a deduction to any publicly held corporation for compensation paid to “covered employees” in a taxable year to the extent that compensation to such covered employee exceeds $1,000,000. It is possible that compensation attributable to awards under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan, when combined with all other types of compensation received by a covered employee from us, may cause this limitation to be exceeded in any particular year.

As described above, the Section 162(m) deduction limitation does not apply to “performance-based” compensation. In order to qualify for the exemption for “performance-based” compensation, Section 162(m) requires that: (i) the compensation be paid solely on account of the attainment of one or more pre-established objective performance goals, (ii) the performance goals must be established by a compensation committee comprised solely of two or more “outside directors”, (iii) the material terms of the performance goals under which the compensation is to be paid must be disclosed to and approved by the company’s stockholders and (iv) a compensation committee of “outside directors” must certify that the performance goals have indeed been met prior to payment.

Section 162(m) contains a special rule for stock options and stock appreciation rights that provides that stock options and stock appreciation rights will satisfy the “performance-based” compensation exemption if (i) the awards are made by a qualifying compensation committee, (ii) the plan sets forth the maximum number of shares that can be granted to any person within a specified period, and (iii) the compensation is based solely on an increase in the stock price after the grant date.

The Amended 2009 Incentive Plan has been designed to permit the Compensation Committee to grant awards that may qualify as “performance-based” compensation. As described above, if the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan is approved by our stockholders and the other requirements of Section 162(m) are met, the Compensation Committee may, but is not obligated to, grant awards under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan that are intended to constitute “performance based” compensation under Section 162(m).

Section 409A of the Code. Certain types of awards under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan may constitute, or provide for, a deferral of compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code. Unless certain requirements set forth in Section 409A of the Code are complied with, holders of such awards may be taxed earlier than would otherwise be the case (e.g., at the time of vesting instead of the time of payment) and may be subject to an additional 20% penalty tax (and, potentially, certain interest penalties and additional state taxes). To the extent applicable, the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan and awards granted under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan are intended to be structured and interpreted in a manner intended to either comply with or be exempt from Section 409A of the Code and the Department of Treasury regulations and other interpretive guidance that may be issued under Section 409A of the Code.

Certain Other Tax Issues. In the event that the exercisability or vesting of any award granted under the Amended 2009 Incentive Plan is accelerated in connection with a change in control, payments relating to the award (or a portion thereof), either alone or together with certain other payments, may constitute parachute payments under Section 280G of the Code, which excess amounts may be subject to excise taxes and may be nondeductible by us. The 2009 Plan is not qualified under the provisions of Section 401(a) of the Code and is not subject to any of the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

VOTE REQUIRED

The approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD

LOGO  The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of the First Amendment.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation31


PROPOSAL 3

Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay)

BACKGROUND

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, requires that our stockholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory (non-binding) vote on executive compensation at the Annual Meeting, commonly referred to as a “Say-on-Pay” vote.compensation.

The advisory vote on executive compensation is a non-binding vote on the compensation of our “named executive officers,” or “Named Executives”, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation, and the accompanying narrative disclosure, set forth in this proxy statement. Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section starting on page 43 of this proxy statement for a detailed discussion about our executive compensation programs, including information about the fiscal 2013 compensation of our Named Executives.

The advisory vote on executive compensation is not a vote on our general compensation policies, the compensation of our Board of Directors, or our compensation policies as they relate to risk management.

Vote Required

The approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

Background

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), requires that our stockholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory (non-binding) vote on executive compensation at annual meetings, commonly referred to as a “Say-on-Pay” vote.

The advisory vote on executive compensation is a non-binding vote on the compensation of our Named Executives, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation, and the accompanying narrative disclosure, set forth in this proxy statement. Please read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section starting on page 17 for a detailed discussion about our executive compensation programs and compensation philosophy, including information about the fiscal 2015 compensation of our Named Executives. The advisory vote on executive compensation is not a vote on our general compensation policies, the compensation of the Board, or our compensation policies as they relate to risk management.

The vote solicited by this Proposal No. 2 is advisory, and therefore is not binding on the Company, the Board or the Compensation Committee. The outcome of the vote will not require the Company, the Board or the Compensation Committee to take any action, and will not be construed as overruling any decision by the Company or the Board. Furthermore, because this non-binding, advisory resolution primarily relates to the compensation of our Named Executives that has already been paid or contractually committed, there is generally no opportunity for us to revisit these decisions. However, the Board, including the Compensation Committee, values the opinions of our stockholders and, to the extent there is any significant vote against the executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns and evaluate what actions, if any, may be appropriate to address those concerns.

Frequency of Say-on-Pay Vote

AnnualSay-on-Pay VoteThe Dodd-Frank Act requires that we hold the advisory vote on executive compensation at least once every three years. At the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Company’s stockholders recommended, on an advisory basis, that the stockholder vote on the compensation of our Named Executives occur every year. Accordingly, our next advisory say on paySay-on-Pay vote (following the non-binding advisory vote at this Annual Meeting) is expected to occur at our 20152017 Annual Meeting.

2015 Say-on-Pay Vote

At the 2015 Annual Meeting, approximately 98.4% of the votes cast on the Say-on-Pay proposal were voted “for” the proposal.

COMPENSATION16


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section describes the general objectives, principles and philosophy of the Company’s executive compensation program. This section focuses primarily on the compensation of Stockholders.

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors oversees and administers our executive compensation program, including the evaluation and approval of compensation plans, policies and programs offered to our Named Executives, who are listed below and appear in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table on page 31.

Named Executives. The Compensation Committee has designed the executive compensation program for our Named Executives to meet the following objectives:

Executive
Position

    Francisco D’Souza

  

Ensure executive compensation is aligned with our corporate strategies and business objectives.

Subject a substantial portion of an executive officer’s compensation to achieving both short-term and long-term performance objectives that enhances stockholder value by linking rewards to measurable corporate and individual performance.

Reinforce the importance of meeting and exceeding identifiable and measurable goals through superior awards for superior performance.

Provide total direct compensation that is competitive in markets in which we compete for management talent in order to attract, retain and motivate the best possible executive talent.

Provide an incentive for long-term continued employment with our Company.

Reinforce our desired culture and unique corporate environment by fostering a sense of ownership, urgency and overall entrepreneurial spirit.

We believe our approach to goal setting and setting of targets with payouts at multiple levels of performance results assists in mitigating excessive risk-taking that could harm our value or reward poor judgment by our executives. Several features of our programs reflect sound risk management practices. We believe we have allocated our compensation among base salary and short and long-term compensation target opportunities in such a way as to not encourage excessive risk-taking. In addition, we believe that the mix of equity award instruments used under our long-term incentive program that includes full value awards as well as the multi-year vesting of our equity awards also mitigate risk and properly account for the time horizon of risk. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis section starting on page 43 of this proxy statement provides a more detailed discussion of our executive compensation program and compensation philosophy.

The vote solicited by this Proposal No. 3 is advisory, and therefore is not binding on the Company, our Board of Directors or our Compensation Committee. The outcome of the vote will not require the Company, our Board of Directors or our Compensation Committee to take any action, and will not be construed as overruling any decision by the Company or the Board of Directors.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation32


PROPOSAL 3 — ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (SAY-ON-PAY)

Furthermore, because this non-binding, advisory resolution primarily relates to the compensation of our Named Executives that has already been paid or contractually committed, there is generally no opportunity for us to revisit these decisions. However, our Board of Directors, including our Compensation Committee, values the opinions of our stockholders and, to the extent there is any significant vote against the executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns and evaluate what actions, if any, may be appropriate to address those concerns. At the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 4, 2013, approximately 98.6% of the votes cast on the Say-on-Pay proposal at that meeting were voted in favor of the proposal.

Stockholders will be asked at the Annual Meeting to approve the following resolution pursuant to this Proposal No. 3:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s Named Executives, disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting.

VOTE REQUIRED

The approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD

LOGO  The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of the advisory (non-binding) vote on executive compensation.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation33


PROPOSAL 4

Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our Audit Committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2014. Our Board has directed that this appointment be submitted to our stockholders for ratification. Although ratification of our selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is not required, we value the opinions of our stockholders and believe that stockholder ratification of our selection is a good corporate governance practice.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP also served as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2013. Neither the accounting firm nor any of its members has any direct or indirect financial interest in or any connection with us in any capacity other than as our auditors, providing audit and non-audit related services. One or more representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to attend the Annual Meeting and to have an opportunity to make a statement and be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

In the event that the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is not ratified by the stockholders, the Audit Committee will consider this fact when it selects the independent auditors for 2015. Even if the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is ratified, the Audit Committee retains the discretion to select a different independent auditor at any time if it determines that such a change is in the interests of the Company.

VOTE REQUIRED

This proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions will not be counted and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal. Because brokers have discretionary authority to vote on the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, we do not expect any broker non-votes in connection with this proposal.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

LOGOThe Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation34


Executive Officers

The following table identifies our current executive officers:

Name  Age  Position  In Current
Position Since

Lakshmi Narayanan 1

  61  Vice Chairman and Director  2007

Francisco D’Souza 2

  45  Chief Executive Officer and Director  2007

Gordon J. Coburn 3

  50  President  2012

Karen McLoughlin 4

  49  Chief Financial Officer  2012

Ramakrishnan Chandrasekaran 5

  56  Executive Vice Chairman, Cognizant India  2013

Rajeev Mehta 6

  47  Chief Executive Officer, IT Services  2013

Malcolm Frank 7

  47  Executive Vice President, Strategy and Marketing  2012

Steven Schwartz 8

  46  Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Corporate Affairs Officer  2013

Sridhar Thiruvengadam9

  50  Chief Operating Officer  2013

Ramakrishna Prasad Chintamaneni10

  44  Executive Vice President and President, Banking and Financial Services  2013

Venkat Krishnaswamy11

  60  Executive Vice President and President, Healthcare & Life Sciences  2013

Debashis Chatterjee12

  48  Executive Vice President and President, Technology Solutions  2013

Dharmendra Kumar Sinha13

  51  Executive Vice President and President, Client Services  2013

Sumithra Gomatam14

  46  Executive Vice President and President, Industry Solutions  2013

1

Lakshmi Narayanan was appointed Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, effective January 1, 2007. Mr. Narayanan served as our Chief Executive Officer from December 2003 through December 2006 and as our President from March 1998 through December 2006. Mr. Narayanan joined our Indian subsidiary as Chief Technology Officer in 1994 and was elected President of such subsidiary on January 1, 1996. Prior to joining us, from 1975 to 1994, Mr. Narayanan was the regional head of Tata Consultancy Services, a large consulting and software services company located in India. Mr. Narayanan serves on the board of directors and as the Chairman of the Governance Committee of TVS Capital Funds Limited. Mr. Narayanan is the Chairman of the Board of ICT Academy of Tamil Nadu, a not-for-profit training and research institution established in a partnership model between the Government of India, IT Industry and the Confederation of Indian Industry. Mr. Narayanan holds a Bachelor of Science degree, a Master of Science degree and a Management degree from the Indian Institute of Science.

2

Francisco D’Souza was appointed Chief Executive Officer and became a member of the Board of Directors, effective January 1, 2007. Mr. D’Souza served as our President from January 1, 2007 through February 6, 2012 and as our Chief Operating Officer from December 2003 through December 2006. Prior to that, from November 1999 to December 2003, he served as our Senior Vice President, North American Operations and Business Development. From March 1998 to November 1999, he served as our Vice President, North American Operations and Business Development and as our Director-North American Operations and Business Development from June 1997 to March 1998. From January 1996 to June 1997, Mr. D’Souza was engaged as our consultant. From February 1995 to December 1995, Mr. D’Souza was employed as Product Manager at Pilot Software. Between 1992 and 1995, Mr. D’Souza held various marketing, business development and technology management positions as a Management Associate at The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation. While working at The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation, Mr. D’Souza was part of the team that established the software development and maintenance business conducted by us. Mr. D’Souza serves on the Board of Directors of General Electric Company. Mr. D’Souza serves on the Board of Trustees of Carnegie Mellon University, the Board of Trustees of The New York Hall of Science and the Board of Directors of the U.S.-India Business Council. Mr. D’Souza also is a member of the Business Roundtable. Mr. D’Souza holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of Macau (formerly known as the University of East Asia) and a Master of Business Administration degree from Carnegie Mellon University.

3

Gordon Coburn was appointed President of the company, effective February 6, 2012. From March 1998 until February 6, 2012, Mr. Coburn served as the company’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and from January 2007 until February 6, 2012, Mr. Coburn also held the position of Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Coburn also served as the company’s Executive Vice President from December 2003 through December 2006. From November 1999 to December 2003, he served as our Senior Vice President. He previously was our Vice President from 1996 to November 1999. Mr. Coburn served as Senior Director—Group Finance and Operations for Cognizant Corporation from November 1996 to December 1997. From 1990 to October 1996, Mr. Coburn held key financial positions with The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation. Mr. Coburn serves on the Board of Directors of The Corporate Executive Board Company. He also served on the Board of Directors of ICT Group, Inc. until its acquisition on February 2, 2010. Mr. Coburn holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Wesleyan University and a Master of Business Administration degree from the Amos Tuck School at Dartmouth College, where he serves as a member of its MBA Advisory Board.

4

Karen McLoughlin was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the company, effective February 6, 2012. She previously served as the company’s Senior Vice President of Finance and Enterprise Transformation, a role she held since January 2010. In such role, Ms. McLoughlin was responsible for the company’s worldwide financial planning and analysis, enterprise risk management and enterprise transformation functions, including the facilitation and execution of various internal reengineering and transformation initiatives designed to enable the company’s strategic vision. From August 2008 to January 2010, Ms. McLoughlin served as the company’s Senior Vice President of Finance, responsible for overseeing the Company’s global financial planning and analysis team

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation35


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

and enterprise risk management, and from October 2003 until August 2008, Ms. McLoughlin served as the company’s Vice President of Global Financial Planning and Analysis. Prior to joining Cognizant in October 2003, Ms. McLoughlin held various financial management positions at Spherion Corporation from August 1997 to October 2003 and at Ryder System Inc. from July 1994 to August 1997. Prior to joining Ryder, she spent six years in the South Florida Practice of Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers). Ms. McLoughlin has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Wellesley College and a Master of Business Administration degree from Columbia University.

5

Ramakrishnan Chandrasekaran was appointed Executive Vice Chairman, Cognizant India, effective December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Chandrasekaran focuses on strengthening our strong relationship with industry bodies, driving strategic initiatives that strengthen outreach to the government, and further enhancing our brand equity through public relations in India. From February 2012 to December 2013, Mr. Chandrasekaran served as Group Chief Executive-Technology and Operations. In this role, Mr. Chandrasekaran was responsible for leading our solutions and delivery teams world-wide. From August 2006 to February 2012, he served as our President and Managing Director, Global Delivery, responsible for leading our global delivery organization, spearheading new solutions, and championing process improvements. Mr. Chandrasekaran served as our Executive Vice President and Managing Director from January 2004 through July 2006. Prior to that, from November 1999 to January 2004, he served as our Senior Vice President responsible for Independent Software Vendor relationships, key alliances, capacity growth, process initiatives, business development and offshore delivery. Mr. Chandrasekaran joined us as Assistant Vice President in December 1994, before being promoted to Vice President in January 1997. Prior to joining us, Mr. Chandrasekaran worked with Tata Consultancy Services. Mr. Chandrasekaran holds a Mechanical Engineering degree and Master of Business Administration degree from the Indian Institute of Management.

6

Rajeev Mehta was appointed Chief Executive Officer, IT Services, effective December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Mehta is responsible for market facing activities across the company as well as for delivery across our IT Services business. From February 2012 to December 2013, Mr. Mehta served as Group Chief Executive-Industries and Markets. In this role, Mr. Mehta was responsible for leading our industry vertical and geographic market operations on a global basis. From August 2006 to February 2012, he served as our Chief Operating Officer, Global Client Services, responsible for our sales, business development and client relationship management organizations. Mr. Mehta served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of our Financial Services business segment from June 2005 to August 2006. From November 2001 to June 2005, he served as our Vice President and General Manager of our Financial Services business segment. From January 1998 to November 2001, Mr. Mehta served as our Director of the U.S. Central Region. Mr. Mehta served as our Senior Manager of Business Development from January 1997 to January 1998. Prior to joining Cognizant in 1997, Mr. Mehta was involved in implementing GE Information Services offshore outsourcing program and also held consulting positions at Deloitte & Touche and Andersen Consulting. Mr. Mehta holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Maryland and a Master of Business Administration degree from Carnegie Mellon University.

7

Malcolm Frank was appointed Executive Vice President, Strategy and Marketing, effective February 6, 2012. Mr. Frank served as our Senior Vice President of Strategy and Marketing from August 2005 to February 2012. In both these roles, Mr. Frank’s responsibilities have included, and continue to include, directing all aspects of our corporate marketing function, including strategy and branding, industry and media relations, corporate communications and corporate marketing. From August 2005 until June 2009, Mr. Frank was also responsible for leading our field marketing function. Prior to joining Cognizant in August 2005, Mr. Frank was co-founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of CXO Systems, Inc., an independent software vendor providing dashboard solutions for senior managers, from March 2002 to July 2005. From June 1999 to September 2002, Mr. Frank was the founder, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Nervewire Inc. (“Nervewire”), a management consulting and systems integration firm. Prior to founding Nervewire, Mr. Frank was a co-founder, executive officer, and Senior Vice President at Cambridge Technology Partners, where he ran Worldwide Marketing, Business Development, and several business units, from January 1990 to June 1999. Mr. Frank graduated from Yale University with a degree in Economics.

8

Steven Schwartz was appointed Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Corporate Affairs Officer on December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Schwartz is responsible for our global legal teams, our global government affairs efforts and our global security team. From July 2007 to December 2013, Mr. Schwartz served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, having global responsibility for managing Cognizant’s legal function. Mr. Schwartz, who joined Cognizant in 2001, previously served as Vice President and General Counsel, a position he held from March 2003 to July 2007. From April 2002 to March 2003, he served as our Vice President and Chief Corporate Counsel. From October 2001 to December 2002, he served as our Chief Corporate Counsel. Mr. Schwartz serves on the board of directors of Information Technology Industry Council and Citizen Schools. Mr. Schwartz holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of Miami, a Juris Doctor degree from Fordham University School of Law and a Master of Law (in Taxation) degree from the New York University School of Law.

9

Sridhar Thiruvengadam was appointed Chief Operating Officer of the company, effective May 8, 2013. Previously, from January 2012 to May 2013, Mr. Thiruvengadam served as an Executive Vice President of the company, leading the global delivery operations for several of the company’s industry verticals, and head of the company’s Business Process Services (“BPS”) practice. From January 2010 to January 2012, Mr. Thiruvengadam served as a Senior Vice President and global head of BPS, infrastructure and testing services. From April 2007 to January 2010, Mr. Thiruvengadam served as the company’s Chief People Officer in charge of talent acquisition, management, training and staffing. From March 2001 to March 2007, Mr. Thiruvengadam held several positions in the company’s banking, financial services, healthcare and insurance practices, including Vice President and head of the company’s insurance industry vertical. Mr. Thiruvengadam joined the company as a project manager in November 1994. Mr. Thiruvengadam holds a M.Tech degree from the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras.

10

Ramakrishna Prasad Chintamaneni was appointed Executive Vice President and President, Banking and Financial Services, effective December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Chintamaneni is responsible for leading Banking and Financial Services. From 2011 to December 2013, Mr. Chintamaneni served as our Global Head of Banking and Financial Practice and was responsible for the practice’s sales, business development, consulting, client relationships, management and delivery, and global profit and loss. Previously, from 2010 to 2011, Mr. Chintamaneni served as our Global Head of Markets for the Banking and Financial Services Practice. From 2006 to 2009, he served as our Head of Banking and Financial Practice for North America. From 1999 through 2006, Mr. Chintamaneni served as our Client Partner, managing the relationships with several of our key Banking and Financial Services clients, and also led our U.S. Eastern Region’s Banking and Financial Services Practice. Prior to joining Cognizant in 1999, Mr. Chintamaneni spent seven years in the investment banking and financial services industry, including working at Merrill Lynch and its affiliates for five years as an Investment Banker and a member of Merrill’s business strategy committee in India. Mr. Chintamaneni serves on the Board of Directors of NPower, a nonprofit that helps nonprofits, schools and individuals build technology skills by harnessing the power of the technology community. Mr. Chintamaneni obtained his Bachelor of Technology degree in Chemical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur and a Postgraduate Diploma in Business Management from XLRI School of Management in India.

11

Venkat Krishnaswamy was appointed President, Healthcare & Life Sciences, effective December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Krishnaswamy is focused on delivering solutions and services to the healthcare industry. From February 2012 to December 2013, Mr. Krishnaswamy served as Executive Vice President of Healthcare and Life Sciences. From April 2007 to February 2012, Mr. Krishnaswamy served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of Healthcare and Life Sciences. Mr. Krishnaswamy served as Vice President - Projects from January 2003 to April 2007 and as Director of Projects from April 1999 to January 2003. Upon joining Cognizant in 1997, Mr. Krishnaswamy served as Senior Manager until April 1999. Between 1997 and 2003, Mr. Krishnaswamy served in our Banking & Financial

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation36


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Services Practice. Prior to joining Cognizant in 1997, Mr. Krishnaswamy spent over ten years in retail and commercial banking with Colonial State Bank (now Commonwealth Bank of Australia). Mr. Krishnaswamy holds a Bachelor of Engineering degree from the University of Madras and a Masters degree in Electrical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology New Delhi.

12

Debashis Chatterjee was appointed Executive Vice President and President, Technology Solutions, effective December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Chatterjee has responsibility for all of our horizontal practices within IT Services and is responsible for implementing best practices in service delivery and creating solutions across our horizontal practices. From May 2013 until his current appointment, Mr. Chatterjee served as Senior Vice President and Global Head, Technology and Information Services. From March 2012 to April 2013, he was Senior Vice President, Transformational Services. Previously, from April 2011 to January 2012, Mr. Chatterjee served as Vice President and Sectors Leader, Global Business Services, Global Delivery at IBM, a multinational technology and consulting company. From January 2010 to March 2011, Mr. Chatterjee was Senior Vice President and Global Head of Cognizant’s Banking and Financial Services practice (BFS), from April 2007 to December 2009, he was Senior Vice President and Global Delivery Head of BFS, and from April 2004 to March 2007, he was Vice President and Global Delivery Head of BFS. Prior to that, Mr. Chatterjee held various key management roles at Cognizant since joining us in 1996. Mr. Chatterjee has a Bachelor of Engineering in Mechanical Engineering from Jadavpur University in India.

13

Dharmendra Kumar Sinha was appointed Executive Vice President and President, Client Services, effective December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Sinha leads our global sales, field marketing and intermediary relations teams. He is also responsible for our strategic partnerships and alliances organization. From 2007 to December 2013, Mr. Sinha served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Global Sales and Field Marketing. From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Sinha served as our Vice President, responsible for our Manufacturing, Logistics, Retail, Hospitality, and Technology verticals. In addition, he assumed the role of Head of Sales and managed our Field Marketing function. From January 2008 to December 2008, Mr. Sinha additionally managed the Insurance business unit. Prior to that, from 1998 to 2004, Mr. Sinha served as Director and subsequently as Vice President of the U.S. Western Region. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Sinha served in various operational and business development positions. Prior to joining Cognizant in 1997, Mr. Sinha worked with Tata Consultancy Services and CMC Limited, anend-to-end IT solutions provider. Mr. Sinha has a Bachelor of Science Degree from Patna Science college, Patna and a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra.

14

Sumithra Gomatam was appointed Executive Vice President and President, Industry Solutions, effective December 04, 2013. In this role, Ms. Gomatam oversees global delivery for all of our industry verticals and is responsible for implementing best practices in services delivery and for creating solutions across our industry practices. Ms. Gomatam also leads our Communications and High Technology business units. From July 2008 to December 2013, Ms. Gomatam served as Senior Vice President, Projects. In this role, Ms. Gomatam served initially as our Global Delivery Head and then as Global Practice Leader for our testing practice. From March 2006 to July 2008, Ms. Gomatam served as Vice President, Projects, leading global delivery and building out the testing practice. From 2001 to March 2006, Ms. Gomatam served as an Account Relationship Manager and as part of our Core Delivery Leadership Team in our banking and financial services practices. From 1995, when Ms. Gomatam joined us, until 2001, she held various key positions within The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation and Cognizant, including serving our banking and financial services clients on application development and application maintenance projects. Ms. Gomatam received her B.E. in Electronics and Communication from Anna University.

None of our executive officers is related to any other executive officer or to any of our Directors. Our executive officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation37


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

CLASS A COMMON STOCK

The following tables set forth certain information with respect to holdings of each class of our Class A Common Stock by (i) stockholders who beneficially owned more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our Class A Common Stock as of December 31, 2013 and (ii) each of our Directors (which includes all nominees), each of our Named Executive Officers, and all Directors and executive officers as a group, as of March 31, 2014. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for the individuals below is our address. Except as otherwise noted below, none of the shares reported as beneficially owned are currently pledged as security for any outstanding loan or indebtedness.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF 5% STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth the persons who, to our knowledge, beneficially owned as of December 31, 2013, more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our Class A Common Stock. This information is based upon information furnished to us by each such person and/or based upon public filings with the SEC. All share numbers in the following table reflect the Company’s two-for-one stock split that occurred on March 7, 2014.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner  

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

   Percent of Class 

BlackRock, Inc. 1

    

40 East 52nd Street

    

New York, NY 10022

   30,265,224     5.0

FMR LLC 2

    

82 Devonshire Street

    

Boston, Massachusetts 02109

   34,310,632     5.6

1

Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by BlackRock, Inc. on February 4, 2014 for December 31, 2013, disclosing that BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 24,721,112 shares of Class A Common Stock, sole dispositive power over 30,238,004 shares of Class A Common Stock, and shared voting and dispositive power over 27,220 shares of Class A Common Stock. The Schedule 13G reports that beneficial owner subsidiaries of the parent holding company are BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Investment Management, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited, BlackRock Investment Management (Korea) Ltd., BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A., BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd, BlackRock Life Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Australia Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Deutschland AG, BlackRock Fund Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited, BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock International Limited, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A., BlackRock Japan Co Ltd., and BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd.

2

Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by FMR LLC and Edward C. Johnson 3d on February 14, 2014. According to the Schedule 13G/A, FMR LLC and Edward C. Johnson 3d each are the beneficial owners of 34,310,632 shares of our Class A Common Stock. According to the cover pages of the Schedule 13G/A, FMR LLC has sole voting power over 4,549,028 shares of Class A Common Stock and sole dispositive power over 34,310,632 shares of Class A Common Stock, and Edward C. Johnson 3d has sole dispositive power over 34,310,632 shares of Class A Common Stock. FMR LLC’s and Edward C. Johnson 3d’s beneficial ownership includes 24,699,846 shares of Class A Common Stock beneficially owned by Fidelity Management & Research Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR LLC and an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Investment Advisers Act”), 4,752,818 shares of Class A Common Stock beneficially owned by Fidelity SelectCo, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR LLC and an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act, 191,018 shares of Class A Common Stock beneficially owned by Fidelity Management Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR LLC and a bank as defined in Section 3(a)(6) of the Exchange Act, 85,580 shares of Class A Common Stock beneficially owned through Strategic Advisers, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR LLC and an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act, 257,850 shares beneficially owned by Pyramis Global Advisors, LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR LLC and an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act, 943,650 shares of our Class A Common Stock held by Pyramis Global Advisers Trust Company, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR LLC and a bank as defined in Section 3(a)(6) of the Exchange Act, and 3,379,870 shares beneficially owned by FIL Limited, which provides investment advisory and management services to a number of non-U.S. investment companies and certain institutional investors.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation38


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

The following table sets forth the ownership of our Directors (which includes all nominees), each of our Named Executive Officers, and all Directors and executive officers as a group, as of March 31, 2014. This information is based upon information furnished to us by each such person and/or based upon Company records. All share numbers in the following table reflect the Company’s two-for-one stock split that occurred on March 7, 2014.

Name  

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Ownership 1

   Percent of Class 2

Directors (which includes all nominees) and Named Executive Officers:

    

Francisco D’Souza 3

   1,587,062    *

Gordon J. Coburn 4

   229,334    *

Lakshmi Narayanan 5

   284,500    *

Malcolm Frank 6

   3,477    *

Rajeev Mehta 7

   218,051    *

Karen McLoughlin 8

   103,667    *

Maureen Breakiron-Evans 9

   72,000    *

John N. Fox, Jr. 10

   102,800    *

John E. Klein 11

   672,876    *

Leo S. Mackay, Jr. 12

   10,000    *

Michael Patsalos-Fox 13

   10,000    *

Robert E. Weissman 14

   1,023,776    *

Thomas M. Wendel 15

   106,000    *

All Directors and executive officers as a group (21 persons)16

   4,906,120    0.8%

*Less than one percent.

1

Except as set forth in the footnotes to this table and subject to applicable community property law, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Class A Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by such stockholder.

2

Applicable percentage of ownership is based on an aggregate of 608,444,973 shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding on March 31, 2014. Such percentage also takes into account the Class A Common Stock to which such individual or entity has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within sixty (60) days after March 31, 2014, including, but not limited to, through the exercise of options which are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within such sixty (60)-day period; however, such Class A Common Stock will not be deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage owned by any other individual or entity. Such calculation is required by Rule 13d-3(d)(1)(i) under the Exchange Act.

3

Includes 354,462 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record, 980,000 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2014 or 60 days after such date, 10,600 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to restricted stock units which are scheduled to vest within 60 days of March 31, 2014 and 242,000 shares of Class A Common Stock owned by the D’Souza Family 2012 Trust. Excludes 482,482 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying performance stock units and restricted stock units, which vest over time after such period. Also excludes 136,894 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying performance stock units granted in 2013, assuming 100% vesting based on target 2014 performance (see page 49 of this proxy statement for more information on these performance stock units).

4

Includes 124,367 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record, 100,000 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2014 or 60 days after such date and 4,967 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to restricted stock units which are scheduled to vest within 60 days of March 31, 2014. Excludes 250,784 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying performance stock units and restricted stock units, which vest over time after such period. Also excludes 73,154 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying performance stock units granted in 2013, assuming 100% vesting based on target 2014 performance (see page 49 of this proxy statement for more information on these performance stock units).

5

Includes 284,500 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record. Excludes 24,644 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying options and restricted stock units which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

6

Includes 810 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record and 2,667 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to restricted stock units which are scheduled to vest within 60 days of March 31, 2014. Excludes 83,432 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying performance stock units and restricted stock units, which vest over time after such period. Also excludes 26,854 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying performance stock units granted in 2013, assuming 100% vesting based on target 2014 performance (see page 49 of this proxy statement for more information on these performance stock units).

7

Includes 8,537 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record, 4,200 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to restricted stock units which are scheduled to vest within 60 days of March 31, 2014, 102,656 shares of Class A Common Stock owned by the Rajeev Mehta 2012 Irrevocable Trust and 102,658 shares of Class A Common Stock owned by the Ruchita Mehta 2012 Irrevocable Trust. Excludes 218,170 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying performance stock units and restricted stock units, which vest over time after such period. Also excludes 67,614 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying performance stock units granted in 2013, assuming 100% vesting based on target 2014 performance (see page 49 of this proxy statement for more information on these performance stock units).

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation39


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

8

Includes 21,583 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record, 80,000 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2014 or 60 days after such date and 2,084 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to restricted stock units which are scheduled to vest within 60 days of March 31, 2014. Excludes 82,598 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying performance stock units and restricted stock units, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period. Also excludes 27,332 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying performance stock units granted in 2013, assuming 100% vesting based on target 2014 performance (see page 49 of this proxy statement for more information on these performance stock units).

9

Includes 2,000 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record and 70,000 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2014 or 60 days after such date. Excludes 11,750 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to restricted stock units which are vested as of March 31, 2014 but will not settle within 60 days of March 31, 2014. Excludes 24,644 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying options and restricted stock units, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

10

Includes 8,000 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record and 94,800 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2014 or 60 days after such date. Excludes 24,644 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying options and restricted stock units, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

11

Includes 495,004 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record, 40,000 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2014 or 60 days after such date and 137,872 shares of Class A Common Stock owned by the John E. Klein Family 2012 Irrevocable Trust. Excludes 24,644 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying options and restricted stock units, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

12

Includes 10,000 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2014 or 60 days after such date. Excludes 1,502 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to restricted stock units which are vested as of March 31, 2014 but will not settle within 60 days of March 31, 2014. Excludes 27,648 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying options and restricted stock units, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

13

Includes 10,000 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2014 or 60 days after such date. Excludes 1,858 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to restricted stock units which are vested as of March 31, 2014 but will not settle within 60 days of March 31, 2014. Excludes 28,364 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying options and restricted stock units, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

14

Includes 973,776 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record and 50,000 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2014 or 60 days after such date. Excludes 24,644 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying options and restricted stock units, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

15

Includes 76,000 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record and 30,000 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2014 or 60 days after such date. Excludes 24,644 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying options and restricted stock units, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

16

Includes an aggregate of 2,805,406 shares of Class A Common Stock owned of record, 1,474,800 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying options granted to our Directors and executive officers which are exercisable as of March 31, 2014 or within 60 days after such date, 40,728 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to restricted stock units which are scheduled to vest within 60 days of March 31, 2014 and 585,186 shares of Class A Common Stock held in various trusts. Excludes 15,110 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to restricted stock units which are vested as of March 31, 2014 but will not settle within 60 days of March 31, 2014. Excludes 1,722,353 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying options, performance stock units and restricted stock units, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period. Also excludes 445,250 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying performance stock units granted in 2013, assuming 100% vesting based on target 2014 performance.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation40


Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Since January 1, 2013, there were no related person transactions that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K other than such matters disclosed herein under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Election of Directors—Compensation of Directors.”

REVIEW OF RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

The Audit Committee of the Company is responsible for reviewing and approving all transactions between us and any related person that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K. Related persons can include any of our directors or executive officers, certain of our stockholders, and any of their immediate family members. This obligation is set forth in our Audit Committee Charter. In evaluating related person transactions, the members of the Audit Committee apply the same standards of good faith and fiduciary duty they apply to their general responsibilities as a committee of the Board of Directors and as individual directors. The Audit Committee will approve a related person transaction when, in its good faith judgment, the transaction is in the best interest of the Company. The Company’s legal staff is primarily responsible for monitoring and obtaining information from our directors and executive officers with respect to potential related person transactions, and for then determining, based on the facts and circumstances, whether the related person has a direct or indirect material interest in any transaction with us. To help our legal staff identify related person transactions, each year, we require each of our directors, director nominees and executive officers to complete a disclosure questionnaire identifying any transactions with us in which the officer or director or their family members have an interest.

In addition, our Code of Ethics describes our expectation that all directors, officers and employees who may have a potential or apparent conflict of interest to, in the case of employees, notify our Chief Compliance Officer or General Counsel, or in the case of executive officers and directors, notify our General Counsel or Board of Directors. A copy of our Code of Ethics is posted on our website located at www.cognizant.com in the “About Us” section of the “Company” page under the “Corporate Governance” tab.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation41


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our Directors, executive officers and stockholders who beneficially own more than 10% of any class of our equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act (collectively, the “Reporting Persons”) to file initial statements of beneficial ownership of securities and statements of changes in beneficial ownership of securities with respect to our equity securities with the SEC. All Reporting Persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all reports that such Reporting Persons file with the SEC pursuant to Section 16(a). Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us and upon written representations of the Reporting Persons received by us, we believe that there has been compliance with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to such Reporting Persons with respect to the year ended December 31, 2013, except that one Form 4 for Venkat Krishnaswamy reporting one transaction was not timely filed.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation42


Executive Compensation

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

All share and share-based numbers and values in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis reflect the Company’s two-for-one stock split that occurred on March 7, 2014.

2013 Fiscal Year Company Performance Overview

The Company experienced industry leading performance for 2013 with year-over-year revenue growth of 20.4%. Our business segments had year-over-year revenue growth ranging from 13.1% to 24.7%, and we continued to expand our service offerings enabling us to provide better support to our customers, including strengthening our offerings in consulting, Information Technology Infrastructure Services, or IT IS, and Business Process Services, or BPS. Our service offerings expanded, including IT IS and BPS services, which enabled us to cross-sell new services to our customers and meet the rapidly growing demand for complex large-scale outsourcing solutions. We increased penetration at existing customers, including strategic customers, and we benefited from the continued expansion of the market for global delivery of IT services and BPS.

The Compensation Committee took into account the Company’s performance relative to the industry during 2013 in its compensation decisions, as described further below.

2013 Fiscal Year Compensation Framework

Our executive compensation program is designed to motivate, retain and engage our executive leadership and appropriately reward them for their contributions to the achievement of our business strategies and goals. In order to achieve our compensation objectives, the Company provides its executives with a total direct compensation package consisting of the following fixed and variable compensation elements:

Compensation ElementCharacteristicsPurpose
Base SalaryFixed. Cash payment based upon scope of responsibilities, experience and individual performance.Offers stable source of income at a competitive level.
Short-Term IncentiveVariable. Performance based opportunity. Annual cash incentive tied to achievement of designated, short-term financial and strategic objectives.Motivate and reward executives for achievement of Company financial and strategic objectives.
Long-Term IncentiveVariable. Performance and service based. Equity incentives with performance vesting and service requirements.Intended to reward achievement of financial objectives and long-term performance of our common stock. Rewards continued service with the Company.

Governance Practices

The Company has several governance practices that it believes support our good compensation practices:

The Compensation Committee is comprised of independent directors;

To assist in analyzing compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee directly retains an independent compensation consultant who works directly with the committee and does not provide other services to the Company;

The Company maintains a formal clawback policy applicable to any performance based compensation paid to its executives;

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation43


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Company maintains stock ownership and holding guidelines;

The Company maintains a policy prohibiting its directors, officers and other employees from buying or selling puts, calls or other derivative securities of the Company;

The Company maintains a policy prohibiting its directors, officers and other employees from engaging in short sales of the Company’s securities; and

The Company maintains a policy prohibiting its directors, officers and other employees from pledging the Company’s securities as collateral for a loan (or modifying an existing pledge) unless the pledge has been approved by the Audit Committee. In addition, directors, officers and other employees are prohibited from using the Company’s securities as collateral in a margin account.

Overview of Compensation Program and Philosophy

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of compensation for our Named Executives who are identified in the 2013 Summary Compensation Table below. The Named Executives are the individuals who served during 2013 as our Chief Executive Officer; President; Chief Financial Officer; Chief Executive Officer and Director

    Gordon Coburn

President

    Karen McLoughlin

Chief Financial Officer

    Rajeev Mehta

Chief Executive Officer, IT Services; and Services

    Malcolm Frank

Executive Vice President, Strategy and Marketing.

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors oversees and administers our executive compensation program, including the evaluation and approval of compensation plans, policies and programs offered to our Named Executives. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our Board of Directors and is comprised entirely of independent, non-employee directors as determined in accordance with various NASDAQ Stock Market, SEC and Internal Revenue Code rules. The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage its own independent advisor to assist in carrying out its responsibilities under its charter.

Marketing

Overview of Executive Compensation Program Objectives

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee oversees and administers our executive compensation program, including the evaluation and approval of compensation plans, policies and programs offered to our Named Executives. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board and is comprised entirely of independent, non-employee directors as determined in accordance with various NASDAQ, SEC and U.S. Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) rules. The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage its own independent advisor to assist in carrying out its responsibilities under its charter.

Program Objectives

The Compensation Committee has designed the executive compensation program for our Named Executives to meet the following objectives:

 

Ensure executive compensation is aligned with our corporate strategies and business objectives.

Ensure executive compensation is aligned with our corporate strategies and business objectives;

 

Subject a substantial portion of an executive officer’s compensation to achieving both short-term and long-term performance objectives that enhance stockholder value by linking rewards to measurable corporate and individual performance.

Subject a substantial portion of an executive officer’s compensation to achieving both short-term and long-term performance objectives that enhance stockholder value by linking rewards to measurable corporate and individual performance;

 

Reinforce the importance of meeting and exceeding identifiable and measurable goals through superior awards for superior performance.

Reinforce the importance of meeting and exceeding identifiable and measurable goals through superior awards for superior performance;

 

Provide total direct compensation that is competitive in markets in which we compete for management talent in order to attract, retain and motivate the best possible executive talent.

Provide total direct compensation that is competitive in markets in which we compete for management talent in order to attract, retain and motivate the best possible executive talent;

 

Provide an incentive for long-term continued employment with our Company.

Provide an incentive for long-term continued employment with the Company; and

 

Reinforce our desired culture and unique corporate environment by fostering a sense of ownership, urgency and overall entrepreneurial spirit.

We believe our approach to goal setting and setting of targets with payouts at multiple levels of performance results assists in mitigating excessive risk-taking that could harm our value or reward poor judgment by our executives. Several features of our programs reflect sound risk management practices. We believe we have allocated our compensation among base salary and short and long-term compensation target opportunities in such a way as to not encourage excessive risk-taking, but to reward meeting strategic company goals that enhance stockholder value. In addition, we believe that the mix of equity award instruments used under our long-term incentive program that includes full value awards as well as the multi-year vesting of our equity awards also mitigate risk and properly accounts for the time horizon of risk.

We do not believe that any of our compensation policies create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Reinforce our desired culture and unique corporate environment by fostering a sense of ownership, urgency and overall entrepreneurial spirit.

Key Program Features

The following tables summarize key elements of our executive compensation program and where they are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section.

 

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation44


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Role of StockholderWhat We Do

See
    Page No.    

LOGO

Annual advisory Say-on-Pay Votesvote for stockholders

18

LOGO

Pay for performance

20

LOGO

Use appropriate peer groups when establishing compensation

19

LOGO

Retain an independent external compensation consultant

19

LOGO

Set significant stock ownership guidelines for executives

26

LOGO

Include a clawback policy in our incentive plans

27

LOGO

Utilize “double trigger” provisions for plans that contemplate a change-in-control

29

17COMPENSATION


What We Don’t Do

The Company provides its stockholders with the opportunity to cast an annual, nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation. At the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 4, 2013, approximately 98.6% of the votes cast on the Say-on-Pay proposal at that meeting were voted in favor of the proposal. Our Compensation Committee considered the outcome of that advisory vote to be an endorsement of the Compensation Committee’s compensation philosophy and implementation. As such, in making its decisions regarding executive compensation for 2013, the Compensation Committee considered the significant level of stockholder support for our compensation program and chose to retain the 2012 structure of the executive compensation program, including the ratio of performance-based compensation to all other compensation and the ratio of performance-based equity compensation to time-based equity compensation, while making quantitative adjustments to reflect the performance of the Company and our Named Executives in 2012. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of the Company’s say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the Named Executives.

Determination of Competitive Compensation and Engagement of Compensation ConsultantSee
    Page No.    

To achieve its objectives for our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee evaluates our executive compensation program with the goal of setting compensation at levels the Committee believes are competitive with those of other growth technology-related companies that compete with us for executive talent. The Compensation Committee has periodically engaged an independent consultant to provide additional assurance that the Company’s executive compensation programs are reasonable and consistent with its objectives. The consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee, periodically participates in committee meetings and advises the Compensation Committee

        LOGO          

No hedging or speculation with respect to compensation trendsCognizant securities

26

        LOGO          

No short sales of Cognizant securities

26

        LOGO          

No margin accounts with Cognizant securities

26

        LOGO          

Limited pledging of Cognizant securities

26

        LOGO          

No excise tax “gross up” and limited tax “gross up” for perquisites

26, 30

2015 Company Performance and Impact on Compensation Program

The Company demonstrated strong performance for 2015 with year-over-year revenue growth of 21.0% (inclusive of 6.2% related to the acquisition of TriZetto). Key drivers of that growth were:

Solid performance across all of our business segments:

Business Segment              Year-over-Year Revenue Growth                 % of 2015 Revenue    

  Financial Services

 16.7% 40.3%

  Healthcare

   36.4%1 29.5%

  Manufacturing/Retail/Logistics

 12.0% 18.9%

  Other

 17.4% 11.3%

1  Inclusive of 23.9% related to the acquisition of TriZetto.

Sustained strength in the North American market with year-over-year revenue growth of 23.9% (inclusive of TriZetto revenue);

Continued penetration of the European market with year-over-year revenue growth of 6.6% after a negative currency impact of 10.2%;

Continued penetration of the Rest of World (primarily the Asia Pacific) market with year-over-year revenue growth of 29.9% after a negative currency impact of 9.2%;

Increased customer spending on discretionary projects;

Expansion of our service offerings, including consulting, infrastructure services and business process services, which enabled us to cross-sell new services to our customers and meet the rapidly growing demand for complex large-scale outsourcing solutions;

Increased penetration at existing customers, including strategic clients; and

Continued expansion of the market for global delivery of IT services and business process services.

The Compensation Committee took into account the above factors and the Company’s performance, including relative to the industry, during 2015 and in previous years in its compensation decisions. See “Proxy Statement Summary” starting on page i for more information about the Company’s performance in previous years.

Role of Stockholder Say-on-Pay Votes

The Company provides its stockholders with the opportunity to cast an annual, non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation. At the 2015 Annual Meeting, approximately 98.4% of the votes cast on the Say-on-Pay proposal were voted “for” the proposal. The Compensation Committee considered the outcome of that advisory vote to be an endorsement of the Compensation Committee’s compensation philosophy and implementation. As such, in making its decisions regarding executive compensation for 2015, the Compensation Committee considered the significant level of stockholder support for our compensation program and chose to generally retain the 2014 structure of the executive compensation program, including the ratio of performance-based compensation to all other compensation and the ratio of performance-based equity compensation to time-based equity compensation, while making quantitative adjustments to reflect the performance of the Company and our Named Executives in 2015 and adding an additional performance criteria for the PSUs, as described in “Primary Compensation Elements for 2015” starting on page 20. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of the Company’s Say-on-Pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the Named Executives.

COMPENSATION18


The Compensation-Setting Process

Compensation Committee and Engagement of Compensation Consultant

To achieve the objectives of our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee evaluates our executive compensation program with the goal of setting compensation at levels the Compensation Committee believes are competitive with those of other growth technology-related companies that compete with us for executive talent. The Compensation Committee has periodically engaged an independent compensation consultant to provide additional assurance that the Company’s executive compensation program is reasonable and consistent with its objectives. The consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee, periodically participates in Committee meetings, and advises the Compensation Committee with respect to compensation trends and best practices, plan design, and the reasonableness of individual compensation awards. Although the Compensation Committee reviews the compensation practices of our peer companies as described below, the Compensation Committee does not adhere to strict formulas or survey data to determine the mix of compensation elements. Instead, as described below, the Compensation Committee considers various factors in exercising its discretion to determine compensation, including the experience, responsibilities and performance of each Named Executive as well as the Company’s overall financial performance. This flexibility is particularly important in designing compensation arrangements to attract and retain executives in a highly-competitive, rapidly changing market.

Since 2010, the Compensation Committee has engaged Pay Governance, LLC (“Pay Governance”), an independent executive compensation advisory firm, to review all elements of executive compensation, benchmark such compensation in relation to other comparable companies with which we compete for executive talent, and provide recommendations to ensure that our executive compensation program continues to enable us to attract and retain qualified executives through competitive compensation packages which will result in the attainment of our short-term and long-term strategic objectives. As part of the compensation-setting processes for 2013, 2014 and 2015, the Compensation Committee asked Pay Governance to provide benchmark compensation data and/or review management’s recommendations for year-over-year compensation adjustments, including review for general market competitiveness and competitiveness with the Company’s peer group. See “Peer Group” below.

The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Pay Governance and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Pay Governance from providing independent advice to the Compensation Committee regarding executive and director compensation matters.

Role of Executive Officers in Determining Executive Compensation

Our Chief Executive Officer, aided by our President, provides statistical data and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee to assist it in determining compensation levels. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer provides the Compensation Committee with a review of the performance of the other executive officers. While the Compensation Committee utilizes this information and values management’s observations with regard to compensation, the ultimate decisions regarding executive compensation are made by the Compensation Committee.

Peer Group

The Compensation Committee, with assistance from Pay Governance, establishes the Company’s peer group that is used for market comparisons and benchmarking. The peer group is comprised of a group of technology-related firms selected based on revenue, headcount and market capitalization.

    PEER GROUP            

In 2012, the Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance, LLC, an independent executive compensation advisory firm, to review all elements of executive compensation, benchmark such compensation in relation to other comparable companies with which we compete for executive talent and provide recommendations to ensure that our executive compensation program continues to enable us to attract and retain qualified executives through competitive compensation packages which will result in the attainment of our short-term and long-term strategic objectives. The Compensation Committee asked Pay Governance, LLC to provide the benchmark data for purposes of setting 2012 and 2013 compensation. Pay Governance, LLC benchmarked our executive compensation against a group of technology-related firms selected based on revenue, headcount and market capitalization, including:

Accenture Plc

Automatic Data Processing, Inc.,

CA, Inc.,

Computer Sciences Corporation

Convergys Corporation

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., Fiserv, Inc., MasterCard, Inc., NetApp, Inc., SAIC, Inc., Symantec Corporation, Visa, Inc., and Yahoo! Inc.

In 2013, the Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance, LLC to review its planned changes to 2013 compensation based on company performance, individual performance and responsibilities, and market trends.

The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Pay Governance, LLC and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Pay Governance, LLC from providing independent advice to the Compensation Committee regarding executive and director compensation matters.

Role of Executive Officers in Determining Executive Compensation

Our Chief Executive Officer, aided by our President, provided statistical data and made recommendations to the Compensation Committee to assist it in determining 2013 compensation levels. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer provided the Compensation Committee with a review of the performance of the other executive officers. While the Compensation Committee utilized this information and valued management’s observations with regard to compensation, the ultimate decisions regarding executive compensation were made by the Compensation Committee.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation45


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Components of Compensation

Our executive compensation program utilizes three primary components to achieve the foregoing objectives. These three components comprise an executive’s total direct compensation: base salary, non-equity incentive awards for annual financial performance, and periodic stock-based awards. Prior to 2007, equity compensation was granted primarily in the form of stock options which derived their value from appreciation of the market price of our Class A Common Stock. Grants of performance-based stock units were introduced in 2007 and grants of restricted stock units were introduced in 2008.

Internal Pay Equity

Our compensation programs are designed so that potential realizable compensation is set relative to each executive’s level of responsibility and potential impact on our performance. While the compensation levels and design may be similar for executives at the same level, actual compensation may vary due to changes in individual performance over time.

Base Salary

The Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of our Named Executives on an annual basis. The primary objective of the base salary component of an executive’s total direct compensation is to provide financial stability and certainty through market competitive salary levels, recognizing each Named Executive’s experience, knowledge, skills, relative value and sustained contribution to our Company. We make periodic adjustments to base salary based on individual performance and contributions, market trends, increases in the cost of living, competitive position and our financial situation. Consideration is also given to relative responsibility, seniority, experience and performance of each individual Named Executive. No specific weight is assigned to any of the above criteria relative to the Named Executives’ compensation. In 2013, each Named Executive received a salary increase of approximately 3%, primarily to account for the annual increase in the cost of living and general market trends, reflecting the fact that there were no major changes in the other factors mentioned above, including the Named Executives’ roles, responsibilities and performance. The Compensation Committee does not attempt to set compensation components to meet specific benchmarks relative to our peers because the Compensation Committee believes that excessive reliance on benchmarking is detrimental to stockholder interests as it can result in compensation that is unrelated to the value delivered by the Named Executives. Based on this analysis, effective January 1, 2013, the base salaries of our Named Executives were set as follows:Fiserv, Inc.

 

Name

Leidos Holdings, Inc.

MasterCard, Inc.

NetApp, Inc.

Symantec Corporation

Visa, Inc.

Yahoo! Inc.

 2013 Base Salary 

Francisco D’Souza

19COMPENSATION


Direct Compensation of Named Executives

Primary Compensation Elements for 2015

Our executive compensation program is designed to motivate, retain and engage our executive leadership and appropriately reward them for their contributions to the achievement of our business strategies and goals. In order to achieve our compensation objectives, the Company provides its executives with a total direct compensation package consisting of the elements listed in the table below. The Compensation Committee makes decisions on executive compensation from a total direct compensation perspective. Each element is considered by the Committee to be important in meeting one or more of the compensation program objectives.

Base Salary

 $608,000

Gordon Coburn

$578,000

Karen McLoughlin

$361,000

Malcolm Frank

$371,000

Rajeev Mehta

$462,000

Annual Non-Equity
Cash Incentive

We have designed our annual non-equity incentive program to stimulate and support a high-performance environment by tying such incentive compensation to the attainment of organizational financial goals and by recognizing superior performance. The annual cash incentive bonuses are intended to compensate individuals for the achievement of these goals. The Compensation Committee determines actual cash incentive bonuses after the end of the fiscal year based upon the Company’s performance.

Long-Term Incentives – Stock Based Awards

 

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation46


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

PSUs

 

The Compensation Committee believes that each Named Executive’s annual cash incentive bonus should be based upon theRSUs

PurposeStable source of income at competitive levelsMotivate and reward
achievement of
financial and
operational goals

Reward achievement of financial goals, continued service and long-term performance of our Common Stock

Reward continued service and long-term performance of our Common Stock

Who receives

All Named Executives LOGO

When grantedReviewed annuallyApproved annually in
February for prior
year
Annually LOGO

Form of delivery

Cash LOGO

Equity LOGO

Type of performance

Short-term emphasis LOGO

Long-term emphasis LOGO

Performance periodOngoing1 year

1 year for performance measurement determines number of shares that may vest; vesting 1/3rd at 18 months and 2/3rds at 36 months from grant date with service through those dates (see changes below)

Quarterly vesting over 3 years from grant date subject to continued service

How compensation is

realized

Compensation Committee judgmentCompensation
Committee verifies
performance
against targets

Compensation Committee verifies performance against targets, determining the number of shares that may vest; value realized depends on number of shares that vest and stock price on the vesting dates

Value realized depends on stock price on the vesting dates
Most recent
performance measures
N/ARevenue (50%),
non-GAAP Income
from Operations
(40%) and days
sales outstanding
(10%)
2016 Revenue (75%) andnon-GAAP EPS (25%)N/A

      PSUs – CHANGES IN 2015      

        PSUs – ADDITIONAL CHANGES IN 2016        

PSUs granted in 2015 utilize two weighted performance metrics measured during fiscal year 2016: revenue (75%) andnon-GAAP EPS (25%). PSUs grants in prior years utilized a single performance metric (revenue).

PSUs granted in 2016 will continue to utilize the same two weighted performance metrics as in 2015 and, in addition, will move to a2-year performance measurement period with vesting of 1/3rd at 30 months and 2/3rds at 36 months, replacing the previous 1-year performance measurement period and vesting of 1/3rd at 18 months and 2/3rds at 36 months.

COMPENSATION20


There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between cash and non-cash compensation or short-term and long-term compensation. However, these primary elements have been weighted to ensure that a substantial amount of pay for the Named Executives is variable, contingent upon meeting or exceeding pre-determined performance goals and tied to the performance of our Common Stock.

2015 Target Total Direct Compensation

The following chart illustrates the balance of the elements of 2015 total direct compensation (using grant date share prices for RSUs and PSUs and target values for the annual cash incentive and the PSUs) for our Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executives.

2015 Target Total Direct Compensation

LOGO

Our Named Executives’ (including our Chief Executive Officer’s) target total direct compensation is, on average, 83% long-term (comprised of RSUs and PSUs) and 62% performance-based (comprised of PSUs and the annual cash incentive). Target total direct compensation for the Chief Executive Officer is weighted more towards long-term, equity compensation as compared to the other Named Executives. While the overall percentage of compensation that is performance-based is similar between the Chief Executive Officer and the other Named Executives, the mix of performance-based compensation for our Chief Executive Officer is weighted more towards the long-term equity (PSUs) as opposed to the annual cash incentive. This emphasis on long-term, equity compensation for our Chief Executive Officer was designed by the Compensation Committee to more closely align our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation with the interests of stockholders and encourage a focus on the Company’s long-term growth.

Base Salary

The Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of our Named Executives on an annual basis. The primary objective of the base salary component of an executive’s total direct compensation is to provide financial stability and certainty through market-competitive salary levels, recognizing each Named Executive’s experience, knowledge, skills, relative value and sustained contribution to the Company. The Compensation Committee makes periodic adjustments to base salary based on individual performance and contributions, market trends, increases in the cost of living, competitive position and our financial situation. Consideration is also given to relative responsibility, seniority, experience and performance of each individual Named Executive. No specific weight is assigned to any of the above criteria relative to the others, but rather the Compensation Committee uses its judgment in combination with market and other data provided by Pay Governance and the Company. The Compensation Committee does not attempt to set compensation components to meet specific benchmarks relative to our peers because the Compensation Committee believes that excessive reliance on benchmarking is detrimental to stockholder interests as it can result in compensation that is unrelated to the value delivered by the Named Executives.

21COMPENSATION


Based on the analysis set forth above, the base salaries of our Named Executives were established, effective January 1, 2015, as set forth in the following table. Messrs. D’Souza and Coburn each received an increase in base salary over their 2014 base salary of approximately 3% to account for annual increases in the cost of living and general market trends. Ms. McLoughlin received an increase of 9% primarily to bring her compensation to a market-competitive level for her experience and position as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Mehta received an increase of 6% primarily to reflect his expanded responsibilities and to account for increases in the cost of living and general market trends. Mr. Frank received an increase of 9% primarily to account for his performance with respect to key strategic initiatives and increased responsibilities he has taken on in the area of digital services.

Name             2015 Base Salary            

  Francisco D’Souza

$645,000

  Gordon Coburn

$613,500

  Karen McLoughlin

$406,000

  Rajeev Mehta

$538,500

  Malcolm Frank

$417,000

Annual Cash Incentive

The Compensation Committee has designed our annual cash incentive program to stimulate and support a high-performance environment by tying such incentive compensation to the attainment of organizational financial goals and by recognizing superior performance. The annual cash incentives are intended to compensate individuals for the achievement of these goals. The Committee determines actual cash incentives after the end of the fiscal year based upon the Company’s performance.

The Compensation Committee believes that each Named Executive’s annual cash incentive should be based upon the achievement of financial goals, which are tied to metrics that are valued by our stockholders. The Compensation Committee believes that our stockholders value and measure the performance of the Named Executives based principally on the growth of Company revenue, earnings and cash flow. Consequently, the Compensation Committee believes it is appropriate to establish three components to the annual cash incentive: revenue, non-GAAP income from operations (“non-GAAP Income from Operations”) (see “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on page 55 for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to our results as reported under GAAP) and days sales outstanding (“DSO”). All three components are subject to adjustment for any acquisitions over the course of the year. Over the past several years, one of our principal goals has been to grow revenue at an industry-leading pace, while maintaining a targeted level of non-GAAP operating margin and DSO. The annual cash incentive target has been set in an effort to achieve this operating performance.

For 2015, the Compensation Committee determined a target for each component (revenue, non-GAAP Income from Operations and DSO) and a weighting for the various components as a percentage of the total award such that achievement of the targeted level of performance for all three components would result in the Named Executives receiving their target awards. The Committee set threshold, or minimum, levels for each of the components below which no annual cash incentive would be paid for the particular component. The Committee also set maximum levels for each of the components above which no additional annual cash incentive would be paid for the particular component and which collectively result in a maximum possible annual cash incentive equal to 200% of the target awards for the Named Executives. To the extent the Company’s actual 2015 performance falls between the threshold and target levels or between the target and maximum levels for any of the components, the annual cash incentive program provides for straight-line interpolation between the levels to calculate the payout level for the component.

           Threshold                 Target                  Maximum         

 

        Weighting        

 ($ in thousands) 

  Component

 

     

Revenue

 

 $11,599,500

 

 $12,210,000

 

 $12,820,500

 

 50%

 

Non-GAAP Income from Operations

 

 $2,256,147

 

 $2,374,892

 

 $2,493,637

 

 40%

 

Days sales outstanding (DSO)

 

 81

 

 70

 

 60

 

 10%

 

  Payout at Level

 

     

Payout as a percent of target

 

 50%

 

 100%

 

 200%

 

  

COMPENSATION22


Annual Cash Incentive Target Based on High Growth ObjectivesThe Compensation Committee believes that our stockholders valueestablished revenue and measurenon-GAAP Income from Operations targets at levels 19% and 13% above the performanceCompany’s 2014 revenue and non-GAAP Income from Operations, respectively. These targets were established to incentivize the Company’s management to prioritize a continued high level of growth in the Named Executives based principally on the growth of CompanyCompany’s revenue earnings and cash flow. Consequently, the Compensation Committee believes that setting incentive targets based upon revenue, earnings and Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) is appropriate. Over the past several years, one of our principal goals has been to grow revenue at an industry-leading pace, while maintaining a targeted level of non-GAAP operating margin and DSO. The annualmargin. Meanwhile, the DSO component incentivizes maintenance of a healthy cash incentive bonus target has been set in an effort to achieve this operating performance. We set annual incentive target levels for our Named Executives based onflow level consistent with past years. As a percentageresult of their salary. For 2013, the applicable percentages were as follows:

Name  

2013 Target

Bonus Award

   Percentage of Salary Payable at
Target Award Level

Francisco D’Souza

   $516,800    85%

Gordon Coburn

   $491,300    85%

Karen McLoughlin

   $306,850    85%

Malcolm Frank

   $315,350    85%

Rajeev Mehta

   $392,700    85%

The Compensation Committee determined the revenue (subject to adjustments for certain 2013 acquisitions), earnings (operating income before charges for stock-based compensation expense and acquisition-related charges and subject to adjustments for certain 2013 acquisitions) and DSOthese targets, for the 2013 fiscal year that would be used for each of the Named Executives, and it also set a minimum and maximum threshold for each component of the annual incentive target as shown in the table below.

    Threshold  Target  Maximum
  (dollars in thousands)

Revenue

  $8,179,500  $8,610,000  $9,040,500

Earnings

  $1,629,250  $1,715,000  $1,800,750

Days sales outstanding

  81  70  60

Payout as a percent of target

  50%  100%  200%

In addition, the Compensation Committee determined that the weighting of the components of the annual cash incentive bonus target would be:

ElementWeighting
Percentage (%)

Achievement of revenue target

50

Achievement of earnings target

40

Achievement of DSO target

10

Due to the high growth objectives set for the revenue and earnings components, there was substantial uncertainty at the time the Compensation Committee established the performance goals for 20132015 as to the likelihood of the Company’s attainment of the targeted levels of performance.

The Compensation Committee set the 2015 target awards for the Named Executives at a level equal to 85% of the Named Executives’ base salaries. Based on the Company’s actual 2015 performance against the metrics described above, the Compensation Committee determined that performance under the annual cash incentive program had been achieved at a level equal to 142% of the target award. The target awards and actual awards approved for payment by the Compensation Committee for 2015 to each of the Named Executives are set forth in the following table.

The maximum amount a Named Executive can earn under the annual cash incentive bonus plan is 200% of the target bonus amount, and for performance below the threshold level, no bonus will be paid for a particular component. Based on the 2013 corporate performance against the metrics described above, the Compensation Committee approved the following annual bonus payments to the Named Executives, which represents approximately 163% of the target bonus amount for each Named Executive:

Name  2013 Bonus Award 

Francisco D’Souza

  $844,812  

Gordon Coburn

  $803,127  

Karen McLoughlin

  $501,607  

Malcolm Frank

  $515,502  

Rajeev Mehta

  $641,946  

 

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation47


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Long-Term Incentives—
Name  

 

2015 Annual Cash Incentive

 

  

 

        Target Award         

 

   

 

        Actual Award        

 

  Francisco D’Souza

 

   

 

          $548,250          

 

  

 

            $778,306          

 

  Gordon Coburn

 

   

 

$521,475          

 

  

 

            $740,296          

 

  Karen McLoughlin

 

   

 

$345,100          

 

  

 

            $489,910          

 

  Rajeev Mehta

 

   

 

$457,725          

 

  

 

            $649,795          

 

  Malcolm Frank

 

   

 

$354,450          

 

  

 

            $503,184          

 

Long-Term Incentives – Stock-Based Awards

We provide long-term incentive compensation through stock-based awards in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based stock units (“PSUs”). The Committee believes that such RSUs and PSUs are a valuable component of our long-term incentive program for several reasons, including concerns over the dilutive effect option grants may have on our outstanding shares, our desire to make a portion of our Named Executives’ compensation less subject to market volatility, and our desire to create a retention mechanism which creates the incentive to maximize stockholder value.

The Compensation Committee currently plans to use a combination of RSUs and PSUs in future years. We believe that stock-based grants provide our executive officers with a strong incentive to manage the Company from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the long-term success of the business, create an ownership culture, and help to align the interests of our executives and our stockholders. In addition, the vesting feature of our equity grants should further our goal of executive retention because this feature provides an incentive to our executive officers to remain in our employ during the vesting period.

In considering the number of long-term incentives to grant, the Compensation Committee first establishes a target compensation value that it wants to deliver to the Named Executives through long-term equity awards. In doing so, the Committee generally takes into account various factors, including the value of RSUs and PSUs that each of our executive officers has previously been awarded, the base salary of the executive officer, the heavy weight placed on equity in the mix of total compensation, and the perceived retention value of the total compensation package in light of the competitive environment. The Committee also generally takes into account increases in the cost of living, the size of comparable awards made to individuals in similar positions within the industry, the scope, responsibility and business impact of the officer’s position, the individual’s potential for increased responsibility and promotion over the award term, and the individual’s personal experience and performance in recent periods. Once the target value is established, the Compensation Committee determines the number of RSUs and PSUs to be granted by reference to the current value of the Company’s Common Stock.

In 2015, the Compensation Committee established target long-term incentive compensation values that were, as compared to the values provided in 2014, approximately 3% higher for all of the Named Executives except Ms. McLoughlin, for whom it was approximately 8% higher. The 3% increases were primarily to account for increases in the cost of living and general market trends, reflecting the fact that there were no major changes in the other factors mentioned above. For Ms. McLoughlin, the higher increase was, in addition, to bring her compensation to a market-competitive level for her experience and position as Chief Financial Officer.

23COMPENSATION


65% / 35%

PSU / RSU

Split

The Compensation Committee determined that the 2015 long-term incentive compensation through stock-based awards. Priorshould be apportioned 65% to 2008, we made such awards inPSUs and 35% to RSUs. The Committee believes that a split that is weighted towards PSUs, which contain both performance- and time-based vesting aspects, is appropriate to emphasize the formimportance of stock options and/or performance-based stock units that vest over multiple years. During 2008, based upon a study prepared byachieving the independent compensation consulting firm then engaged by the Compensation Committee, our Compensation Committee modified its strategy on the use of stock-based compensation to discontinue annual grants of stock optionsspecified financial results and to include the use of restricted stock units. Our Compensation Committee continued such strategy in the following years with the awards of restricted stock units and performance-based stock units to our Named Executives. We believe that such restricted stock units and performance-based stock units are a valuable component of our long-term incentive program for several reasons, including ongoing concerns over the dilutive effect of option grants on our outstanding shares, our desire to make a portion of our Named Executives’ compensation less subject to market volatility, and to create a retention mechanism which creates the incentive to maximize stockholder value.

The Compensation Committee currently plans to use a combination of stock options, performance-based stock units, and/or restricted stock units in future years. We believe that stock-based grants provide our executive officers with a strong incentive to manage the Company from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the long-term success of the business, create an ownership culture and help to align the interests of our executives and our stockholders. In addition, the vesting feature of our equity grants should further our goal of executive retention, because this feature provides an incentive to our executive officers to remain in our employ during the vesting period.

In considering the number of long-term incentives to grant, the Compensation Committee first establishes a target compensation value that it wants to deliver to the Named Executives through long-term equity awards. In doing so, the Compensation Committee generally takes into account various factors, including the value of restricted stock units and performance-based stock units that each of our executive officers has previously been awarded, the base salary of the executive officer and the heavy weight placed on equity in the mix of total compensation, and the perceived retention value of the total compensation package in light of the competitive environment. The Compensation Committee also generally takes into account increases in the cost of living, the size of comparable awards made to individuals in similar positions within the industry, the scope, responsibility and business impact of the officer’s position, the individual’s potential for increased responsibility and promotion over the award term, and the individual’s personal experience and performance in recent periods. Once the target value is established, the Compensation Committee determines the number of restricted stock units and performance-based stock units by reference to the current valueappreciation of the Company’s Class A Common Stock.

In 2013, The RSUs then provide further incentive for all named Executives other than Mr. Mehta, the Compensation Committee established target long-term incentive compensation values that were approximately 3% higher than the values provided in 2012, primarily to account for increases in the cost of livingcontinued service and general market trends, reflecting the fact that there were no major changes in the other factors mentioned above. Mr. Mehta received a 9% increase in long-term incentive compensation value in 2013 because of his increased responsibilities that occurred as a result of his transition from Group Chief Executive-Industries and Markets to Chief Executive Officer, IT Services.

Based on the foregoing considerations, in December 2013, the Compensation Committee approved the awardalignment of the following restricted stock units to our Named Executives:Executives’ interests with those of stockholders.

Based on the foregoing considerations, on November 30, 2015, the Compensation Committee approved the following PSU and RSU awards to our Named Executives.

 

Name
Name 

PSUs

 

 

RSUs

 

 

    Total Grant Date    
Fair Value of
Awards

 

 

        Number        

 

 

Grant Date
        Fair Value         

 

 

        Number        

 

 

Grant Date
        Fair Value         

 

 

  Francisco D’Souza

 

   

 

      105,516      

 

 

 

      $

 

6,814,223    

 

 

 

   

 

    56,816    

 

 

 

        $

 

3,669,177      

 

 

 

  $

 

10,483,400

 

 

 

  Gordon Coburn

 

   

 

56,386      

 

 

 

      $

 

3,641,408    

 

 

 

   

 

    30,362    

 

 

 

        $

 

1,960,778      

 

 

 

  $

 

5,602,186

 

 

 

  Karen McLoughlin

 

   

 

28,201      

 

 

 

      $

 

1,821,221    

 

 

 

   

 

    15,185    

 

 

 

        $

 

980,647      

 

 

 

  $

 

2,801,868

 

 

 

  Rajeev Mehta

 

   

 

53,887      

 

 

 

      $

 

3,480,022    

 

 

 

   

 

    29,016    

 

 

 

        $

 

1,873,853      

 

 

 

  $

 

5,353,875

 

 

 

  Malcolm Frank

 

   

 

26,426      

 

 

 

      $

 

1,706,591    

 

 

 

   

 

    14,229    

 

 

 

        $

 

918,909      

 

 

 

  $

 

2,625,500

 

 

 

Such PSUs and RSUs were granted pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Company’s 2009 Incentive Plan and the related Stock Unit Award Agreements. Details of how such PSUs and RSUs work can be found on page 25.

Other Elements of Compensation

Supplemental Retirement Programs

We do not have any nonqualified deferred compensation programs, pension plans or pre-tax supplemental executive retirement plans for our executive officers, except for the CSRP described under “Broad-Based Programs” below and a nonqualified deferred compensation program established for Mr. Coburn. We established the program for Mr. Coburn to provide him with the equivalent economic value of the retirement plan in which he participated while the Company was majority-owned by IMS Health. Accordingly, Mr. Coburn is entitled to an annual Company contribution to his nonqualified deferred compensation account equal to 6% of his base salary and earned annual cash incentive.

Broad-Based Programs

Our U.S.-based executive officers are eligible to participate in our broad-based medical, dental and vision insurance, life and accidental death insurance, 401(k) savings plan, CSRP and 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan on the same basis as all other regular employees.

Under the 401(k) savings plan, we match employee contributions at the rate of 50% for each dollar contributed during each pay period, up to the first 6% of eligible compensation contributed during each pay period, subject to applicable U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) limits. The matching contributions immediately vest.

Our U.S.-based executive officers who are subject to contribution restrictions under our 401(k) savings plan due to statutory limits that apply to highly-compensated employees are eligible to participate in the Cognizant Technology Solutions Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “CSRP”) on the same basis as all other regular U.S.-based employees. The CSRP is a nonqualified savings plan in which the employee’s contributions are made on a post-tax basis to an individually owned, portable and flexible retirement plan held with a life insurance company. The CSRP works alongside established qualified retirement plans such as our 401(k) savings plan or can be the basis for a long-term stand-alone retirement savings plan. We provide a fully vested incentive match following the same formula as our 401(k) savings plan. Because the CSRP is not subject to the same IRS non-discrimination rules as our 401(k) savings plan, employees that face limitations on their 401(k) contributions due to these rules can avail themselves of the CSRP without foregoing the Company match. Although there is a limit in the amount of employer contributions, there is no limit to the amount an employee may contribute to the CSRP and it can be used in concert with other retirement strategies that may be available outside of our Company.

The 401(k) savings plan, CSRP and other generally available benefit programs allow us to remain competitive for employee talent. We believe that the availability of the aforementioned broad-based benefit programs generally enhances employee morale and loyalty.

COMPENSATION24 Date of GrantNumber of
Restricted Stock Units

Francisco D’Souza

December 3, 201373,712

Gordon Coburn

December 3, 201339,390

Karen McLoughlin

December 3, 201314,716

Malcolm Frank

December 3, 201314,460

Rajeev Mehta

December 3, 201336,408

Such restricted stock units were granted pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Company’s 2009 Incentive Plan and the related Stock Unit Award Agreements.

The December 2013 restricted stock units, referred to herein as the December 2013 Stock Units, vest in quarterly installments over three years, with 1/12th of the December 2013 Stock Units vesting on each March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of each of years 2014, 2015 and 2016.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation48


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

PSUs – HOW THEY WORK

 

Also, based on the foregoing considerations, in December 2013, the Compensation Committee approved the award of the following performance-based stock units, also referred to herein as the Performance Units:

 

NameDate of Grant

Number of

Performance Units

Francisco D’Souza

December 3, 2013136,894

Gordon Coburn

December 3, 201373,154

Karen McLoughlin

December 3, 201327,332

Malcolm Frank

December 3, 201326,854

Rajeev Mehta

December 3, 201367,614

The Performance UnitsPSUs are subject to attainment of certain performance milestones as well as certainand continued service requirements.

Step 1 – Performance milestones

1-year

Performance

Period;

2 Performance

Metrics

The Performance Units vest, if at all, based uponPSUs granted in November 2015 have a 1-year performance period (fiscal year 2016) over which the levelCompany’s performance across two performance metrics is measured: revenue and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share (“non-GAAP EPS”) (see “Reconciliation of achievementNon-GAAP Financial Measures” on page 55 for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to our results as reported under GAAP). Revenue determines 75% of the revenue milestone, also referredaward and non-GAAP EPS determines the remaining 25% of the award. Both metrics are subject to hereinadjustment by the Compensation Committee for any acquisitions over the course of the performance period.

For each metric, the Compensation Committee established threshold (50% vesting), target (100% vesting) and maximum (200% vesting) levels at the time of the award, with no PSUs eligible for vesting as to a metric for performance below the threshold level and the maximum possible number of PSUs that may vest as to a metric capped at 200%, regardless of performance above the maximum level. Performance Milestone, set forth belowacross these two metrics determines the total number of PSUs that may vest, subject to the Named Executive satisfying the continued service requirements of the award as follows:described in Step 2 below. The following diagram summarizes the manner in which the number of PSUs that may vest is determined.

 

(a)   0% of the Performance Units will vest if the Company’s 2014 revenue is less than $9,945,000,000.

(b)   50% of the Performance Units will vest upon the Company’s achievement of 2014 revenue of $9,945,000,000.

(c)    100% of the Performance Units will vest upon the Company’s achievement of 2014 revenue of $10,250,000,000.

(d)   200% of the Performance Units will vest upon the Company’s achievement of 2014 revenue of $10,960,000,000 or greater.

For these purposes, revenue is calculated pursuant to U.S. GAAP, subject to adjustments for certain acquisitions.

LOGO

Whether and to what extent the Performance Milestoneperformance as to either metric has been achieved will be determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole and absolute discretion based upon the audited financials for the 20142016 fiscal year. The numberTo the extent the level of Performance Units that will vest for performanceachievement falls between the applicable threshold targets will be determined usingand target levels or between the target and maximum levels for either metric, straight-line interpolation, rounded down to the preceding whole number (e.g., 101.74 rounded down to 101)., is utilized to calculate the payout level for the component.

In addition,

Step 2 – Continued service requirement

Vesting over Subsequent2-year Period

A Named Executive must continue in the service of the Performance Units that vest based upon attainment ofCompany until the Performance Milestone, shares of Company Class A Common Stock underlyingrelevant vesting date in order to receive the PSUs calculated in Step 1:

 1/3rd (or 33.33%) of such vested Performance Units,3rd, rounded down to the nearest whole number, will be issuedvest on the eighteen-month18-month anniversary of the date of grant; provided that the Named Executive remains in the Company’s service through such anniversary date, and shares of Company Class A Common Stock underlying

 the remaining 2/3rds (or 66.67%) of the vested Performance Units3rds will be issuedvest on the thirty-six month36-month anniversary of the date of grant; provided thatgrant.

RSUs – HOW THEY WORK

Quarterly

Vesting Over

3 Years

The RSUs vest in quarterly installments over a 3-year period. As a result, 1/12th of the RSUs granted in November 2015 vest on March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of 2016, 2017 and 2018.

25COMPENSATION


Perquisites

We seek to maintain an egalitarian culture in our facilities and operations. The Company’s philosophy is to provide a minimal amount of personal benefits perquisites to its executives and generally only when such benefits have a business purpose.

We incur expenses to ensure that our employees, including our executive officers, are accessible to us and our customers at all times and to promote our commitment to provide our employees and executives with the necessary resources and items of technology to allow them to operate “around the clock” in a “virtual office” environment. However, we do not view these expenses as executive perquisites because they are essential to the efficient performance of their duties and are comparable to the benefits provided to a broad-based group of our employees. In addition, the Company may reimburse executives for approved travel expenses where an immediate family member accompanies an executive to attend a business function at which such family member is generally expected to attend. Each of the Named Executives receives a perquisite in the form of an annual physical exam.

In addition, the Company provides Mr. D’Souza with limited access to an administrative assistant of the Company for his personal business purposes. Mr. D’Souza does not reimburse the Company for its cost of providing the administrative services and the Company pays him an additional amount to help offset any income taxes associated with the receipt of such services.

Additional Compensation Policies and Practices

Internal Pay Equity

Our compensation programs are designed so that potential realizable compensation is set relative to each executive’s level of responsibility and potential impact on our performance.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Company maintains a stock ownership and retention policy which is applicable to the Named Executives and non-employee Directors and designed to help align their interests with those of stockholders. The policy requires such individuals, consistent with their responsibilities to the stockholders of the Company, to hold a significant equity interest in the Company. The policy expects each individual to attain a minimum share ownership level equal to the lesser of a certain number of shares and a multiple of his or her base salary or retainer, as set forth in the table below.

Officer or Director LevelOwnership Target

Chief Executive Officer

Lesser of 100,000 shares and 5x annual base salary

U.S.-based Named Executive remains in the Company’s service through such anniversary date, each such date referred to herein as the Issue Date. For the avoidance(other than Chief Executive Officer)

Lesser of doubt, a Named Executive shall only be entitled to have60,000 shares of Company Class A Common Stock underlying Performance Units issued to him or her if the applicable Performance Milestone is achieved based on the schedule set forth above and the Named Executive remains in the service4x annual base salary

Chairman of the Company through the applicable Issue Date.Board (or Lead Director, if applicable)

Supplemental Retirement Programs

Other than the Cognizant Technology Solutions Supplemental Retirement Plan, described below, we do not have any nonqualified deferred compensation programs, pension plans or pre-tax supplemental executive retirement plans for our executive officers, except for Mr. Coburn. We established a nonqualified deferred compensation program for Mr. Coburn in order to provide him with the equivalent economic value

Lesser of the retirement plan in which he participated while the Company was majority-owned by IMS Health. Accordingly, Mr. Coburn is entitled to an20,000 shares and 4x annual Company contribution to his nonqualified deferred compensation account equal to 6%retainer

Non-employee Directors

Lesser of his base salary6,000 shares and earned4x annual performance bonus.

In addition, our U.S.-based executive officers who are subject to contribution restrictions under our 401(k) savings plan due to statutory limits that apply to highly-compensated employees are eligible to participate in the Cognizant Technology Solutions Supplemental Retirement Plan, referred to herein as the CSRP, on the same basis as all other regular U.S.-based employees. The CSRP is a nonqualified savings plan in which the employee’s contributions are made on a post-tax basis to an individually owned, portable and flexible retirement plan held with a life insurance company. The CSRP works alongside established qualified retirement plans such as our 401(k) savings plan or can be the basis for a long term stand-alone retirement savings plan. We provide a fully vested incentive match following the same formula as our 401(k) savings plan. Because the CSRP is not subject to the same IRS non-discrimination rules as our 401(k) savings plan, employees that faceretainer

Compliance with the policy is measured every June 30 and Named Executives and non-employee Directors are required to come into compliance with the policy within five years of becoming subject to it and meet any subsequently increased ownership requirements within five years of the increase.

Hedging, Short Sale, Margin Account and Pledging Prohibitions

The Company’s insider trading policies include the following prohibitions:

 

No hedging or speculation with respect to Cognizant securities. All of the Company’s directors, officers and other employees are prohibited from purchasing or selling puts, calls and other derivative securities of the Company or any other derivative security that provides the equivalent of ownership of any of the Company’s securities or an opportunity, direct or indirect, to profit from the change in value of the Company’s securities.

No short sales of Cognizant securities. All of the Company’s directors, officers and other employees are prohibited from engaging in short sales of Cognizant securities, preventing such persons from profiting from a decline in the trading price of the Company’s common stock.

No margin accounts with Cognizant securities. The Company’s directors and certain of its senior officers and other specified “insiders,” including the Named Executives, are prohibited from using Company securities as collateral in a margin account.

Limited pledging of Cognizant securities. The Company’s directors and certain of its senior officers and other specified “insiders,” including the Named Executives, are prohibited from pledging the Company’s securities as collateral for a loan, or modifying an existing pledge, without pre-approval from the Audit Committee.

COMPENSATION26
2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation49


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

limitation on their 401(k) contributions due to these rules can avail themselves of the CSRP without foregoing the Company match. Although there is a limit in the amount of employer contributions, there is no limit to the amount an employee may contribute to the CSRP and it can be used in concert with other retirement strategies that may be available outside of our Company.

Broad-Based Programs

Our U.S.-based executive officers


Clawback Policy

The Company maintains a Clawback Policy which applies to all Named Executives and certain other members of management. The policy provides that if the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance by the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws that is caused directly or indirectly by any current or former employee’s gross negligence, willful fraud or failure to act that affects the performance measures or the payment, award or value of any compensation which is based in whole or in part on the achievement of financial results by the Company, the Company may recover from any employee covered by the policy, regardless of whether or not such employee engaged in the applicable misconduct, the difference between (1) the amount of any such incentive compensation actually paid or awarded to, or realized by, the covered employee during the preceding three years, and (2) the amount of any such incentive compensation that would have been paid or awarded to, and value that would have been realized by, the covered employee based on the financial results under the restatement, as determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.

To the extent the applicable restatement is caused directly or indirectly by any current or former covered employee’s willful fraud or intentional manipulation of performance measures that affect the payment, award or value of incentive compensation, the Company may recoup from such covered employee responsible for the fraud or manipulation, the difference between (1) the amount of any such incentive compensation actually paid or awarded to, and value of any such incentive compensation realized by, such covered employee at any time while a covered employee, and (2) the amount of any such incentive compensation that would have been paid or awarded to, and value of any incentive compensation that would have been realized by, such covered employee at any time while a covered employee based on the financial results under the restatement, as determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.

Equity Grant Practices

The Compensation Committee or the Board approves the grant of stock-based equity awards, such as options, PSUs and RSUs, at its regularly scheduled meetings or by written consent. Awards approved during a regularly scheduled meeting become effective on the date of the meeting or as of a future date, as specified by the Compensation Committee or the Board in its approval. Awards approved by unanimous written consent become effective as of the date the Company is in receipt of all signed consents or as of a future date, as specified by the Compensation Committee or the Board in the written consent. In addition, the Board has authorized an executive committee, comprised of Messrs. Coburn, D’Souza and Narayanan (the “Executive Committee”), to grant options to newly hired and existing employees. Stock options granted by the Executive Committee are eligible to participate in our broad-based medical, dental and vision insurance, life and accidental death insurance, and 401(k) savings plan, post-tax supplemental retirement plan and our employee stock purchase plan on the same basis as all other regular employees. Under the 401(k) savings plan, we match employee contributions at the rate of 50% for each dollar contributed during each pay period, up to the first 6% of eligible compensation contributed during each pay period, subject to applicable IRS limits. The matching contributions immediately vest. The 401(k) savings plan and other generally available benefit programs allow us to remain competitive for employee talent.

We believe that the availability of the aforementioned broad-based benefit programs generally enhances employee morale and loyalty.

Perquisites

We seek to maintain an egalitarian culture in our facilities and operations. The Company’s philosophy is to provide a minimal amount of personal benefits perquisites to its executives and generally only when such benefits have a business purpose.

We incur expenses to ensure that our employees, including our executive officers, are accessible to us and our customers at all times and to promote our commitment to provide our employees and executives with the necessary resources and items of technology to allow them to operate “around the clock” in a “virtual office” environment. However, we do not view these expenses as executive perquisites because they are essential to the efficient performance of their duties and are comparable to the benefits provided to a broad-based group of our employees. In addition, if an immediate family member accompanies an executive to attend a business function at which such family member is generally expected to attend, the Company reimburses the executive for the related travel expenses. Each of the Named Executives receives a perquisite in the form of an annual physical exam.

In addition, the Company provides Mr. D’Souza with limited access to an administrative assistant of the Company for his personal business purposes. Mr. D’Souza does not reimburse the Company for its cost of providing the administrative services and the Company pays him an additional amount to help offset any income taxes associated with the receipt of such services.

Compensation Policies

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Company maintains a stock ownership and retention policy which is applicable to the Named Executives and non-employee directors. The policy requires such individuals, consistent with their responsibilities to the stockholders of the Company, to hold a significant equity interest in the Company. The policy expects each individual to attain a minimum share ownership level equal to the lesser of a certain number of shares and his or her base salary times a certain multiplier, as indicated below:

Officer or Director LevelOwnership Target

Chief Executive Officer

Lesser of 5x annual base salary and 50,000 shares

U.S.-based named executive officer (other than Chief Executive Officer)

Lesser of 4x annual base salary and 30,000 shares

Chairman of the Board of Directors (or Lead Director, if applicable)

Lesser of 4x annual retainer and 10,000 shares

Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors

Lesser of 4x annual base salary and 10,000 shares

Non-employee directors

Lesser of 4x annual retainer and 3,000 shares

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation50


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Clawback Policy

The Company maintains a Clawback Policy which applies to all Named Executives and certain other members of management. The policy provides that if the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance by the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, that is caused directly or indirectly by any current or former employee’s gross negligence, willful fraud or failure to act that affects the performance measures or the payment, award or value of any compensation which is based in whole or in part on the achievement of financial results by the Company, the Company may recover from any employee covered by the policy, regardless of whether or not such employee engaged in the applicable misconduct, the difference between (1) the amount of any such incentive compensation actually paid or awarded to, or realized by, the covered employee during the preceding three years, and (2) the amount of any such incentive compensation that would have been paid or awarded to, and value that would have been realized by, the covered employee based on the financial results under the restatement, as determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.

To the extent the applicable restatement is caused directly or indirectly by any current or former covered employee’s willful fraud or intentional manipulation of performance measures that affect the payment, award or value of incentive compensation, the Company may recoup from such covered employee responsible for the fraud or manipulation, the difference between (1) the amount of any such incentive compensation actually paid or awarded to, and value of any such incentive compensation realized by, such covered employee at any time while a covered employee, and (2) the amount of any such incentive compensation that would have been paid or awarded to, and value of any incentive compensation that would have been realized by, such covered employee at any time while a covered employee based on the financial results under the restatement, as determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.

Equity Grant Practices

The Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors approves the stock-based equity awards, such as the restricted stock units and performance-based stock units, at its regularly scheduled meetings or by written consent. Awards approved during a regularly scheduled meeting become effective on the date of the meeting or as of a future date, as specified by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors in its approval. Awards approved by unanimous written consent become effective as of the date the Company is in receipt of all signed consents or as of a future date, as specified by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors in the written consent. In addition, our Board of Directors has authorized an executive committee of Company management, comprised of Messrs. Narayanan, D’Souza and Coburn (the “Executive Committee”), to grant stock-based equity awards to newly hired and existing employees. Stock options granted by the executive committee of Company management shall be granted in accordance with the Company’s policy governing the issuance of stock options which is detailed below. The grant of restricted stock units and performance-based stock units is not covered by the policy governing the issuance of stock options.

The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors do not engage in any market timing of the stock-based equity awards made to the executive officers or other award recipients. There is no established practice of timing our awards in advance of the release of favorable financial results or adjusting the award date in connection with the release of unfavorable financial developments affecting our business. It is our intent that all stock option grants, whether made by the Board, of Directors, the Compensation Committee or the Executive Committee, have an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value of our Class A Common Stock based on the closing market price per share on the grant date.

The Company has a written policy governing the grant of stock options. The grant of PSUs and RSUs is not covered by the policy. The policy applies equally to grants of stock options to executives and other employees. The policy provides, among other things, that:

 

Stock option grants may be made by the Executive Committee, the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee, provided the Executive Committee shall not grant options to any of its members, to any employee subject to Section 16 reporting as defined by the SEC that are not members of the Executive Committee or to anyone who is or may be a “covered employee” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) that are not members of the Executive Committee;

Stock option grants may be made by the Executive Committee, the Board or the Compensation Committee, provided the Executive Committee shall not grant options to any of its members, to any employee subject to Section 16 reporting as defined by the SEC that are not members of the Executive Committee or to anyone who is or may be a “covered employee” under IRC Section 162(m) that are not members of the Executive Committee;

The exercise price of each stock option shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of grant based on the closing market price per share on such date;

Stock options granted by the Executive Committee must be within the guidelines set forth in the policy and may only be granted on the 14th day of a calendar month or, if the 14th day is a day that the Common Stock is not publicly traded, then on the last preceding trading date. The grants are reported to the Board at its next regularly scheduled meeting;

Except for grants to non-employee members of the Board (which shall only be issued with a grant date coincident with the date of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders or, with respect to the initial grant made to a non-employee Board member who is first elected or appointed to the Board other than at an annual meeting, the date of his or her initial election or appointment to the Board), no stock options shall be granted on a date that falls within

27COMPENSATION


one of the Company’s earnings black-out periods (period beginning 15 days prior to the end of each fiscal quarter (i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31) and ending with and including the second full trading day following the quarterly announcement of the earnings of the Company for such quarter);

 

The exercise price of each stock option shall not be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of our Class A Common Stock on the date of grant based on the closing market price per share on such date;

No stock options shall be granted by the Executive Committee to any one individual that collectively exceed 10,000 shares (subject to certain adjustments provided for under the policy) during any rolling12-month period without approval by the Board or the Compensation Committee;

 

Stock options granted by the Executive Committee must be within the guidelines set forth in the policy and may only be granted on the fourteenth (14th) day of a calendar month or, if the fourteenth (14th) day is a day that the Class A

No stock option grant by the Executive Committee shall have a term in excess of 10 years or a vesting schedule other than 25% per year over a four-year period measured from the grant date or contain terms other than those specified in the applicable plan document; and

 

2014 Proxy Statement
All option grants to employees subject to Section 16 reporting as defined by the SEC shall be made by the Compensation Committee comprised solely of two or more “outside directors” as determined under IRC Section 162(m) and the applicable Treasury Regulations (or by the Board so long as (i) any member of the Board that does not so qualify as such an outside director recuses himself or herself, and (ii) any such grant is made by two or more members of the Board who do qualify as such outside directors).

Risk Assessment

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation51


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Common Stock is not publicly traded, then on the last preceding trading date. The grants are reported to the Board at its next regularly scheduled meeting;

We believe our approach to goal setting and setting of targets with payouts at multiple levels of performance assists in mitigating excessive risk-taking that could harm our value or reward poor judgment by our executives. Several features of our programs reflect sound risk management practices. We believe we have allocated our compensation among base salary and short and long-term compensation target opportunities in such a way as to not encourage excessiverisk-taking, but rather to reward meeting strategic company goals that enhance stockholder value. In addition, we believe that the mix of equity award instruments used under our long-term incentive program that includes full value awards as well as the multi-year vesting of our equity awards also mitigates risk and properly accounts for the time horizon of risk.

Except for grants to non-employee members of the Board (which shall only be issued with a grant date coincident with the date of the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders or, with respect to the initial grant made to a non-employee Board member who is first elected or appointed to the Board other than at the Annual Meeting, the date of his or her initial election or appointment to the Board), no stock options shall be granted on a date that falls within one of the Company’s earnings black-out periods (period beginning fifteen days prior to the end of each fiscal quarter (i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31) and ending with and including the second full trading day following the quarterly announcement of the earnings of the Company for such quarter);

We do not believe that any of our compensation policies create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Tax Considerations – Deductibility of Executive Compensation

No stock options shall be granted by the Executive Committee to any one individual that collectively exceed 10,000 shares (subject to certain adjustments provided for under the policy) during any rolling twelve month period without approval by the Board or the Compensation Committee;

No stock option grant by the Executive Committee shall have a term

IRC Section 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction to publicly held companies for compensation exceeding $1.0 million paid to certain of the corporation’s executive officers, to the extent that compensation exceeds $1.0 million per covered officer in any fiscal year. The limitation applies only to compensation which is not considered to be “qualified performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee believes it is important to maintain compensation at the requisite level to attract and retain the executive officers essential to the Company’s financial success, even if all or part of that compensation may not be “qualified performance-based compensation”, and therefore subject to the $1.0 million limitation on deductible compensation under Section 162(m). Accordingly, the Compensation Committee may provide one or more executive officers with the opportunity to earn compensation, which may include cash incentive programs tied to the Company’s financial performance or equity awards other than in the form of stock options, which may be in excess of the amount deductible by reason of Section 162(m) or other provisions of the IRC. In establishing such cash and equity incentive compensation programs for the Company’s executive officers, the Compensation Committee believes that the potential deductibility of the compensation payable under those programs should be only one of a number of relevant factors taken into consideration, and not the sole governing factor.

Ongoing and Post-Employment Compensation

The Company recognizes that a change in excess of ten years; a vesting schedule other than twenty-five (25) percent per year over a four-year period measured from the grant date; or contain terms other than those specified in the applicable plan document; and

All option grants to employees subject to Section 16 reporting as defined by the SEC shall be made by the Compensation Committee comprised solely of two or more “outside directors” as determined under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) and the applicable Treasury Regulations (or by the Board so long as (i) any member of the Board that does not so qualify as such an outside director recuses himself or herself, and (ii) any such grant is made by two or more members of the Board who do qualify as such outside directors).

Ongoing and Post-Employment Compensation

The Company recognizes that a change of control can create uncertainty for its employees that may result in loss or distraction of executives during a critical period. As a result, in February 2013, we entered into Amended and Restated Executive Employment and Non-Disclosure, Non-Competition and Invention Assignment Agreements (collectively, the “Employment Agreements”) with each of the Named Executives under which certain payments and benefits would be provided should the executive officer’s employment terminate under certain circumstances, including in connection with a change in control. The Employment Agreements replace the Severance and Noncompetition Agreements previously entered into with Messrs. D’Souza, Coburn and Mehta. Prior to this, Ms. McLoughlin and Mr. Frank were not a party to any such agreement with the Company.

Under these agreements, in the event of an involuntary termination, other than in the case of a termination for cause, death, disability, or in the event that the Named Executive resigns for Good Reason (other than any termination described in the next paragraph) the Named Executive will receive his or her then current base salary for the 22-month period following termination in regular installments, commencing on or as soon as practicable after the applicable general release of claims is effective and within 35 days of the date of such termination, and an amount equal to the monthly COBRA medical insurance cost under the Company’s medical plan for the Named Executive, his or her spouse and

COMPENSATION28


dependents for the 12 months after termination. In addition, the portion of any outstanding equity awards that were subject to vesting solely upon continued service with the Company and that would have vested had the Named Executive remained employed during the year following the termination will become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date, and with respect to any equity award subject to vesting in whole or in part based on achievement of performance objectives, to the extent such performance period expired on or before the termination date, the performance objectives have been satisfied and the only condition remaining to vesting is continued employment, the portion of such equity awards that would have vested during the year following the termination date will become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date. With respect to any equity award subject to vesting in whole or in part based on achievement of performance objectives, if the performance period has not expired on or before the termination date or the performance objectives have not been satisfied, the entire unvested portion of such equity awards will be forfeited. The Named Executive will also be entitled to any amounts earned, accrued and owed but not yet paid to Named Executive as of the termination date and any benefits accrued and earned in accordance with the terms of any benefits plans or programs, and this amount is not conditioned upon the release becoming effective.

The Employment Agreements replace the Severance and Noncompetition Agreement previously entered into with Messrs. D’Souza, Coburn and Mehta. Prior to this, Ms. McLoughlin and Mr. Frank were not a party to any such agreement with the Company.

Under these agreements, in the event of an involuntary termination, other than in the case of a termination for cause, death, disability, or in the event that the Named Executive resigns for Good Reason (other than any termination described in the next paragraph) the Named Executive will receive his then-current base salary for the twenty-two (22) month period following termination in regular installments, commencing on or as soon as practicable after the applicable general release of claims is effective and within 35 days of the date of such termination, and an amount equal to the monthly COBRA medical insurance cost under the Company’s medical plan for the Named Executive, his spouse and dependents for the twelve (12) months after termination. In addition, the portion of any outstanding equity awards that were subject to vesting solely upon continued service with the Company and would have vested had the Named Executive remained employed during the year following the termination will become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date, and with respect to any equity award subject to vesting in whole or in part based on achievement of performance objectives, to the extent such performance period expired on or before the termination date, the performance objectives have been satisfied and the only condition remaining to vesting is continued employment, the portion of such equity awards that would have vested during the year following the termination date will become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date. The Named Executive will also be entitled to any amounts earned, accrued and owed but not yet paid to Named Executive as of the termination date and any benefits accrued and earned in accordance with the terms of any benefits plans or programs, and this amount is not conditioned upon the release becoming effective.

The Employment Agreement also providesprovide that in the event of an involuntary termination that coincides with, or within the twelve (12) month12-month period immediately after, the first occurrence of a change in control, we will pay such individual the following,

“Double
Trigger”
Change in
Control
Payments

provided he or she executes and does not revoke a general release of claims: a cash payment equal to one times his or her annual base salary, to be paid in regular installments over a period of twelve12 months commencing on or as soon as

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation52


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

practicable after the release is effective and within 35 days of the date of such termination, a cash payment equal to the amount of the target bonusannual cash incentive the Named Executive would otherwise have been eligible to receive for the performance year in which the termination occurs, assuming that the Named Executive and the Company have achieved 100% of performance targets and objectives, to be paid in a lump sum on or as soon as practicable after the release is effective and within 35 days of the date of such termination, and an amount equal to the

monthly COBRA medical insurance cost under the Company’s medical plan for the Named Executive and his or her spouse and dependents for the twelve (12)12 months after termination. In addition, the portion of any outstanding equity awards that were subject to vesting solely upon continued service with the Company will become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date, and with respect to any equity award subject to vesting in whole or in part based on achievement of performance objectives, to the extent such performance period expired on or before the termination date, the performance objectives have been satisfied and the only condition remaining to vesting is continued employment, such equity awards become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date. Moreover, with respect to the portion of any equity award subject to vesting in whole or in part based on achievement of performance objectives, to the extent the applicable performance period has not expired before the termination date, the Company must pro-rate the performance objectives for the period up to the closing of the change in control and make a good faith determination of the level of achievement the performance objective and treat as fully vested and exercisable the proportionate amount of equity awards corresponding to that level of achievement. The Named Executive will also be entitled to any amounts earned, accrued and owed but not yet paid to Named Executive as of the termination date and any benefits accrued and earned in accordance with the terms of any benefits plans or programs, and this amount is not conditioned upon the effectiveness of the release.

The Employment Agreement also provides that in the event any payments under the Employment Agreement would constitute parachute payments under Section 280G of the Code, then the payments under the Employment Agreement shall be reduced by the minimum amount necessary so that no amounts paid will be non-deductible to the Company or subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code.

Pursuant to such agreements, each Named Executive has agreed not to engage in any competitive business in any capacity for one year following termination of employment and not to solicit any of our employees to leave our employ within the one-year period following termination of employment. Our executive officers are also bound by confidentiality covenants that protect our and our customers’ confidential information and business and by intellectual property covenants that require Named Executives to fully and promptly disclose all inventions and works developed while at the Company and for a period of six months after employment termination.

We believe that the Employment Agreements continue to achieve two important goals crucial to our long-term financial success, namely, the long-term retention of our senior executives and their commitment to the attainment of our strategic objectives. These agreements will allow our participating executive officers to continue to focus their attention on our business operations and strategic plans without undue concern over their own financial situations during periods when substantial disruptions and distractions might otherwise prevail. We believe that these severance packages are also fair and reasonable in light of the years of service our executive officers have rendered us (average tenure of over 10 years), the level of dedication and commitment they have rendered us over that period, the contribution they have made to our growth and financial success and the value we expect to receive from retaining their services, including during challenging transition periods following a change in control.

None of the Named Executives is entitled to any tax gross-up payments for the tax liability they incur with respect to such severance benefits.

The material terms of the Named Executive’s post-employment compensation are described below in the section of the proxy statement entitled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” starting on page 62 of this proxy statement.

TAX CONSIDERATIONS

Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a tax deduction to publicly held companies for compensation exceeding $1.0 million paid to certain of the corporation’s executive officers, to the extent that compensation exceeds $1.0 million per covered officer in any fiscal year. The limitation applies only to compensation which is not considered to be “qualified performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code. The Compensation Committee believes it is important to maintain incentive compensation at the requisite level to attract and retain the executive officers essential to the

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation53


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Company’s financial success, even if all or part of that compensation may not be “qualified performance-based compensation”, and therefore subject to the $1.0 million limitation on deductible compensation under Section 162(m). Accordingly, the Compensation Committee may provide one or more executive officers with the opportunity to earn incentive compensation, whether through cash bonus programs tied to the Company’s financial performance or equity awards other than in the form of stock options, which may be in excess of the amount deductible by reason of Section 162(m) or other provisions of the Code. In establishing such cash and equity incentive compensation programs for the Company’s executive officers, the Compensation Committee believes that the potential deductibility of the compensation payable under those programs should be only one of a number of relevant factors taken into consideration, and not the sole governing factor.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation54


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the Exchange Act.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for evaluating and approving the compensation for the executive officers. Management has primary responsibility for our Company’s financial statements and reporting process, including the disclosure of executive compensation. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above. The Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

By the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation

John N. Fox, Jr.

John E. Klein

Michael Patsalos-Fox

Robert E. Weissman

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation55


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

2013 Summary Compensation Table

The following 2013 Summary Compensation Table provides certain summary information concerning the compensation earned for services rendered in all capacities to us and our subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2013 by our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers whose total compensation for the 2013 year was in excess of $100,000 and who were serving as executive officers at the end of the 2013 fiscal year (collectively, the “Named Executives”). No other executive officers who would have otherwise been includable in such table on the basis of total compensation for the 2013 fiscal year have been excluded by reason of their termination of employment or change in executive status during that year. All share and share-based numbers and values in this 2013 Summary Compensation Table reflect the Company’s two-for-one stock split that occurred on March 7, 2014.

(a) (b)  (c)   (d)   (e)   (f)   (g)   (h)  (i)  (j) 
Name and Principal Position Year  

Salary

($)

   

Bonus

($)

   Stock Awards 1  2
($)
   Option Awards
($)
   Non-Equity
Incentive  Plan
Compensation 3
($)
   

Change in Pension

Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)

  All Other
Compensation
($)
  

Total

($)

 

Francisco D’Souza

Chief Executive Officer

 2013   608,000          9,882,687          844,812         12,177 9   11,347,676  
 2012   590,000          9,594,952          405,780         21,687 9   10,612,419  
 2011   566,500          10,285,710          908,248         1,500 5   11,761,958  

Gordon J. Coburn

President 7

 2013   578,000          5,281,127          803,127     260,861 4   90,518 6   7,013,633  
 2012   561,000          5,127,386          385,835     98,412 4   64,310 6   6,236,943  
 2011   510,000          4,819,405          817,664         87,010 6   6,234,079  

Karen McLoughlin

Chief Financial Officer 8

 2013   361,000          1,973,102          501,607         7,650 10   2,843,359  
 2012   350,000          1,915,628          240,717         7,500 10   2,513,845  

Malcolm Frank

Executive Vice President,

Strategy and Marketing

 2013   371,000       1,938,660          515,502         1,500 5   2,826, 662  
 2012   360,000          1,882,138          247,595         1,500 5   2,491,233  

Rajeev Mehta

Chief Executive Officer, IT Services

 2013   462,000          4,881,232          641,946         1,500 5   5,986,678  
 2012   448,000          4,437,492          308,118         1,500 5   5,195,110  
 2011   406,500          4,075,470          651,726         1,500 5   5,135,196  

1

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, with respect to the share-based awards granted in each respective year. The reported dollar amounts do not take into account any estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. A description of the terms of the restricted stock units and performance-based stock units granted during 2013 is disclosed under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentives—Stock-Based Awards” on page 48 of this proxy statement.

2

These amounts do not necessarily represent the actual value that will be recognized by the Named Executives upon vesting and issuance of shares. The amounts reported in the columns assume settlement of performance-based stock units at target levels; however, performance-based stock units may vest at a maximum of 200% of target, depending on the Company’s 2014 revenue. For performance-based stock units granted in 2013, if the maximum level of performance is achieved, the grant date fair value for the performance-based stock units will be approximately $12,847,502 for Mr. D’Souza, $6,865,502 for Mr. Coburn, $2,565,108 for Ms. McLoughlin $2,520,248 for Mr. Frank and $6,345,574 for Mr. Mehta, resulting in an aggregate grant date fair value for all stock awards of approximately $16,306,438 for Mr. D’Souza, $8,713,878 for Mr. Coburn, $3,255,656 for Ms. McLoughlin, $3,198,784 for Mr. Frank and $8,054,019 for Mr. Mehta. None of the Named Executives forfeited any stock awards during the 2013, 2012, or 2011 fiscal years. For information regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of stock-based awards, see Note 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the applicable fiscal year.

3

Amounts shown in this column represent cash incentive bonuses earned for each respective fiscal year and paid in the first quarter of the following year under our officer annual non-equity incentive bonus program.

4

Amount represents investment earnings or losses on Mr. Coburn’s nonqualified deferred compensation account. The earnings or losses correspond to the actual market earnings on a select group of investment funds utilized to track the notional investment return on the account balance for the respective fiscal year. The Company has not made any determination as to which portion of such earnings may be considered above market for purposes of column (h) of this table and has elected to report the entire amount of such earnings or losses. Mr. Coburn’s nonqualified deferred compensation account incurred investment gains in 2013 in an amount equal to $260,861, as reflected in the 2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 61 of this proxy statement.

5

Represents a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution.

6

For 2013, includes a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $1,500, a Cognizant Supplemental Retirement Plan, or CSRP, matching contribution in the amount of $6,150 and a contribution in the amount of $82,868, which the Company is required to make to a nonqualified deferred compensation account. For 2012, includes a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $1,500, a Cognizant Supplemental Retirement Plan, or CSRP, matching contribution in the amount of $6,000 and a contribution in the amount of $56,810 to the nonqualified deferred compensation account. For 2011, includes a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $1,500, a Cognizant Supplemental Retirement Plan, or CSRP, matching contribution in the amount of $5,850 and a contribution in the amount of $79,660 to the nonqualified deferred compensation account.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation56


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

7

Mr. Coburn was appointed as President on February 6, 2012, prior to which he served as our Chief Financial Officer.

8

Ms. McLoughlin was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company on February 6, 2012.

9

For 2013, includes a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $1,500, and the use of an administrative assistant of the Company for personal matters, which is valued at $5,141, plus a gross-up for taxes relating to such services equal to $5,536. For 2012, includes a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $1,500, and the use of an administrative assistant of the Company for personal matters, which is valued at $10,831, plus a gross up for taxes relating to such services equal to $9,356.

10

For 2013, represents a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $844 and a CSRP matching contribution in the amount of $6,806. For 2012, represents a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $1,500 and a CSRP matching contribution in the amount of $6,000.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation57


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2013 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table provides certain summary information concerning each grant of an award made to a Named Executive in the 2013 fiscal year under a compensation plan. All share and share-based numbers and values in this 2013 Grants of Plan-based Awards Table reflect the Company’s two-for-one stock split that occurred on March 7, 2014.

(a) (b)   (c)  (d)  (e)    (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j)  (k)  (l) 
      

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards 1

    

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards  2

             
Name Grant Date   

Threshold

($)

  

Target

($)

  

Maximum

($)

    

Threshold

(#)

  

Target

(#)

  

Maximum

(#)

  

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number

of

Shares

of Stock

or

Units 3

(#)

  

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options

(#)

  

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

Awards

($/SH)

  

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Equity

Awards 4

($)

 
Francisco D’Souza 2/28/13   258,400    516,800    1,033,600          
 12/3/13       68,447    136,894    273,788             6,423,751  
 12/3/13          73,712            3,458,936  
Gordon Coburn 2/28/13   245,650    491,300    982,600          
 12/3/13       36,577    73,154    146,308             3,432,751  
 12/3/13          39,390            1,848,376  
Karen McLoughlin 2/28/13   153,425    306,850    613,700          
 12/3/13       13,666    27,332    54,664             1,282,554  
 12/3/13          14,716            690,548  
Malcolm Frank 2/28/13   157,675    315,350    630,700          
 12/3/13       13,427    26,854    53,708             1,260,124  
 12/3/13          14,460            678,536  
Rajeev Mehta 2/28/13   196,350    392,700    785,400          
 12/3/13       33,807    67,614    135,228             3,172,787  
 12/3/13          36,408            1,708,445  

1

Represents the range of performance bonuses that can be earned by the Named Executive if the minimum threshold, target and maximum performance targets are achieved. The bonus is prorated if performance levels are achieved between the threshold and target levels or between the target and maximum levels. Performance below the minimum threshold results in no bonus payout to the Named Executive. The methodology and performance criteria applied in determining these potential bonus amounts are discussed under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Annual Non-Equity Incentive” starting on page 47 of this proxy statement. The actual cash bonus paid to each Named Executive for his 2013 performance is reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation above in the 2013 Summary Compensation Table. In each case, the Named Executive received a bonus in excess of his or her target amount based on 2013 performance.

2

Represents the range of shares that could vest and be issued pursuant to performance-based stock units. A description of the terms of the performance-based stock units is discussed under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentives—Stock-Based Awards” starting on page 48 of this proxy statement.

3

Represents restricted stock units. A description of the terms of the restricted stock units is discussed under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentives—Stock-Based Awards” starting on page 48 of this proxy statement.

4

Represents the grant date fair value of the restricted stock units and performance-based stock units determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, assuming target achievement for performance-based stock units. For information regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of stock-based awards, see Note 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation58


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2013 Table

The following table provides certain summary information concerning outstanding equity awards held by the Named Executives as of December 31, 2013. All share and share-based numbers and values in this Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2013 Table reflect the Company’s two-for-one stock split that occurred on March 7, 2014.

(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)    (g)  (h)  (i)  (j) 
  Option Awards 1    Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)

Exercisable

  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)

Unexercisable

  

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)

  

Option
Exercise

Price

($)

  

Option
Expiration

Date

     

Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested 2

(#)

  

Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested 3

($)

  

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units

or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested

(#)

  

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other

Rights That
Have Not
Vested 3

($)

 

Francisco D’Souza

  500,000            16.85    08/06/16                   
  480,000            9.11    12/08/18                   
                       42,4002   2,140,776          
                       85,8604   4,335,071          
                       66,852 2   3,375,357          
                       249,3566   12,589,984          
                       73,7122   3,721,719          
                               136,894 7   6,911,778  

Gordon J. Coburn

  100,000            16.85    08/06/16                   
                       19,8682   1,003,135          
                       40,2304   2,031,213          
                       35,7242   1,803,705          
                       133,251 6   6,727,843          
                       39,3902   1,988,801          
                         73,1547   3,693,545  

Karen McLoughlin

  70,000            20.17    12/13/16                   
  20,000            15.53    8/13/18                   
                       8,3342   420,784          
                       3,4785   175,604          
                       13,3482   673,941          
                       49,7846   2,513,594          
                       14,7162   743,011          
                               27,3327   1,379,993  

Malcolm Frank

                       10,6682   538,627          
                       4,452 5   224,781          
                       13,1142   662,126          
                       48,9136   2,469,617          
                       14,4602   730,085    
                               26,8547   1,355,858  

Rajeev Mehta

                       16,8002   848,232          
                       34,0204   1,717,670    
                       30,918 2   1,561,050          
                       115,322 6   5,822,608          
                       36,4082   1,838,240          
                                 67,6147   3,413,831  

1

Each stock option grant included in this table has a term of 10 years measured from the grant date, and all outstanding options granted to the Named Executives as of December 31, 2013 have fully vested pursuant to their terms.

2

Awards shown are time-based restricted stock units that were granted on November 28, 2011, December 3, 2012 and December 3, 2013 and vest on specified dates if the individual is then employed by the Company:

Mr. D’Souza: Approximately 10,600 shares are scheduled to vest on each of February 28, May 28, August 28 and November 28 of 2014; approximately 14,498 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2014 and 2015; and approximately 6,142 shares are scheduled to vest on each of March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2016.

Mr. Coburn: Approximately 4,966 shares are scheduled to vest on each of February 28, May 28, August 28 and November 28 of 2014; approximately 7,746 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2014 and 2015; and approximately 3,282 shares are scheduled to vest on each of March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2016.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation59


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Ms. McLoughlin: Approximately 2,084 shares are scheduled to vest on each of February 1, May 1, August 1 and November 1 of 2014; approximately 2,894 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2014 and 2015; and approximately 1,226 shares are scheduled to vest on each of March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2016.

Mr. Frank: Approximately 2,666 shares are scheduled to vest on each of February 1, May 1, August 1 and November 1 of 2014; approximately 2,842 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 3, June 3, September��3 and December 3 of 2014 and 2015; and approximately 1,204 shares are scheduled to vest on March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2016.

Mr. Mehta: Approximately 4,200 shares are scheduled to vest on each of February 28, May 28, August 28 and November 28 of 2014; approximately 6,898 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2014 and 2015; and approximately 3,034 shares are scheduled to vest on each of March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2016.

3

Market value was determined based on a closing price of a share of our Class A Common Stock of $50.49 as of December 31, 2013.

4

For awards of performance-based units granted in 2011, target levels for 2012 were achieved at 67.5% based on the performance measures set forth below. The awards have partially time-vested and will fully time-vest based on continued employment through each of the vesting dates.

Measurement Date

Number of SharesCalendar Year
Revenue in ‘000

December 31, 2012

200% of Award Outstanding$8,087,500
100% of Award Outstanding$7,525,000
50% of Award Outstanding$7,243,000
No Awardless than $7,243,000

1/3 of the award vested on May 28, 2013 and the remaining 2/3 of the award will vest on November 28, 2014 provided the Named Executive is employed by the Company.

5

For awards of performance-based units granted in 2011, target levels for 2012 were achieved at 67.5% based on the performance measures set forth below. The awards have partially time-vested and will fully time-vest based on continued employment through each of the vesting dates.

Measurement Date

Number of SharesCalendar Year
Revenue in ‘000

December 31, 2012

125% of Award Outstanding$8,087,500
100% of Award Outstanding$7,525,000
50% of Award Outstanding$7,243,000
No Awardless than $7,243,000

1/2 of the award vested on June 3, 2013 and the remaining 1/2 of the award will vest on December 1, 2014 provided the Named Executive is employed by the Company.

6

For awards of performance-based units granted in 2012, target levels were achieved at 133.9% based on the performance measures set forth below. Awards will time-vest based on continued employment through each of the vesting dates.

Measurement Date

Number of SharesCalendar Year
Revenue in ‘000

December 31, 2013

200% of Award Outstanding$9,175,000
100% of Award Outstanding$8,515,000
50% of Award Outstanding$8,220,000
No Awardless than $8,220,000

1/3rd of the award will vest on June 3, 2014 provided the Named Executive is employed by the Company and the remaining 2/3rds of the award will vest on December 3, 2015 provided the Named Executive is employed by the Company.

7

For awards of performance-based units granted in 2013, target levels will vest upon the achievement of the performance measures set forth below and continued employment through each of the vesting dates.

Measurement Date

Number of SharesCalendar Year
Revenue in ‘000

December 31, 2014

200% of Award Outstanding$10,960,000
100% of Award Outstanding$10,250,000
50% of Award Outstanding$9,945,000
No Awardless than $9,945,000

Upon achieving performance criteria, 1/3rd of the award will vest on June 3, 2015 provided the Named Executive is employed by the Company and the remaining 2/3rds of the award will vest on December 3, 2016 provided the Named Executive is employed by the Company.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation60


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2013 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE

The following Option Exercises and Stock Vested table provides additional information about the value realized by the Named Executives on option award exercises and stock award vesting during the year ended December 31, 2013. All share and share-based numbers and values in this 2013 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table reflect the Company’s two-for-one stock split that occurred on March 7, 2014.

(a) (b)  (c)    (d)  (e) 
  Option Awards    Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise (#)
  

Value Realized

on Exercise

($) 1

     Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting (#) 2
  

Value Realized

on Vesting

($) 3

 

Francisco D’Souza

           386,426    16,533,517  

Gordon J. Coburn

  317,500    9,694,577     183,182    7,828.792  

Karen McLoughlin

  10,000    273,350     23,186    908,431  

Malcolm Frank

           27,688    1,085,380  

Rajeev Mehta

  152,580    5,591,477      155,490    6,644,627  

1

Value realized on exercise is calculated based upon the number of options exercised and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise less the exercise price, before any applicable tax withholding.

2

The number of shares shown in the table reflects the gross number of shares received by each Named Executive upon vesting of the stock awards. The Company reduced the number of shares issued to each Named Executive by automatically withholding a number of shares with a fair market value as of the issuance date sufficient to satisfy required tax withholdings. Each Named Executive actually received the following net number of shares of Company stock following such share withholding: Mr. D’Souza, 190,574; Mr. Coburn, 95,026; Ms. McLoughlin, 14,086; Mr. Frank, 17,498; and Mr. Mehta, 93,000.

3

Value realized on vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired on vesting by the fair market value of the shares on the respective vesting date.

2013 Pension Benefits Table

None of the Named Executives participated in any defined benefit pension plans in 2013.

2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information with respect to the nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements in effect during 2013 for the Named Executives.

(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)
NameExecutive
Contributions
in Last FY ($)
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY ($)
Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
($)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
Aggregate
Balance
at Last FYE
($)

Francisco D’Souza

Gordon J. Coburn

82,868 1260,861 21,048,863 3

Karen McLoughlin

Malcolm Frank

Rajeev Mehta

1

This amount is reported as compensation and is included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the 2013 Summary Compensation Table on page 56 of this proxy statement.

2

This amount is reported as compensation and is included in the “Changes in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the 2013 Summary Compensation Table on page 56 of this proxy statement. Earnings are broken down between funds as follows:

Investment Fund  

Earnings

Attributable to such Fund

 

Mass Mutual Select Focused Value

  $201,392  

Mass Mutual Select Mid Cap Growth Equity II A

   59,469  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $260,861  

3

Includes the amounts reported in columns (c) and (d) of this table plus such amounts previously reported in the Company’s Summary Compensation Table in previous years if such compensation was required to be disclosed.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation61


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Company has established this nonqualified deferred compensation arrangement for Mr. Coburn to serve as the economic equivalent of the retirement plan in which he participated while the Company was majority owned by IMS Health. Pursuant to such arrangement, the Company will credit Mr. Coburn’s deferred compensation account with an annual contribution in a dollar amount equal to 6% of his base salary and earned bonus for the year. Mr. Coburn can select from the 16 investment funds sponsored by Mass Mutual available to the plan to serve as the measures of the investment return on his account for each year. Mr. Coburn may change his investment elections up to six times per year. The account balance will become due and payable upon the occurrence of any of the following distributable events: (i) retirement at 55 years of age—payable six months following retirement in either a lump sum or 10 annual installments as elected by Mr. Coburn per plan provisions; (ii) termination of employment—payable in a lump sum six months following termination of employment; (iii) death or disability—immediate lump sum payment; and (iv)  unforeseen emergency, as defined by IRC 409A—payable in a lump sum.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

No Named Executive has an employment agreement that provides a specific term of employment. Accordingly, the employment of each Named Executive may be terminated at any time at the discretion of our Board of Directors.

We have entered into Amended and Restated Executive Employment and Non-Disclosure, Non-Competition, and Invention Assignment Agreements (“Employment Agreement”) with each of the Named Executives, effective February 25, 2013, which provided certain benefits upon the termination of their employment under certain prescribed circumstances.

Employment Agreements. Under the Employment Agreement, if a Named Executive’s employment terminates for any reason other than Cause, death or disability or if the Named Executive resigns for Good Reason and the Company’s right to cure has expired (an “involuntary termination”) (other than a termination that coincides with, or occurs within the twelve (12) month period immediately after, the first occurrence of a change in control) and if the Named Executive executes and does not revoke the applicable general release of claims in favor of the Company, we will pay such individual his then-current base salary for the twenty-two (22) month period following termination in regular installments, commencing on or as soon as practicable after the release is effective and within 35 days of the date of such termination and an amount equal to the monthly COBRA medical insurance cost under the Company’s medical plan for the Named Executive, his spouse and dependents for the twelve (12) months after termination. In addition, the portion of any outstanding equity awards that were subject to vesting solely upon continued service with the Company and would have vested had the Named Executive remained employed during the year following the termination will become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date, and, with respect to any equity award subject to vesting in whole or in part based on achievement of performance objectives, to the extent such performance period expired on or before the termination date, the performance objectives have been satisfied and the only condition remaining to vesting is continued employment, the portion of such equity awards that would have vested during the year following the termination date will become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date. The Named Executive will also be entitled to any amounts earned, accrued and owed but not yet paid to Named Executive as of the termination date and any benefits accrued and earned in accordance with the terms of any benefits plans or programs, and this amount is not conditioned upon the Release becoming effective.

Under the Employment Agreement, “Cause” is generally defined to include: (i) willful malfeasance or willful misconduct by the Named Executive in connection with his employment, (ii) continuing failure to perform such duties as are requested by the Board of Directors, (iii) failure by the Named Executive to observe material policies of the Company applicable to him or her, (iv) the commission by the Named Executive of (x) any felony or (y) any misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, (v) the Named Executive engaging in any fraudulent act or embezzlement, or (vi) any material breach of the agreement.

Under the Employment Agreement, “Good Reason” is generally defined as the occurrence of one or more of the following events: (i) a material diminution of the Named Executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities, (ii) a material diminution in his overall compensation package which is not caused by an overall policy to reduce senior employee compensation throughout the Company, (iii) the failure of the Company to obtain from its successor the express assumption of the agreement, and (iv) a change, without the Named Executive’s consent, in the principal place of work of the Named Executive to a location more than 50 miles from his primary work location, but only if the change is after a change in control. The Employment Agreement provides that the Named Executive must give the Company notice within 30 days of the action or

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation62


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

omission giving rise to the Good Reason, and the Company then has a period of 30 days to correct the reason constituting grounds for Good Reason. If the Company does not correct the event during the cure period, the Named Executive has 30 days to terminate for Good Reason.

The Employment Agreement also provides that in the event of an involuntary termination that coincides with, or occurs within the twelve (12) month period immediately after, the first occurrence of a change in control, we will pay such individual the following, provided he or she executes and does not revoke the applicable release of claims: a cash payment equal to one times his annual base salary, to be paid in regular installments over a period of twelve months commencing on or as soon as practicable after the applicable release is effective and within 35 days of the date of such termination, a cash payment equal to the amount of the target bonus the Named Executive would otherwise have been eligible to receive for the performance year in which the termination occurs, assuming that the Named Executive and the Company have achieved 100% of performance targets and objectives, to be paid in a lump sum on or as soon as practicable after the Release is effective and within 35 days of the date of such termination, and an amount equal to the monthly COBRA medical insurance cost under the Company’s medical plan for the Named Executive and his spouse and dependents for the (12) months after termination. In addition, the portion of any outstanding equity awards that were subject to vesting solely upon continued service with the Company will become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date, and with respect any equity award subject to vesting in whole or in part based on achievement of performance objectives, to the extent such performance period expired on or before the termination date, the performance objectives have been satisfied and the only condition remaining to vesting is continued employment, such equity awards become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date. Moreover, with respect the portion of any equity award subject to vesting in whole or in part based on achievement of performance objectives, to the extent the applicable performance period has not expired before the termination date, the Company must pro-rate the performance objectives for the period up to the closing of the change in control and make a good faith determination of the level of achievement of the performance objective and treat as fully vested and exercisable the proportionate amount of equity awards corresponding to that level of achievement. The Named Executive will also be entitled to any amounts earned, accrued and owed but not yet paid to the Named Executive as of the termination date and any benefits accrued and earned in accordance with the terms of any benefits plans or programs, and this amount is not conditioned upon the effectiveness of the Release.release.

The Employment Agreements also provide that in the event any payments under the Employment Agreements would constitute parachute payments under IRC Section 280G, then the payments under the Employment Agreements shall be reduced by the minimum amount necessary so that no amounts paid will be non-deductible to the Company or subject to the excise tax imposed under IRC Section 4999.

Pursuant to the Employment Agreements, each Named Executive has agreed not to engage in any competitive business in any capacity for one year following termination of employment and not to solicit any of our employees to leave our employ within the one-year period following termination of employment. Our Named Executives are also bound by confidentiality covenants that protect our and our customers’ confidential information and business and by intellectual property covenants that require the Named Executives to fully and promptly disclose all inventions and works developed while at the Company and for a period of six months after employment termination.

We believe that the Employment Agreements continue to achieve two important goals crucial to our long-term financial success, namely, the long-term retention of the Named Executives and their commitment to the attainment of our strategic objectives. These agreements will allow our Named Executives to continue to focus their attention on our business operations and strategic plans without undue concern over their own financial situations during periods when substantial disruptions and distractions might otherwise prevail. We believe that these severance packages are also fair and reasonable in light of the years of service our executive officers have rendered us (average tenure of over 10 years), the level of dedication and commitment they have rendered us over that period, the contribution they have made to our growth and financial success and the value we expect to receive from retaining their services, including during challenging transition periods following a change in control.

29COMPENSATION


No TaxGross-ups on Severance BenefitsNone of the Named Executives is entitled to any tax gross-up payments for the tax liability they incur with respect to such severance benefits.

The material terms of the Named Executives’ post-employment compensation are described in “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” starting on page 35.

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Compensation Committee has furnished the report set forth below. The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.

To the Board of Directors of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation:

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Compensation Committee has recommended to the Employment Agreement, a “changeBoard of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in control” is generally defined as a change in ownership or controlsuch proxy statement for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

By the Compensation Committee of the Company effected throughBoard of Directors of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation

John N. Fox, Jr.

John E. Klein

Michael Patsalos-Fox

Robert E. Weissman

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

During the year ended December 31, 2015, Messrs. Fox, Klein, Patsalos-Fox and Weissman served on the Compensation Committee. No member of the Compensation Committee was or is a current or former officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

None of our executive officers serve as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity which has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Company.

COMPENSATION30


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

2015 Summary Compensation Table

The following 2015 Summary Compensation Table provides certain summary information concerning the compensation earned for services rendered in all capacities to us and our subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2015 by our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers whose total compensation for the 2015 fiscal year was in excess of $100,000 and who were serving as executive officers at the end of the 2015 fiscal year (collectively, the “Named Executives”). No other executive officers who would have otherwise been includable in such table on the basis of total compensation for the 2015 fiscal year have been excluded by reason of their termination of employment or change in executive status during that year.

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j)

Name and Principal

Position

   Year   

  Salary  

($)

 

  Bonus  

($)

 

Stock

  Awards 1,2  

($)

 

Option

  Awards  

($)

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

 Compensation 3 
($)

 

 

 Change in Pension 
Value and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($)

 

 

All Other

 Compensation 

($)

 

  Total  

($)

Francisco D’Souza

Chief Executive Officer

 2015   645,000        10,483,400      778,306    44,677 5 11,951,383
 2014   626,000        10,178,101      511,705    17,257 5 11,333,063
 2013   608,000        9,882,687      844,812    12,177 5 11,347,676

Gordon J. Coburn

President

 2015   613,500        5,602,186      740,296 (76,165) 4   89,178 6 6,968,995
 2014   595,500        5,438,997      486,773 129,043 4   72,736 6 6,723,049
 2013   578,000        5,281,127      803,127 260,861 4   90,518 6 7,013,633

Karen McLoughlin

Chief Financial Officer

 2015   406,000        2,801,868      489,910    7,950 7 3,705,728
 2014   372,000        2,594,346      304,080    7,800 7 3,278,226
 2013   361,000        1,973,102      501,607    7,650 7 2,843,359

Rajeev Mehta

Chief Executive Officer,

IT Services

 2015   538,500        5,353,875      649,795    1,500 8 6,543,670
 2014   508,000        5,197,934      415,249    1,500 8 6,122,683
 2013   462,000        4,881,232      641,946    1,500 8 5,986,678

Malcolm Frank

Executive Vice President,

Strategy and Marketing

 2015   417,000        2,625,500      503,184    1,500 8 3,547,184
 2014   382,200        2,549,052      312,254    1,500 8 3,245,006
 2013   371,000        1,938,660      515,502    1,500 8 2,826,662
1Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs and PSUs determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 granted in each respective year. The reported dollar amounts do not take into account any estimated forfeitures related to continued service vesting requirements. See “Long-Term Incentives – Stock-Based Awards” starting on page 23 for a description of the following transactions: (i) consummation of a merger, consolidation or other reorganization approved by the stockholders, unless securities representing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of the voting securities of the successor corporation are immediately thereafter beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the persons who beneficially owned the Company’s outstanding voting securities immediately prior to such transaction, (ii) a sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, (iii) the closing of any transaction or series of related transactions pursuant to which any person or any group of persons comprising a “group” within the meaning of Rule 13d-5(b)(1) of the 1934 Act (other than (A) the Company or (B) a person that, prior to such transaction or series of related transactions, directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with, the Company) acquires directly or indirectly (whether as a result of a single acquisition or by reason of one or more acquisitions within the twelve (12)-month period ending with the most recent acquisition) the beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the 1934 Act) of securities possessing (or convertible into or exercisable for securities possessing) more than thirty-five percent (35%) of the total combined voting power of the Company’s securities (as measured in terms of the power to vote with respect toRSUs and PSUs granted during 2015.

2These amounts do not necessarily represent the election of Board members) outstanding immediately after the consummation of such acquisition or series of related acquisitions, whether any such acquisition involves a direct issuance from the Company or the acquisition of outstanding securities held by one or more of the Company’s existing stockholders, or (iv) a change in the composition of the Board over a period of twelve (12) consecutive months or less suchactual value that a majority of the Board members ceases, by reason of one or more contested elections for Board membership, to be comprised of individuals who either (A) have been Board members continuously since the beginning of such period or (B) have been elected or nominated for election as Board members during such period by at least a majority of the Board members described in clause (A) who were still in office at the time the Board approved such election or nomination.

If a Named Executive is terminated due to death, disability or for Cause, he or she will receive any amounts earned, accrued and owed but not yet paid to him or her as of his termination date and any benefits accrued and earned in accordance with the terms of any benefit plan or program of the Company. However, all other obligations to the Named Executive will be extinguished as of the termination date.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation63


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Pursuant to such agreements, each Named Executive has agreed not to engage in any competitive business in any capacity for one year following termination of employment and not to solicit any of our employees to leave our employ within the one-year period following termination of employment. Our executive officers are also boundrecognized by confidentiality covenants of indefinite duration and by intellectual property covenants that require Named Executives to fully and promptly disclose all inventions and works developed while at the Company and for a period of six months after termination.

Calculation of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

The following table shows potential payments to our Named Executives under the various severance and other arrangements and agreements that were in effect on December 31, 2013 for various scenarios involving a change in control or termination of employment of each of our Named Executives, assuming a December 31, 2013 termination date and, where applicable, using the closing price of our Class A Common Stock of $50.49 (as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market as of December 31, 2013, as adjusted for the Company’s two-for-one stock split that occurred on March 7, 2014).

Name  Trigger  Salary and
Bonus
   Benefits 3   Value of Equity
Acceleration  4
   Total Value 

Francisco D’Souza

  Qualifying Termination Prior to Change in Control 1  $1,114,667    $11,276    $13,600,794    $14,726,737  
  Qualifying Termination Following Change in Control 2  $1,124,800    $11,276    $26,162,908    $27,298,984  
  Death or Disability  $      $    $  
  Retirement  $      $    $  
  Termination for Other Reasons  $      $    $  

Gordon J. Coburn

  Qualifying Termination Prior to Change in Control 1  $1,059,667    $11,276    $6,841,799    $7,912,742  
  Qualifying Termination Following Change in Control 2  $1,069,300    $11,276    $13,554,697    $14,635,273  
  Death or Disability  $      $    $  
  Retirement  $      $    $  
  Termination for Other Reasons  $      $    $  

Karen McLoughlin

  Qualifying Termination Prior to Change in Control 1  $661,833    $8,149    $2,018,994    $2,688,976  
  Qualifying Termination Following Change in Control 2  $667,850    $8,149    $4,526,933    $5,202,932  
  Death or Disability  $      $    $  
  Retirement  $      $    $  
  Termination for Other Reasons  $      $    $  

Malcolm Frank

  Qualifying Termination Prior to Change in Control 1  $680,167    $11,276    $2,161,073    $2,852,516  
  Qualifying Termination Following Change in Control 2  $686,350    $11,276    $4,625,237    $5,322,863  
  Death or Disability  $      $    $  
  Retirement  $      $    $  
  Termination for Other Reasons  $      $    $  

Rajeev Mehta

  Qualifying Termination Prior to Change in Control 1  $847,000    $11,276    $5,900,009    $6,758,285  
  Qualifying Termination Following Change in Control 2  $854,700    $11,276    $11,787,799    $12,653,775  
  Death or Disability  $      $    $  
  Retirement  $      $    $  
  Termination for Other Reasons  $      $    $  

While we believe that the amounts shown above and the assumptions upon which they are based provide reasonable estimates of the amounts that would have been due to the Named Executives in the event that any of the circumstances described above had occurred on December 31, 2013, the actual amounts due to the Named Executives upon vesting of shares. The amounts reported in the columns assume settlement of PSUs at target levels; however, PSUs may vest at a triggering eventmaximum of 200% of target, depending on the Company’s 2016 revenue and non-GAAP EPS. For PSUs granted in 2015, if the maximum level of performance is achieved, the grant date fair value for the PSUs will depend uponbe approximately $13,628,447 for Mr. D’Souza, $7,282,816 for Mr. Coburn, $3,642,441 for Ms. McLoughlin, $6,960,045 for Mr. Mehta and $3,413,182 for Mr. Frank, resulting in an aggregate grant date fair value for all stock awards of approximately $17,297,624 for Mr. D’Souza, $9,243,594 for Mr. Coburn, $4,623,088 for Ms. McLoughlin, $8,833,898 for Mr. Mehta and $4,332,091 for Mr. Frank. None of the Named Executives forfeited any stock awards during the 2015, 2014, or 2013 fiscal years. For information regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of stock-based awards, see Note 14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the applicable fiscal year.

3Amounts shown in this column represent cash incentive awards earned for each respective fiscal year and paid in the first quarter of the following year under our officer annual cash incentive program.

4Amount represents investment earnings/(losses) on Mr. Coburn’s nonqualified deferred compensation account. The earnings/(losses) correspond to the actual circumstances andmarket earnings on a select group of investment funds utilized to track the then applicable provisions ofnotional investment return on the Employment Agreements andaccount balance for the 2009 Incentive Plan,respective fiscal year. The Company has not made any determination as in effect at the timeto which portion of such event.

1

A Qualifying Termination is a termination of the Named Executive’s employment by the Company without cause. Represents 22 months’ additional salary based on the salary earned by such Named Executive in 2013.

2

Represents 12 months’ additional salary based on the salary earned by such Named Executive in 2013 and bonus payout at 100% of the 2013 target.

3

Represents 12 months of reimbursement for COBRA premiums.

4

Represents the value of restricted stock unit and performance-based stock unit acceleration, as described above.

In additionearnings may be considered above market for purposes of column (h) of this table and has elected to report the foregoing amounts indicated in the above table,entire amount of such earnings/(losses). Mr. Coburn will also be entitled to the balance of hisCoburn’s nonqualified deferred compensation account incurred an investment loss in 2015 in an amount equal to $(76,165), as describedreflected in the section above entitled “20132015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table”, which appearsTable on page 6135.

5For 2015, includes a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of this proxy statement.$783, and the use of an administrative assistant of the Company for personal matters, which is valued at $22,759, plus a gross-up for taxes relating to such services equal to $21,135. For 2014, includes a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $1,500, and the use of an administrative assistant of the Company for personal matters, which is valued at $7,588, plus a gross-up for taxes relating to such services equal to $8,169. For 2013, includes a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $1,500, and the use of an administrative assistant of the Company for personal matters, which is valued at $5,141, plus a gross up for taxes relating to such services equal to $5,536.

6For 2015, includes a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $4,500, a CSRP matching contribution in the amount of $3,450 and a contribution in the amount of $81,228, which the Company is required to make to a nonqualified deferred compensation account. For 2014, includes a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $4,250, a CSRP matching contribution in the amount of $3,550 and a contribution in the amount of $64,936 to the nonqualified deferred compensation account. For 2013, includes a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $1,500, a CSRP matching contribution in the amount of $6,150 and a contribution in the amount of $82,868 to the nonqualified deferred compensation account.

7For 2015, represents a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $1,860 and a CSRP matching contribution in the amount of $6,090. For 2014, represents a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $1,805 and a CSRP matching contribution in the amount of $5,995. For 2013, represents a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution in the amount of $844 and a CSRP matching contribution in the amount of $6,806.

8Represents a 401(k) savings plan matching contribution.

31COMPENSATION


2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table provides certain summary information concerning each grant of an award made to a Named Executive in the 2015 fiscal year under a compensation plan.

 

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation64


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Equity Compensation Plan Information

(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j) (k) (l)

 

Name

 

 

 

 

Grant
Date

 

  

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards1

  

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards2

  

All
Other
Stock

Awards:
Number
of
Shares
 of Stock 
or Units 3
(#)

 

  

All Other
Option

Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)

 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
 Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards 4
($)
  

 

Threshold
($)

 

  

 

Target
($)

 

  

 

Maximum
($)

 

  

 

Threshold
(#)

 

  

 

Target
(#)

 

  

 

Maximum
(#)

 

     

Francisco D’Souza

  02/27/15    274,125    548,250    1,096,500                        
   11/30/15       52,758    105,516    211,032      6,814,223
   11/30/15          56,816     3,669,177

Gordon Coburn

  02/27/15    260,738    521,475    1,042,950          
   11/30/15       28,193    56,386    112,772      3,641,408
   11/30/15          30,362     1,960,778

Karen McLoughlin

  02/27/15    172,550    345,100    690,200          
   11/30/15       14,101    28,201    56,402      1,821,221
   11/30/15          15,185     980,647

Rajeev Mehta

  02/27/15    228,863    457,725    915,450          
   11/30/15       26,944    53,887    107,774      3,480,022
   11/30/15          29,016     1,873,853

Malcolm Frank

  02/27/15    177,225    354,450    708,900          
   11/30/15       13,213    26,426    52,852      1,706,591
   11/30/15                            14,229     918,909
1Represents the range of annual cash incentive that can be earned by the Named Executive if the minimum threshold, target and maximum performance targets are achieved. The following table provides information as of December 31, 2013 with respectannual cash incentive is prorated if performance levels are achieved between the threshold and target levels or between the target and maximum levels. Performance below the minimum threshold results in no annual cash incentive payout to the shares of our Class A Common Stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans. We previously had four equity compensation plans,Named Executive. See “Annual Cash Incentive” starting on page 22 for information regarding the methodology and performance criteria applied in determining these potential cash incentive amounts. The actual annual cash incentive paid to each of which was approved by our stockholders: (1) Amended and Restated 1999 Incentive Compensation Plan, which we refer toNamed Executive for his or her 2015 performance is reported as the 1999 Incentive Plan; (2) Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, which we refer to as the Director Plan; (3) Amended and Restated Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan; which we refer to as the Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan, and (4) Amended and Restated 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which we refer to as the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The 1999Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the Director Plan2015 Summary Compensation Table on page 31.

2Represents the range of shares that could vest pursuant to PSUs. See “Long-Term Incentives – Stock-Based Awards” starting on page 23 for a description of the terms of the PSUs.

3Represents RSUs. See “Long-Term Incentives – Stock-Based Awards” starting on page 23 for a description of the terms of the RSUs.

4Represents the grant date fair value of the RSUs and PSUs determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, assuming target achievement for PSUs. For information regarding assumptions underlying the Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan were succeeded by the Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan, which we refer to as the 2009 Incentive Plan, which was approved by our stockholders. Awards granted under the previous plans are still valid, however no additionalvaluation of stock-based awards, may be granted from these previous plans. For additional information on our equity compensation plans, please see Note 1214 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. All share and share-based numbers and values2015.

COMPENSATION32


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2015 Table

The following table provides certain summary information concerning outstanding equity awards held by the Named Executives as of December 31, 2015.

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)  (g) (h) (i) (j)
Name 

 

Option Awards 1

 

  

 

Stock Awards

 

 Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options
(#)
 Equity
Incentive
 Plan Awards; 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
 Option
 Exercise 
Price
($)
 Option
 Expiration 
Date
  

Number
of

Shares or
Units
of Stock
That
 Have Not 
Vested 2
(#)

 Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
 Stock That 
Have Not
Vested3
($)
 

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards;
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
 Rights That 
Have Not
Vested (#)

 

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards;
Market or
 Payout Value 
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested3
($)

 

 

 

 Exercisable 

 

 

 

 Unexercisable 

 

       

Francisco D’Souza

 500,000   16.85  08/06/16      
  480,000     9.11  12/08/18      
            24,569 2 1,474,631  
            78,614 4 4,718,412  
            43,939 2 2,637,219  
          150,394 5 9,026,648  
            56,816 2 3,410,096  
            105,516 6 6,333,070

Gordon J. Coburn

           13,128 2   787,943  
            42,010 4 2,521,440  
            23,480 2 1,409,270  
            80,368 5 4,823,687  
            30,362 2 1,822,327  
              56,386 6 3,384,288

Karen McLoughlin

   40,000   20.17  12/13/16      
    20,000   15.53  08/13/18      
              4,904 2   294,338  
            15,696 4   942,074  
            11,200 2   672,224  
            38,334 5 2,300,807  
            15,185 2   911,404  
              28,201 6 1,692,624

Rajeev Mehta

           12,136 2   728,403  
            38,828 4 2,330,457  
            22,440 2 1,346,849  
            76,806 5 4,609,896  
            29,016 2 1,741,540  
              53,887 6 3,234,298

Malcolm Frank

             4,820 2   289,296  
            15,422 4   925,628  
            11,004 2   660,460  
            37,665 5 2,260,653  
            14,229 2   854,025  
              26,426 6 1,586,089

1Each stock option grant included in this Equity Compensation Plan Information Table reflecttable has a term of 10 years measured from the grant date, and all outstanding options granted to the Named Executives as of December 31, 2015 have fully vested pursuant to their terms.

2Awards shown are time-based RSUs that were granted on December 3, 2013, December 1, 2014 and November 30, 2015 and vest on specified dates if the individual is then employed by the Company:

Mr. D’Souza: Approximately 6,142 shares are scheduled to vest on March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2016; approximately 5,492 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of 2016 and 2017; and approximately 4,734 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of 2016, 2017 and 2018.

33COMPENSATION


Mr. Coburn: Approximately 3,282 shares are scheduled to vest on March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2016; approximately 2,935 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of 2016 and 2017; and approximately 2,530 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of 2016, 2017 and 2018.

Ms. McLoughlin: Approximately 1,226 shares are scheduled to vest on March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2016; approximately 1,400 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of 2016 and 2017; and approximately 1,265 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of 2016, 2017 and 2018.

Mr. Mehta: Approximately 3,034 shares are scheduled to vest on March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2016; approximately 2,805 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of 2016 and 2017; and approximately 2,418 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of 2016, 2017 and 2018.

Mr. Frank: Approximately 1,205 shares are scheduled to vest on March 3, June 3, September 3 and December 3 of 2016; approximately 1,376 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of 2016 and 2017; and approximately 1,185 shares are scheduled to vest on each March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of 2016, 2017 and 2018.

3Market value was determined based on a closing price of a share of our Common Stock of $60.02 as of December 31, 2015.

4For PSUs granted in 2013, represents the number of shares that are eligible to vest subject to the continued service vesting requirements, at an achievement of 86.1% of the target for such PSUs, which percentage was determined based on the Company’s two-for-one stock split that occurredfiscal 2014 revenue measured against the target for such revenue set forth in the award. 1/3rd of such shares vested on March 7, 2014.

Plan Category  Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
  Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
  Number of Securities
Available for Future
Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1

   14,216,152 2  $16.43 3   35,432,266 4 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

       N/A      

Total

   14,216,152        35,432,266  

1

Consists of the 1999 Incentive Plan, the Director Plan, the Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan, the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 2009 Incentive Plan.

June 3, 2015 and the remaining 2/3rds will vest on December 3, 2016 provided the Named Executive is employed by the Company on such date.

 

2

Excludes purchase rights outstanding under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under such plan, employees may purchase whole shares of stock at a price per share equal to 90% of the lower of the fair market value per share on the first day of the purchase period or the fair market value per share on the last day of the purchase period. As of December 31, 2013, 6,871,722 shares of common stock may be issued pursuant to stock options upon exercise, 3,596,808 shares of common stock may be issued pursuant to restricted stock units upon vesting and 3,747,622 shares of common stock may be issued pursuant to performance based stock units. The number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the outstanding and unvested performance based stock units for which the performance period has not ended is based on vesting of the maximum number of award shares. The actual number of shares of common stock that may be issued at the time of issuance will generally range from 0% to 200% of the target number (half of the maximum) based on the level of satisfaction of the applicable performance-based vesting condition over the vesting period.

Measurement DateNumber of Shares

Calendar Year
Revenue in ‘000

  December 31, 2014

200% of Award Outstanding$10,960,000
100% of Award Outstanding$10,250,000
50% of Award Outstanding$9,945,000
No Awardless than $9,945,000
5For PSUs granted in 2014, represents the number of shares that are eligible to vest subject to the continued service vesting requirements, at an achievement of 122.9% of the target for such PSUs, which percentage was determined based on the Company��s fiscal 2015 revenue measured against the target for such revenue set forth in the award. Such shares will vest 1/3rd on June 1, 2016 and the remaining 2/3rds on December 1, 2017 provided the Named Executive is employed by the Company on such dates.

 

3

As of December 31, 2013, the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options to purchase common stock was $16.43 and no weighting was assigned to restricted stock units or performance based stock units, as no exercise price is applicable to restricted stock units or performance based stock units.

Measurement DateNumber of Shares

Calendar Year
Revenue in ‘000

  December 31, 2015

200% of Award Outstanding$13,050,000
100% of Award Outstanding$12,228,000
50% of Award Outstanding$11,875,000
No Awardless than $11,875,000
6For PSUs granted in 2015, represents the number of unearned shares of stock not vested equal to the target award for such PSUs. The actual number of shares of stock that may vest will be determined by the Company’s fiscal 2016 performance versus target levels on two metrics: revenue (75% of the award) and non-GAAP EPS (25% of the award). For the shares subject to each of the metrics, the number that may vest may be zero, if a threshold level of performance is not achieved as to the metric, or between 50% and 200% of the target number of shares. After the Compensation Committee determines, based on the performance for the fiscal 2016 measurement period, the number of shares that may vest, such shares will vest 1/3rd on May 31, 2017 and the remaining 2/3rds on November 30, 2018 provided the Named Executive is employed by the Company on such dates. See “Long-Term Incentives – Stock-Based Awards” starting on page 23 for additional information.

2015 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

The following Option Exercises and Stock Vested table provides additional information about the value realized by the Named Executives on option award exercises and stock award vesting during the year ended December 31, 2015.

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
   Option Awards Stock Awards
Name 

 

Number of Shares  

Acquired on Exercise  

(#)  

 

 

Value Realized on
Exercise1

($)

 

Number of Shares 

Acquired on Vesting 
Date2 

(#) 

 

 

Value Realized on
Vesting3

($)

  Francisco D’Souza

   285,510 17,899,516

  Gordon J. Coburn

 40,000 1,851,500 152,571   9,565,158

  Karen McLoughlin

 20,000    846,700   58,215   3,650,753

  Rajeev Mehta

   135,110   8,475,558

  Malcolm Frank

     57,197   3,586,918
1Value realized on exercise is calculated based upon the number of options exercised and the fair market value or sale price of the shares on the date of exercise less the exercise price, before any applicable tax withholding.

2The number of shares shown in the table reflects the gross number of shares received by each Named Executive upon vesting of the stock awards. The Company reduced the number of shares issued to each Named Executive by automatically withholding a number of shares with a fair market value as of the vesting date sufficient to satisfy required tax withholdings. Each Named Executive actually received the following net number of shares of Company stock following such share withholding: Mr. D’Souza, 139,710; Mr. Coburn, 80,122; Ms. McLoughlin, 28,696; Mr. Mehta, 79,825; and Mr. Frank, 29,312.

3Value realized on vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired on vesting by the fair market value of the shares on the respective vesting date.

COMPENSATION34


2015 Pension Benefits Table

None of the Named Executives participated in any defined benefit pension plans in 2015.

2015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information with respect to the nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements in effect during 2015 for the Named Executives.

(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)
Name

Executive

Contributions

in Last FY

($)

Registrant

Contributions

in Last FY

($)

Aggregate

Earnings/(Losses) 

in Last FY

($)

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

Aggregate

Balance

at Last FYE

($)

  Francisco D’Souza

  Gordon J. Coburn

81,228 1(76,165) 21,247,905 3

  Karen McLoughlin

  Rajeev Mehta

  Malcolm Frank

1This amount is reported as compensation and is included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the 2015 Summary Compensation Table on page 31.

2This amount is reported as compensation and is included in the “Changes in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the 2015 Summary Compensation Table on page 31. Earnings/(losses) are broken down between funds as follows:

 

4

Includes 23,270,526 shares of Class A common stock available for future issuance under the 2009 Incentive Plan and 12,161,740 shares of Class A Common Stock available for future issuance under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. As of December 31, 2013, there were no outstanding purchase periods under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATIONInvestment Fund

Earnings/(Losses)
Attributable to such Fund

($)

  Mass Mutual Select Focused Value

(90,998)

  Mass Mutual Select Mid Cap Growth Equity II A

                             14,833                          

 

DuringTotal

(76,165)

3Includes the amounts reported in columns (c) and (d) of this table plus such amounts previously reported in the Company’s Summary Compensation Table in previous years if such compensation was required to be disclosed.

The Company has established this nonqualified deferred compensation arrangement for Mr. Coburn to serve as the economic equivalent of the retirement plan in which he participated while the Company was majority owned by IMS Health. Pursuant to such arrangement, the Company will credit Mr. Coburn’s deferred compensation account with an annual contribution in a dollar amount equal to 6% of his base salary and earned annual cash incentive for the year. Mr. Coburn can select from the 16 investment funds sponsored by Mass Mutual available to the plan to serve as the measures of the investment return on his account for each year. Mr. Coburn may change his investment elections up to six times per year. The account balance will become due and payable upon the occurrence of any of the following distributable events: (i) retirement at 55 years of age—payable six months following retirement in either a lump sum or 10 annual installments as elected by Mr. Coburn per plan provisions; (ii) termination of employment—payable in a lump sum six months following termination of employment; (iii) death or disability—immediate lump sum payment; and (iv) unforeseen emergency, as defined by IRC Section 409A—payable in a lump sum.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

No Named Executive has an employment agreement that provides a specific term of employment. Accordingly, the employment of each Named Executive may be terminated at any time at the discretion of the Board.

We have entered into Employment Agreements with each of the Named Executives that provided certain benefits upon the termination of their employment under certain prescribed circumstances.

Under the Employment Agreements, if a Named Executive’s employment terminates for any reason other than Cause, death or disability or if the Named Executive resigns for Good Reason and the Company’s right to cure has expired (an “involuntary termination”) (other than a termination that coincides with, or occurs within the 12-month period immediately after, the first occurrence of a change in control) and if the Named Executive executes and does not revoke the applicable general release of claims in favor of the Company, we will pay such individual his or her then current base salary for the 22-month period following termination in regular installments, commencing on or as soon as practicable after the release is effective and within 35 days of the date of such termination, and an amount equal to the monthly COBRA medical insurance cost under the Company’s medical plan for the Named Executive, his or her spouse and dependents for the 12 months after termination. In addition, the portion of any outstanding equity awards that were subject to vesting solely upon continued service with the Company and would have vested had the Named Executive remained employed during the year following the termination will become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date, and, with respect to

35COMPENSATION


any equity award subject to vesting in whole or in part based on achievement of performance objectives, to the extent such performance period expired on or before the termination date, the performance objectives have been satisfied and the only condition remaining to vesting is continued employment, the portion of such equity awards that would have vested during the year following the termination date will become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date. With respect to any equity award subject to vesting in whole or in part based on achievement of performance objectives, if the performance period has not expired on or before the termination date or the performance objectives have not been satisfied, the entire unvested portion of such equity awards will be forfeited. The Named Executive will also be entitled to any amounts earned, accrued and owed but not yet paid to Named Executive as of the termination date and any benefits accrued and earned in accordance with the terms of any benefits plans or programs, and this amount is not conditioned upon the release becoming effective.

Under the Employment Agreements, “Cause” is generally defined to include: (i) willful malfeasance or willful misconduct by the Named Executive in connection with his or her employment, (ii) continuing failure to perform such duties as are requested by the Board, (iii) failure by the Named Executive to observe material policies of the Company applicable to him or her, (iv) the commission by the Named Executive of (x) any felony or (y) any misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, (v) the Named Executive engaging in any fraudulent act or embezzlement, or (vi) any material breach of the agreement.

Under the Employment Agreements, “Good Reason” is generally defined as the occurrence of one or more of the following events: (i) a material diminution of the Named Executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities, (ii) a material diminution in his or her overall compensation package which is not caused by an overall policy to reduce senior employee compensation throughout the Company, (iii) the failure of the Company to obtain from its successor the express assumption of the agreement, and (iv) a change, without the Named Executive’s consent, in the principal place of work of the Named Executive to a location more than 50 miles from his or her primary work location, but only if the change is after a change in control. The Employment Agreements provide that the Named Executive must give the Company notice within 30 days of the action or omission giving rise to the Good Reason, and the Company then has a period of 30 days to correct the reason constituting grounds for Good Reason. If the Company does not correct the event during the cure period, the Named Executive has 30 days to terminate for Good Reason.

The Employment Agreements also provide that in the event of an involuntary termination that coincides with, or occurs within the 12-month period immediately after, the first occurrence of a change in control, we will pay such individual the following, provided he or she executes and does not revoke the applicable release of claims: a cash payment equal to one times his or her annual base salary, to be paid in regular installments over a period of 12 months commencing on or as soon as practicable after the applicable release is effective and within 35 days of the date of such termination, a cash payment equal to the amount of the target annual cash incentive the Named Executive would otherwise have been eligible to receive for the performance year in which the termination occurs, assuming that the Named Executive and the Company have achieved 100% of performance targets and objectives, to be paid in a lump sum on or as soon as practicable after the release is effective and within 35 days of the date of such termination, and an amount equal to the monthly COBRA medical insurance cost under the Company’s medical plan for the Named Executive and his or her spouse and dependents for the 12 months after termination. In addition, the portion of any outstanding equity awards that were subject to vesting solely upon continued service with the Company will become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date, and with respect to any equity award subject to vesting in whole or in part based on achievement of performance objectives, to the extent such performance period expired on or before the termination date, the performance objectives have been satisfied and the only condition remaining to vesting is continued employment, such equity awards will become fully vested and exercisable as of the termination date. Moreover, with respect the portion of any equity award subject to vesting in whole or in part based on achievement of performance objectives, to the extent the applicable performance period has not expired before the termination date, the Company must pro-rate the performance objectives for the period up to the closing of the change in control and make a good faith determination of the level of achievement of the performance objective and treat as fully vested and exercisable the proportionate amount of equity awards corresponding to that level of achievement. The Named Executive will also be entitled to any amounts earned, accrued and owed but not yet paid to Named Executive as of the termination date and any benefits accrued and earned in accordance with the terms of any benefits plans or programs, and this amount is not conditioned upon the effectiveness of the release.

Pursuant to the Employment Agreements, a “change in control” is generally defined as a change in ownership or control of the Company effected through any of the following transactions: (i) consummation of a merger, consolidation or other reorganization approved by the stockholders, unless securities representing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of the voting securities of the successor corporation are immediately thereafter beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the persons who beneficially owned the Company’s outstanding voting securities immediately prior to such transaction, (ii) a sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, (iii) the closing of any

COMPENSATION36


transaction or series of related transactions pursuant to which any person or any group of persons comprising a “group” within the meaning of Rule 13d-5(b)(1) of the Exchange Act (other than (A) the Company or (B) a person that, prior to such transaction or series of related transactions, directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with, the Company) acquires directly or indirectly (whether as a result of a single acquisition or by reason of one or more acquisitions within the 12-month period ending with the most recent acquisition) the beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the 1934 Act) of securities possessing (or convertible into or exercisable for securities possessing) more than 35% of the total combined voting power of the Company’s securities (as measured in terms of the power to vote with respect to the election of Board members) outstanding immediately after the consummation of such acquisition or series of related acquisitions, whether any such acquisition involves a direct issuance from the Company or the acquisition of outstanding securities held by one or more of the Company’s existing stockholders, or (iv) a change in the composition of the Board over a period of 12 consecutive months or less such that a majority of the Board members ceases, by reason of one or more contested elections for Board membership, to be comprised of individuals who either (A) have been Board members continuously since the beginning of such period or (B) have been elected or nominated for election as Board members during such period by at least a majority of the Board members described in clause (A) who were still in office at the time the Board approved such election or nomination.

If a Named Executive is terminated due to death, disability or for Cause, he or she will receive any amounts earned, accrued and owed but not yet paid to him or her as of the termination date and any benefits accrued and earned in accordance with the terms of any benefit plan or program of the Company. However, all other obligations to the Named Executive will be extinguished as of the termination date.

Pursuant to the Employment Agreements, each Named Executive has agreed not to engage in any competitive business in any capacity for one year following termination of employment and not to solicit any of our employees to leave our employ within the one-year period following termination of employment. Our Named Executives are also bound by confidentiality covenants of indefinite duration and by intellectual property covenants that require the Named Executives to fully and promptly disclose all inventions and works developed while at the Company and for a period of six months after termination.

37COMPENSATION


Calculation of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

The following table shows potential payments to our Named Executives under the various severance and other arrangements and agreements that were in effect on December 31, 2015 for various scenarios involving a change in control or termination of employment of each of our Named Executives, assuming a December 31, 2015 termination date and, where applicable, using the closing price of our Common Stock of $60.02 on December 31, 2015, as reported on NASDAQ.

 

Name

  

 

Trigger

 

Salary and
Bonus

($)

  

 

Benefits 3  

($)  

  

Value of Equity

Acceleration 4

($)

 

 

Total Value

($)

Francisco D’Souza

  Qualifying Termination Prior to Change in Control1  1,182,500    9,610   11,657,144 12,849,254
   Qualifying Termination Following Change in Control2  1,193,250    9,610   21,267,007 22,469,867
   Death or Disability          
   Retirement          
   Termination for Other Reasons          

Gordon J. Coburn

  Qualifying Termination Prior to Change in Control1  1,124,750    13,067     6,229,296   7,367,113
   Qualifying Termination Following Change in Control2  1,134,975    13,067   11,364,667 12,512,709
   Death or Disability          
   Retirement          
   Termination for Other Reasons          

Karen McLoughlin

  Qualifying Termination Prior to Change in Control1  744,333    9,482     2,643,221 3,397,036
   Qualifying Termination Following Change in Control2  751,100    9,482     5,120,846 5,881,428
   Death or Disability          
   Retirement          
   Termination for Other Reasons          

Rajeev Mehta

  Qualifying Termination Prior to Change in Control1  987,250    13,110     5,849,429   6,849,789
   Qualifying Termination Following Change in Control2  996,225    13,110   10,757,145 11,766,480
   Death or Disability          
   Retirement          
   Termination for Other Reasons          

Malcolm Frank

  Qualifying Termination Prior to Change in Control1  764,500    13,110     2,583,381   3,360,991
   Qualifying Termination Following Change in Control2  771,450    13,110     4,990,063   5,774,623
   Death or Disability          
   Retirement          
   Termination for Other Reasons          
1A Qualifying Termination is a termination of the Named Executive’s employment by the Company without cause or the employee for good reason. Represents 22 months’ additional base salary based on the salary earned by such Named Executive in 2015.

2Represents 12 months’ additional base salary based on the salary earned by such Named Executive in 2015 and annual cash incentive payout at 100% of the 2015 target.

3Represents 12 months of reimbursement for COBRA premiums.

4Represents the value of RSU and PSU acceleration, as described above.

While we believe that the amounts shown above and the assumptions upon which they are based provide reasonable estimates of the amounts that would have been due to the Named Executives in the event that any of the circumstances described above had occurred on December 31, 2015, the actual amounts due to the Named Executives upon a triggering event will depend upon the actual circumstances and the then applicable provisions of the Employment Agreements and the 2009 Incentive Plan, as in effect at the time of such event.

In addition to the foregoing amounts indicated in the above table, Mr. Coburn will also be entitled to the balance of his nonqualified deferred compensation account, as described in the 2015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 35.

COMPENSATION38


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2015 with respect to the shares of our Common Stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans. We previously had four equity compensation plans, each of which was approved by our stockholders: (1) Amended and Restated 1999 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “1999 Plan”); (2) Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (the “Director Plan”); (3) Amended and Restated Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan (the “Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan”); and (4) Amended and Restated 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan”). During 2009, the 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan (as amended, the “2009 Incentive Plan”) succeeded the 1999 Incentive Plan, the Director Plan and the Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan. The 2009 Incentive Plan was also approved by our stockholders. Awards granted under the previous plans are still valid; however, no additional awards may be granted from such previous plans. For additional information on our equity compensation plans, see Note 14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

   

(a)

 

 

(b)

 

 

(c)

 

Plan Category

 

 

Number of Securities

to be Issued Upon

Exercise of

Outstanding

Options, Warrants

and Rights

 

Weighted-Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding

Options,

Warrants and

Rights

 

Number of Securities  

Available for Future  

Issuance Under Equity  

Compensation Plans  

(excludes securities  

reflected in column (a))  

  Equity compensation plans approved by security holders1

 11,366,359 2 $19.09 3 21,072,858 4

  Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

     N/A                 —                 
  

 

  

 

Total

 11,366,359      21,072,858

1Consists of the 1999 Incentive Plan, the 2009 Incentive Plan and the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

2Excludes purchase rights outstanding under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under such plan, employees may purchase whole shares of stock at a price per share equal to 90% of the lower of the fair market value per share on the first day of the purchase period or the fair market value per share on the last day of the purchase period. As of December 31, 2015, 4,165,651 shares of Common Stock may be issued pursuant to stock options upon exercise, 4,681,745 shares of Common Stock may be issued pursuant to RSUs upon vesting and 2,518,963 shares of Common Stock may be issued pursuant to PSUs upon vesting. The number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the outstanding and unvested PSUs for which the performance period has not ended is based on vesting of the maximum number of award shares. The actual number of shares of Common Stock that may vest will generally range from 0% to 200% of the target number based on the level of achievement of the applicable performance metric(s) and the continued service vesting requirements.

3As of December 31, 2015, the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options to purchase Common Stock was $19.09 and no weighting was assigned to RSUs or PSUs, as no exercise price is applicable to RSUs or PSUs.

4Includes 12,916,223 shares of Common Stock available for future issuance under the 2009 Incentive Plan and 8,156,635 shares of Common Stock available for future issuance under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. As of December 31, 2015, there were no outstanding purchase periods under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

39COMPENSATION


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Discussion and Analysis

The Company uses cash and stock-based compensation to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on the Board. The Company sets compensation for directors who are not our employees or the employees of any of our subsidiaries (“non-employee Directors”) in light of the time commitment and experience level expected of its Directors. A Director who is an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries receives no cash or stock-based compensation for serving as a Director.

Engagement of Compensation Consultant

For purposes of establishing non-employee Director compensation for 2015, the Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance, an independent executive compensation advisory firm, to review all elements of non-employee Director compensation, benchmark such compensation in relation to other comparable companies with which we compete for Board talent and provide recommendations to ensure that our non-employee Director compensation program remains competitive. Pay Governance benchmarked our non-employee Director compensation against the same group of technology-related firms used by Pay Governance in preparing its recommendations to the Compensation Committee in determining stock-based awards for executive officers in November 2015. See “Compensation Committee and Engagement of Compensation Consultant” and “Peer Group” on page 19. The Compensation Committee considered the benchmarking data and recommendations of Pay Governance in setting the 2015 cash and stock-based compensation of non-employee Directors set forth below.

Cash Compensation

Prior to the 2015 Annual Meeting, all non-employee Directors, other than our Chairman, received an annual retainer of $40,000 for their service on the Board (with no additional fees paid for attendance at meetings of the Board), our Chairman received an annual retainer of $140,000 (with no additional fees paid for attendance at meetings of the Board), the Chair of the Audit Committee received an additional annual retainer of $15,000, the Chair of the Compensation Committee received an additional annual retainer of $10,000 and the Chair of the Governance Committee received an additional annual retainer of $5,000.

For purposes of establishing non-employee Director compensation for the director term commencing following the 2015 Annual Meeting, the Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance to review all elements of non-employee Director compensation, benchmark such compensation in relation to other comparable companies with which we compete for Board talent and provide recommendations to ensure that the Company’s non-employee Director compensation program remained competitive. See “Engagement of Compensation Consultant” above. Based on the Pay Governance review, the Board determined that, commencing with the 2015 Annual Meeting, all non-employee Directors, other than our Chairman, would receive an annual retainer of $90,000 for their service on the Board (with no additional fees paid for attendance at meetings of the Board), our Chairman would receive an annual retainer of $240,000 (with no additional fees paid for attendance at meetings of the Board), the Chair of the Audit Committee would receive an additional annual retainer of $25,000, and the Chair of the Compensation Committee and the Chair of the Governance Committee each would receive an additional annual retainer of $15,000.

All non-employee Directors receive $1,500 for attendance at each meeting of a committee of the Board, other than telephonic meetings that are held for 30 minutes or less, for which no attendance fee is paid.

The Company’s compensation policy is to pay the annual retainers to Directors in advance following their election or reelection at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. In the event that a non-employee Director is nominated to the Board at any point during the year, that Director will receive a pro-rated amount of the retainer for the period from such election to the one-year anniversary of the Company’s last annual meeting of stockholders.

Stock-Based Compensation

Directors were previously eligible to participate in the 1999 Incentive Plan and the Director Plan. During 2009, the 2009 Incentive Plan succeeded the 1999 Incentive Plan and the Director Plan. Awards granted under the previous plans are still valid; however, no additional awards may be granted from the 1999 Incentive Plan and the Director Plan. All Directors are currently eligible to participate in our 2009 Incentive Plan.

In 2015, all non-employee Directors received grants of options to purchase shares of our Common Stock and grants of RSUs under the 2009 Incentive Plan. All grants of options are subject to the Company’s written policy governing the grant of stock options which is described in “Long-Term Incentives – Stock Based Awards” starting on page 23. Those non-employee Directors who were re-elected to the Board at the 2015 Annual Meeting, consisting of all of the non-employee

COMPENSATION40


Directors except Messrs. Abdalla and Chadwick, were granted options to purchase 6,371 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of $65.60 and 1,600 RSUs on June 2, 2015, the date of such annual meeting. The Company’s compensation policy provides that the annual stock-based awards to non-employee Directors are subject to pro-ration in the same manner as the cash compensation described under “Cash Compensation” on page 40. As a result, Mr. Abdalla received a lesser grant of options to purchase 4,368 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of $62.77 and 1,191 RSUs on September 15, 2015, the date of his election to the Board, and Mr. Chadwick received a lesser grant of options to purchase 998 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of $60.16 and 258 RSUs on April 9, 2016, the date of his election to the Board.

Each of the options granted under the 2009 Incentive Plan vests ratably, 50% per year on the anniversary of such grant in 2016 and 2017 (or 2017 and 2018, in the case of the grants to Mr. Chadwick), and has an exercise price equal to the fair market value per share of Common Stock on the grant date or the closing price on the last trading day if granted on a weekend or holiday, and a maximum term of seven years measured from such date. The Directors will have a limited period in which to exercise their vested options following cessation of Board service. Each of the RSUs granted to the Directors under the 2009 Incentive Plan during 2015 vests ratably one-third per year on the anniversary of such grant in 2016, 2017 and 2018, subject to the deferral elections described below under “Deferral of Restricted Stock Units”. Upon a Director’s retirement while in good standing, the Board’s intent is to utilize its discretion to accelerate the vesting of such Director’s outstanding stock-based awards.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Company maintains a stock ownership and retention policy which is applicable to the Named Executives and non-employee Directors and designed to align their interests with those of stockholders. The policy requires the Chairman of the Board to hold a number of shares of our Common Stock equal to the lesser of 20,000 shares and four times the Chairman’s annual retainer. The policy requires other non-employee Directors to hold a number of shares of our Common Stock equal to the lesser of 6,000 shares and four times such non-employee Director’s annual retainer. Compliance with the policy is measured every June 30 and non-employee Directors are required to come into compliance with the policy within five years of becoming subject to it and meet any subsequently increased ownership requirements within five years of the increase. See “Stock Ownership Guidelines” on page 26 for additional information on the policy as well as its applicability to Directors who are employees.

Hedging, Short Sale, Margin Account and Pledging Prohibitions

All Directors are subject to the same insider trading policies of the Company that apply to employees that provide for:

No hedging or speculation with respect to Cognizant securities;

No short sales of Cognizant securities;

No margin accounts with Cognizant securities; and

Limited pledging of Cognizant securities.

See “Hedging, Short Sale, Margin Account and Pledging Prohibitions” on page 26 for additional information on these restrictions.

Deferral of Restricted Stock Units

The non-employee Directors had the opportunity to defer settlement of the RSUs granted in 2015. Mr. Weissman elected to defer such settlement until the first to occur of (i) a change in control of the Company, (ii) the Director’s death or permanent disability or (iii) the July 1 immediately following his separation from service from the Company.Ms. Breakiron-Evans and Messrs. Klein and Wendel elected to defer such settlement until the first to occur of: (i) a change in control of the Company, (ii) the Director’s death or disability or (iii) (a) with respect to one-third of the Director’s RSUs (rounded down to the nearest whole share), the July 1 immediately following his or her separation from service from the Company, (b) with respect to one-third of his or her RSUs (rounded down to the nearest whole share), the second July 1 immediately following his or her separation from service from the Company and (c) with respect to the remainder of his or her RSUs, the third July 1 following his or her separation from service from the Company. Messrs. Abdalla, Fox, Mackay, Jr. and Patsalos-Fox did not elect to defer the settlement of their RSUs.

41COMPENSATION


2015 Director Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation of each of our Directors for 2015.

Name 

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

($)1

 

 

Stock Awards

($)2

 

 

Option Awards

($)3

 

 

All Other
  Compensation  

($)

 

 

    Total    

($)

 

Zein Abdalla         30,884 4             74,759 4                 74,780 4              180,423
Maureen Breakiron-Evans   104,849          104,960            104,995               314,804
John N. Fox, Jr.   78,041          104,960            104,995               287,996
John E. Klein   230,486          104,960            104,995               440,441
Leo S. Mackay, Jr.   79,541          104,960            104,995               289,496
Lakshmi Narayanan   69,041          104,960            104,995               278,996
Michael Patsalos-Fox   78,041          104,960            104,995               287,996
Robert E. Weissman   88,849          104,960            104,995               298,804

Thomas M. Wendel

   84,041          104,960            104,995         

      293,996

1Consists of amounts described under “Director Compensation” starting on page 40.

2Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs granted in the 2015 fiscal year under the 2009 Incentive Plan, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The per share grant date fair value of each RSU awarded was $65.60, except for the award to Mr. Abdalla, which was $62.77. The reported dollar amounts do not take into account any estimated forfeitures related to continued service vesting requirements. For information regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards, see Note 14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, Messrs. Fox, Howe, Klein2015.

3Represents the aggregate grant date fair value for stock options granted in the 2015 fiscal year under the 2009 Incentive Plan, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of each stock option was $16.48, except for the option granted to Mr. Abdalla, which was $17.12. The reported dollar amounts do not take into account any estimated forfeitures related to continued service vesting requirements. For information regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards, see Note 14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

4Mr. Abdalla was elected to the Board on September 15, 2015 and, Weissman served onas such, his fees and equity awards were pro-rated for the Compensation Committee for at least a portion of the year. No member of the Compensation Committee was or is a current or former officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

None of our executive officers serve as members of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity which has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.year that he served.

Director Stock and Option Awards Outstanding

The following table sets forth the aggregate number of stock awards and the aggregate number of stock options held by each of our Directors at December 31, 2015.

 

Name 

Aggregate

Number of

            Stock Awards             

(#)1

 

Aggregate

Number of

            Stock Options             

(#)

Zein Abdalla

   1,191     4,368

Maureen Breakiron-Evans

 18,495   96,398

John N. Fox, Jr.

   4,002 115,973

John E. Klein

   6,745   76,398

Leo S. Mackay, Jr.

   8,508   20,618

Lakshmi Narayanan

   4,002   36,398

Michael Patsalos-Fox

   9,580   46,398

Robert E. Weissman

   6,745   86,398

Thomas M. Wendel

 

  6,745

 

  51,398

1Includes the RSUs granted in 2014 and 2015, with respect to which the settlement has been delayed for some directors, as described above. For Ms. Breakiron-Evans, Mr. Mackay, Jr. and Mr. Patsalos-Fox, also includes 11,750, 4,506 and 5,578 deferred stock units, respectively, to be settled upon the Director’s termination of service on the Board.
2014 Proxy Statement

COMPENSATION42 Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation65


Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors  AUDIT MATTERS

 

 

PROPOSAL 3 – RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

What are you

voting on?

Our Audit Committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting for 2016. We are asking our stockholders to ratify this appointment of PwC.

WHY STOCKHOLDERS ARE VOTING ON THIS PROPOSAL

Although ratification is not required by our By-laws or otherwise, the Board values the opinions of our stockholders and believes that stockholder ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection is a good corporate governance practice. If the selection is not ratified, the Audit Committee will take this fact into consideration in determining whether it is appropriate to select another independent auditor for 2016 or future years. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may select a different independent auditor at any time during the year if it determines that this would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

LOGO

The Board unanimously recommends a voteFOR the Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2016.

Vote Required

The approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions are not considered to be votes cast and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal. Because brokers have discretionary authority to vote on the ratification of the appointment of PwC, we do not expect any broker non-votes in connection with this proposal.

Our Auditor Review and Engagement Process

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation (including negotiation and approval of the audit fee), retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm that audits our financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting. Our Audit Committee and its chairperson are directly involved in the selection of the lead audit partner at the start of each rotation.

To ensure continuing audit independence:

The Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be a regular rotation of the accounting firm that is retained, and considers the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different accounting firm;

Neither the accounting firm nor any of its members is permitted to have, and none has, any direct or indirect financial interest in or any connection with us in any capacity other than as our auditors, providing audit and non-audit related services; and

In accordance with SEC rules and PwC policies, audit partners are subject to rotation requirements to limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may provide services to our Company. For lead and concurring audit partners, the maximum number of consecutive years of service in that capacity is five years.

The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of PwC to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

We Expect PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to Attend the 2016 Annual Meeting

PwC representatives are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they wish and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

43AUDIT MATTERS


REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Audit Committee has furnished the following report:

To the Board of Directors of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation:

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is currently composed of four members and acts under a written charter, which is available under the Corporate Governance tab in the “Company Overview” section of the “About Cognizant” page of the Company’s website located at www.cognizant.com.www.cognizant.com, under the “Corporate Governance” tab. The members of the Audit Committee are independent Directors, as defined in its charter and the rules of theThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC. The Audit Committee held nine meetings during 2013.2015.

Management is responsible for the preparation of the Company’s financial statementsestablishing and for maintaining an adequate system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for that purpose.reporting. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent integrated audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee is responsible for providing independent, objective oversight of these processes.

The Audit Committee has reviewed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20132015 and has discussed these financial statements with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has also received from, and discussed with, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm various communications that such independent registered public accounting firm is required to provide to the Audit Committee, including the matters required to be discussed by statementStatement on Auditing Standards No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.Board (PCAOB), as may be modified or supplemented.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm also provided the Audit Committee with formal written statements required by PCAOB Rule 3526 (Communications(Communications with Audit Committees Concerning Independence)Independence) describing all relationships between the independent registered public accounting firm and the Company, including the disclosures required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardPCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence from Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation. The Audit Committee also considered whether the independent registered public accounting firm’s provision of certain other non-audit related services to the Company is compatible with maintaining such firm’s independence.

Based on its discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, and its review of the representations and information provided by management and the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.2015.

By the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation

Zein Abdalla

Maureen Breakiron-Evans

John E. Klein

Leo S. Mackay, Jr.

Thomas M. Wendel

AUDIT MATTERS44


INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES AND OTHER MATTERS

The following table summarizes the fees of PwC, our independent registered public accounting firm, for each of the last two fiscal years.

Fee Category              2014                               2015            

Audit Fees

  $3,348,300   $4,122,200

Audit-Related Fees

       859,500     1,575,300

Tax Fees

       517,400     1,080,600

All Other Fees

       289,100        335,400
   

 

   

 

Total Fees

  $5,014,300    $7,113,500

Audit Fees

Audit fees consist of fees for the audit of our consolidated financial statements (including services necessary for rendering an opinion under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), the review of our interim quarterly financial statements and other professional services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees consist of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit and the review of our financial statements and which are not reported under “Audit Fees”, including financial due diligence services related to business combinations. These services relate to attest services that are not required by statute or regulation, consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting matters, and independent assessment of controls related to outsourcing services. During 2015, we reclassified financial due diligence services related to business combinations from “All Other Fees” to “Audit-Related Fees”. These services were $744,000 and $945,600 for 2014 and 2015, respectively.

Tax Fees

Tax fees comprise fees for a variety of permissible services relating to tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice. These services include assistance in complying with local transfer pricing requirements, assistance with local tax audits and assessments, withholding tax and indirect tax matters, preparation and filing of local tax returns, and technical advice relating to local and international tax matters.

All Other Fees

For 2014, other fees primarily relate to advisory fees for immigration services. For 2015, other fees primarily relate to advisory fees for immigration and IT security services.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures

The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the approval of all audit and non-audit services that are to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. This policy generally provides that we will not engage our independent registered public accounting firm to render audit or non-audit services unless the service is specifically approved in advance by the Audit Committee or the engagement is entered into pursuant to one of the pre-approval procedures described below.

From time to time, the Audit Committee may pre-approve specified types of services that are expected to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm during the next 12 months. Any such pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or type of services to be provided.

The Audit Committee has also delegated to Maureen Breakiron-Evans, the current Audit Committee Chair, the authority to approve any audit or non-audit services to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm. Any approval of services by a member of the Audit Committee pursuant to this delegated authority is reported on at the next meeting of the Audit Committee. During 2014 and 2015, the Audit Committee approved all services provided to us by PwC that are subject to the pre-approval policies and procedures described above.

45AUDIT MATTERS


  STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

PROPOSAL 4 – STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING STOCKHOLDER ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT

What are you

voting on?

The following stockholder proposal will be voted on at the 2016 Annual Meeting only if properly presented by or on behalf of the stockholder proponent. The Board unanimously recommends a voteAGAINST the proposal for the reasons set forth following the proposal.

The Company has been advised that James McRitchie and Myra K. Young, 9295 Yorkship Court, Elk Grove, California 95758, beneficial owners of 100 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, intend to submit the proposal set forth below at the Annual Meeting. Mr. McRitchie and Ms. Young have delegated John Chevedden to act on their behalf regarding the proposal.

Proposal 4 — Right to Act by Written Consent

Resolved, Shareholders request that our board of directors undertake such steps as may be necessary to permit written consent by shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting. This written consent is to be consistent with applicable law and consistent with giving shareholders the fullest power to act by written consent consistent with applicable law. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any topic for written consent consistent with applicable law.

A shareholder right to act by written consent and to call a special meeting are 2 complimentary ways to bring an important matter to the attention of both management and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle.

A shareholder right to act by written consent is one method to equalize our limited provisions for shareholders to call a special meeting. Delaware law allows 10% of shareholders to call a special meeting without mandating a holding period. However it takes 25% of Cognizant shareholders, from only those shareholders with at least one-year of continuous stock ownership, to call a special meeting.

Thus potentially 50% of Cognizant shareholders could be disenfranchised from having any voice whatsoever in calling a special meeting due to the Cognizant one-year lock-out period. The average holding period for stock is less than one-year according to “Stock Market Investors Have Become Absurdly Impatient.”

Please vote to enhance shareholder value:

Right to Act by Written Consent — Proposal 4

LOGO

The Board unanimously recommends a voteAGAINST this proposal.

Vote Required

The approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS46


The Board’s Statement of Opposition

The BoardUNANIMOUSLY recommends that stockholders voteAGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

1.Substantially identical proposals were rejected by the Company’s stockholders in 2013 and 2015, upon the recommendation of the Board. Substantially the same proposal has been submitted, considered by the Board and rejected by stockholders at two of the previous three annual meetings of the Company. The Board has repeatedly evaluated whether adoption of the right to act by written consent would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, and has repeatedly concluded that it would not. As discussed further below, the Board has implemented changes in its corporate governance practices where it has determined that a particular practice would benefit the Company and stockholders. The Board continues to believe that the right to act by written consent would not be a sound corporate governance practice and, in fact, could be detrimental to the Company’s ability to operate effectively and create long-term value for all stockholders.

2.Implementation of the proposal is unnecessary given the Company’s governance practices, including the ability of stockholders to call special meetings, and could impose significant burdens on the Company. The Board believes, as it has in past years, that implementation of this proposal is unnecessary given the Company’s governance practices, including the ability of stockholders to call special meetings at any time. Stockholders may propose any proper matter for a vote at our annual meeting, and, in addition, stockholders holding 25% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock may call a special meeting. In the Board’s view, action at an annual or special meeting supports stockholders’ interests more than action by written consent. At meetings of stockholders, all stockholders have the opportunity to express views on proposed actions and to participate in deliberations and vote. Such meetings occur at a time and date announced publicly in advance of the meeting. These provisions ensure that stockholders can raise matters for consideration while protecting stockholders interests in receiving notice of and an opportunity to voice concerns about proposed actions affecting the Company. The proposal, however, would allow stockholders to use the written consent procedure at any time and as frequently as they choose to act on a range of potentially significant matters, without a meeting, potentially without prior notice to all stockholders, and without an opportunity for fair and open discussion among all stockholders on the merits of the proposed action. Allowing stockholders to act by written consent could lead to a disordered state of corporate affairs, distract the Board and management, and impose significant financial and administrative burdens on the Company, with little or no corresponding benefit to stockholders.

3.The Company’s existing corporate governance practices and policies already ensure stockholder democracy and the accountability of the Board. The Board believes that the adoption of this proposal is ill-advised in light of the sound corporate governance practices and stockholder protections the Company currently has in place. In addition to providing for stockholders’ right to call special meetings, the Company has been responsive to stockholder input and enhanced its governance practices and policies over the past several years to ensure the rights of our stockholders and the accountability of the Board, including:

Proxy Access By-law. In early 2016, the Board approved amended and restated By-laws which provide for proxy access. See “Director Nominees for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy Statement (Proxy Access)” on page 48. This new by-law permits a stockholder, or a group of stockholders, owning 3% or more of the Company’s Common Stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials directors constituting up to 25% of the board or two individuals, whichever is greater, provided that the stockholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the certain requirements outlined in the By-laws.

Majority Voting in Director Elections. The Company’s By-laws provide that, in an uncontested election of directors, a director nominee must receive more “for” votes than “against” votes to be elected. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that any incumbent director nominee who fails to receive the requisite number of votes is expected to tender his or her resignation.

Board Declassification. In 2013, the Board recommended and the stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board. Each of our directors is now subject to re-election at each annual meeting of stockholders.

No Poison Pill. In 2003, the Company adopted a Rights Plan. That plan expired by its terms on March 5, 2013, and the Company decided not to adopt a new plan or amend the existing one to extend its term.

We believe that our existing corporate governance practices and policies strike the optimal balance between facilitating the monitoring of Board members by stockholders and enabling stockholders to act quickly in support of their interests, while avoiding the governance risk associated with the ability of stockholders to act by written consent.

47STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING

Proposals for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy Statement

SEC rules permit stockholders to submit proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement if the stockholder and the proposal meet the requirements specified in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act (“Rule 14a-8”).

When to send these proposals. Any stockholder proposals submitted in accordance with Rule 14a-8 must be received at our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on December 30, 2016.

Where to send these proposals. Proposals should be addressed to our Secretary at our offices at Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666.

What to include. Proposals must conform to and include the information required by Rule 14a-8.

Director Nominees for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy Statement (Proxy Access)

We recently amended our By-laws to permit a group of stockholders who have owned a significant amount of the Company’s Common Stock (at least 3%) for a significant amount of time (at least three years) to submit director nominees (up to 25% of the Board and in any event not less than two directors) for inclusion in our proxy statement if the stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in our By-laws.

When to send these proposals. Notice of director nominees under these By-law provisions must be received no earlier than November 30, 2016 and no later than the close of business on December 30, 2016. In the event that the date of the 2017 Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after June 15, 2017, then our Secretary must receive such written notice not earlier than the close of business on the 150th day prior to the 2017 Annual Meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 120th day prior to the 2017 Annual Meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company.

Where to send these proposals. Notice should be addressed to our Secretary at our offices at Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666.

What to include. Notice must include the information required by our By-laws, a copy of which is available upon request to our Secretary.

Other Proposals or Nominees for Presentation at the 2017 Annual Meeting

Our By-laws require that any stockholder proposal, including a director nomination, that is not submitted for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement (either under Rule 14a-8 or our proxy access By-laws), but is instead sought to be presented directly at such meeting, must be received by our Secretary in writing not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day and not later than the close of business on the 90th day prior to the anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting.

When to send these proposals. Stockholder proposals or director nominations submitted under theseBy-law provisions must be received no earlier than the close of business on February 15, 2017 and no later than the close of business on March 17, 2017. In the event that the date of the 2017 Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after June 15, 2017, then our Secretary must receive any such proposal not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the 2017 Annual Meeting and not later than the close of business of the later of the 90th day prior to the 2017 Annual Meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company.

Where to send these proposals. Proposals should be addressed to our Secretary at our offices at Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666.

What to include. Proposals must include the information required by our By-laws, a copy of which is available upon request to our Secretary.

Management Discretion to Vote Proxies on These Proposals

SEC rules permit management to vote proxies in its discretion in certain cases if the stockholder does not comply with the above deadlines and, in certain other cases, notwithstanding the stockholder’s compliance with these deadlines.

NON-COMPLIANT PROPOSALS

We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with the requirements set forth above or other applicable requirements.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS48


  ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE INFORMATION

CORPORATE GOVERANCE GUIDELINES

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to assist the Board in the exercise of its responsibilities and to serve as a framework for the effective governance of the Company. We have posted our Corporate Governance Guidelines in the “Company Overview” section of the “About Cognizant” page of our website located atwww.cognizant.com, under the “Corporate Governance” tab, and you may also obtain a copy by writing to our Secretary at our offices at Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666.

CODE OF ETHICS

The Board has also adopted a written Code of Ethics, entitled “Cognizant’s Core Values and Standards of Business Conduct,” that applies to our Directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. Our Code of Ethics is posted in the “Company Overview” section of the “About Cognizant” page of our website located atwww.cognizant.com, under the “Corporate Governance” tab, and you may also obtain a copy by writing to our Secretary at our offices at Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666.

We intend to post on our website all disclosures that are required by law or NASDAQ listing standards concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of our Code of Ethics.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table identifies our current executive officers. None of our executive officers is related to any other executive officer or to any of our Directors. Our executive officers are elected annually by the Board and serve until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

 

Name

 

 

    Age    

 

 

Current Position

 

 

In Current
    Position Since    

 

Francisco D’Souza1 47 Chief Executive Officer and Director 2007
Gordon J. Coburn2 52 President 2012
Karen McLoughlin3 51 Chief Financial Officer 2012
Rajeev Mehta4 49 Chief Executive Officer, IT Services 2013
Malcolm Frank5 50 Executive Vice President, Strategy and Marketing 2012
Ramakrishnan Chandrasekaran6 58 Executive Vice Chairman, Cognizant India 2013
Debashis Chatterjee7 50 Executive Vice President and President, Technology Solutions 2013
Ramakrishna Prasad Chintamaneni 8 46 Executive Vice President and President, Banking and Financial Services 2013
Sumithra Gomatam9 48 Executive Vice President and President, Industry Solutions 2013
Venkat Krishnaswamy10 63 Executive Vice President and President, Healthcare and Life Sciences 2013
Steven Schwartz11 48 Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Corporate Affairs Officer 2013
Dharmendra Kumar Sinha12 53 Executive Vice President and President, Client Services 2013
Sridhar Thiruvengadam13 52 Chief Operating Officer 2013

1See biographical information on page 7.

2Gordon Coburn was appointed President of the Company, effective February 6, 2012. From March 1998 until February 2012, Mr. Coburn served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and from January 2007 until February 2012, Mr. Coburn also held the position of Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Coburn also served as the Company’s Executive Vice President from December 2003 through December 2006. From November 1999 to December 2003, he served as our Senior Vice President. He previously was our Vice President from 1996 to November 1999. Mr. Coburn served as Senior Director Group Finance and Operations for Cognizant Corporation from November 1996 to December 1997. From 1990 to October 1996, Mr. Coburn held key financial positions with The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation. Mr. Coburn serves on the Board of Directors of The Corporate Executive Board Company. He also served on the Board of Directors of ICT Group, Inc. until its acquisition on February 2, 2010. Mr. Coburn holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Wesleyan University and a Master of Business Administration degree from the Amos Tuck School at Dartmouth College, where he serves as a member of its MBA Advisory Board.

3Karen McLoughlin was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company, effective February 6, 2012. She previously served as the Company’s Senior Vice President of Finance and Enterprise Transformation, a role she held since January 2010. In such role, Ms. McLoughlin was responsible for the Company’s worldwide financial planning and analysis, enterprise risk management and enterprise transformation functions, including the facilitation and execution of various internal reengineering and transformation initiatives designed to enable the Company’s strategic vision. From August 2008 to January 2010, Ms. McLoughlin served as the Company’s Senior Vice President of Finance, responsible for overseeing the Company’s global financial planning and analysis team and enterprise risk management, and from October 2003 until August 2008, Ms. McLoughlin served as the Company’s Vice President of Global Financial Planning and Analysis. Prior to joining Cognizant in October 2003, Ms. McLoughlin held various financial management positions at Spherion Corporation from August 1997 to October 2003 and at Ryder System Inc. from July 1994 to August 1997. Prior to joining Ryder, she spent six years in the South Florida Practice of Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers). Ms. McLoughlin has served on the Board of Directors of Best Buy Co., Inc. since 2015. Ms. McLoughlin has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Wellesley College and a Master of Business Administration degree from Columbia University.

4

Rajeev Mehta was appointed Chief Executive Officer, IT Services, effective December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Mehta is responsible for market facing activities across the Company as well as for delivery across our IT Services business. From February 2012 to December 2013, Mr. Mehta served as Group Chief

49ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE INFORMATION


Executive Industries and Markets. In this role, Mr. Mehta was responsible for leading our industry vertical and geographic market operations on a global basis. From August 2006 to February 2012, he served as our Chief Operating Officer, Global Client Services, responsible for our sales, business development and client relationship management organizations. Mr. Mehta served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of our Financial Services business segment from June 2005 to August 2006. From November 2001 to June 2005, he served as our Vice President and General Manager of our Financial Services business segment. From January 1998 to November 2001, Mr. Mehta served as our Director of the U.S. Central Region. Mr. Mehta served as our Senior Manager of Business Development from January 1997 to January 1998. Prior to joining Cognizant in 1997, Mr. Mehta was involved in implementing GE Information Services offshore outsourcing program and also held consulting positions at Deloitte & Touche and Andersen Consulting. Mr. Mehta holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Maryland and a Master of Business Administration degree from Carnegie Mellon University.

5Malcolm Frank was appointed Executive Vice President, Strategy and Marketing, effective February 6, 2012. Mr. Frank served as our Senior Vice President of Strategy and Marketing from August 2005 to February 2012. In both these roles, Mr. Frank’s responsibilities have included, and continue to include, directing all aspects of our corporate marketing function, including strategy and branding, industry and media relations, corporate communications and corporate marketing. From August 2005 until June 2009, Mr. Frank was also responsible for leading our field marketing function. Prior to joining Cognizant in August 2005, Mr. Frank was co-founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of CXO Systems, Inc., an independent software vendor providing dashboard solutions for senior managers, from March 2002 to July 2005. From June 1999 to September 2002, Mr. Frank was the founder, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Nervewire Inc., a management consulting and systems integration firm. Prior to founding Nervewire, Mr. Frank was a co-founder, executive officer, and Senior Vice President at Cambridge Technology Partners, where he ran Worldwide Marketing, Business Development, and several business units, from January 1990 to June 1999. Mr. Frank graduated from Yale University with a degree in Economics.

6Ramakrishnan Chandrasekaran was appointed Executive Vice Chairman, Cognizant India, effective December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Chandrasekaran focuses on strengthening our strong relationship with industry bodies, driving strategic initiatives that strengthen outreach to the government, and further enhancing our brand equity through public relations in India. From February 2012 to December 2013, Mr. Chandrasekaran served as Group Chief Executive Technology and Operations. In this role, Mr. Chandrasekaran was responsible for leading our solutions and delivery teams worldwide. From August 2006 to February 2012, he served as our President and Managing Director, Global Delivery, responsible for leading our global delivery organization, spearheading new solutions, and championing process improvements. Mr. Chandrasekaran served as our Executive Vice President and Managing Director from January 2004 through July 2006. Prior to that, from November 1999 to January 2004, he served as our Senior Vice President responsible for Independent Software Vendor relationships, key alliances, capacity growth, process initiatives, business development and offshore delivery. Mr. Chandrasekaran joined us as Assistant Vice President in December 1994, before being promoted to Vice President in January 1997. Prior to joining us, Mr. Chandrasekaran worked with Tata Consultancy Services. Mr. Chandrasekaran holds a Mechanical Engineering degree and Master of Business Administration degree from the Indian Institute of Management.

7Debashis Chatterjee was appointed Executive Vice President and President, Technology Solutions, effective December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Chatterjee has responsibility for all of our horizontal practices within IT Services and is responsible for implementing best practices in service delivery and creating solutions across our horizontal practices. From May 2013 until his current appointment, Mr. Chatterjee served as Senior Vice President and Global Head, Technology and Information Services. From March 2012 to April 2013, he was Senior Vice President, Transformational Services. Previously, from April 2011 to January 2012, Mr. Chatterjee served as Vice President and Sectors Leader, Global Business Services, Global Delivery at IBM, a multinational technology and consulting company. From January 2010 to March 2011, Mr. Chatterjee was Senior Vice President and Global Head of Cognizant’s BFS practice, from April 2007 to December 2009, he was Senior Vice President and Global Delivery Head of BFS, and from April 2004 to March 2007, he was Vice President and Global Delivery Head of BFS. Prior to that, Mr. Chatterjee held various key management roles at Cognizant since joining us in 1996. Mr. Chatterjee has a Bachelor of Engineering in Mechanical Engineering from Jadavpur University in India.

8Ramakrishna Prasad Chintamaneni was appointed Executive Vice President and President, Banking and Financial Services (“BFS”), effective December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Chintamaneni is responsible for leading the BFS practice. From 2011 to December 2013, Mr. Chintamaneni served as our Global Head of the BFS practice and was responsible for the practice’s sales, business development, consulting, client relationships, management and delivery, and global profit and loss. Previously, from 2010 to 2011, Mr. Chintamaneni served as our Global Head of Markets for the BFS practice. From 2006 to 2009, he served as our Head of BFS practice for North America. From 1999 through 2006, Mr. Chintamaneni served as our Client Partner, managing the relationships with several of our key BFS clients, and also led our U.S. Eastern Region’s BFS practice. Prior to joining Cognizant in 1999, Mr. Chintamaneni spent seven years in the investment banking and financial services industry, including working at Merrill Lynch and its affiliates for five years as an Investment Banker and a member of Merrill’s business strategy committee in India. Mr. Chintamaneni serves on the Board of Directors of NPower, a nonprofit that helps nonprofits, schools and individuals build technology skills by harnessing the power of the technology community. Mr. Chintamaneni obtained his Bachelor of Technology degree in Chemical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur and a Postgraduate Diploma in Business Management from the XLRI School of Management in India.

9Sumithra Gomatam was appointed Executive Vice President and President, Industry Solutions, effective December 4, 2013. In this role, Ms. Gomatam oversees global delivery for all of our industry verticals and our Business Process Services unit, and is responsible for implementing best practices in services delivery and for creating solutions across our industry practices. Ms. Gomatam also leads our Communications and High Technology business units. From July 2008 to December 2013, Ms. Gomatam served as Senior Vice President, Projects. In this role, Ms. Gomatam served initially as our Global Delivery Head and then as Global Practice Leader for our testing practice. From March 2006 to July 2008, Ms. Gomatam served as Vice President, Projects, leading global delivery and building out the testing practice. From 2001 to March 2006, Ms. Gomatam served as an Account Relationship Manager and as part of our Core Delivery Leadership Team in our BFS practice. From 1995, when Ms. Gomatam joined us, until 2001, she held various key positions within The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation and Cognizant, including serving our BFS clients on application development and application maintenance projects. Ms. Gomatam received her B.E. in Electronics and Communication from Anna University.

10Venkat Krishnaswamy was appointed President, Healthcare and Life Sciences, effective December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Krishnaswamy is focused on delivering solutions and services to the healthcare industry. From February 2012 to December 2013, Mr. Krishnaswamy served as Executive Vice President of Healthcare and Life Sciences. From April 2007 to February 2012, Mr. Krishnaswamy served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of Healthcare and Life Sciences. Mr. Krishnaswamy served as Vice President Projects from January 2003 to April 2007 and as Director of Projects from April 1999 to January 2003. Upon joining Cognizant in 1997, Mr. Krishnaswamy served as Senior Manager until April 1999. Between 1997 and 2003, Mr. Krishnaswamy served in our BFS practice. Prior to joining Cognizant in 1997, Mr. Krishnaswamy spent over 10 years in retail and commercial banking with Colonial State Bank (now Commonwealth Bank of Australia). Mr. Krishnaswamy holds a Bachelor of Engineering degree from the University of Madras and a Masters degree in Electrical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi.

11Steven Schwartz was appointed Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Corporate Affairs Officer on December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Schwartz is responsible for our global legal teams, our global government affairs efforts and our global security team. From July 2007 to December 2013, Mr. Schwartz served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, having global responsibility for managing Cognizant’s legal function. Mr. Schwartz, who joined Cognizant in 2001, previously served as Vice President and General Counsel, a position he held from March 2003 to July 2007. From April 2002 to March 2003, he served as our Vice President and Chief Corporate Counsel. From October 2001 to December 2002, he served as our Chief Corporate Counsel. Mr. Schwartz serves on the Board of Directors of Information Technology Industry Council. Mr. Schwartz holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of Miami, a Juris Doctor degree from Fordham University School of Law and a Master of Law (in Taxation) degree from the New York University School of Law.

12

Dharmendra Kumar Sinha was appointed Executive Vice President and President, Client Services, effective December 4, 2013. In this role, Mr. Sinha leads our global sales, field marketing and intermediary relations teams. He is also responsible for our strategic partnerships and alliances organization. From 2007 to December 2013, Mr. Sinha served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Global Sales and Field Marketing. From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Sinha served as our Vice President, responsible for our Manufacturing, Logistics, Retail, Hospitality, and Technology verticals. In addition, he assumed the role of Head of Sales

ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE INFORMATION50


and managed our Field Marketing function. From January 2008 to December 2008, Mr. Sinha additionally managed the Insurance business unit. Prior to that, from 1998 to 2004, Mr. Sinha served as Director and subsequently as Vice President of the U.S. Western Region. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Sinha served in various operational and business development positions. Prior to joining Cognizant in 1997, Mr. Sinha worked with Tata Consultancy Services and CMC Limited, an end-to-end IT solutions provider. Mr. Sinha has a Bachelor of Science Degree from Patna Science College, Patna and a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra.

13Sridhar Thiruvengadam was appointed Chief Operating Officer of the Company, effective May 8, 2013. Previously, from January 2012 to May 2013, Mr. Thiruvengadam served as an Executive Vice President of the Company, leading the global delivery operations for several of the Company’s industry verticals, and head of the Company’s Business Process Services practice. From January 2010 to January 2012, Mr. Thiruvengadam served as a Senior Vice President and global head of business process, infrastructure and testing services. From April 2007 to January 2010, Mr. Thiruvengadam served as the Company’s Chief People Officer in charge of talent acquisition, management, training and staffing. From March 2001 to March 2007, Mr. Thiruvengadam held several positions in the Company’s banking, financial services, healthcare and insurance practices, including Vice President and head of the Company’s insurance industry vertical. Mr. Thiruvengadam joined the Company as a project manager in November 1994. Mr. Thiruvengadam holds a Masters in Technology degree from the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Class A Common Stock

The following tables set forth certain information with respect to holdings of our Common Stock by (i) stockholders who beneficially owned more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock as of December 31, 2015 and (ii) each of our Directors (which includes all nominees), each of our Named Executives, and all Directors and executive officers as a group, as of March 31, 2016. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for the individuals below is our address. Except as otherwise noted below, none of the shares reported as beneficially owned are currently pledged as security for any outstanding loan or indebtedness.

Security Ownership of 5% Stockholders

The following table sets forth the persons who, to our knowledge, beneficially owned as of December 31, 2015, more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. This information is based upon information furnished to us by each such person and/or based upon public filings with the SEC.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner 

    Amount and Nature of    

Beneficial Ownership

     Percent of Class     
  The Vanguard Group1 35,987,955 5.9%

100 Vanguard Blvd.

  

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

  
  BlackRock, Inc.2 35,437,281 5.8%

55 East 52nd Street

  

New York, New York 10055

  
  FMR LLC3 33,362,791 5.5%

245 Summer Street

  

Boston, Massachusetts 02210

  

1Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group on February 11, 2016 as of December 31, 2015. According to the Schedule 13G/A, the Vanguard Group has sole voting power over 1,131,118 shares of Common Stock, shared voting power over 61,100 shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power over 34,787,958 shares of Common Stock and shared dispositive power of 1,199,997 shares of Common Stock. The Schedule 13G/A reports that Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., each a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., are the beneficial owners of 952,997 and 425,121 shares of Common Stock, respectively, as a result of their serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts and investment manager of Australian investment offerings, respectively.

2Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. on January 26, 2016 as of December 31, 2015. According to the Schedule 13G/A, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 30,103,175 shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power over 35,402,961 shares of Common Stock and shared voting and dispositive power over 34,320 shares of Common Stock. The Schedule 13G reports that beneficial owner subsidiaries of the parent holding company are BlackRock (Channel Islands) Ltd, BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A., BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock (Singapore) Limited, BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Deutschland AG, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Asset Management North Asia Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock Capital Management, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A., BlackRock International Limited, BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited, BlackRock Investment Management (Korea) Ltd., BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd, BlackRock Investment Management, LLC, BlackRock Japan Co Ltd, BlackRock Life Limited and Xulu, Inc.

3Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by FMR LLC on February 12, 2016 as of December 31, 2015. According to the Schedule 13G, FMR LLC has sole voting power over 2,237,097 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power over 33,362,791 shares of Common Stock. The Schedule 13G reports that beneficial owner subsidiaries of the parent holding company are FIAM LLC, Fidelity (Canada) Asset Management ULC, Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Trust Company, Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited, Fidelity Management Trust Company, Inc., FMR Co., Inc., FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited and Strategic Advisors, Inc.

51ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE INFORMATION


Security Ownership of Directors and Officers

The following table sets forth the ownership of our Directors (which includes all nominees), each of our Named Executive Officers, and all Directors and executive officers as a group, as of March 31, 2016. This information is based upon information furnished to us by each such person and/or based upon Company records.

Name

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Ownership 1

Percent of Class 2
Named Executives and Directors (which includes all nominees):

Francisco D’Souza3

            1,513,244            *

Gordon J. Coburn4

97,159            *

Karen McLoughlin5

101,621            *

Rajeev Mehta6

361,953            *

Malcolm Frank7

754            *

Zein Abdalla8

*

Maureen Breakiron-Evans9

76,868            *

Jonathan Chadwick10

*

John N. Fox, Jr.11

106,111            *

John E. Klein12

698,669            *

Leo S. Mackay, Jr.13

12,756            *

Lakshmi Narayanan14

112,187            *

Michael Patsalos-Fox15

48,536            *

Robert E. Weissman16

1,030,469            *

Thomas M. Wendel17

116,793            *

All Directors and executive officers as a group (23 persons)18

4,889,826            

*

*Less than one percent.

1Except as set forth in the footnotes to this table and subject to applicable community property law, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by such stockholder.

2Applicable percentage of ownership is based on an aggregate of 606,249,605 shares of Common Stock outstanding on March 31, 2016. Such percentage also takes into account the Common Stock to which such individual or entity has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days after March 31, 2016, including, but not limited to, through the exercise of options which are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within such 60-day period; however, such Common Stock will not be deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage owned by any other individual or entity. Such calculation is required by Rule 13d-3(d)(1)(i) under the Exchange Act.

3Includes 291,244 shares of Common Stock owned of record, 980,000 shares of Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2016 or will become exercisable within 60 days after such date and 242,000 shares of Common Stock owned by the D’Souza Family 2012 Trust. Excludes 465,552 shares of Common Stock underlying PSUs and RSUs, which vest over time after 60 days after March 31, 2016. Also excludes 105,516 shares of Common Stock underlying PSUs granted in 2015, assuming 100% vesting based on target 2016 performance. See “Long-Term Incentives – Stock-Based Awards” starting on page 23 for more information.

4Includes 97,159 shares of Common Stock owned of record. Excludes 248,782 shares of Common Stock underlying PSUs and RSUs, which vest over time after 60 days after March 31, 2016. Also excludes 56,386 shares of Common Stock underlying PSUs granted in 2015, assuming 100% vesting based on target 2016 performance. See “Long-Term Incentives – Stock-Based Awards” starting on page 23 for more information.

5Includes 41,621 shares of Common Stock owned of record and 60,000 shares of Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2016. Excludes 115,528 shares of Common Stock underlying PSUs and RSUs, which vest over time after 60 days after March 31, 2016. Also excludes 28,201 shares of Common Stock underlying PSUs granted in 2015, assuming 100% vesting based on target 2016 performance. See “Long-Term Incentives – Stock-Based Awards” starting on page 23 for more information.

6Includes 154,239 shares of Common Stock owned of record, 103,856 shares of Common Stock owned by the Rajeev Mehta 2012 Irrevocable Trust and 103,858 shares of Common Stock owned by the Ruchita Mehta 2012 Irrevocable Trust. Excludes 236,128 shares of Common Stock underlying PSUs and RSUs, which vest over time after 60 days after March 31, 2016. Also excludes 53,887 shares of Common Stock underlying PSUs granted in 2015, assuming 100% vesting based on target 2016 performance. See “Long-Term Incentives – Stock-Based Awards” starting on page 23 for more information.

7Includes 754 shares of Common Stock owned of record. Excludes 111,329 shares of Common Stock underlying PSUs and RSUs, which vest over time after 60 days after March 31, 2016. Also excludes 26,426 shares of Common Stock underlying PSUs granted in 2015, assuming 100% vesting based on target 2016 performance. See “Long-Term Incentives – Stock-Based Awards” starting on page 23 for more information.

8Excludes 5,559 shares of Common Stock underlying options and RSUs, which become exercisable or vest over time after 60 days after March 31, 2016.

9Includes 1,075 shares of Common Stock owned of record and 75,793 shares of Common Stock underlying options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2016 or will become exercisable within 60 days after such date. Excludes 14,493 shares of Common Stock subject to RSUs which are vested as of March 31, 2016 but will not settle within 60 days of March 31, 2016. Excludes 14,607 shares of Common Stock underlying options and RSUs, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

10Excludes 1,256 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying options and RSUs, which become exercisable or vest over time after 60 days after March 31, 2016.

11Includes 10,743 shares of Common Stock owned of record and 95,368 shares of Common Stock underlying options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2016 or will become exercisable within 60 days after such date. Excludes 14,607 shares of Common Stock underlying options and RSUs, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE INFORMATION52


12Includes 495,004 shares of Common Stock owned of record, 65,793 shares of Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2016 or will become exercisable within 60 days after such date and 137,872 shares of Common Stock owned by the John E. Klein Family 2012 Irrevocable Trust. Excludes 2,743 shares of Common Stock subject to RSUs which are vested as of March 31, 2016 but will not settle within 60 days of March 31, 2016. Excludes 14,607 shares of Common Stock underlying options and RSUs, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

13Includes 2,743 shares of Common Stock owned of record and 10,013 shares of Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2016 or will become exercisable within 60 days after such date. Excludes 4,506 shares of Common Stock subject to RSUs which are vested as of March 31, 2016 but will not settle within 60 days of March 31, 2016. Excludes 14,607 shares of Common Stock underlying options and RSUs, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

14Includes 86,394 shares of Common Stock owned of record and 25,793 shares of Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2016 or will become exercisable within 60 days after such date. Excludes 14,607 shares of Common Stock underlying options and RSUs which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

15Includes 12,743 shares of Common Stock owned of record and 35,793 shares of Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2016 or will become exercisable within 60 days after such date. Excludes 5,578 shares of Common Stock subject to RSUs which are vested as of March 31, 2016 but will not settle within 60 days of March 31, 2016. Excludes14,607 shares of Common Stock underlying options and RSUs, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

16Includes 954,676 shares of Common Stock owned of record and 75,793 shares of Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2016 or will become exercisable within 60 days after such date. Excludes 2,743 shares of Common Stock subject to RSUs which are vested as of March 31, 2016 but will not settle within 60 days of March 31, 2016. Excludes 14,607 shares of Common Stock underlying options and RSUs, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

17Includes 60,000 shares of Common Stock owned of record, 40,793 shares of Common Stock subject to options which were exercisable as of March 31, 2016 or will become exercisable within 60 days after such date, and 16,000 shares of Common Stock owned by the Tom Wendel Charitable Remainder Unitrust. Excludes 2,743 shares of Common Stock subject to RSUs which are vested as of March 31, 2016 but will not settle within 60 days of March 31, 2016. Excludes 14,607 shares of Common Stock underlying options and RSUs, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period.

18Includes an aggregate of 2,808,787 shares of Common Stock owned of record, 1,475,139 shares of Common Stock underlying options granted to our Directors and executive officers which are exercisable as of March 31, 2016 or within 60 days after such date, 2,314 shares of Common Stock subject to RSUs which are scheduled to vest within 60 days of March 31, 2016 and 603,586 shares of Common Stock held in various trusts. Excludes 32,806 shares of Common Stock subject to RSUs which are vested as of March 31, 2016 but will not settle within 60 days of March 31, 2016. Excludes 1,691,118 shares of Common Stock underlying options, PSUs and RSUs, which become exercisable or vest over time after such period. Also excludes 335,771 shares of Common Stock underlying PSUs granted in 2015, assuming 100% vesting based on target 2016 performance.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

Transactions with Related Persons

Since January 1, 2015, there were no related person transactions that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K other than such matters disclosed herein under “Compensation” starting on page 16.

Review of Related Person Transactions

The Audit Committee of the Company is responsible for reviewing and approving all transactions between us and any related person that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K. Related persons can include any of our Directors or executive officers, certain of our stockholders, and any of their immediate family members. This obligation is set forth in our Audit Committee Charter. In evaluating related person transactions, the members of the Audit Committee apply the same standards of good faith and fiduciary duty they apply to their general responsibilities as a committee of the Board and as individual Directors. The Audit Committee will approve a related person transaction when, in its good faith judgment, the transaction is in the best interests of the Company. The Company’s legal staff is primarily responsible for monitoring and obtaining information from our Directors and executive officers with respect to potential related person transactions, and for then determining, based on the facts and circumstances, whether the related person has a direct or indirect material interest in any transaction with us. Each year, to help our legal staff identify related person transactions, we require each of our Directors, Director nominees and executive officers to complete a disclosure questionnaire identifying any transactions with us in which the officer or Director or their family members have an interest.

In addition, our Code of Ethics describes our expectation that all Directors, officers and employees who may have a potential or apparent conflict of interest to, in the case of employees, notify our Chief Compliance Officer or General Counsel, or in the case of executive officers and Directors, notify our General Counsel or the Board. A copy of our Code of Ethics is posted in the “Company Overview” section of the “About Cognizant” page of our website located atwww.cognizant.com, under the “Corporate Governance” tab.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our Directors, executive officers and stockholders who beneficially own more than 10% of any class of our equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act (collectively, the “Reporting Persons”) to file initial statements of beneficial ownership of securities and statements of changes in beneficial ownership of securities with respect to our equity securities with the SEC. All Reporting Persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all reports that such Reporting Persons file with the SEC pursuant to Section 16(a). Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us and upon written representations of the Reporting Persons received by us, we believe that there has been compliance with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to such Reporting Persons with respect to the year ended December 31, 2015.

53ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE INFORMATION


  ADDITIONAL REFERENCE INFORMATION

OTHER MATTERS AT THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

The Board is not aware of any matter to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than the matters referred to above and does not intend to bring any other matters before the Annual Meeting. However, if other matters should come before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that holders of the proxies will vote thereon in their discretion.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

The accompanying proxy is solicited by and on behalf of the Board, whose Notice of Annual Meeting is attached to this proxy statement, and the entire cost of such solicitation will be borne by us. In addition to the use of mail, proxies may be solicited by personal interview, telephone, e-mail and facsimile by our Directors, officers and other employees who will not be specially compensated for these services. We have engaged MacKenzie Partners, Inc., 105 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, to assist us with the solicitation of proxies. We expect to pay MacKenzie Partners, Inc. a fee of $35,000 plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses for its services. We will also request that brokers, nominees, custodians and other fiduciaries forward soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of shares held by such brokers, nominees, custodians and other fiduciaries. We will reimburse such persons for their reasonable expenses in connection therewith.

COGNIZANT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

A copy of Cognizant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, including financial statements and schedules thereto but not including exhibits, as filed with the SEC, will be sent to any stockholder of record on April 18, 2016 without charge upon written request addressed to:

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation

Maureen Breakiron-Evans

John E. Klein

Leo S. Mackay, Jr.

Thomas M. Wendel

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation66


Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Other Matters

The following table summarizes the fees of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, billed to us for each of the last two fiscal years for audit services and billed to us in each of the last two fiscal years for other services:

Fee Category  2013   2012 

Audit Fees

  $2,897,500    $2,912,200  

Audit-Related Fees

   145,200     233,600  

Tax Fees

   674,300     566,700  

All Other Fees

   678,200     158,000  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Fees

  $4,395,200    $3,870,500  

AUDIT FEES

Audit fees consist of fees for the audit of our consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, the review of the interim financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and other professional services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

AUDIT-RELATED FEES

Audit-related fees consist of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit and the review of our financial statements and which are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services relate to attest services that are not required by statute or regulation, consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and employee benefit audits.

TAX FEES

Tax fees comprise fees for a variety of permissible services relating to tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. These services include assistance in complying with local transfer pricing requirements, assistance with local tax audits and assessments, withholding tax and indirect tax matters, preparation and filing of local tax returns and technical advice relating to local and international tax matters.

ALL OTHER FEES

For 2013, the amount relates to fees related to an information security strategy review, immigration advisory services, information technology advisory fees and accounting research software fees. For 2012, the amount relates to immigration and human resource compliance advisory services and accounting research software fees.

AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICY AND PROCEDURES

The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the approval of all audit and non-audit services that are to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. This policy generally provides that we will not engage our independent registered public accounting firm to render audit or non-audit services unless the service is specifically approved in advance by the Audit Committee or the engagement is entered into pursuant to one of the pre-approval procedures described below.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation67


INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES AND OTHER MATTERS

From time to time, the Audit Committee may pre-approve specified types of services that are expected to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm during the next 12 months. Any such pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or type of services to be provided.

The Audit Committee has also delegated to Maureen Breakiron-Evans the authority to approve any audit or non-audit services to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm. Any approval of services by a member of the Audit Committee pursuant to this delegated authority is reported on at the next meeting of the Audit Committee. During 2013 and 2012, the Audit Committee approved all services provided to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP that are subject to the pre-approval policies and procedures described above.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation68


Stockholders’ Proposals

Stockholders who intend to have a proposal considered for inclusion in our proxy materials for presentation at our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act must submit the proposal to our Secretary at our offices at Glenpointe Centre West, 500 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Teaneck, New Jersey 07666, in writing not later than December 18, 2014.

Stockholders intending to present a proposal at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, but not to include the proposal in our proxy statement, or to nominate a person for election as a director, must comply with the requirements set forth in our Amended and Restated By-laws. Our Amended and Restated By-laws require, among other things, that our Secretary receive written notice from the stockholder of record of their intent to present such proposal or nomination not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day and not later than the close of business on the 90th day prior to the anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. Therefore, the Company must receive notice of such a proposal or nomination for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders no earlier than the close of business on February 3, 2015 and no later than the close of business on March 5, 2015. The notice must contain the information required by the Amended and Restated By-laws, a copy of which is available upon request to our Secretary. In the event that the date of the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after June 3, 2015, then our Secretary must receive such written notice not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the 2015 Annual Meeting and not later than the close of business of the later of the 90th day prior to the 2015 Annual Meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company.

We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these or other applicable requirements.

Other Matters

Our Board of Directors is not aware of any matter to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than the matters referred to above and does not intend to bring any other matters before the Annual Meeting. However, if other matters should come before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that holders of the proxies will vote thereon in their discretion.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation69


Solicitation of Proxies

The accompanying proxy is solicited by and on behalf of our Board of Directors, whose Notice of Annual Meeting is attached to this proxy statement, and the entire cost of such solicitation will be borne by us. In addition to the use of mail, proxies may be solicited by personal interview, telephone, e-mail and facsimile by our Directors, officers and other employees who will not be specially compensated for these services. We will request that brokers, nominees, custodians and other fiduciaries forward soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of shares held by such brokers, nominees, custodians and other fiduciaries. We will reimburse such persons for their reasonable expenses in connection therewith.

Certain information contained in this proxy statement relating to the occupations and security holdings of our Directors and officers is based upon information received from the individual Directors and officers.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation70


Cognizant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K

A copy of Cognizant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, including financial statements and schedules thereto but not including exhibits, as filed with the SEC, will be sent to any stockholder of record on April 7, 2014 without charge upon written request addressed to:

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation

Attention: Secretary

Glenpointe Centre West

500 Frank W. Burr Blvd.

Teaneck, New Jersey 07666

A reasonable fee will be charged for copies of exhibits. You also may access this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K atwww.proxyvote.com. You also may access ourOur Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20132015 is also available atwww.cognizant.com.

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON, WE URGE YOU TO VOTE YOUR SHARES VIA THE TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER OR OVER THE INTERNET, AS DESCRIBED IN THE ENCLOSED MATERIALS. IF YOU RECEIVED A COPY OF THE PROXY CARD BY MAIL, YOU MAY SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THE PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE. PROMPTLY VOTING YOUR SHARES WILL ENSURE THE PRESENCE OF A QUORUM AT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND WILL SAVE US THE EXPENSE OF FURTHER SOLICITATION.

By Order of the Board of Directors

LOGO

Steven Schwartz, Secretary

Teaneck, New Jersey

April 17, 2014

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation71


EXHIBIT A

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION

2009 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

ARTICLE ONE

GENERAL PROVISIONS

I.PURPOSE OF THE PLAN

This 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan is intended to promote the business success and interests of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, a Delaware corporation, by providing eligible persons in the Corporation’s service with the opportunity to participate in one or more cash or equity incentive compensation programs designed to encourage them to continue their service relationship with the Corporation and to contribute to the Corporation’s growth and long-term success.

Capitalized terms shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the attached Appendix.

II.STRUCTURE OF THE PLAN

A. The Plan shall be divided into three separate incentive compensation programs:

— the Discretionary Grant Program under which eligible persons may, at the discretion of the Plan Administrator, be granted options to purchase shares of Common Stock or stock appreciation rights tied to the value of such Common Stock,

— the Stock Issuance Program under which eligible persons may, at the discretion of the Plan Administrator, be issued shares of Common Stock pursuant to restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance shares or other stock-based awards which vest upon the completion of a designated service period and/or the attainment ofpre-established performance milestones, or such shares of Common Stock may be issued through direct purchase or as a bonus for services rendered to the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary), and

— the Incentive Bonus Program under which eligible persons may, at the discretion of the Plan Administrator, be provided with bonus opportunities through performance unit awards and other special cash incentive programs tied to the attainment of pre-established performance milestones.

B. The provisions of Articles One and Five shall apply to all incentive compensation programs under the Plan and shall govern the interests of all persons under the Plan.

III.ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN

A. The Compensation Committee shall have sole and exclusive authority to administer the Plan with respect to Section 16 Insiders. Administration of the Plan with respect to all other persons eligible to participate in the Plan may, at the Board’s discretion, be vested in the Compensation Committee or a Secondary Board Committee, or the Board may retain the power to administer those programs with respect to all such persons. In addition, administration of the Plan may, at the Board’s discretion, be vested in a Special Award Committee with authority to administer the Plan with respect to employees other than Section 16 Insiders and members of such Special Award Committee and to make Awards to such individuals under the Plan subject to such limitations and other terms and conditions as the Board shall specify from time to time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Awards for one or more members of the Compensation Committee (other than ad hoc or formulaic Awards made to all or substantially all of the non-employee Board members on substantially the same basis) must be authorized by a disinterested majority of the non-employee Board members.

B. Members of the Compensation Committee or any Secondary Board Committee or Special Award Committee shall serve for such period of time as the Board may determine and may be removed by the Board at any time. The Board may also at any time terminate the functions of any Secondary Board Committee or Special Award Committee and reassume all powers and authority previously delegated to such committee.

C. Each Plan Administrator shall, within the scope of its administrative functions under the Plan, have full power and authority (subject to the provisions of the Plan) to establish such rules and regulations as it may deem appropriate for proper administration of the Plan and to make such determinations under, and issue such interpretations of, the provisions of the

 

2014 Proxy StatementADDITIONAL REFERENCE INFORMATION Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation54 A-1


PlanRECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Portions of our disclosure, including the following table, include non-GAAP Income from Operations, non-GAAP operating margin, and non-GAAP EPS. These non-GAAP financial measures are not based on any outstanding Awards thereunder as itcomprehensive set of accounting rules or principles and should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), and may deem necessary or advisable. Decisionsbe different from non-GAAP measures used by other companies. In addition, these non-GAAP measures should be read in conjunction with our financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. The reconciliations of Cognizant’s non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP measures should be carefully evaluated.

We seek to manage the Company to a targeted non-GAAP operating margin of 19% to 20% of revenue. We believe providing investors with an operating view consistent with how we manage the Company provides enhanced transparency into the operating results of the Plan Administrator withinCompany. For our internal management reporting and budgeting purposes and as performance metrics for certain of our executive compensation programs, we use non-GAAP financial information that does not include certain charges, including stock-based compensation expense, acquisition-related charges and netnon-operating foreign currency exchange gains or losses, for financial and operational decision making, to evaluate period-to-period comparisons, to determine portions of the scopecompensation of its administrative functions undercertain of our executive officers and for making comparisons of our operating results to those of our competitors. Therefore, it is our belief that the Plan shall be finaluse ofnon-GAAP financial measures excluding these costs provides a meaningful measure for investors to evaluate our financial performance. Accordingly, we believe that the presentation of non-GAAP Income from Operations, non-GAAP operating margin and binding onnon-GAAP EPS, when read in conjunction with our reported GAAP results, can provide useful supplemental information to our management and investors regarding financial and business trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations.

A limitation of using non-GAAP financial measures versus financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP is that non-GAAP measures do not reflect all parties who have an interestof the amounts associated with our operating results as determined in accordance with GAAP and exclude costs that are recurring, namely stock-based compensation expense, certain acquisition-related charges, and net non-operating foreign currency exchange gains or losses. In addition, other companies may calculate non-GAAP financial measures differently than us, thereby limiting the Plan under its jurisdiction or any Award thereunder.

D. Serviceusefulness of these non-GAAP financial measures as a Plan Administratorcomparative tool. We compensate for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the members of the Compensation Committee or the Secondary Board Committee shall constitute service as Board members,GAAP amounts excluded from non-GAAP Income from Operations, non-GAAP operating margin and the membersnon-GAAP EPS to allow investors to evaluate such non-GAAP financial measures.

The following table presents a reconciliation of each such committee shall accordingly be entitled to full indemnification and reimbursement as Board members for their service on such committee. No member of the Compensation Committee, the Special Award Committee or the Secondary Board Committee shall be liable for any act or omission made in good faith with respectnon-GAAP financial measure to the Plan or any Award thereunder.most comparable GAAP measure for the years ended December 31.

   2011
($)
  % of
Revenue
  2012
($)
  % of
Revenue
  2013
($)
  % of
Revenue
  2014
($)
  % of
Revenue
  2015
($)
  % of
Revenue
 ($ in millions, except per share data)
GAAP income from operations and operating margin  1,136.5      18.6    1,361.5      18.5    1,677.9      19.0    1,884.9      18.4    2,142.0     17.3
Add: Stock-based compensation expense  90.2      1.5    107.3      1.5    118.8      1.3    134.8      1.3    192.0       1.5
Add: Acquisition-related charges1  13.4      0.2    15.9      0.2    24.0      0.3    48.4      0.5    115.8       0.9
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   
Non-GAAP income from operations and non-GAAP operating margin    1,240.1      20.3      1,484.7      20.2      1,820.7      20.6      2,068.1      20.2      2,449.8     19.7
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   
            
GAAP diluted earnings per share  1.42       1.72       2.02       2.35       2.65      
Effect of above operating adjustments, net of tax  0.13       0.15       0.17       0.23       0.35      
Effect of non-operating foreign currency exchange gains and losses, net of tax2  N/A3     0.03       0.08       0.02       0.07      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   
Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share  1.553     1.90       2.27       2.60       3.07      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

   
1Acquisition-related charges include, when applicable, amortization of purchased intangible assets included in the depreciation and amortization expense line on our consolidated statements of operations, external deal costs, acquisition-related retention bonuses, integration costs, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities, charges for impairment of acquired intangible assets and other acquisition-related costs.

 

IV.2ELIGIBILITYNon-operating foreign currency exchange gains and losses are inclusive of gains and losses on related foreign exchange forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes.

A. The persons eligible to participate in the Plan are as follows:

(i) Employees,

(ii) non-employee members of the Board or the board of directors of any Parent or Subsidiary, and

(iii) consultants and other independent advisors who provide services to the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary).

B. The Plan Administrator shall have full authority to determine, (i) with respect to Awards made under the Discretionary Grant Program, which eligible persons are to receive such Awards, the time or times when those Awards are to be made, the number of shares to be covered by each such Award, the time or times when the Award is to become exercisable, the vesting schedule (if any) applicable to the Award, the maximum term for which such Award is to remain outstanding and the status of a granted option as either an Incentive Option or a Non-Statutory Option; (ii) with respect to Awards under the Stock Issuance Program, which eligible persons are to receive such Awards, the time or times when the Awards are to be made, the number of shares subject to each such Award, the applicable performance and/or service vesting provisions, the issuance schedule in effect for the shares that vest and become issuable under such Award, the cash consideration (if any) payable for those shares and the form (cash or shares of Common Stock) in which the Award is to be settled; and (iii) with respect to Awards under the Incentive Bonus Program, which eligible persons are to receive such Awards, the time or times when the Awards are to be made, the performance objectives for each such Award, the amounts payable at designated levels of attained performance, any applicable service vesting requirements, the payout schedule for each such Award and the form (cash or shares of Common Stock) in which the Award is to be settled.

 

V.3The calculation of non-GAAP EPS for 2011 has not been conformed to the presentation of the other years and excludes the adjustment for the effect ofSTOCK SUBJECT TO THE PLANnon-operating foreign currency exchange gains and losses, net of tax.

A. The stock issuable under the Plan shall be shares of authorized but unissued or reacquired Common Stock, including shares repurchased by the Corporation on the open market. The number of shares of Common Stock initially reserved for issuance over the term of the Plan shall be limited to Twenty-Four Million (24,000,000) shares. The Plan shall serve as the successor to the Predecessor Plans, and no further stock option grants or other awards shall be made under the Predecessor Plans on or after the Plan Effective Date. However, all option grants and unvested share awards outstanding under the Predecessor Plans on the Plan Effective Date shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with their terms, and no provision of this Plan shall be deemed to affect or otherwise modify the rights or obligations of the holders of those awards with respect to their acquisition of shares of Common Stock thereunder.

B. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for each share of Common Stock issued without cash consideration pursuant to the Stock Issuance or the Incentive Bonus Program, the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be reduced by 1.55 shares of Common Stock.

C. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Incentive Options granted under the Plan shall be limited to Twenty-Four Million (24,000,000) shares, subject to periodic adjustment in accordance with Section V.G. of this Article One.

D. Each person participating in the Plan shall be subject the following limitations:

— for Awards denominated in shares of Common Stock at the time of grant (whether subsequently payable in cash or Common Stock, or a combination of both), the maximum number of shares of Common Stock for which such Awards may be made to such person in any calendar year shall not exceed One Million (1,000,000) shares of Common Stock in the aggregate, and

 

2014 Proxy Statement Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation55 A-2ADDITIONAL REFERENCE INFORMATION


— for Awards denominated in dollars at the time of grant (whether subsequently payable in cash or Common Stock, orINDEX OF DEFINED TERMS

Set forth below is a combination of both), the maximum dollar amount for which such Awards may be made to such person in any calendar year shall not exceed Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000).

E. Shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding Awards made under the Plan shall be available for subsequent issuance under the Plan to the extent those Awards expire or terminate for any reason prior to the issuancelist of the shares of Common Stock subject to those Awards. Unvested shares issued under the Plan and subsequently forfeited or repurchased by the Corporation, at a price per share not greater than the original issue price paid per share, pursuant to the Corporation’s repurchase rights under the Plan shall be added back to the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan and shall accordingly be available for subsequent reissuance.

F. Should the exercise price of an option under the Plan be paid with shares of Common Stock, then the authorized reserve of Common Stock under the Plan shall be reduced by the gross number of shares for which that option is exercised, and not by the net number of shares issued under the exercised stock option. Upon the exercise of any stock appreciation right under the Plan, the share reserve shall be reduced by the gross number of shares as to which such right is exercised, and not by the net number of shares actually issued by the Corporation upon such exercise. If shares of Common Stock otherwise issuable under the Plan are withheld by the Corporation in satisfaction of the withholding taxes or other taxes incurred in connection with the issuance, vesting or exercise of an Award or the issuance of Common Stock thereunder (including, without limitation any fringe benefit or employer taxes permitted to be passed through to the employee under applicable law), then the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be reduced on the basis of the gross number of shares issued, vested or exercised under such Award, calculated in each instance prior to any such share withholding.

G. Should any change be made to the Common Stock by reason of any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, combination of shares, exchange of shares, spin-off transaction or other change affecting the outstanding Common Stock as a class without the Corporation’s receipt of consideration, or should the value of outstanding shares of Common Stock be substantially reduced as a result of a spin-off transaction or an extraordinary dividend or distribution, or should there occur any merger, consolidation or other reorganization, then equitable adjustments shall be made by the Plan Administrator to (i) the maximum number and/or class of securities issuable under the Plan, (ii) the number and/or class of securities by which the share reserve will be reduced for each security issued without cash consideration under the Stock Issuance and Incentive Bonus Programs, (iii) the maximum number and/or class of securities issuable under the Plan pursuant to Incentive Options, (iv) the maximum number and/or class of securities for which any one person may be granted Common Stock-denominated Awards under the Plan per calendar year, (v) the number and/or class of securities and the exercise or base price per share in effect under each outstanding Award under the Discretionary Grant Program, (vi) the number and/or class of securities subject to each outstanding Award under the Stock Issuance Program and the cash consideration (if any) payable per share, (vii) the number and/or class of securities subject to each outstanding Award under the Incentive Bonus Program denominated in shares of Common Stock and (viii) the number and/or class of securities subject to the Corporation’s outstanding repurchase rights under the Plan and the repurchase price payable per share. The adjustments shall be made in such manner as the Plan Administrator deems appropriate and such adjustments shall be final, binding and conclusive. In the event of a Change in Control, however, the adjustments (if any) shall be made solely in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Plan governing Change in Control transactions.

H. Outstanding Awards granted pursuant to the Plan shall in no way affect the right of the Corporation to adjust, reclassify, reorganize or otherwise change its capital or business structure or to merge, consolidate, dissolve, liquidate or sell or transfer all or any part of its business or assets.

defined terms used within this proxy statement.

 

2014 Proxy StatementDefined Term

Meaning

See
Page No.

1999 PlanAmended and Restated 1999 Incentive Compensation Plan39
2004 Employee Stock Purchase PlanAmended and Restated 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan39
2009 Incentive Plan2009 Incentive Compensation Plan39
2015 Annual Meeting2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company5
2015 Annual ReportCompany’s Annual Report to Stockholders for Year Ended December 31, 20151
2017 Annual Meeting2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company1
Annual MeetingAnnual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held on June 15, 20161
BFSBanking and Financial Services50
Board or Board of DirectorsBoard of Directors of the Company1
BroadridgeBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., the Company’s agent for distribution of this proxy statement and tabulator for the Annual Meeting2
Cognizant Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation A-31
Common StockClass A Common Stock, $0.01 par value, of the Company1
CompanyCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation1
CSRPCognizant Technology Solutions Supplemental Retirement Plan24
Director PlanAmended and Restated Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan39
DirectorsDirectors of the Company1
Dodd-Frank ActDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act16
DSODays Sales Outstanding22
Employment AgreementsAmended and Restated Executive Employment and Non-Disclosure,Non-Competition and Invention Assignment Agreements28
Exchange ActSecurities Exchange Act of 193413
Executive CommitteeGordon Coburn, Francisco D’Souza and Lakshmi Narayanan27
FASB ASCFinancial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards CodificationN/A
GAAPU.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles55
Governance CommitteeNominating and Corporate Governance Committee14
Internet NoticeNotice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials2
IRCU.S. Internal Revenue Code17
IRSU.S. Internal Revenue Service24
Key Employees’ Stock Option PlanAmended and Restated Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan39
Named ExecutivesThe Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and each of the Company’s three other most highly compensated executive officers whose total compensation for the 2015 fiscal year was in excess of $100,000 and who were serving as executive officers of the Company at the end of the 2015 fiscal year31
NASDAQThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC13
non-GAAP EPSNon-GAAP diluted earnings per share (see “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures”)25 (55) 
non-GAAP Income from OperationsNon-GAAP income from operations (see “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures”)22 (55) 
non-employee DirectorsDirectors who are not employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries40
Pay GovernancePay Governance, LLC, independent compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee19
PSUsPerformance-based stock units23
PwCPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm43
Record DateApril 18, 2016, the record date for the Annual Meeting1
Reporting PersonsDirectors, executive officers and stockholders who beneficially own more than 10% of any class of the Company’s equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act53
RSUsRestricted stock units23
Rule 14a-8Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act48
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission2
TriZettoTZ US Parent, Inc.N/A


ARTICLE TWO

DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAM

I.OPTION TERMS

Each option shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement in the form approved by the Plan Administrator;provided, however,that each such Award Agreement shall comply with the terms specified below. Each Award Agreement evidencing an Incentive Option shall, in addition, be subject to the provisions of the Plan applicable to such options.

A.Exercise Price.

1. The exercise price per share shall be fixed by the Plan Administrator;provided, however, that such exercise price shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock on the grant date.

2. The exercise price shall become immediately due upon exercise of the option and shall, subject to the provisions of the Award Agreement, be payable in one or more of the forms specified below:

(i) cash or check made payable to the Corporation,

(ii) shares of Common Stock (whether delivered in the form of actual stock certificates or through attestation of ownership) held for the requisite period (if any) necessary to avoid any resulting charge to the Corporation’s earnings for financial reporting purposes and valued at Fair Market Value on the Exercise Date,

(iii) to the extent the option is exercised for vested shares of Common Stock, through a special sale and remittance procedure pursuant to which the Optionee shall concurrently provide instructions to (a) a brokerage firm (reasonably satisfactory to the Corporation for purposes of administering such procedure in compliance with the Corporation’s pre-clearance/pre-notification policies) to effect the immediate sale of all or a portion of the purchased shares and remit to the Corporation, out of the sale proceeds available on the settlement date, sufficient funds to cover the aggregate exercise price payable for the purchased shares plus all applicable income and employment taxes and Foreign Taxes required to be withheld by the Corporation by reason of such exercise and any employer taxes required to be paid by the Optionee under Section V.B, V.C or V.D of this Article II and (b) the Corporation to deliver the certificates for the purchased shares directly to such brokerage firm on such settlement date in order to complete the sale, or

(iv) to the extent the option is at the time exercisable for vested shares of Common Stock, through the surrender to the Corporation of all or any part of that vested portion for an appreciation distribution payable in shares of Common Stock with a Fair Market Value at the time of such option surrender equal to the dollar amount by which the then Fair Market Value of the shares of Common Stock subject to the surrendered portion exceeds the aggregate exercise price payable for those shares of Common Stock, with any resulting fractional share to be rounded down to the next whole share.

Except to the extent such sale and remittance procedure is utilized, payment of the exercise price for the purchased shares must be made on the Exercise Date.

B.Term and Exercisability of Options.

1. No option shall have a term in excess of seven (7) years measured from the option grant date. Unless a shorter term is specified in the Award Agreement, each option under the Discretionary Grant Program shall have such a seven (7)-year maximum term.

2. Unless otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement, each option shall vest and become exercisable for twenty-five percent (25%) of the option shares upon the Optionee’s completion of each year of Service over the four (4)-year period measured from the grant date. In no event, however, shall such option be exercisable for fractional shares.

3. The Plan Administrator shall also have the discretionary authority, consistent with Code Section 162(m), to structure one or more Awards under the Discretionary Grant Program so that those Awards shall vest and become exercisable only after the achievement of pre-established corporate performance objectives based on one or more Performance Goals and measured over the performance period specified by the Plan Administrator at the time of the Award

 

2014 Proxy StatementADDITIONAL REFERENCE INFORMATION Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation56 A-4


C.Effect of Termination of Service.

1. Unless otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement, the following provisions shall govern the exercise of any options granted to an Optionee pursuant to the Discretionary Grant Program that are outstanding at the time of his or her cessation of Service or death:

(i) Should Optionee cease to remain in Service for any reason (other than death, Permanent Disability, Misconduct or Cause) while an option is outstanding, then Optionee (or any person or persons to whom an option is transferred pursuant to a permitted transfer under Paragraph F below) shall have a three (3)-month period measured from the date of such cessation of Service during which to exercise the option, but in no event shall the option be exercisable at any time after the expiration of the option term.

(ii) Should Optionee die while his or her option is outstanding, then the option may be exercised by (i) the personal representative of Optionee’s estate or (ii) the person or persons to whom the option is transferred pursuant to Optionee’s will or the laws of inheritance following Optionee’s death or (iii) the person to whom the option is transferred during Optionee’s lifetime pursuant to a permitted transfer under Paragraph F below, as the case may be. However, if Optionee dies while holding an outstanding option under the Discretionary Grant Program and has an effective beneficiary designation in effect for that option at the time of his or her death, then the designated beneficiary or beneficiaries shall have the exclusive right to exercise the option following Optionee’s death. Any such right to exercise the option shall lapse, and the option shall cease to be outstanding, upon the earlier of (i) the expiration of the twelve (12)-month period measured from the date of Optionee’s death and (ii) the expiration of the option term.

(iii) Should Optionee cease Service by reason of Permanent Disability while his or her option is outstanding, then Optionee (or any person or persons to whom this option is transferred pursuant to a permitted transfer under Paragraph F below) shall have a twelve (12)-month period measured from the date of such cessation of Service during which to exercise the option. In no event shall the option be exercisable at any time after the expiration of the option term.

(iv) The applicable period of post-Service exercisability in effect pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this Paragraph C.1 shall automatically be extended by an additional period of time equal in duration to any interval within such post-Service exercise period during which the exercise of the option or the immediate sale of the underlying shares of Common Stock purchasable under that option cannot be effected in compliance with applicable federal and state securities laws, but in no event shall such an extension result in the extension of the option beyond the expiration of the maximum option term.

(v) During the limited period of post-Service exercisability, the option may not be exercised in the aggregate for more than the number of shares of Common Stock for which such option is, at the time of Optionee’s cessation of Service, vested and exercisable pursuant to the vesting provisions of Paragraph B.2 above or the special vesting acceleration provisions of Section IV.A of this Article Two. The option shall not vest or become exercisable for any additional underlying shares of Common Stock, whether pursuant to the normal vesting provisions of Paragraph B.2 above or the special vesting acceleration provisions of Section IV.A of this Article Two, following Optionee’s cessation of Service, except to the extent (if any) specifically authorized by the Plan Administrator pursuant to an express written agreement with Optionee. Upon the expiration of such limited exercise period or (if earlier) upon the expiration of the term, the option shall terminate and cease to be outstanding for any exercisable shares of Common Stock for which the option has not otherwise been exercised.

(vi) Should Optionee’s Service be terminated for Misconduct or Cause or should Optionee otherwise engage in any Misconduct or other act or omission constituting grounds for termination for Cause while his or her option is outstanding, then such option, whether vested or unvested at the time, shall terminate immediately and cease to remain outstanding.

2. The Plan Administrator shall have complete discretion, exercisable either at the time an option is granted or at any time while the option remains outstanding, to:

(i) extend the period of time for which the option is to remain exercisable following Optionee’s cessation of Service from the limited exercise period otherwise in effect for that option to such greater period of time as the Plan Administrator shall deem appropriate, but in no event beyond the expiration of the option term, and/or

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-5


(ii) permit the option to be exercised, during the applicable post-Service exercise period, not only with respect to the number of vested shares of Common Stock for which such option is exercisable at the time of Optionee’s cessation of Service but also with respect to one or more additional shares in which Optionee would have vested had Optionee continued in Service.LOGO

D.Stockholder Rights. The holder of an option shall have no stockholder rights with respect to the shares subject to the option until such person shall have exercised the option, paid the exercise price and become a holder of record of the purchased shares.CC


E.Repurchase Rights. The Plan Administrator shall have the discretion to grant options which are exercisable for unvested shares of Common Stock. Should the Optionee cease Service while such shares are unvested, the Corporation shall have the right to repurchase any or all of those unvested shares at a price per share equal to thelower of (i) the exercise price paid per share or (ii) the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock at the time of repurchase. The terms upon which such repurchase right shall be exercisable (including the period and procedure for exercise and the appropriate vesting schedule for the purchased shares) shall be established by the Plan Administrator and set forth in the document evidencing such repurchase right.Cognizant


F.Transferability of Options. The transferability of options granted under the Plan shall be governed by the following provisions:World Headquarters


(i)Incentive Options: During the lifetime of the Optionee, Incentive Options shall be exercisable only by the Optionee and shall not be assignable or transferable other than by will or the laws of inheritance following the Optionee’s death.500 Frank W. Burr Blvd


(ii)Non-Statutory Options. Non-Statutory Options shall be subject to the same limitation on transfer as Incentive Options. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement, a Non-Statutory Option may be assigned in whole or in part during the Optionee’s lifetime, by gratuitous transfer to a revocable living trust established for the exclusive benefit of Optionee or Optionee and his or her spouse (the “Trust”) or pursuant to a domestic relations order to Optionee’s former spouse in settlement of their marital property rights (the “Spouse Transferee”). The assigned portion may only be exercised by the Trust or the Spouse Transferee acquiring the proprietary interest in the option pursuant to the assignment. The terms applicable to the assigned portion shall be the same as those in effect for the option immediately prior to such assignment and shall be set forth in such documents issued to the assignee as the Plan Administrator may deem appropriate.Teaneck, NJ 07666


(iii)Beneficiary Designations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Optionee may designate one or more persons as the beneficiary or beneficiaries of his or her outstanding options under this Article Two (whether Incentive Options or Non-Statutory Options), and those options shall, in accordance with such designation, automatically be transferred to such beneficiary or beneficiaries upon the Optionee’s death while holding those options. Such beneficiary or beneficiaries shall take the transferred options subject to all the terms and conditions of the applicable agreement evidencing each such transferred option, including (without limitation) the limited time period during which the option may be exercised following the Optionee’s death.

II.INCENTIVE OPTIONS

The terms specified below shall be applicable to all Incentive Options. Except as modified by the provisions of this Section II, all the provisions of Articles One, Two and Six shall be applicable to Incentive Options. Options which are specifically designated as Non-Statutory Options when issued under the Plan shallnot be subject to the terms of this Section II.

A.Eligibility. Incentive Options may only be granted to Employees.

B.Dollar Limitation. The aggregate Fair Market Value of the shares of Common Stock (determined as of the respective date or dates of grant) for which one or more options granted to any Employee under the Plan (or any other option plan of the Corporation or any Parent or Subsidiary) may for the first time become exercisable as Incentive Options during any one calendar year shall not exceed the sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000).

To the extent the Employee holds two (2) or more such options which become exercisable for the first time in the same calendar year, then for purposes of the foregoing limitations on the exercisability of those options as Incentive Options, such options shall be deemed to become first exercisable in that calendar year on the basis of the chronological order in which they were granted, except to the extent otherwise provided under applicable law or regulation.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-6


C.10% Stockholder. If any Employee to whom an Incentive Option is granted is a 10% Stockholder, then the exercise price per share shall not be less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock on the option grant date, and the option term shall not exceed five (5) years measured from the option grant date.

III.STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

A.Authority. The Plan Administrator shall have full power and authority, exercisable in its sole discretion, to grant stock appreciation rights in accordance with this Section III to selected Optionees or other individuals eligible to receive option grants under the Discretionary Grant Program.

B.Types. Two types of stock appreciation rights shall be authorized for issuance under this Section III: (i) tandem stock appreciation rights (“Tandem Rights”) and (ii) Stand-Alone stock appreciation rights (“Stand-Alone Rights”).

C.Tandem Rights. The following terms and conditions shall govern the grant and exercise of Tandem Rights.

1. One or more Optionees may be granted a Tandem Right, exercisable upon such terms and conditions as the Plan Administrator may establish, to elect between the exercise of the underlying option for shares of Common Stock or the surrender of that option in exchange for a distribution from the Corporation in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the Fair Market Value (on the option surrender date) of the number of shares in which the Optionee is at the time vested under the surrendered option (or surrendered portion thereof) over (ii) the aggregate exercise price payable for such vested shares.

2. Any distribution to which the Optionee becomes entitled upon the exercise of a Tandem Right may be made in (i) shares of Common Stock valued at Fair Market Value on the option surrender date, (ii) cash or (iii) a combination of cash and shares of Common Stock, as the Plan Administrator shall determine in its sole discretion. Unless otherwise specified in the applicable Award Agreement, the distribution shall be made in shares of Common Stock.

D.Stand-Alone Rights. The following terms and conditions shall govern the grant and exercise of Stand-Alone Rights:

1. One or more individuals eligible to participate in the Discretionary Grant Program may be granted a Stand-Alone Right not tied to any underlying option under this Discretionary Grant Program. The Stand-Alone Right shall relate to a specified number of shares of Common Stock and shall be exercisable upon such terms and conditions as the Plan Administrator may establish. In no event, however, may the Stand-Alone Right have a maximum term in excess of seven (7) years measured from the grant date. Except to the extent otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, the provisions of Paragraphs B.1 and B.2 of Section I of this Article Two shall govern the term and exercisability of each Stand-Alone Right awarded under the Plan.

2. Upon exercise of the Stand-Alone Right, the holder shall be entitled to receive a distribution from the Corporation in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the aggregate Fair Market Value (on the exercise date) of the shares of Common Stock underlying the exercised right over (ii) the aggregate base price in effect for those shares.

3. The number of shares of Common Stock underlying each Stand-Alone Right and the base price in effect for those shares shall be determined by the Plan Administrator in its sole discretion at the time the Stand-Alone Right is granted. In no event, however, may the base price per share be less than the Fair Market Value per underlying share of Common Stock on the grant date.

4. Stand-Alone Rights shall be subject to the same transferability restrictions applicable to Non-Statutory Options under Section I.F of this Article Two. In addition, one or more beneficiaries may be designated for an outstanding Stand-Alone Right in accordance with substantially the same terms and provisions as set forth in Section I.F of this Article Two.

5. The distribution with respect to an exercised Stand-Alone Right may be made in (i) shares of Common Stock valued at Fair Market Value on the exercise date, (ii) cash or (iii) a combination of cash and shares of Common Stock, as the Plan Administrator shall determine in its sole discretion. Unless otherwise specified in the applicable Award Agreement, the distribution shall be made in shares of Common Stock.

6. The holder of a Stand-Alone Right shall have no stockholder rights with respect to the shares subject to the Stand-Alone Right unless and until such person shall have exercised the Stand-Alone Right and become a holder of record of the shares of Common Stock issued upon the exercise of such Stand-Alone Right.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-7


E.Post-Service Exercise. The provisions governing the exercise of Tandem and Stand-Alone Rights following the cessation of the recipient’s Service shall be the same as those set forth in Section I.C of this Article Two for the options granted under the Discretionary Grant Program, and the Plan Administrator’s discretionary authority under Section I.C.2 of this Article Two shall also extend to any outstanding Tandem or Stand-Alone Appreciation Rights.

IV.CHANGE IN CONTROL

A. In the event of an actual Change in Control transaction, each Award outstanding at that time under the Discretionary Grant Program but not otherwise fully vested and exercisable shall automatically accelerate and become exercisable immediately prior to the effective date of that Change in Control as to all of the shares of Common Stock at the time subject to such Award, unless (i) such Award is to be assumed by the successor corporation (or parent thereof) or is otherwise to continue in full force and effect pursuant to the terms of the Change in Control transaction or (ii) such Award is to be replaced with a cash incentive program of the successor corporation which preserves the spread existing at the time on the Change in Control on any shares as to which the Award is not otherwise at that time vested and exercisable and provides for the subsequent vesting and payout of that spread in accordance with the same exercise/vesting schedule in effect for that Award or (iii) the acceleration of such Award is subject to other limitations imposed by the Plan Administrator.

B. All outstanding repurchase rights under the Discretionary Grant Program shall automatically terminate, and the shares of Common Stock subject to those terminated rights shall immediately vest in full, immediately prior to the effective date of an actual Change in Control transaction, except to the extent: (i) those repurchase rights are to be assigned to the successor corporation (or parent thereof) or are otherwise to continue in full force and effect pursuant to the terms of the Change in Control transaction or (ii) such accelerated vesting is precluded by other limitations imposed by the Plan Administrator.

C. Immediately following the consummation of the Change in Control, all outstanding Awards under the Discretionary Grant Program shall terminate and cease to be outstanding, except to the extent assumed by the successor corporation (or parent thereof) or otherwise continued in full force and effect pursuant to the terms of the Change in Control transaction.

D. Each Award under the Discretionary Grant Program which is assumed in connection with a Change in Control or otherwise continued in effect shall be appropriately adjusted, immediately after such Change in Control, to apply to the number and class of securities into which the shares of Common Stock subject to that Award would have been converted in consummation of such Change in Control had those shares actually been outstanding at that time. Equitable adjustments to reflect such Change in Control shall also be made to (i) the exercise or base price per share in effect under each such assumed Award under the Discretionary Grant Program,provided the aggregate exercise or base price in effect for such securities shall remain the same, (ii) the maximum number and/or class of securities available for issuance over the remaining term of the Plan, (iii) the number and/or class of securities by which the share reserve will be reduced for each security issued without cash consideration under the Stock Issuance and Incentive Bonus Programs, (iv) the maximum number and/or class of securities which may be issued pursuant to Incentive Options granted under the Plan, (v) the maximum number and/or class of securities for which any one person may be granted Common Stock-denominated Awards under the Plan per calendar year, (vi) the number and/or class of securities and the exercise or base price per share in effect under each outstanding Award under the Discretionary Grant Program, (vii) the number and/or class of securities subject to each outstanding Award under the Stock Issuance Program and the cash consideration (if any) payable per share, (viii) the number and/or class of securities subject to each outstanding Award under the Incentive Bonus Program denominated in shares of Common Stock and (ix) the number and/or class of securities subject to the Corporation’s outstanding repurchase rights under the Plan and the repurchase price payable per share. To the extent the actual holders of the Corporation’s outstanding Common Stock receive cash consideration for their Common Stock in consummation of the Change in Control, the successor corporation may, in connection with the assumption or continuation of the outstanding Awards under the Discretionary Grant Program and subject to the Plan Administrator’s approval, substitute, for the securities underlying those assumed rights, one or more shares of its own common stock with a fair market value equivalent to the cash consideration paid per share of Common Stock in such Change in Control transaction, provided such common stock is readily traded on an established U.S. securities exchange.

E. The Plan Administrator shall have the discretionary authority to structure one or more outstanding Awards under the Discretionary Grant Program so that those Awards shall, immediately prior to the effective date of an actual Change in Control transaction, vest and become exercisable as to all the shares of Common Stock at the time subject to those Awards and may be exercised as to any or all of those shares as fully vested shares of Common Stock, whether or not those Awards are to be assumed in the Change in Control transaction or otherwise continued in effect. In addition, the Plan Administrator

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-8


shall have the discretionary authority to structure one or more of the Corporation’s repurchase rights under the Discretionary Grant Program so that those rights shall terminate immediately prior to the effective date of an actual Change in Control transaction, and the shares subject to those terminated rights shall thereupon vest in full.

F. The Plan Administrator shall have full power and authority to structure one or more outstanding Awards under the Discretionary Grant Program so that those Awards shall vest and become exercisable as to all the shares of Common Stock at the time subject to those Awards in the event the Optionee’s Service is subsequently terminated by reason of an Involuntary Termination within a designated period following the effective date of any Change in Control transaction in which those Awards do not otherwise fully accelerate. In addition, the Plan Administrator may structure one or more of the Corporation’s repurchase rights so that those rights shall immediately terminate with respect to any shares held by the Optionee at the time of such Involuntary Termination, and the shares subject to those terminated repurchase rights shall accordingly vest in full at that time.

G. The portion of any Incentive Option accelerated in connection with a Change in Control shall remain exercisable as an Incentive Option only to the extent the applicable One Hundred Thousand Dollar ($100,000) limitation is not exceeded. To the extent such dollar limitation is exceeded, the accelerated portion of such option shall be exercisable as a Non-statutory Option under the Federal tax laws.

V.TAX WITHHOLDING

A. The Corporation’s obligation to deliver shares of Common Stock or make a cash payment in connection with the grant, exercise, vesting or settlement of any Award under this Discretionary Grant Program shall be subject to the satisfaction of all applicable income and employment taxes, and Foreign Tax withholding requirements, any employer taxes passed through to the Optionee under Section V.B, V.C or V.D of this Article II and any other taxes required to be collected at the time of the grant, exercise, vesting or settlement of such Award. Accordingly, no shares shall be issued or cash payment made with respect to an outstanding Award under this Discretionary Grant Program until all such taxes have been collected.

B. Any Optionee who is subject to taxation in India shall be required to pay any fringe benefits or other tax payable by the Corporation (or the Parent or Subsidiary employing such Optionee) as a result of or with respect to the grant, vesting or exercise of an Award under the Discretionary Grant Program or the issuance of shares of Common Stock thereunder (the “Employer Option Taxes”). Optionee must pay such Employer Option Taxes at such times and in such form as determined by the Corporation (or such Parent or Subsidiary).

C. Any Optionee who is subject to taxation in the United Kingdom shall be liable for and pay all secondary Class 1 National Insurance Contributions which may be payable by the Corporation (or the Parent or Subsidiary employing such Optionee) arising in connection with the grant, vesting or exercise of an Award under the Discretionary Grant Program or the issuance of shares of Common Stock thereunder (the “Employer Option NIC”). The Optionee must pay such Employer Option NIC at such times and in such form as determined by the Corporation (or such Parent or Subsidiary).

D. Any Optionee subject to taxation in any jurisdiction shall pay any taxes or other amounts required to be paid by the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary employing such Options) with respect to the grant, vesting or exercise of an Award under this Discretionary Grant Program or the issuance of shares of Common Stock thereunder, to the extent those taxes or other amounts are permitted to be passed through to the Optionee under applicable law. The Optionee must pay any such taxes or other amounts at such times and in such form as determined by the Corporation.

E. The Optionee shall enter into such additional agreements as may be required by the Corporation (or the Parent or Subsidiary employing Optionee) to effect the transfer of the Employer Option Taxes, Employer Option NIC and any other taxes or payments from the Corporation (or the Parent or Subsidiary employing Optionee) to the Optionee.

VI.PROHIBITION ON REPRICING PROGRAMS

The Plan Administrator shall not (i) implement any cancellation/regrant program pursuant to which outstanding options or stock appreciation rights under the Plan are cancelled and new options or stock appreciation rights are granted in replacement with a lower exercise price per share, (ii) cancel outstanding options or stock appreciation rights under the Plan with exercise prices per share in excess of the then current Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock for consideration payable in cash or equity securities of the Corporation or (iii) otherwise directly reduce the exercise price in effect for outstanding options or stock appreciation rights under the Plan, without in each such instance obtaining stockholder approval.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-9


ARTICLE THREE

STOCK ISSUANCE PROGRAM

I.STOCK ISSUANCE TERMS

Shares of Common Stock may be issued under the Stock Issuance Program, either as vested or unvested shares, through direct and immediate issuances. Shares of Common Stock may also be issued under the Stock Issuance Program pursuant to performance shares or restricted stock units which entitle the recipients to receive the shares underlying those Awards upon the attainment of designated Performance Goals or the satisfaction of specified Service requirements or upon the expiration of a designated time period following the vesting of those Awards. Each Award under the Stock Issuance Program shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement in the form approved by the Plan Administrator;provided, however, that each such Award Agreement shall comply with the terms specified below.

A.Issue Price/Consideration.

1. Shares of Common Stock may be issued under the Stock Issuance Program for any of the following items of consideration which the Plan Administrator may deem appropriate in each individual instance:

(i) cash or check made payable to the Corporation,

(ii) past services rendered to the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary); or

(iii) any other valid consideration under the State in which the Corporation is at the time incorporated.

2. However, for shares of Common Stock to be issued for cash consideration, the cash consideration payable per share shall be fixed by the Plan Administrator at the time of the Award, but in no event shall such cash consideration be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock on the Award date.

B.Vesting Provisions.

1. Shares of Common Stock issued under the Stock Issuance Program may, in the discretion of the Plan Administrator, be fully and immediately vested upon issuance as a bonus for Service rendered or may vest in one or more installments over the Participant’s period of Service and/or upon the attainment of specified performance objectives. The elements of the vesting schedule applicable to any unvested shares of Common Stock issued under the Stock Issuance Program shall be determined by the Plan Administrator and incorporated into the Award Agreement. Shares of Common Stock may also be issued under the Stock Issuance Program pursuant to performance shares or restricted stock units which entitle the recipients to receive the shares underlying those Awards upon the attainment of designated performance goals and/or the satisfaction of specified Service requirements or upon the expiration of a designated time period following the vesting of those Awards, including (without limitation) a deferred distribution date on or after termination of the Participant’s Service, or upon the occurrence of such other dates or events as determined by the Plan Administrator, subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following limitations shall apply with respect to the vesting schedules established for the Awards made under the Stock Issuance Program, subject to the acceleration provisions of Paragraphs B.7 and B.8 below and Section II of this Article Three:

(i) for any such Award which is to vest on the basis of Service, the minimum vesting period shall be three (3) years, with such vesting to occur in one or more installments over that period as determined by the Plan Administrator, but in no event more favorably than monthly; and

(ii) for any such Award which is to vest on the basis of performance objectives, the performance period shall have a duration of at least one year.

2. The Plan Administrator shall also have the discretionary authority, consistent with Code Section 162(m), to structure one or more Awards under the Stock Issuance Program so that the shares of Common Stock subject to those Awards shall vest (or vest and become issuable) upon the achievement of pre-established performance objectives based on one or more Performance Goals and measured over the performance period specified by the Plan Administrator at the time of the Award.

3. The Participant shall have full stockholder rights with respect to any shares of Common Stock issued to the Participant under the Stock Issuance Program, whether or not the Participant’s interest in those shares is vested. Accordingly, the Participant shall have the right to vote such shares and to receive any dividends paid on such shares, subject to any applicable vesting requirements. The Participant shall not have any stockholder rights with respect to the shares of Common Stock subject to a performance share or restricted stock unit Award until that Award vests and the shares of Common Stock

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-10


are actually issued thereunder. However, dividend-equivalent units may be paid or credited, either in cash or in actual or phantom shares of Common Stock, on outstanding performance share or restricted stock unit Awards, subject to such terms and conditions as the Plan Administrator may deem appropriate.

4. Any new, substituted or additional securities or other property (including money paid other than as a regular cash dividend) which the Participant may have the right to receive with respect to the Participant’s unvested shares of Common Stock by reason of any stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, combination of shares, exchange of shares, spin-off transaction, extraordinary dividend or distribution or other change affecting the outstanding Common Stock as a class without the Corporation’s receipt of consideration shall be issued subject to (i) the same vesting requirements applicable to the Participant’s unvested shares of Common Stock and (ii) such escrow arrangements as the Plan Administrator shall deem appropriate. Equitable adjustments to reflect each such transaction shall also be made by the Plan Administrator to the repurchase price payable per share by the Corporation for any unvested securities subject to its existing repurchase rights under the Plan; provided the aggregate repurchase price shall in each instance remain the same.

5. Should the Participant cease to remain in Service while holding one or more unvested shares of Common Stock issued under the Stock Issuance Program or should the performance objectives not be attained with respect to one or more such unvested shares of Common Stock, then those shares shall be immediately surrendered to the Corporation for cancellation, and the Participant shall have no further stockholder rights with respect to those shares. To the extent the surrendered shares were previously issued to the Participant for consideration paid in cash or cash equivalent, the Corporation shall repay to the Participant thelower of (i) the cash consideration paid for the surrendered shares or (ii) the Fair Market Value of those shares at the time of cancellation.

6. The Plan Administrator may in its discretion waive the surrender and cancellation of one or more unvested shares of Common Stock which would otherwise occur upon the cessation of the Participant’s Service or the non-attainment of the performance objectives applicable to those shares. Any such waiver shall result in the immediate vesting of the Participant’s interest in the shares of Common Stock as to which the waiver applies. Such waiver may be effected at any time, whether before or after the Participant’s cessation of Service or the attainment or non-attainment of the applicable performance objectives. However, no vesting requirements tied to the attainment of performance objectives may be waived with respect to shares which were intended at the time of issuance to qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m), except as otherwise provided in Section II of this Article Three.

7. Outstanding performance shares or restricted stock units under the Stock Issuance Program shall automatically terminate, and no shares of Common Stock shall actually be issued in satisfaction of those Awards, if the performance goals or Service requirements established for those Awards are not attained or satisfied. The Plan Administrator, however, shall have the discretionary authority to issue vested shares of Common Stock under one or more outstanding Awards of performance shares or restricted stock units as to which the designated performance goals or Service requirements have not been attained or satisfied. However, no vesting requirements tied to the attainment of performance goals may be waived with respect to Awards which were intended, at the time those Awards were made, to qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m), except as otherwise provided in Section II of this Article Three.

8. The following additional requirements shall be in effect for any performance shares awarded under this Article Three:

(i) At the end of the performance period, the Plan Administrator shall determine and confirm the actual level of attainment for each performance objective and the extent to which the performance shares awarded for that period are to vest and become payable based on the attained performance levels.

(ii) The performance shares which so vest shall be paid as soon as practicable following the end of the performance period, unless such payment is to be deferred for the period specified by the Plan Administrator at the time the performance shares are initially awarded or the period designated by the Participant pursuant to a timely deferral election in accordance with the applicable requirements of Code Section 409A.

(iii) Performance shares may be paid in (i) cash, (ii) shares of Common Stock or (iii) any combination of cash and shares of Common Stock, as determined by the Plan Administrator in its sole discretion. Unless otherwise specified in the applicable Award Agreement, the distribution shall be made in shares of Common Stock.

(iv) Performance shares may also be structured so that the shares are convertible into shares of Common Stock, but the rate at which each performance share is to so convert shall be based on the attained level of performance for each applicable performance objective.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-11


II.CHANGE IN CONTROL

A. Each outstanding Award under the Stock Issuance Program may be assumed in connection with a Change in Control or otherwise continued in effect. Each Award so assumed or continued in effect shall be adjusted immediately after the consummation of that Change in Control so as to apply to the number and class of securities into which the shares of Common Stock subject to that Award immediately prior to the Change in Control would have been converted in consummation of such Change in Control had those shares actually been outstanding at that time, and appropriate adjustments shall also be made to the cash consideration (if any) payable per share thereunder, provided the aggregate consideration shall remain the same. To the extent the actual holders of the Corporation’s outstanding Common Stock receive cash consideration for their Common Stock in consummation of the Change in Control, the successor corporation may, in connection with the assumption or continuation of the outstanding Awards and subject to the Plan Administrator’s approval, substitute one or more shares of its own common stock with a fair market value equivalent to the cash consideration paid per share of Common Stock in such Change in Control transaction, provided such common stock is readily traded on an established U.S. securities exchange.

B. If an Award under the Stock Issuance Program is not assumed or otherwise continued in effect or replaced with a cash incentive program of the successor corporation which preserves the Fair Market Value of the underlying shares of Common Stock at the time of the Change in Control and provides for the subsequent vesting and payout of that value in accordance with the same vesting and issuance schedule in effect for those shares at the time of such Change in Control, then such Award shall vest, and the shares of Common Stock subject to that Award shall be issued as fully-vested shares, immediately prior to the effective date of the Change in Control or at such other time as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement.

C. The Plan Administrator shall have the discretionary authority to structure one or more unvested Awards under the Stock Issuance Program so that the shares of Common Stock subject to those Awards shall automatically vest (or vest and become issuable) in whole or in part on the effective date of an actual Change in Control transaction or upon the subsequent termination of the Participant’s Service by reason of an Involuntary Termination within a designated period following the effective date of that Change in Control transaction.

D. The Plan Administrator’s authority under Paragraph C of this Section II shall also extend to any Awards intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m), even though the automatic vesting of those Awards may result in their loss of performance-based status under Code Section 162(m).

E. All of the Corporation’s outstanding repurchase rights under the Stock Issuance Program shall terminate automatically, and all the shares of Common Stock subject to those terminated rights shall vest in full, immediately prior to the effective date of an actual Change in Control transaction, except to the extent (i) the Awards to which those repurchase rights are to be assumed by the successor corporation (or parent thereof) or are otherwise to continue in full force and effect pursuant to the terms of the Change in Control transaction, (ii) those Awards are to be replaced with a cash incentive program of the successor corporation which preserves, for each such Award, the Fair Market Value of the underlying shares of Common Stock at the time of the Change in Control and provides for the subsequent vesting and payout of that value in accordance with the same vesting schedule in effect for those shares at the time of such Change in Control or (iii) such accelerated vesting is precluded by other limitations imposed in the Stock Issuance Agreement.

III.COLLECTION OF WITHHOLDING TAXES

A. The Corporation (or the Parent or Subsidiary employing Participant) shall collect the employee portion of the U.S. FICA taxes (Social Security and Medicare) with respect to the shares of Common Stock subject to an Award issued under this Stock Issuance Program at the time those shares vest. Such taxes shall be based on the Fair Market Value of such shares on their vesting date. The Corporation (or the Parent or Subsidiary employing Participant) shall also collect the employee portion of the FICA taxes with respect to any dividend equivalents payable pursuant to the Award at the time those dividend equivalents vest. Such taxes shall be based on the cash amount and the fair market value of any other property underlying the dividend equivalents on the vesting date. Unless the Participant delivers a separate check payable to the Corporation in the amount of the FICA taxes required to be withheld from the Participant, the Corporation shall withhold those taxes from the Participant’s wages. However, if the Participant is at the time an executive officer of the Corporation, then such withholding taxes must be collected from the Participant through delivery of his or her separate check not later than the vesting date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for any shares of Common Stock to be issued immediately upon vesting or for any divided equivalents to be paid immediately upon vesting, the employee portion of the applicable FICA taxes shall be collected in the

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-12


same manner as the federal, state and local income taxes are to be withheld under Section III.B below. The foregoing tax collection provisions shall also be applicable to the employee portion of any Foreign Taxes that become due and payable upon the vesting of the shares of Common Stock subject to an Award issued under this Stock Issuance Program.

B. The Corporation shall collect the U.S. federal, state and local income taxes and/or all applicable Foreign Taxes required to be withheld with respect to the distribution of the phantom dividend equivalents to the Participant by withholding a portion of that distribution equal to the amount of those taxes, with the cash portion of the distribution to be the first portion so withheld.

C. Until such time as the Corporation provides the Participant with written or electronic notice to the contrary, the Corporation shall collect the U.S. federal, state and local income taxes and/or all applicable Foreign Taxes required to be withheld with respect to the issuance of the vested shares of Common Stock subject to the Award outstanding under this Stock Issuance Program through an automatic share withholding procedure pursuant to which the Corporation will withhold, at the time of such issuance, the number of shares (rounded up to the nearest whole share) with a Fair Market Value (measured as of the issuance date) equal to the amount of those taxes (the “Share Withholding Method”); provided, however, that the amount of any shares so withheld shall not exceed the amount necessary to satisfy the Corporation’s required tax withholding obligations using the minimum statutory withholding rates for federal and state tax purposes that are applicable to supplemental taxable income. Participant shall be notified in writing or electronically in the event such Share Withholding Method is no longer available.

D. Should any shares of Common Stock subject to an Award be distributed at time the Share Withholding Method is not available, then the U.S. federal, state and local income taxes and/or all applicable Foreign Taxes required to be withheld with respect to those shares shall be collected from the Participant through either of the following alternatives:

(i) the Participant’s delivery of his or her separate check payable to the Corporation in the amount of such taxes, or

(ii) the use of the proceeds from a next-day sale of the shares issued to the Participant, provided and only if (i) such a sale is permissible under the Corporation’s insider trading policies governing the sale of Common Stock, (ii) the Participant makes an irrevocable commitment, on or before the issuance of the vested shares, to effect such sale of the shares and (iii) the transaction is not otherwise deemed to constitute a prohibited loan under Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

E. Any Participant who is subject to taxation in India shall be required to pay any fringe benefit or other tax payable by the Corporation (or the Parent or Subsidiary employing such Participant) as a result of or with respect to the grant, vesting or settlement of an Award under this Stock Issuance Program or the issuance of shares of Common Stock thereunder (the “Employer Issuance Taxes”) Until such time as the Corporation provides the Participant with written or electronic notice to the contrary, the Employer Issuance Taxes shall be collected through the Share Withholding Method.

F. Any Participant who is subject to taxation in the United Kingdom shall be liable for and pay all secondary Class 1 National Insurance Contributions which may be payable by the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary employing or retaining or previously employing or retaining the Participant) arising in connection with the Award or the issuance of shares of Common Stock thereunder (the “Employer Issuance NIC”). Until such time as the Corporation provides the Participant with written or electronic notice to the contrary, the Employer Issuance NIC shall be collected through the Share Withholding Method.

G. Any Participant subject to taxation in any jurisdiction shall pay any taxes or other amounts that are required by the laws of that jurisdiction to be paid by the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary employing such Participant) with respect to the grant, vesting or settlement of an Award under this Stock Issuance Program or the issuance of shares of Common Stock thereunder, to the extent those taxes or other amounts are permitted to be passed through to the Participant under applicable law. Until such time as the Corporation provides the Participant with written or electronic notice to the contrary, such taxes or other amounts shall be collected through the Share Withholding Method.

H. The Participant shall enter into such additional agreements as may be required by the Corporation (or the Parent or Subsidiary employing Participant) to effect the transfer of the Employer Issuance Taxes, Employer Issuance NIC and any other taxes or payments from the Corporation (or the Parent or Subsidiary employing Participant) to the Participant.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-13


ARTICLE FOUR

INCENTIVE BONUS PROGRAM

I. INCENTIVE BONUS TERMS

The Plan Administrator shall have full power and authority to implement one or more of the following incentive bonus programs under the Plan:

(i) cash bonus awards (“Cash Awards”),

(ii) performance unit awards (“Performance Unit Awards”), and

(iii) dividend equivalent rights (“DER Awards”).

A.Cash Awards. The Plan Administrator shall have the discretionary authority under the Plan to make Cash Awards which are to vest in one or more installments over the Participant’s continued Service with the Corporation or upon the attainment of specified performance goals. Each such Cash Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement in the form approved by the Plan Administrator;provided however, that each such Award Agreement shall comply with the terms specified below.

1. The elements of the vesting schedule applicable to each Cash Award shall be determined by the Plan Administrator and incorporated into the Award Agreement.

2. The Plan Administrator shall also have the discretionary authority, consistent with Code Section 162(m), to structure one or more Cash Awards so that those Awards shall vest upon the achievement of pre-established corporate performance objectives based upon one or more Performance Goals.

3. Outstanding Cash Awards shall automatically terminate, and no cash payment or other consideration shall be due the holders of those Awards, if the performance goals or Service requirements established for the Awards are not attained or satisfied. The Plan Administrator may in its discretion waive the cancellation and termination of one or more unvested Cash Awards which would otherwise occur upon the cessation of the Participant’s Service or the non-attainment of the performance objectives applicable to those Awards. Any such waiver shall result in the immediate vesting of the Participant’s interest in the Cash Award as to which the waiver applies. Such wavier may be effected at any time, whether before or after the Participant’s cessation of Service or the attainment or non-attainment of the applicable performance objectives. However, no vesting requirements tied to the attainment of performance goals may be waived with respect to awards which were intended, at the time those awards were granted, to qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m), except as otherwise provided in Section II of this Article Four.

4. Cash Awards which become due and payable following the attainment of the applicable performance goals or satisfaction of the applicable Service requirement (or the waiver of such goals or Service requirement) may be paid in (i) cash, (ii) shares of Common Stock valued at Fair Market Value on the payment date or (iii) a combination of cash and shares of Common Stock, as the Plan Administrator shall determine in its sole discretion.

B.Performance Unit Awards. The Plan Administrator shall have the discretionary authority to make Performance Unit Awards in accordance with the terms of this Article Four. Each such Performance Unit Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement in the form approved by the Plan Administrator;provided however, that each such Award Agreement shall comply with the terms specified below.

1. A Performance Unit shall represent a participating interest in a special bonus pool tied to the attainment of pre-established performance objectives based on one or more Performance Goals. The amount of the bonus pool may vary with the level at which the applicable performance objectives are attained, and the value of each Performance Unit which becomes due and payable upon the attained level of performance shall be determined by dividing the amount of the resulting bonus pool (if any) by the total number of Performance Units issued and outstanding at the completion of the applicable performance period.

2. Performance Units may also be structured to include a Service requirement which the Participant must satisfy following the attainment of the applicable performance objectives in order to vest in those Performance Units.

3. Performance Units which become due and payable following the attainment of the applicable performance objectives and the satisfaction of any applicable Service requirement may be paid in (i) cash, (ii) shares of Common Stock valued at Fair Market Value on the payment date or (iii) a combination of cash and shares of Common Stock, as determined by the Plan Administrator in its sole discretion and set forth in the Award Agreement.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-14


C.Dividend Equivalent Right (“DER”) Awards. The Plan Administrator shall have the discretionary authority to make DER Awards in accordance with the terms of this Article Four. Each such DER Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement in the form approved by the Plan Administrator;provided however, that each Award Agreement shall comply with the terms specified below.

1. The DER Awards may be made as stand-alone awards or in tandem with other Awards made under the Plan. The term of each such DER Award shall be established by the Plan Administrator at the time of grant, but no DER Award shall have a term in excess of seven (7) years.

2. Each DER shall represent the right to receive the economic equivalent of each dividend or distribution, whether in cash, securities or other property (other than shares of Common Stock), which is made per issued and outstanding share of Common Stock during the term the DER remains outstanding. A special account shall be maintained on the books of the Corporation for each Participant to whom a DER Award is made, and that account shall be credited per DER with each such dividend or distribution made per issued and outstanding share of Common Stock during the term of that DER remains outstanding.

3. Payment of the amounts credited to such book account may be made to the Participant either concurrently with the actual dividend or distribution made per issued and outstanding share of Common Stock or may be deferred for a period specified by the Plan Administrator at the time the DER Award is initially made or designated by the Participant pursuant to a time deferral election made in accordance with the requirements of Code Section 409A.

4. Payment may be paid in (i) cash, (ii) shares of Common Stock or (iii) a combination of cash and shares of Common Stock, as determined by the Plan Administrator in its sole discretion and set forth in the Award Agreement. If payment is to be made in the form of Common Stock, the number of shares of Common Stock into which the cash dividend or distribution amounts are to be converted for purposes of the Participant’s book account may be based on the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock on the date of conversion, a prior date or an average of the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock over a designated period, as the Plan Administrator shall determine in its sole discretion.

II.CHANGE IN CONTROL

A. The Plan Administrator shall have the discretionary authority to structure one or more Awards under this Incentive Bonus Program so that those Awards shall automatically vest in whole or in part immediately prior to the effective date of an actual Change in Control transaction or upon the subsequent termination of the Participant’s Service by reason of an Involuntary Termination within a designated period following the effective date of such Change in Control.

B. The Plan Administrator’s authority under Paragraph A of this Section II shall also extend to any performance bonus awards intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m), even though the automatic vesting of those awards may result in their loss of performance-based status under Code Section 162(m).

III.TAX WITHHOLDING

The Corporation’s obligation to deliver shares of Common Stock or make a cash payment in settlement of any Award under this Incentive Bonus Program shall be subject to the satisfaction of all applicable income, employment and Foreign Tax withholding requirements, any employer taxes passed through to the Optionee under Article Five, Section II and any other taxes required to be collected at the time of the issuance, vesting or settlement of such Award. Accordingly, no shares shall be issued or cash payment made with respect to an outstanding Award under this Incentive Bonus Program until such all such taxes have been collected.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-15


ARTICLE FIVE

MISCELLANEOUS

I.DEFERRED COMPENSATION

A. The Plan Administrator may, in its sole discretion, structure one or more Awards under the Stock Issuance or Incentive Bonus Programs so that the Participants may be provided with an election to defer the compensation associated with those Awards for federal income tax purposes. Any such deferral opportunity shall comply with all applicable requirements of Code Section 409A.

B. To the extent the Corporation maintains one or more separate non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements which allow the participants the opportunity to make notional investments of their deferred account balances in shares of Common Stock, the Plan Administrator may authorize the share reserve under the Plan to serve as the source of any shares of Common Stock that become payable under those deferred compensation arrangements. In such event, the share reserve under the Plan shall be reduced on a share-for-one share basis for each share of Common Stock issued under the Plan in settlement of the deferred compensation owed under those separate arrangements.

C. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this Plan or any outstanding Award Agreement, to the extent any Award under this Plan may be deemed to create a deferred compensation arrangement under Section 409A of the Code, then the following limitations shall apply to such Award and the applicable Award Agreement (if not otherwise expressly provided therein):

— No shares of Common Stock or other amounts which become issuable or distributable under such Award Agreement by reason of the Participant’s cessation of Service shall actually be issued or distributed to such Participant until the date of his or her Separation from Service (as determined in accordance with the provisions of Section 1.409A-1(h) of the Treasury Regulations) or as soon thereafter as administratively practicable, but in no event later than thelater of (i) the close of the calendar year in which such Separation from Service occurs and (ii) the fifteenth day of the third calendar month following the date of such Separation from Service.

— Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, shares of Common Stock or other amounts which become issuable or distributable under such Award Agreement by reason of the Participant’s cessation of Service shall actually be issued or distributed to such Participant prior to theearlier of (i) the first day of the seventh (7th) month following the date of the Participant’s Separation from Service and (ii) the date of Participant’s death, if he or she is deemed at the time of such Separation from Service to be a specified employee under Section 1.409A-1(i) of the Treasury Regulations as determined by the Plan Administrator in accordance with consistent and uniform standards applied to all other Code Section 409A arrangements of the Corporation, and such delayed commencement is otherwise required in order to avoid a prohibited distribution under Code Section 409A(a)(2). The deferred shares or other distributable amount shall be issued or distributed in a lump sum on the first day of the seventh (7th) month following the date of the Participant’s Separation from Service or (if earlier) the first day of the month immediately following the date the Corporation receives proof of his or her death.

II.TAX WITHHOLDING

A. The Corporation’s obligation to deliver shares of Common Stock upon the issuance, exercise, vesting or settlement of an Award under the Plan shall be subject to the satisfaction of all applicable income, employment and Foreign Tax withholding requirements, and any employer taxes passed through to the Optionee pursuant to the terms of the Plan or the applicable Award Agreement.

B. The Plan Administrator may, in its discretion, structure one or more Awards under the Plan so that all applicable federal, state, local and Foreign Taxes (including, without limitation, any employer fringe benefit or other taxes permitted to be passed through to the employee under applicable law) incurred in connection with the issuance, exercise, vesting or settlement of those Awards or the issuance of shares of Common Stock thereunder shall automatically be collected by withholding, from the shares of Common Stock otherwise issuable upon the issuance, exercise, vesting or settlement of such Awards or the issuance of Common Stock thereunder, the number of shares (rounded up to the nearest whole share) with an aggregate Fair Market Value equal to the dollar amount of those taxes. The shares of Common Stock so withheld shall reduce the number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Plan.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-16


III.SHARE ESCROW/LEGENDS

Unvested shares may, in the Plan Administrator’s discretion, be held in escrow by the Corporation until the Participant’s interest in such shares vests or may be issued directly to the Participant with restrictive legends on the certificates evidencing those unvested shares.

IV.EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM OF THE PLAN

A. The Plan shall become effective on the Plan Effective Date.

B. The Plan shall serve as the successor to each of the Predecessor Plans, and no further option grants or unvested share issuances shall be made under the Predecessor Plans if this Plan is approved by the stockholders at the 2009 Annual Meeting. Such stockholder approval shall not affect the option grants and unvested share awards outstanding under the Predecessor Plans at the time of the 2009 Annual Meeting, and those option grants and unvested share awards shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.

C. The Plan shall terminate upon theearliest to occur of (i) April 15, 2019, (ii) the date on which all shares available for issuance under the Plan shall have been issued as fully vested shares or (iii) the termination of all outstanding Awards in connection with a Change in Control. Should the Plan terminate on April 15, 2019, then all Awards outstanding at that time shall continue to have force and effect in accordance with the provisions of the documents evidencing those Awards.

V.AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN

A. The Board shall have complete and exclusive power and authority to amend or modify the Plan in any or all respects;provided, however, that stockholder approval shall be required for any amendment to the Plan which materially increases the number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Plan (other than pursuant to Section V.E of Article One), materially increases the benefits accruing to Optionees or Participants, materially expands the class of individuals eligible to participate in the Plan, expands the types of awards which may be made under the Plan or extends the term of the Plan or to the extent such stockholder approval may otherwise required under applicable law or regulation or pursuant to the listing standards of the Stock Exchange on which the Common Stock is at the time primarily traded. However, no such amendment or modification shall adversely affect the rights and obligations with respect to Awards at the time outstanding under the Plan unless the Optionee or the Participant consents to such amendment or modification.

B. The Compensation Committee shall have the discretionary authority to adopt and implement from time to time such addenda or subplans to the Plan as it may deem necessary in order to bring the Plan into compliance with applicable laws and regulations of any foreign jurisdictions in which grants or awards are to be made under the Plan and/or to obtain favorable tax treatment in those foreign jurisdictions for the individuals to whom the grants or awards are made.

C. Awards may be made under the Plan that involve shares of Common Stock in excess of the number of shares then available for issuance under the Plan, provided no shares shall actually be issued pursuant to those Awards until the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan is sufficiently increased by stockholder approval of an amendment of the Plan authorizing such increase. If such stockholder approval is not obtained within twelve (12) months after the date the first excess Award is made, then all Awards granted on the basis of such excess shares shall terminate and cease to be outstanding.

VI.USE OF PROCEEDS

Any cash proceeds received by the Corporation from the sale of shares of Common Stock under the Plan shall be used for general corporate purposes.

VII.REGULATORY APPROVALS

A. The implementation of the Plan, the granting of any Award under the Plan and the issuance of any shares of Common Stock in connection with the issuance, exercise or vesting of any Award under the Plan shall be subject to the Corporation’s procurement of all approvals and permits required by regulatory authorities having jurisdiction over the Plan, the Awards made under the Plan and the shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to those Awards.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-17


B. No shares of Common Stock or other assets shall be issued or delivered under the Plan unless and until there shall have been compliance with all applicable requirements of applicable securities laws, including the filing and effectiveness of the Form S-8 registration statement for the shares of Common Stock issuable under the Plan, and all applicable listing requirements of any Stock Exchange on which Common Stock is then listed for trading.

VIII.NO EMPLOYMENT/SERVICE RIGHTS

Nothing in the Plan shall confer upon the Optionee or the Participant any right to continue in Service for any period of specific duration or interfere with or otherwise restrict in any way the rights of the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary employing or retaining such person) or of the Optionee or the Participant, which rights are hereby expressly reserved by each, to terminate such person’s Service at any time for any reason, with or without cause.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationA-18


APPENDIX

The following definitions shall be in effect under the Plan:

A.Annual Meeting shall mean the 2009 annual meeting of the Corporation’s stockholders.

B.Award shall mean any of the following awards authorized for issuance or grant under the Plan: stock options, stock appreciation rights, direct stock issuances, restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards, performance shares, performance units, dividend-equivalent rights and cash incentive awards.

C.Award Agreement shall mean the agreement(s) between the Corporation and the Optionee or Participant evidencing a particular Award made to that individual under the Plan, as such agreement(s) may be in effect from time to time

D.Board shall mean the Corporation’s Board of Directors.

E.Cause shall, with respect to each Award made under the Plan, be defined in accordance with the following provisions:

— Cause shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Award Agreement for the particular Award or in any other agreement incorporated by reference into the Award Agreement for purposes of defining such term.

— In the absence of any other Cause definition in the Award Agreement for a particular Award (or in any other agreement incorporated by reference into the Award Agreement), an individual’s termination of Service shall be deemed to be for Cause if such termination occurs by reason of (i) his or her continuing failure to perform the duties and functions assigned or delegated to such individual by the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary for whom such individual renders Service), (ii) his or her failure to observe the material policies of the Corporation applicable to individuals in Service, (iii) his or her commission of any felony or (iv) his or her commission of any misdemeanor involving moral turpitude.

F.Change in Control shall, with respect to each Award made under the Plan, be defined in accordance with the following provisions:

— Change in Control shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Award Agreement for the particular Award or in any other agreement incorporated by reference into the Award Agreement for purposes of defining such term.

— In the absence of any other Change in Control definition in the Award Agreement (or in any other agreement incorporated by reference into the Award Agreement), Change in Control shall mean a change in ownership or control of the Corporation effected through any of the following transactions:

(i) consummation of a merger, consolidation or other reorganization approved by the Corporation’s stockholders,unless securities representing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of the voting securities of the successor corporation are immediately thereafter beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the persons who beneficially owned the Corporation’s outstanding voting securities immediately prior to such transaction,

(ii) a sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Corporation’s assets,

(iii) the closing of any transaction or series of related transactions pursuant to which any person or any group of persons comprising a “group” within the meaning of Rule 13d-5(b)(1) of the 1934 Act (other than (A) the Corporation or (B) a person that, prior to such transaction or series of related transactions, directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with, the Corporation) acquires directly or indirectly (whether as a result of a single acquisition or by reason of one or more acquisitions within the twelve (12)-month period ending with the most recent acquisition) the beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the 1934 Act) of securities possessing (or convertible into or exercisable for securities possessing) more than thirty-five percent (35%) of the total combined voting power of the Corporation’s securities (as measured in terms of the power to vote with respect to the election of Board members) outstanding immediately after the consummation of such acquisition or series of related acquisitions, whether any such acquisition involves a direct issuance from the Corporation or the acquisition of outstanding securities held by one or more of the Corporation’s existing stockholders, or

(iv) a change in the composition of the Board over a period of twelve (12) consecutive months or less such that a majority of the Board members ceases, by reason of one or more contested elections for Board membership, to be comprised of individuals who either (A) have been Board members continuously since the beginning of such

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationAA-1


period or (B) have been elected or nominated for election as Board members during such period by at least a majority of the Board members described in clause (A) who were still in office at the time the Board approved such election or nomination.

G.Code shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

H.Common Stock shall mean the Corporation’s Class A common stock, with a par value of $.01 per share.

I.Compensation Committee shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board comprised of two (2) or more non-employee Board members.

J.Corporation shall mean Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and any corporate successor to all or substantially all of the assets or voting stock of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation which has by appropriate action assumed the Plan.

K.Discretionary Grant Program shall mean the discretionary grant program in effect under Article Two of the Plan pursuant to which stock options and stock appreciation rights may be granted to one or more eligible individuals.

L.Employee shall mean an individual who is in the employ of the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary, whether now existing or subsequently established), subject to the control and direction of the employer entity as to both the work to be performed and the manner and method of performance.

M.Exercise Date shall mean the date on which the Corporation shall have received written or electronic notice of the option exercise.

N.Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock on any relevant date shall be the closing selling price per share of Common Stock at the close of regular hours trading (i.e., before after-hours trading begins) on date on question on the Stock Exchange serving as the primary market for the Common Stock, as such price is reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers (if primarily traded on the Nasdaq Global or Global Select Market) or as officially quoted in the composite tape of transactions on any other Stock Exchange on which the Common Stock is then primarily traded. If there is no closing selling price for the Common Stock on the date in question, then the Fair Market Value shall be the closing selling price on the last preceding date for which such quotation exists. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should a different method of Fair Market Value determination be required by applicable law or regulation of the foreign jurisdiction in which the Award is to be made under the Plan, then the Fair Market Value per share applicable to such Award shall be determined in accordance with the law or regulations of the foreign jurisdiction in which that Award is made.

O.Foreign Taxes shall, for purposes of tax withholding by the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary employing the Optionee or Participant), mean any income tax, employment tax, social insurance, payroll tax, contributions, payment on account obligations or other amounts required to be withheld by the Corporation (such Parent or Subsidiary) in connection with the issuance, exercise, vesting or settlement of Award or the issuance of shares of Common Stock thereunder.

P.Good Reason shall, with respect to each Award made under the Plan, be defined in accordance with the following provisions:

— Good Reason shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Award Agreement for the particular Award or in any other agreement incorporated by reference into the Award Agreement for purposes of defining such term.

— In the absence of any other Good Reason definition in the Award Agreement (or in any other agreement incorporated by reference into the Award Agreement), Good Reason shall mean an individual’s voluntary resignation following (A) a change in his or her position with the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary) which materially reduces his or her duties and responsibilities, (B) a change in his or her reporting responsibilities so that such individual is required to report to a person whose duties, responsibilities and authority are materially less that those of the person to whom such individual previously reported, (C) a material reduction in his or her aggregate level of compensation (including base salary, fringe benefits and target bonus under any corporate-performance based bonus or incentive programs), with a reduction of more than fifteen percent (15%) to be deemed material for such purpose, or (D) a relocation of such individual’s place of employment by more than fifty (50) miles,provided, however, that such individual’s resignation for any of the foregoing reasons shall constitute an a resignation for Good Reason only if the following requirements are satisfied: (x) such individual provides written notice of the clause (A), (B) or (C) event to the Corporation (or the Parent or Subsidiary employer) within sixty (60) days after the occurrence of that event, (y) the Corporation (or the Parent or Subsidiary employer) fails to take appropriate remedial action to remedy such eventwww.cognizant.com

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationAA-2


within thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice and (z) such individual resigns from his or her employment with the Corporation (or the Parent or Subsidiary employer) within one hundred (120) days following the initial occurrence of the clause (A), (B) or (C) event.

Q.Incentive Bonus Program shall mean the incentive bonus program in effect under Article Four of the Plan.

R.Incentive Option shall mean an option which satisfies the requirements of Code Section 422.

S.Involuntary Termination shall mean the termination of the Service of any individual which occurs by reason of:

(i) such individual’s involuntary dismissal or discharge by the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary) for reasons other than Cause or Misconduct, or

(ii) such individual’s voluntary resignation for Good Reason.

T.Misconduct shall mean the commission of any act of fraud, embezzlement or dishonesty by a recipient of an Award, any unauthorized use or disclosure by such individual of confidential information or trade secrets of the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary), or any other intentional misconduct by such individual adversely affecting the business or affairs of the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary) in a material manner. The foregoing definition shall not in any way preclude or restrict the right of the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary) to discharge or dismiss such individual or any other person in the Service of the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary) for any other acts or omissions, but such other acts or omissions shall not be deemed for purposes of the Plan to constitute grounds for termination for Misconduct.

U.1934 Act shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

V.Non-Statutory Option shall mean an option not intended to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 422.

W.Optionee shall mean any person to whom an option or stock appreciation right is granted under the Discretionary Grant Program.

X.Parent shall mean any corporation (other than the Corporation) in an unbroken chain of corporations ending with the Corporation, provided each corporation in the unbroken chain (other than the Corporation) owns, at the time of the determination, stock possessing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain.

Y.Participant shall mean any person who is issued (i) shares of Common Stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units or other stock-based awards under the Stock Issuance Program or (ii) an incentive bonus award under the Incentive Bonus Program.

Z.Permanent Disability or Permanently Disabled shall mean the inability of the Optionee or the Participant to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment expected to result in death or to be of continuous duration of twelve (12) months or more. The determination of whether an Optionee or Participant has become Permanently Disabled shall be made by the Plan Administrator based upon such medical or other evidence as it may deem necessary and appropriate, and such determination shall be conclusive and binding upon the Optionee or Participant.

AA.Performance Goals shall mean any of the following performance criteria upon which the vesting of one or more Awards under the Plan may be based: (i) revenue or revenue growth, (ii) operating or net income, (iii) operating or net income before charges for stock-based compensation and any taxes or fringe benefits incurred by the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary) in settlement of stock-based awards, (iv) operating or net income before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and/or charges for stock-based compensation and any taxes or fringe benefits incurred by the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary) in settlement of stock-based awards, (v) gross, operating or net profit margin, (vi) gross, operating or net profit margin before charges for stock-based compensation and any taxes or fringe benefits incurred by the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary) in settlement of stock-based awards, (vii) earnings per share, (viii) return on assets, capital or stockholder equity, (ix) total stockholder return, (x) cash flow, (xi) measures in terms of days sales outstanding or accounts receivable outstanding, (xii) working capital, (xiii) market share, (xiv) increases in customer base, (xv) cost reductions or other expense control objectives, (xvi) market price of the Common Stock, whether measured in absolute terms or in relationship to earnings or operating income or in relation to various stock market or industry indicies, (xvii) budget objectives, (xviii) working capital, (xix) mergers, acquisitions or divestitures, (xx) measures of customer satisfaction or (xxi) economic value added, models. Each performance criteria may be based upon the attainment of specified levels of the Corporation’s performance under one or more of the measures described above relative to the performance of other entities

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationAA-3


and may also be based on the performance of any of the Corporation’s business units or divisions or any Parent or Subsidiary. Each applicable Performance Goal may include a minimum threshold level of performance below which no Award will be earned, levels of performance at which specified portions of an Award will be earned and a maximum level of performance at which an Award will be fully earned. Each applicable Performance Goal may be structured at the time of the Award to provide for appropriate adjustment for one or more of the following items: (A) asset impairments or write-downs; (B) litigation judgments or verdicts and expenses and settlement costs and expenses; (C) the effect of changes in tax laws or regulations, accounting principles or other applicable laws, regulations or provisions affecting reported results; (D) accruals for reorganization and restructuring programs; (E) any extraordinary nonrecurring items as described in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 and/or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in the Corporation’s annual report to shareholders for the applicable year; (F) the operations of any business acquired by the Corporation or any Parent or Subsidiary or of any joint venture in which the Corporation or any Parent or Subsidiary participates; (G) the divestiture of one or more business operations or the assets thereof; (H) the costs incurred in connection with such acquisitions or divestitures or (I) non-operating foreign exchange gains or losses.

BB.Plan shall mean the Corporation’s 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan, as set forth in this document.

CC.Plan Administrator shall mean the particular entity, whether the Compensation Committee (or subcommittee thereof), the Board, the Special Award Committee or the Secondary Board Committee, which is authorized to administer the Discretionary Grant and Stock Issuance Programs with respect to one or more classes of eligible persons, to the extent such entity is carrying out its administrative functions under the Plan with respect to the persons under its jurisdiction.

DD.Plan Effective Date shall mean the June 5, 2009 date on which the Plan is approved by the stockholders at the 2009 Annual Meeting.

EE.Predecessor Plans shall mean (i) the Corporation’s Amended and Restated 1999 Incentive Compensation Plan, (ii) the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan and (iii) the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan, as each such plan is in effect immediately prior to the 2009 Annual Meeting.

FF.Secondary Board Committee shall mean a committee of one or more Board members appointed by the Board to administer the Plan with respect to eligible persons other than Section 16 Insiders.

GG.Section 16 Insider shall mean an officer or director of the Corporation subject to the short-swing profit liabilities of Section 16 of the 1934 Act.

HH. Service shall mean the performance of services for the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary, whether now existing or subsequently established) by a person in the capacity of an Employee, a non-employee member of the board of directors or a consultant or independent advisor, except to the extent otherwise specifically provided in the documents evidencing the option grant or stock issuance. For purposes of the Plan, an Optionee or Participant shall be deemed to cease Service immediately upon the occurrence of the either of the following events: (i) the Optionee or Participant no longer performs services in any of the foregoing capacities for the Corporation or any Parent or Subsidiary or (ii) the entity for which the Optionee or Participant is performing such services ceases to remain a Parent or Subsidiary of the Corporation, even though the Optionee or Participant may subsequently continue to perform services for that entity. Service shall be deemed to continue during a period of military leave, sick leave or other personal leave approved by the Corporation for which the Optionee or Participant is provided with a right tore-employment following such leave;provided, however, that should such leave of absence exceed three (3) months, then for purposes of determining the period within which an Incentive Option may be exercised as such under the federal tax laws, the Optionee’s Service shall be deemed to cease on the first day immediately following the expiration of such three (3)-month period, unless Optionee is provided with the right to return to Service following such leave either by statute or by written contract. Service credit shall be given for vesting purposes for any period the Optionee or Participant is on a leave of absence to the extent (i) the leave of absence does not exceed three (3) months and the Optionee or Participant is provided with a right to re-employment following such leave, (ii) required by law, or (iii) expressly authorized by the Plan Administrator or by the Corporation’s written policy on leaves of absence, as in effect from time to time.

II.Special Award Committee shall mean a committee of one or more executive officers appointed by the Board to administer the Plan with respect to eligible employees other than members of such committee and Section 16 Insiders.

JJ.Stock Exchange shall mean the American Stock Exchange, the Nasdaq Global Market or the New York Stock Exchange.

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationAA-4


KK.Stock Issuance Program shall mean the stock issuance program in effect under Article Three of the Plan.

LL.Subsidiary shall mean any corporation (other than the Corporation) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Corporation, provided each corporation (other than the last corporation) in the unbroken chain owns, at the time of the determination, stock possessing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain.

MM.10% Stockholder shall mean the owner of stock (as determined under Code Section 424(d)) possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary).

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationAA-5


EXHIBIT B

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION

2009 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), originally adopted the Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan (as amended from time to time, the “Plan”) effective as of December 17, 2007, and the Plan was approved by the stockholders of the Corporation on December 17, 2007. Article Five, Section V.A of the Plan allows the Board of Directors of the Corporation to amend the Plan in certain respects at any time or from time to time.

In order to amend the Plan in certain respects, this First Amendment to the Plan has been adopted and approved by a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Corporation on February 19, 2014, effective as set forth below. This First Amendment to the Plan, together with the Plan, constitutes the entire Plan as amended to date.

1. Effective as of March 1, 2014, and subject to approval by the stockholders of the Corporation, Article One, Section V.D of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

D. Each person participating in the Plan shall be subject the following limitations:

— for Awards to Employees, consultants and other independent advisors who provide services to the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary) denominated in shares of Common Stock at the time of grant (whether subsequently payable in cash or Common Stock, or a combination of both), the maximum number of shares of Common Stock for which such Awards may be made to such person in any calendar year shall not exceed Two Million Five Hundred Thousand (2,500,000) shares of Common Stock in the aggregate, and

— for Awards denominated in dollars at the time of grant (whether subsequently payable in cash or Common Stock, or a combination of both), the maximum dollar amount for which such Awards may be made to such person in any calendar year shall not exceed Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000),

— for Awards to non-employee members of the Board or the board of directors of any Parent or Subsidiary denominated in shares of Common Stock at the time of grant (whether subsequently payable in cash or Common Stock, or a combination of both), the maximum number of shares of Common Stock for which such Awards may be made to such person in any calendar year shall not exceed Fifty Thousand (50,000) shares of Common Stock in the aggregate.

2. Effective as of March 1, 2014, and subject to approval by the stockholders of the Corporation, Appendix Section AA of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

AA. Performance Goals shall mean any of the following performance criteria upon which the vesting of one or more Awards under the Plan may be based: (i) revenue or revenue growth, (ii) operating or net income, (iii) operating or net income before acquisition related charges, net non-operating foreign currency exchange gains or losses and/or charges for stock-based compensation and any taxes or fringe benefits incurred by the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary) in settlement of stock-based awards, (iv) operating or net income before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and/or charges for stock-based compensation and any taxes or fringe benefits incurred by the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary) in settlement of stock-based awards, (v) gross, operating or net profit margin, (vi) gross, operating or net profit margin before acquisition related charges, net non-operating foreign currency exchange gains or losses and/or charges for stock-based compensation and any taxes or fringe benefits incurred by the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary) in settlement of stock-based awards, (vii) earnings per share, either before or after acquisition related charges, net non-operating foreign currency exchange gains or losses and/or charges for stock-based compensation and any taxes or fringe benefits incurred by the Corporation (or any Parent or Subsidiary) in settlement of stock-based awards, (viii) return on assets, capital or stockholder equity, (ix) total stockholder return, (x) cash flow, (xi) measures in terms of days sales outstanding or accounts receivable outstanding, (xii) working capital, (xiii) market share, (xiv) increases in customer base, (xv) cost reductions or other expense control objectives, (xvi) market price of the Common Stock, whether measured in absolute terms or in relationship to earnings or operating income or in relation to various stock market or industry indicies, (xvii) budget objectives, (xviii) working capital, (xix) mergers, acquisitions or divestitures, (xx) measures of customer satisfaction, (xxi) productivity measures, (xxii) funds from operations, (xxiii) operating efficiency, or (xxiv) economic value-added models. Each performance criteria may be based upon the attainment of specified levels of the Corporation’s performance under one or more of the measures described above relative to the performance of other entities and may also be based on the performance of any of

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationB-1


the Corporation’s business units or divisions or any Parent or Subsidiary. Each applicable Performance Goal may include a minimum threshold level of performance below which no Award will be earned, levels of performance at which specified portions of an Award will be earned and a maximum level of performance at which an Award will be fully earned. Each applicable Performance Goal may be structured at the time of the Award to provide for appropriate adjustment for one or more of the following items: (A) asset impairments or write-downs; (B) litigation judgments or verdicts and expenses and settlement costs and expenses; (C) the effect of changes in tax laws or regulations, accounting principles or other applicable laws, regulations or provisions affecting reported results; (D) accruals for reorganization and restructuring programs; (E) any extraordinary nonrecurring items as described in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 and/or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in the Corporation’s annual report to shareholders for the applicable year; (F) the operations of any business acquired by the Corporation or any Parent or Subsidiary or of any joint venture in which the Corporation or any Parent or Subsidiary participates; (G) the divestiture of one or more business operations or the assets thereof; (H) the costs incurred in connection with such acquisitions or divestitures or (I) non-operating foreign exchange gains or losses.

* * * * * * * *

2014 Proxy StatementCognizant Technology Solutions CorporationB-2


LOGOLOGO

 

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION

GLENPOINTE CENTRE WEST

500 FRANK W. BURR BLVD.

TEANECK, NJ 07666

 

      LOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and followFollow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

 

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporationour company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically viae-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

 

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge,

51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

  M72662-P48306E05843-P78126           KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
  DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

 

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION

  

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each of the following:nominees:

              
                 
                 
  

1.

  Election of Directors               
ForAgainstAbstain  
     Nominees                
     

1a.    Michael Patsalos-Fox

 

¨

 

¨

 

¨

           
    NomineesForAgainstAbstain

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3.

ForAgainstAbstain
  

 

1a.    Zein Abdalla

1b.   Maureen Breakiron-Evans

1c.    Jonathan Chadwick

1d.   Francisco D'Souza

1e.    John N. Fox, Jr.

1f.    John E. Klein

1g.   Leo S. Mackay, Jr.

1h.   Lakshmi Narayanan

1i.    Michael Patsalos-Fox

1j.    Robert E. Weissman

1k.   Thomas M. Wendel

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

¨

2.

Approval, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, of the compensation of the Company's named executive officers.

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

  
      

3.

Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016.

¨

¨

¨

  

 

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2, 3 andAGAINST proposal 4.

 

 

For

 

 

Against

 

 

Abstain

  
  

 

2.4.

  

 

APPROVAL OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S 2009 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN.Stockholder proposal requesting that the Board of Directors take the steps necessary to permit stockholder action by written consent.

  

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

3.

APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

¨

¨

¨

  
  

4.

 

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2014.

    

 

¨

¨

¨

NOTE:Note: TO TRANSACT SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY CONTINUATION, POSTPONEMENT OR ADJOURNMENT THEREOF.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof.

       
  

 

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

 

      
                         
  

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

 

Date

       

Signature (Joint Owners)                          Date

 

Date

          


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

— — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — —

M72663-P48306E05844-P78126        

 

 

PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION

CLASS A COMMON STOCK

JUNE 3, 201415, 2016

 

Please date, sign and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.

 

The undersigned stockholderstockholder(s) of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation hereby appointsappoint(s) Steven E. Schwartz, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Corporate Affairs Officer and Secretary of the Company, Karen McLoughlin,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and Gordon J. Coburn, President of the Company, as proxies, with full power of substitution, to vote all shares of the Company’sCompany's Class A Common Stock which the undersigned isstockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Company’s 2014Company's 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any postponement, continuation or adjournment thereof.

 

This proxy will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR each director nominee, and FOR Proposals 2 and 3 and AGAINST Proposal 4. The proxies are further authorized to vote in their discretion (1) for the election of any person to the Board of Directors if any nominee named herein becomes unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, (2) on any matter that the Board of Directors did not know would be presented at the Annual Meeting by a reasonable time before the proxy solicitation was made, (3) on any proposal omitted from the Company’s proxy statement and this proxy card pursuant to Rule 14a-8, and (4)(3) on such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof.

  

 

Continued and to be signed on reverse side